Who are they?

"They" are the ones who elect leaders to travel to Washington to solve local problems.  "They" are the ones who want to benefit these they represent by taking away from others.

In other words, the ideal character of Ron Paul is recognized more as an American concerned with the people of the United States than he is as a representative of the people in his district.  The governor of a state should be admired more than a Washington Senator or representative from that same state.  Likewise, the mayor of a city should be admired more than a governor of a state.

We solve our problems on the local level:  We sell our American souls on the Federal.

While I'd like to say my state of Texas is better, our state government is no better than any other the way it is populated by Washingtonians corrupted by the false powers of manipulation.            

First part of my argument to the Supreme Court holding them to a higher standard and greater penalty under judgement of the Truth

Jesus Christ, Being the Fullness of the Triune God, is the Ultimate of Authority Being that He was the One Who, through the process of His Crucifixion and Resurrection, defeated every enemy of the People by washing away every sin of the world with His precious blood.

As the ultimate power is this immovable, rock solid Truth, the endeavor of government is controlled by way of conscience.

Beneath this highest of His Authority came the most evil one to ever live named Saul who, with Christ Being the most glorious One, defeated him by knocking him off his horse and striking him blind with just one of His little fingers (by words spoken from a converted Eunuch).  Being as Saul was the unforgivable one who had offended the Holy Spirit, he was then taken and transformed into the Apostle Paul, as God's chosen vessel.  At the same time, the old man of Saul was put to death spiritually.    

This action by Jesus Christ eliminated the authority of Emperor (the anti-Christ).  Like Caesar Nero, the three parts of a fallen Emperor is one who rules corruptly in a constant state of drunkenness, plays in the world killing thoughtlessly as a warmonger, and spends the rest of his leisure time pleasuring in harems stocked with young women and small boys.  As the world can see quite clearly today, this is the direction we are headed back towards.

So, the most direct authority under the authority of the Chosen Vessel Paul is the rightful rule of a king.  After all, Jesus Christ did not ask the governor Pilate or the king Herod why it was that they were persecuting Him; but, after His resurrection He came in the guise of the very least of all (a Eunuch) to ask that question of the most evil one of all (Saul).

While crafting the Declaration of Independence and signing their names to it, our Founding Fathers acknowledged in writing at the end of it that they understood that they were standing under Judgement of His Holy Truth even to the extent that they were willing to give up their fortunes for the sake of the people.

In other words, as God's authority was dispensed primarily from Christ, secondarily through the chosen vessel Paul, and then thirdly through the authority of a rightful king, our Founding Fathers acted in submission to God within the Declaration of independence by recognizing the rightful authority of the king.  This means that authority is not received directly through blood relationship to Jesus Christ, but through the indirect authority of the word of the chosen vessel Paul as spoken in the Book of Roman and those of the apostleship he held authority over (meaning the authority of the apostles were created to replace the corrupt Emperors, with they exhibiting the characteristics of the anti-Christ).

Likewise, as our Founding Fathers stood submissive while under judgement of the Truth; so, I stand today as their first attorney while under submission to their authority.  As they divorced the people rightfully from under the authority of one who behaved as a corrupt Emperor, forsaking the legal precedence of old for that of a new natural law, so have the people of these United States become a new world separated from the old.      

In other words, though we should be submissive to authority because all government is controlled by conscience - meaning that the evil one is defeated by those strong ones who convert over to the side of the very least - we should understand that the evil position of the three part Emperor should no longer be tolerated.

Indeed, as the true authority of the Shepherd rules from the middle of the flock behind the false authority of the leading rams, so has our true government today perished having been lost within a body made up of the most nameless and faceless.  

The Fall of Man

Vigorous - strong, healthy, and full of energy.
Rigorous - extremely thorough, exhaustive, or accurate.
Litigious - concerned with lawsuits or litigation.
Judicious - having, showing, or done with good judgment or sense.

It took two offenses to be committed for mankind to fall out of the garden. First, Eve had to allow herself to be deceived by the serpent which brought about judgement. Second, Adam had to fail to take responsibility for Eve's actions by blaming her.

At first, before the fall, Adam and Eve had a Holy union together.  After the fall, the more Adam and Eve became separate rational individuals apart from the other, their once vigorous union together in paradise became a more rigorous two-party system in the world.  As the being of Eve was by nature distracted inwardly, she grew disadvantaged over time to Adam bringing about a further litigious division between the two.  The further they fell away from paradise, the more judicious they became in their relationship leading to divorce and the eventual state of death.  

In every instance, each step taken by the two represents an overall fall of man away from the original paradise they enjoyed in the garden of Eden.    

Judge not lest yee be judged.  This is the first step towards returning to the garden of paradise.  

Accepting the history of the American Movement over that of the advent of a bickering two-party system is the next.  After all, the American Movement as a process works to return the people to the revering of our Founding Fathers.  Indeed, it also works to returns the people to the full understanding of what is the U.S. Constitution not as a single document mind you, but as documentation containing two parts!  For, on one hand, as it contains the legal laws meant to lead us towards an every improving more perfect Union, it, on the other, also contains our natural Bill of Rights meant to serve as warnings to future tyranny whether such evil be foreign or domestic.  And, most important, it returns the people to the document of independence our Founders declared before signing their names upon it signifying that they stood responsible under threat of the judgement of God.  It returns the people to  the conclusion of a natural law that our Founders, in fellowship, all agreed upon, a whole new order above all others, establishing the people as equal in God's plan with liberty being a prerequisite for the exponential advancement of their Civil Purpose, this last purpose being quintessential above all else.

As I am a poor patriot of a better New World, so, I am neither left nor right, neither conservative nor liberal.

*Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins 

**Prime Minister of these United States

And ***First Attorney to our Founding Fathers under Light of the Truth         

*Founder.  Signing ones name Fd. signifies he or she is an ideal ruler other than that a legal precedent lawyer.
**  Not a legal official Prime Minister, but one who has been raised of, by, and for the people.
***  A First Attorney is one who holds the natural Bill of Rights of the people as supreme over the long established traditions of legal precedence.      

          

What is "I am"?

Because "I" serves as a subject and "am" serves as a predicate, "I am" is a complete sentence.  Yet, to say the sentence "I am" is not a rational logical statement as it doesn't mean the same as "I exist." Then again, to say "I exist' would also be an irrational statement as the inverse of existence isn't knowable.  However, it is possible to exist as one who is the most worthless in society.

Saying the sentence "I am" is both a confession for being the very least of all and a proclamation for being the greatest.  Indeed, when limiting ones confession to a simple "I am," one is confessing to being a doer of nothing. For example, Jesus did not confess under judgement of the world claiming, "I am a carpenter like my father" or, "I am the Messiah."  Instead, a stripped down naked Jesus simply said, "I am . . . "

Yet, in His confession, Jesus proclaimed Himself also to be the very same one as the all inclusive Holy Father who, in the Old Testament, proclaimed Himself to Moses upon a mountaintop to be the same "I am . . .."

This is why I've said many times that the designation of a Son of God is the greatest male offspring of the most worthwhile while the designation of a Son of Man is the least male offspring born of the most worthless.

Again, like all the other confused people living in the world today, though I don't know where is the real Israel, I do know where is the very least one among us.  She is a trespassing prostitute residing on the street enduring the coldest of nights.  If all men are indeed endowed having been created equal with the mutual desire for the same exact business agenda - for the advancement of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness (as all our Founding Fathers once declared), then within her resides the worthless great "I am . . .."  
       

A Writ by Uncle Emanuel Watkins on What is the Supreme Rational State?

(Again, the process of writing a Writ differs from writing an Essay in that, in determining who is the reading audience, the first method should always reduce the whole world's population to the common denominator of a lone trespassing prostitute.  Indeed, the writer of a Writ should always reduce his or her reading audience to within the being of the one being made to prostitute herself upon the streets while she is having to suffer from the harshest of seasonal elements whether that be during the hottest of days or during the coldest of nights.)

The Old World

At a moments notice, to protect the borders of their city-state home of Athens, Socrates the great Athenian hoplite would grab his armament and arms to scamper off diligently with his other fellow Athenian guards.  The incredible bravery exhibited in such battles by this future philosopher and father of all Western Civilization became *legendary.  Upon his return from war, his students, as was customary of them, would all come running up asking about his exploits and of all the particulars having taken place during the conflict.

In typical fashion, Socrates would settle them down by agreeing to do so, but only after they had first demonstrated to him the progress they had made in their school work.

And what have we all learned today?  Well, after countless amounts of pain suffered and blood spilled, we have arrived at the conclusion that "corruption is the most supreme of all things rational."

Indeed, to Socrates question of "what is rational?," we should all provide the paradoxical answer of "corruption."  Understand, Socrates using a new teaching method already had the problem worked out prior.  Indeed, as he surely had if figured, a rational person is one who, by the use of dialectic truth engines, has discipline themselves along a general path in a direction towards what is the best-principled truth, somewhere between what was established to be false and deceptive, and what was established by the sophists to be an unapproachable Truth.

Plato, one of the students of Socrates and the first master professor in Western Civilization, the one who developed the Theory of the Forms and Best Principled Statements, would have gone about working the problem out this way:

Okay, as an irrational person is one who behaves in the most informal of states, in contrast, a rational person is one who would behave in the most formal.  Or, think of an irrational person as being one who would be adorned in the most informal attire of just wearing their undergarments perhaps, or, even less so, of being so primitive as to wear nothing at all.  Meanwhile, consider a rational person as being one who is adorned in the most formal attire of a suit and a tie.

We should consider this the Old World.

The New World      

Aristotle, being that he was the father of deductive reason, might find irrational my conclusion that "political corruption" is the most supreme of all forms of rational reasoning.  However, like most, he couldn't see that there always existed a missing variable in Plato's dialogues.  This variable is an invisible character representing the ruling class, the ones who could never be spoken poorly about - accused of ruling irrational - or else there would have been severe consequences to pay!  These were those who had absolute power as the all-knowing tyrants living within the world of Greece.  Indeed, a paradox exists here that, while the sophists and the philosophers were instrumental in helping rid the world of corruption, the best we can ever be ruled over is by corrupt politics.  

Indeed, Plato wrote of a conflict pitting two kinds of "knowers" against the other with one being the sophist (literally the Greek meaning being one who is a wisdomer) and the other being the philosopher (literally the Greek meaning being one who is a lover of wisdom).  While the sophists were the oral ones making sophisticated arguments that the ultimate Truth could never be approached, meaning that this was the best truth out of all and, as a consequence there existed no such conclusion as the truth, the philosophers took up their challenge and, by the use of dialectic truth engines, proved that certain refined truths were more valuable than others, ethically speaking.

While there is no such thing as a perfect Union as a sophists might argue, suggesting that the best any truth can be is in two parts while the same is true of the endeavor of government, our Founders argued for the existence of a more perfect Union, suggesting the most ideal state is the one always perfecting in its quest to advance the Civil Purpose of the people.          

Our enemy is the same today as it has always been.  They are born into their position as the most supreme of all thinkers even over the rational thinkers (or else).  These are the same ones who concocted a way of sentencing Socrates to death.  Indeed, they are also are the same ones who schemed a way of crucifying the Almighty.

In our New World, there exists a better way to govern than the Old World two-party system.  I know this to be the case as most Americans also consider it so, for most of us are far too busy to be either liberal or conservative.  Instead, as the best rational thought can ever be is a corrupt and cruel politics ruling over us, then the best authority is the one that is circumcised (narrowed) towards what is the most ideal - the government that is best controlled by the people.

Indeed, the best government is not the best endowed man among many, as our Founding Fathers declared while submissive to God's authority, but all men are endowed.  

As the most supreme rational state above all else will always be a political corrupt one (or else), the American way is to circumcise authority reducing it down to what is the most ideal by way of controlling government towards a relationship that is an ever improving 'more perfect Union.'

        
        

The advancement of a clear and open Civil Purpose of the people of these United States versus a mysterious best interest of those making up the Federal government, with it being the necessary tyranny established originally by our Founding Fathers

The center of emphasis concerning these United States was never intended to be on the federal government that our Founders established over us as a necessary tyranny; but, what is most important about our more perfect Union is how the people advanced in their Civil Purpose whenever the government over them had its authority circumcised towards that which is most quintessential and ideal.

As the natural law established within the Declaration of Independence by our Founders can never be altered, and just as the Bill of Natural Rights later *enuciated by them within the U.S. Constitution can never be repealed - just as mothers will forever tend for their children and fathers will forever fend off tyranny - so the above truth concerning the original intentions of our Founding Fathers is not up for political debate.

*Fd. Uncle Emaneul Watkins
**Prime Minister of these United States
and a Primary Attorney to our Founders as they will have to stand under Light of the Truth

*The meaning of the title "Fd." means "Founder."  While the title of "attorney" had to be deemed official by other attorneys holding no official title, as no Federal king has ever been enthroned to bless their titles as sovereign, in contrast, the title of Founder should remain unofficial as such a position was raised up "of, by, and for" the people.

Think of these attorneys ruling over our nation today as drunkards intoxicated by the false powers of manipulation.  Indeed, when our society is thought of as a metaphorical flock of sheep, these attorneys would be those dominant male sheep whose heads are endowed with menacing pointy horns - with these being the leading rams out in front of the flock.  In contrast, a Founder possesses the true power as they have to learn to rule as shepherds from the middle of the flock ruling both as submissive figures to the false authority established in front of the flock in order to care for the sake of the nameless and faceless falling back at the rear.

**This is an unofficial position in government also with it having been created both for advancing the people's Civil Purpose and for raising the importance of these United States over that of the necessary tyranny of the federal government.
.
***A "Primary Attorney" limits themselves in function to the sake of the soul, rejecting all matters concerned with legal precedence as secondary in importance, as our Founders did sign their names under the threat of judgement while standing under the Light of the Truth.