martes, 31 de diciembre de 2013

Who are they?

"They" are the ones who elect leaders to travel to Washington to solve local problems.  "They" are the ones who want to benefit these they represent by taking away from others.

In other words, the ideal character of Ron Paul is recognized more as an American concerned with the people of the United States than he is as a representative of the people in his district.  The governor of a state should be admired more than a Washington Senator or representative from that same state.  Likewise, the mayor of a city should be admired more than a governor of a state.

We solve our problems on the local level:  We sell our American souls on the Federal.

While I'd like to say my state of Texas is better, our state government is no better than any other the way it is populated by Washingtonians corrupted by the false powers of manipulation.            

First part of my argument to the Supreme Court holding them to a higher standard and greater penalty under judgement of the Truth


Jesus Christ, Being the Fullness of the Triune God, is the Ultimate of Authority Being that He was the One Who, through the process of His Crucifixion and Resurrection, defeated every enemy of the People by washing away every sin of the world with His precious blood.

As the ultimate power is this immovable, rock solid Truth, the endeavor of government is controlled by way of conscience.

Beneath this highest of His Authority came the most evil one to ever live named Saul who, with Christ Being the most glorious One, defeated him by knocking him off his horse and striking him blind with just one of His little fingers (by words spoken from a converted Eunuch).  Being as Saul was the unforgivable one who had offended the Holy Spirit, he was then taken and transformed into the Apostle Paul, as God's chosen vessel.  At the same time, the old man of Saul was put to death spiritually.    

This action by Jesus Christ eliminated the authority of Emperor (the anti-Christ).  Like Caesar Nero, the three parts of a fallen Emperor is one who rules corruptly in a constant state of drunkenness, plays in the world killing thoughtlessly as a warmonger, and spends the rest of his leisure time pleasuring in harems stocked with young women and small boys.  As the world can see quite clearly today, this is the direction we are headed back towards.

So, the most direct authority under the authority of the Chosen Vessel Paul is the rightful rule of a king.  After all, Jesus Christ did not ask the governor Pilate or the king Herod why it was that they were persecuting Him; but, after His resurrection He came in the guise of the very least of all (a Eunuch) to ask that question of the most evil one of all (Saul).

While crafting the Declaration of Independence and signing their names to it, our Founding Fathers acknowledged in writing at the end of it that they understood that they were standing under Judgement of His Holy Truth even to the extent that they were willing to give up their fortunes for the sake of the people.

In other words, as God's authority was dispensed primarily from Christ, secondarily through the chosen vessel Paul, and then thirdly through the authority of a rightful king, our Founding Fathers acted in submission to God within the Declaration of independence by recognizing the rightful authority of the king.  This means that authority is not received directly through blood relationship to Jesus Christ, but through the indirect authority of the word of the chosen vessel Paul as spoken in the Book of Roman and those of the apostleship he held authority over (meaning the authority of the apostles were created to replace the corrupt Emperors, with they exhibiting the characteristics of the anti-Christ).

Likewise, as our Founding Fathers stood submissive while under judgement of the Truth; so, I stand today as their first attorney while under submission to their authority.  As they divorced the people rightfully from under the authority of one who behaved as a corrupt Emperor, forsaking the legal precedence of old for that of a new natural law, so have the people of these United States become a new world separated from the old.      

In other words, though we should be submissive to authority because all government is controlled by conscience - meaning that the evil one is defeated by those strong ones who convert over to the side of the very least - we should understand that the evil position of the three part Emperor should no longer be tolerated.

Indeed, as the true authority of the Shepherd rules from the middle of the flock behind the false authority of the leading rams, so has our true government today perished having been lost within a body made up of the most nameless and faceless.  

martes, 17 de diciembre de 2013

The Fall of Man

Vigorous - strong, healthy, and full of energy.
Rigorous - extremely thorough, exhaustive, or accurate.
Litigious - concerned with lawsuits or litigation.
Judicious - having, showing, or done with good judgment or sense.



It took two offenses to be committed for mankind to fall out of the garden. First, Eve had to allow herself to be deceived by the serpent which brought about judgement. Second, Adam had to fail to take responsibility for Eve's actions by blaming her.
At first, before the fall, Adam and Eve had a Holy union together.  After the fall, the more Adam and Eve became separate rational individuals apart from the other, their once vigorous union together in paradise became a more rigorous two-party system in the world.  As the being of Eve was by nature distracted inwardly, she grew disadvantaged over time to Adam bringing about a further litigious division between the two.  The further they fell away from paradise, the more judicious they became in their relationship leading to divorce and the eventual state of death.  

In every instance, each step taken by the two represents an overall fall of man away from the original paradise they enjoyed in the garden of Eden.    

Judge not lest yee be judged.  This is the first step towards returning to the garden of paradise.  

Accepting the history of the American Movement over that of the advent of a bickering two-party system is the next.  After all, the American Movement as a process works to return the people to the revering of our Founding Fathers.  Indeed, it also works to returns the people to the full understanding of what is the U.S. Constitution not as a single document mind you, but as documentation containing two parts!  For, on one hand, as it contains the legal laws meant to lead us towards an every improving more perfect Union, it, on the other, also contains our natural Bill of Rights meant to serve as warnings to future tyranny whether such evil be foreign or domestic.  And, most important, it returns the people to the document of independence our Founders declared before signing their names upon it signifying that they stood responsible under threat of the judgement of God.  It returns the people to  the conclusion of a natural law that our Founders, in fellowship, all agreed upon, a whole new order above all others, establishing the people as equal in God's plan with liberty being a prerequisite for the exponential advancement of their Civil Purpose, this last purpose being quintessential above all else.

As I am a poor patriot of a better New World, so, I am neither left nor right, neither conservative nor liberal.

*Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins 
**Prime Minister of these United States
And ***First Attorney to our Founding Fathers under Light of the Truth         

*Founder.  Signing ones name Fd. signifies he or she is an ideal ruler other than that a legal precedent lawyer.
**  Not a legal official Prime Minister, but one who has been raised of, by, and for the people.
***  A First Attorney is one who holds the natural Bill of Rights of the people as supreme over the long established traditions of legal precedence.      
          

jueves, 12 de diciembre de 2013

What is "I am"?

Because "I" serves as a subject and "am" serves as a predicate, "I am" is a complete sentence.  Yet, to say the sentence "I am" is not a rational logical statement as it doesn't mean the same as "I exist." Then again, to say "I exist' would also be an irrational statement as the inverse of existence isn't knowable.  However, it is possible to exist as one who is the most worthless in society.

Saying the sentence "I am" is both a confession for being the very least of all and a proclamation for being the greatest.  Indeed, when limiting ones confession to a simple "I am," one is confessing to being a doer of nothing. For example, Jesus did not confess under judgement of the world claiming, "I am a carpenter like my father" or, "I am the Messiah."  Instead, a stripped down naked Jesus simply said, "I am . . . "

Yet, in His confession, Jesus proclaimed Himself also to be the very same one as the all inclusive Holy Father who, in the Old Testament, proclaimed Himself to Moses upon a mountaintop to be the same "I am . . .."

This is why I've said many times that the designation of a Son of God is the greatest male offspring of the most worthwhile while the designation of a Son of Man is the least male offspring born of the most worthless.

Again, like all the other confused people living in the world today, though I don't know where is the real Israel, I do know where is the very least one among us.  She is a trespassing prostitute residing on the street enduring the coldest of nights.  If all men are indeed endowed having been created equal with the mutual desire for the same exact business agenda - for the advancement of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness (as all our Founding Fathers once declared), then within her resides the worthless great "I am . . .."  
       

lunes, 9 de diciembre de 2013

A Writ by Uncle Emanuel Watkins on What is the Supreme Rational State?

(Again, the process of writing a Writ differs from writing an Essay in that, in determining who is the reading audience, the first method should always reduce the whole world's population to the common denominator of a lone trespassing prostitute.  Indeed, the writer of a Writ should always reduce his or her reading audience to within the being of the one being made to prostitute herself upon the streets while she is having to suffer from the harshest of seasonal elements whether that be during the hottest of days or during the coldest of nights.)

The Old World

At a moments notice, to protect the borders of their city-state home of Athens, Socrates the great Athenian hoplite would grab his armament and arms to scamper off diligently with his other fellow Athenian guards.  The incredible bravery exhibited in such battles by this future philosopher and father of all Western Civilization became *legendary.  Upon his return from war, his students, as was customary of them, would all come running up asking about his exploits and of all the particulars having taken place during the conflict.

In typical fashion, Socrates would settle them down by agreeing to do so, but only after they had first demonstrated to him the progress they had made in their school work.

And what have we all learned today?  Well, after countless amounts of pain suffered and blood spilled, we have arrived at the conclusion that "corruption is the most supreme of all things rational."

Indeed, to Socrates question of "what is rational?," we should all provide the paradoxical answer of "corruption."  Understand, Socrates using a new teaching method already had the problem worked out prior.  Indeed, as he surely had if figured, a rational person is one who, by the use of dialectic truth engines, has discipline themselves along a general path in a direction towards what is the best-principled truth, somewhere between what was established to be false and deceptive, and what was established by the sophists to be an unapproachable Truth.

Plato, one of the students of Socrates and the first master professor in Western Civilization, the one who developed the Theory of the Forms and Best Principled Statements, would have gone about working the problem out this way:

Okay, as an irrational person is one who behaves in the most informal of states, in contrast, a rational person is one who would behave in the most formal.  Or, think of an irrational person as being one who would be adorned in the most informal attire of just wearing their undergarments perhaps, or, even less so, of being so primitive as to wear nothing at all.  Meanwhile, consider a rational person as being one who is adorned in the most formal attire of a suit and a tie.

We should consider this the Old World.

The New World      

Aristotle, being that he was the father of deductive reason, might find irrational my conclusion that "political corruption" is the most supreme of all forms of rational reasoning.  However, like most, he couldn't see that there always existed a missing variable in Plato's dialogues.  This variable is an invisible character representing the ruling class, the ones who could never be spoken poorly about - accused of ruling irrational - or else there would have been severe consequences to pay!  These were those who had absolute power as the all-knowing tyrants living within the world of Greece.  Indeed, a paradox exists here that, while the sophists and the philosophers were instrumental in helping rid the world of corruption, the best we can ever be ruled over is by corrupt politics.  

Indeed, Plato wrote of a conflict pitting two kinds of "knowers" against the other with one being the sophist (literally the Greek meaning being one who is a wisdomer) and the other being the philosopher (literally the Greek meaning being one who is a lover of wisdom).  While the sophists were the oral ones making sophisticated arguments that the ultimate Truth could never be approached, meaning that this was the best truth out of all and, as a consequence there existed no such conclusion as the truth, the philosophers took up their challenge and, by the use of dialectic truth engines, proved that certain refined truths were more valuable than others, ethically speaking.

While there is no such thing as a perfect Union as a sophists might argue, suggesting that the best any truth can be is in two parts while the same is true of the endeavor of government, our Founders argued for the existence of a more perfect Union, suggesting the most ideal state is the one always perfecting in its quest to advance the Civil Purpose of the people.          

Our enemy is the same today as it has always been.  They are born into their position as the most supreme of all thinkers even over the rational thinkers (or else).  These are the same ones who concocted a way of sentencing Socrates to death.  Indeed, they are also are the same ones who schemed a way of crucifying the Almighty.

In our New World, there exists a better way to govern than the Old World two-party system.  I know this to be the case as most Americans also consider it so, for most of us are far too busy to be either liberal or conservative.  Instead, as the best rational thought can ever be is a corrupt and cruel politics ruling over us, then the best authority is the one that is circumcised (narrowed) towards what is the most ideal - the government that is best controlled by the people.

Indeed, the best government is not the best endowed man among many, as our Founding Fathers declared while submissive to God's authority, but all men are endowed.  

As the most supreme rational state above all else will always be a political corrupt one (or else), the American way is to circumcise authority reducing it down to what is the most ideal by way of controlling government towards a relationship that is an ever improving 'more perfect Union.'

        
        





lunes, 2 de diciembre de 2013

The advancement of a clear and open Civil Purpose of the people of these United States versus a mysterious best interest of those making up the Federal government, with it being the necessary tyranny established originally by our Founding Fathers

The center of emphasis concerning these United States was never intended to be on the federal government that our Founders established over us as a necessary tyranny; but, what is most important about our more perfect Union is how the people advanced in their Civil Purpose whenever the government over them had its authority circumcised towards that which is most quintessential and ideal.

As the natural law established within the Declaration of Independence by our Founders can never be altered, and just as the Bill of Natural Rights later *enuciated by them within the U.S. Constitution can never be repealed - just as mothers will forever tend for their children and fathers will forever fend off tyranny - so the above truth concerning the original intentions of our Founding Fathers is not up for political debate.

*Fd. Uncle Emaneul Watkins
**Prime Minister of these United States
and a Primary Attorney to our Founders as they will have to stand under Light of the Truth

*The meaning of the title "Fd." means "Founder."  While the title of "attorney" had to be deemed official by other attorneys holding no official title, as no Federal king has ever been enthroned to bless their titles as sovereign, in contrast, the title of Founder should remain unofficial as such a position was raised up "of, by, and for" the people.

Think of these attorneys ruling over our nation today as drunkards intoxicated by the false powers of manipulation.  Indeed, when our society is thought of as a metaphorical flock of sheep, these attorneys would be those dominant male sheep whose heads are endowed with menacing pointy horns - with these being the leading rams out in front of the flock.  In contrast, a Founder possesses the true power as they have to learn to rule as shepherds from the middle of the flock ruling both as submissive figures to the false authority established in front of the flock in order to care for the sake of the nameless and faceless falling back at the rear.

**This is an unofficial position in government also with it having been created both for advancing the people's Civil Purpose and for raising the importance of these United States over that of the necessary tyranny of the federal government.
.
***A "Primary Attorney" limits themselves in function to the sake of the soul, rejecting all matters concerned with legal precedence as secondary in importance, as our Founders did sign their names under the threat of judgement while standing under the Light of the Truth.      

  

sábado, 16 de noviembre de 2013

In a forever growing government, those without conscience overpower those with conscience; or, why is an ideal communist state really a fascist one?

The best a two-party system can ever achieve is a necessary-evil or a necessary-tyranny.  Beyond that, it is a perpetuated lie.  Indeed, the document of the Declaration of Independence and the documentation of the U.S. Constitution were both unofficial within the Old World as they weren't officially deemed by way of a king's proclamation or blessing.  So too was it the American Movement process that grew out of the people and not the advent of the two-party system that was later concocted by the official necessary tyranny established by our Founders.  Indeed, during the Enlightenment period, our Founding Fathers forsook their rightful titles as gentlemen in British high society to play the part of mere commoner people, acting on our behalf, separating us as a New World from the prior Old, establishing for us an American Civil Purpose.  This whole new order was first declared by them as a natural law within the Declaration of Independence.  Then they later created upon that new order the two documents within the U.S. Constitution, one being their *pronuciation of our Bill of natural rights as warnings made towards all future tyranny - both domestic and foreign - as well as the necessary laws needed to establish a new ideal government as a more perfect Union.  As they were acting of, by, and for as the people and not under the authority of a king, so both the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution should be considered unofficial in its relationship with that of the Old World.

The subtle but significant point being made here is that the two-party system did not usher forth from the people, but from a system concocted in the Old World tyranny.  So, if anything, the two-party system should be considered secondary in importance, a necessary-tyranny at best for the primary purpose of advancing the Civil Purpose of the people, and as a mere means to a greater end.

As did both the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution, what process also ushered out from the people?  It was the American Movement.  And what was the primary conclusion of this American Movement?  A "more perfect Union is best obtained by having the least amount of government possible, by the process of having its authority circucised (reduced) towards what is the most perfect or most ideal.    

So, we have a choice to make between what is the right path and the wrong one.  While the wrong path will lead us towards the two party system and an ever growing government, the right path will lead us towards an ideal circumcised authority.

The wrong path is a perpetual lie set up by two kinds of drunkards who, with both having been intoxicated on the false powers of manipulation, work in unison to usher in a new tyranny.  As the drunkards with a conscience return the people to a government of equality and responsibility, to a new age of social communism, the drunkards without a conscience will then execute and exile the drunkards with a conscience.  In the end, the best an ideal communist state can ever be is really a fascist one governed by conservatives acting out the parts of the caring liberals with a conscience.

Indeed, and where did the conservatives go within the social system after it was set up within the Soviet Union?  Well, being strong and without a conscience, they went straight to the top of the government.  And where did the primary liberals go who were responsible for setting up social system?  You know, the professors, the activists for equality, the homosexuals, and the minorities? Why, they were the ones sent to Siberia where they were executed indirectly by being imprisoned in work camps.

It is both the conservatives and the liberals who usher in social communism.  Afterwards, it is the conservatives who overpower the liberals as they will then run a fascist society masked as a social communist state.

What is the only way to deal with this absurdity?  Well, reduce the size of government.  As Plato might say, circumcision towards what is the ideal man-writ-large.              

miércoles, 13 de noviembre de 2013

True American Liberty is Freedom Out From Under the Rule of Official Self-Deemed Lawyers

As the U.S. Constitution is documentation, while the Declaration of Independence is a single document, so these United States (nations) should have two kinds of lawyers.

Again, to use as an example, there is a difference between what is the military and what is the militia.  As the military is official and created officially so to protect the necessary tyrant, one of the figures sitting at a far end of our new American political spectrum, the militia is unofficial and should remain unofficially so to protect the necessary prostitute, the other figure sitting at the other end of our New World order.    

During the Revolutionary War between the Colonies and the British, the military was created to protect the new government (necessary tyranny) from being captured and punished by the existing British government (old tyranny).  In contrast, the Militia was created to protect the people (the prostituted) from being persecuted by tyranny.

As the military is an officially deemed organization, the militia should remain unofficial.  While the military was established by the laws of the Old World, the militia was founded on the natural laws (rights) of the New World. While we would be most proud in the Old World to serve in the military, in contrast, we should be proudest in the New World to serve in the militia.

We need two kinds of lawyers today.  The over-abundant kind existing today are those who serve in an official capacity for the sake of the Old World laws of government, the necessary tyranny that was established by our Founders.  The new kind of lawyer would the those who serve in an unofficial capacity concerning what is the natural law concerning the advancement of the people's Civil Purpose, and how to best utilized that natural law as natural rights.

In other words, while we have the natural right to peacefully assemble, perhaps we should only peacefully assemble at the properties of a wayward media and police force.  But then perhaps we should peacefully assemble the media to win back their support; because, in peacefully assembling to first win back the police force, the media wouldn't be there to report on any abuse.

The tyranny of the Old World established within the Colonies hated the admissions of Natural Law within the U.S. Constitution - the expression of natural rights within the United States which, by design, are supposed to free up the prostituted people towards the advancement of their Civil Purpose by placing limitations upon the authority our wise Founders established over us as a necessary ruling tyranny.      

The primary power within the U.S. Constitution isn't our government or the concept of law and lawyering that originated within the Old World, but the greatest aspect about these United States are the abilities freed up within its people when the authority established is circumcised (limited) towards what is the most Ideal.

There is a gradation in the beginning of the Lord's Ministry which represents growth with this being the false powers of manipulation.  The Lord seemed to bless this stage of His ministry as a necessary evil.  After fulfilling the prophecies as the first part of His plan, Jesus then began a process of withering away in a direction towards His Father the unapproachable Truth by walking away hastily with the commandment to His disciples that they should never look back.  The first part of His ministry concerns a virtue involving expansion and a growth towards what seems to be true while the latter part of His ministry concerns a virtue involving reduction and a withering towards what is most crucial as the one true Power.

In the end, our Lord the Supreme over all was existential in purpose in how He managed with a little wine and the most unleavened of bread to Will Himself, as His final act, into mankind, imparting Himself into them and making them above all else His primary purpose.                

viernes, 8 de noviembre de 2013

Flight 800 TWA

There exists no mysterious agenda that is in the best interest of these United States other than for the people to advance their Civil-Purpose.  Furthermore, the people of these United States take no responsibility for the evil actions committed by the Federal Government , a necessary tyranny established over our heads by our Founders for the sake of a more perfect Union.

As was the case of the Warren Commission's investigation into the assassination of president John F. Kennedy, the similar contempt involved with the investigation into the downing of TWA flight 800 is another example of how the rational scientific individuals in society are controlled by irrational powerful individuals in government.

The absurdity involved with the TWA investigation is tantamount to a bullying college football team threatening the school faculty into establishing the curriculum.      

 


miércoles, 6 de noviembre de 2013

Verdict:  When the American people use the Internet, they are neither speaking orally nor writing, but they are social networking.  Therefore, as they are neither saying nor writing, they shall not be held accountable for what they do under Light of the Truth.  

Where is the Supreme Court on this matter?  Until they decide to serve the people concerning the advancement of their Civil Purpose, I will as the Prime Minister of these United States continue holding our government including those within the Supreme Court to a higher standard and greater penalty under the Light of the Truth.
When the Supreme Court does decide to stop with their contempt of the disadvantaged people serving them to the detriment of the necessary tyranny ruling over them, then I will revert back to handling my primary duty as Prime Minister which is to work with these United States in the people's desire to control Federal tyranny.        

jueves, 31 de octubre de 2013

Unconscionable powerful individuals control rational scientific individuals

Rational scientific people are intelligent,
but unconscionable powerful people bully and control the rational scientific people.
Therefore, truly, it is the unconscionable people who should be considered rational.

Or else!

For example, as rational scientific doctors at Parkland hospital in Dallas made determinations in 1963 concerning wounds on the body of a mortally injured President Kennedy, wounds that would later differ with the final version, the unconscionable powerful people who wrote that conflicting conclusion of that final version  were later held up by the popular majority of the people as being the most rational and, therefore, the most accepted official conclusion.

The irrational media corporations during the time of the Kennedy assassination could not help but work for and write the agenda concocted by unconscionable powerful men (and women) as they knew nothing of what was going on (The media was shown during that time to be, on average, ten years behind the government in knowing real time events).

Figure also that the endeavor of law, which is also an irrational process, was utilized in writing the conclusion of this official version, a report too which was concocted by unconscionable, powerful men, a report now known as the Warren Report.  This official version has long been proven to be irrational nonsense in how the commission members snaked there way about alternating back and forth in the process from behaving scientific at times when it suited them and then behaving legal and civil concerning the law at other times when that suited them.  In this way, they were able to write any kind of legal fiction desired by the unconscionably powerful above them.

In other words, we have always lived in a crazy world where an irrational government process
controls a rational scientific process.  We would be better off living without the endeavor of rational science altogether.

In the end, the truth perpetuated by those making up the unconscionably powerful individuals making up the Warren Commission, trumped over the personal, up-close, and on-the-job observations of the scientific doctors at Parkland Hospital.  The pathologists working at Bethesda Naval hospital, also experts who got a personal, up-close, and on the job observation of the president's body reported serious problems as well with the wounds that were later ignored blatantly by the unconscionably powerful segment of our government.

At long last, the unconscionably powerful should be seen for what they truly are as quite unintelligent.  Indeed, they should be deemed esteemed players in the game of power, but only so concerning the false powers of manipulation.  In truth, in the places where real people meet, they should be thought of as nothing more than dark princes of disruption while the deceived people who follow after them should be thought of as less than the moronic.  

The problem lies in the irrational people who run our schools.  Indeed, also for the love of money, they teach a false dichotomy which contrasts science with art when, in the New World, we should be splitting science into two competing parts that at war with themselves.  As I've said before, in the New World. we should possess within ourselves both the persons of a scientist and an artist.  For while the endeavor of science should be the foundation, be our solid being in how we think, the endeavor of art should be the actions that we take, our dynamic becoming in what we do.

As the modern theoretical science that was created in the Old World has worked out to further propel tyranny over the people, the science we now create in the New World should work specifically to aid the disadvantaged people in their quest, not to destroy, but to simply control tyranny.  In other words, our science in the New World needs to quit being a filthy slut for government's benefit who do anything for money.

After all, what makes the United States great isn't the ideal government that our Founders constructed.  No!  That is two party nonsense!  According to the American Movement, with this being the true process which ushered of, by, and for the people as the true advancement over the U.S. Constitution, the great aspect about these United States is the freed up abilities of its people when the authority of the government is circumcised (limited) to a bare minimal.

For the sake of gratuitous gain, research performed by today's modern theoretical science is financed by government.  Therefore, the conclusions that are derived by science tend to favor an increase of government tyranny over the people:  The work performed by modern theoretical science is going to justify irrational government and, in doing so, also justify the evil deeds of unconscionably powerful individuals.

This is why we have unconscionably powerful individuals ruling in the New World today.    

          



martes, 29 de octubre de 2013

The True State of the Union Address

written by Uncle Emanuel Watkins
The Acting Prime Minister of these United States
And First Attorney to our Founding Fathers under Light of the Truth

For all those foreign beyond our borders, let it be known concerning they who so thoughtlessly call themselves our Federal government, and more specifically the misdeeds that they have manufactured against our forefathers in foreign lands, with these being evil actions committed with claims that such were necessary in the best interest of the people.  To the contrary, these false powers of manipulation being perpetuated by these impostors so blindly and in darkness are both in violation of the true ruling people of these United States and in contempt of what is supposed to be the perpetual advancement of our Civil Purpose.  Indeed, the people of these Untied States express no ill will against all other peoples of this world nor do we possess a dark mysterious best interest which would benefit us over them, as we would gladly accept and care for their children as our own.  Indeed, we express no hidden agenda whatsoever, but a clear and open desire to preserve that which is our American Civil Purpose - with this being the base of a rock solid natural law established by our Founding Fathers - and the absolute prerequisite for us to perpetually advance upon it.       

Once again, a lie will never find a foundation for which to support itself.  Therefore, in order to propagate and maintain itself, the liar must deceive, divide, and manipulate the people unto a dis-eased state, a resulting chaos which turns the body inward to fighting among itself.  This has often been described by the wise as a process of the ruling elite 'manufacturing consent' among the disadvantaged people, unto the stumbling up of the Children of God so to speak.  There are those who shamelessly make up our present police state today - being the head of the body or a necessary tyranny - to the extent of causing the people to back-slide, a process which is now taking place within these United States and throughout the world, the fast tracking of societies back to the dark days of Old World tyranny, to a similar feudal condition that our forefathers experienced.  

What I am stating here is profound.  Indeed, there exists no communist, no terrorist, and no racist among the body who didn't have their hostility stirred up first by the manufacturing of confusion and chaos by the acting police state.  The subtlety here being that what comes first isn't the hatred expressed in the people, with them being the prostituted, but the stirring up of the hatred within the people by the police state, with they being tyranny.  In other words, Arabs aren't hateful Muslims; but, more precisely, Arabs are people who have been stirred up to the extent of hostility by design, by the perpetuation of lies sewn primarily by the police state.  Simply put, as a result of lies being expressed through a one world corporation of cooperating media, the Arab people today are being made to vent their frustrations at lies being told about them by the expression of hostility.

In the end, the seeming good of the police state has become even worse in its persecution than what would have been suffered by the acts of terrorism alone as a cycle of abuse commences forth perpetuating even more hostility within those being lied to by the one world news media, which, in turn, creates even more of a necessity for a greater police state to fight against evil.  Indeed, the disadvantaged people today are in the process of being sent back to hell by tyrants made drunken by the false powers of manipulation.  In other words, while government can only be controlled by being made to face its conscience, a drunkard has no conscience other than to be made to sober up by sleeping it off.  It is high time for a break.  The embarrassment today calling itself our Federal government has absolutely no idea what it is doing, no spiritual sense about itself whatsoever, of what is inside or out, of what is upside down or right side up.  As a warning to these drunkards, the worst offense deemed by the Almighty Himself wasn't the militant acts of maiming  nor of even killing children, which our Federal government is now in the process of doing for reasons it knows not of and can't explain; but, the worst of all offenses is the stumbling up of the Children of God!  In former days, the result of drunken tyrants, a common state of being for such rulers, was the act of committing infanticide against lessor mothers of the population, the killing of their human infants.  

For most of us, this world has always been so deemed in the past to be too small for our advancement.  Always!  In contempt of a Truth which clearly states otherwise (be fruitful and multiply), these evil-doing drunkards have drowned out their consciences choosing to spurn even the best-principled ways of our Founding Fathers. the thoughtful paths they gathered in fellowship to lay out for us, with these culminating to become a whole new order of a New World - all established upon a rock solid natural law.

From this date onward, let all those so willfully influenced by these false powers of manipulation (those unintelligent paths which, when traveled down, stumble up the Children of God) be held to a higher standard and a greater penalty under the Light of the Truth.

FD. Uncle Emanuel Watkins
*Both the acting Prime Minister of these United States of America
and the acting First Attorney to our Founding Fathers under Light of the Truth
   
*I have taken up this position not for the benefit of those officials who are now corrupted concerning what they are supposed to both be and do, and what are to be the limits to their capacities in ruling  as our government (those workers of inequity who today have been made drunken by the false powers of manipulation), but I am now persevering as one who is envisioned and empowered, as one who has been converted over to the side of the disadvantaged people (suffering a good bit at the present in order to do so) all for the purpose of preserving the role of Prime Minister as an unofficial position as unmolested for the well being of these sovereign United States, of the American people themselves and the advancement of their Civil Purpose, and of their future posterity as well.  This is why the primary function of the Supreme Court today is in contempt of the advancement of the Civil Purpose of the people.  For, when time came for them to act on the behalf of the people they chose not to do so of, by, and for the sake of the people, but, being opportunists, they allowed themselves to be persuaded to taking on a lessor task of seers over the law of the land, an endeavor which has worked out to benefit tyranny much to the detriment of the people.            
        

martes, 22 de octubre de 2013

Thoughts and reflections

I have had some time to sit back to ponder the world crisis happening today and how it is not only threatening the people of these United States, but threatening to abolish outright the more perfect Union established by our Founding Fathers to advance our Civil Purpose.  More and more are the ragged out people of the United States being deceived into buying the same old two-party agenda, a deeming of acts of evil as in the best-interest of the nation.

There exist no mysterious agendas within the New World of these United States that haven't been designed to be in the best interest of tyranny and a detriment to the people; but, our Founders established a more perfect Union between government and the people in order to advance their American Civil Purpose. Even back when our new nation had just won its independence from the Old World, the old Englishmen within the region of the Northeast and of within "New England" had already set themselves busily about contriving ways to make the poor living within the agricultural southern states inferior subjects, relegating their status back to the prior positions of lessor colonies and territories, subjecting them under the rule of a burgeoning New World Empire.

Even within the present day casual discussions taking place within this Puritan region, its intelligentsia gather around the fireside to highlight the exploits of their superiority, over nice cigars and glasses of fine brandy, finding it quite suiting and proper to refer to themselves as the principle power-elite within an new burgeoning empire of the United States.

This Old World lie has managed to squirm its way back into being,  as an offense to the people and the advancement of their Civil Purpose, and in clear contempt of the natural law our Founders established as a New World Order.   Enlightenment and Empowerment captured as lightning in a bottle by our Founders would later usher in the American Movement as the one true advancement over the U.S. Constitution.  This American Movement process has long been and is still at war today with the two party political system, a lie established soon after the beginnings of our nation, one that created a left / right false dichotomy in opposition to, and distracting of the people from the original vision of our Founders involving a conflict between the people and their long lasting quest for an eternity to finally overcome and control tyranny.        

From this day onward, let all those who stumble up the children of God by perpetuating the United States as a New World Empire be held to a higher standard and to a greater penalty under the Light of the Truth.

Again, one will never find the means to control  the corruption of those who partake in the out-of-control implementations of laws, by the process of implementing even more laws; but, to the contrary, one can only control government by holding it and those who serve within it to a higher standard and to a greater penalty under Light of the Truth.

    
    

viernes, 4 de octubre de 2013

The U.S. Constitution is made up of two documents with one being laws concerning the legal structure of government and the other being a pronuciation of our natural Bill of Rights.  Therefore, we should have two types of attorneys with one kind representing the law and the other representing the people concerning their Bill of Rights and the best way for them to utilize those rights.

In other words, the focus of the U.S. Constitution shouldn't be upon government and the maintenance of it as somehow special in concept, but upon the people and the advancement of their Civil Purpose.

Tyranny is the maintaining of a society in the same condition for thousands of years - as that of a dynasty.  When societies are  allowed to fall apart completely, they have demonstrated the ability to quickly rise to a greater state than before.

The Catholic Church maintains the world in a never altering, perpetual rate of stasis.  This only seems the ideal situation.    

sábado, 28 de septiembre de 2013

The Pronuciation of our Bill of Rights

The U.S. Constitution is not a single document as is the case with the formal document of The Declaration of Independence, but is documentation containing two documents.  While it does contain a legal document dealing with matters concerning laws and how they are to be instituted in the forming of a more ideal government, the U.S. Constitution also contains a judicial document dealing with the matter of the Bill of Rights and how such natural rights should be understood as a warning towards those in contempt of the people's Civil Purpose.  Our Founder's pronuciation of our Bill of Rights served to threaten such offenders with judgement under Light of the Truth.

Therefore, the Bill of Rights should be understood as one of two documents within The U.S. Constitution while both of them together should be considered necessary for the instituting of a more perfect Union.  This more perfect Union differs from that of a better ideal government.  As demonstrated by the functioning of an ant colony in the last post, the nameless and faceless can function without that of a government, but government cannot function without the nameless and faceless.  Indeed, without the understanding of this sobering Pronuciation by our Founders, our present government has become a tyranny of drunkards.  This is a very simple subtle point which is why it is quite difficult to understand.    

From now on, I'm going to refer to the document of our Bill of Rights as the people's Pronuciation (pro - new - see - a - shun) just as our Founders once referred to the people's independence from tyranny as a written "declaration."  Pronuciation refers to the warning written within the U.S. Constitution as the people's Bill of Rights.  Our Founders ushered a threat to any future government, to any necessary tyranny that is, whether it be domestic or foreign, concerning the true power in the natural rights of the people versus the false but necessary powers of manipulation welded by those who function in government.    

sábado, 21 de septiembre de 2013

Our American Civil Purpose

Because of a recent realization leading me to a new conclusion, I now consider my last blog sufficiently finished.  

New conclusion:  Management isn't a necessity endeavor concerning our survival, but is an absolute prerequisite function for leading us towards exponential expansion of our Civil Purpose.                                                                                                                                                                                        Again, the greatest of benefits ever achieved are those derived by the most precious of alterations made upon a preexisting foundation, a base which has already been established for us by our ancestors.  For we once learned to recognize the faces of our parents by first learning what their faces looked like.  We then advanced ever so slightly over our parents after learning that our faces appeared similar to theirs.  We are human beings because the faces of the grandchild and the grandparent are quite similar.  Therefore, when we follow willfully away from that which we have already inherited choosing instead to walk along that path encouraging the abandonment of our ancestors and every preexisting foundation laid down by them, we are the ones freely choosing to lose our identity, freely choosing to become personified as the very least of all creatures, and freely choosing to become like the insect that too has no recognizable face of authority.    

As Americans, we need to quit losing our American souls to the misleading two party traps of political "movements."  Rather than being distracted by such vain efforts - gimmicks promising that we can have our cake and eat it too - instead, we should be carefully building upon the philosophical base already provided for us.  In plain view, there has always been the American Movement concerning what is in the best interest of the people.  It is this one and only American Movement and not the two party system which ushered forth of, by, and for the people as a slight alteration beyond our Bill of Rights, beyond the laws within the U.S. Constitution, and beyond the new order declared for our sake within The Declaration of Independence..  This process should never be altered from how it is still returning Americans today to revering our Founding Fathers, to focusing our attention on what is the new order they declared together in fellowship, and to the understanding, deeply and profoundly, of both what are our proclaimed Bill of Rights and our laws ratified within the U.S. Constitution concerning our Union.

As already pointed out, the two party system was concocted in contempt of the people's Civil Purpose as it functions as a false dichotomy in clear opposition with the American Movement process, with the New World order that was declared within the formal document of the Declaration of Independence, and with both the forewarning and legal documents within the U.S. Constitution as both the Bill of Rights and as laws instituting a new government.

Lord, as your children, how much are we being stumbled by tyranny?  As of 09/28/2013, the Republican party is dead.  As this only leaves us with the one party that controls the media, the people don't even have the voice to declare the Republican party dead.  Therefore, the dead thing just keeps right on living as a fiction.      

Again, the greatest of benefits are derived from the most precious of alterations to that which has already been provided to us as our inheritance.  There is something quite special here that our Founders didn't quite envision to convey.  As The Declaration of Independence was a formal document divorcing us rightfully out from under the rule of tyranny, so the Bill of Rights became a forewarning document.

In other words, just as they were justified in declaring a natural law as a whole new order, so did the evocations they made within the Bill of Rights become rightful proclamations, and so did the new laws they instituted within the U.S. Constitution become legal.

This is a big breakthrough in understanding.

From this day onward, the U.S. Constitution being the law of the land should be understood both as legal documentation concerning the instituting of a more perfect Union, and as a Proclamation of the Bill of Rights of the people concerning judgement over future tyranny - whether foreign or domestic - under Light of the Truth.                  

Therefore, just as everything concerning the law is superseded by proclamation, and as the U.S. Constitution is the law of the land dealing both with legal documentation and proclaimed documentation, so should he U.S. Congress concern itself with the legal documentation side of the U.S. Constitution and the Supreme Court concern itself with the proclaimed side of it.

From this date onward, allow every member of the U.S. Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court be held beyond just accountable for their actions to that of a higher standard and to a greater penalty under Light of the Truth.

With that out of the way, concerning our survival, let's get on with the matter of why management shouldn't be considered a necessary endeavor.  In the Book of Revelation, an insect is considered the least of all creatures because of how it is poorly personified lacking a face.  After all, a face represents authority.  In comparison, while dogs do recognize themselves poorly by their tail ends, they still have a face of authority which will cause their superior owners to recognize and care about them.

Of all the insects, the ants are the very least of the least.  I say they are the very least only in the sense that if they were to grow any smaller, they would be in danger of losing their identities becoming like enslaved organelles incorporated as parts of the cells of larger creatures. Indeed, in her small size, think of the female ant as on the borderline having been reduced to the releasing of God's Will.  I say female as every active member of an ant society are female and I say God's Will as there exists no wasted motion by any member of the colony as every one of their action is tuned to survival.  As it is the female ants who manages and defends the colony, the drones, the angelic winged males have been tucked away below ground helpless having to be fed and tended to as babies.  Therefore, concerning survival, the males are not even needed other than for reproduction.  Similarly, the people of the United States don't need a management instituted over them for their survival; but, the reason we choose to have the endeavor of management as a necessary tyranny instituted over us is so we might thrive towards further contentment on an exponential scale.                            

Continuing with the use of insects as metaphorical examples, our government has evolved over the years from behaving like productive honey bees to that of wasteful hornets.  Their nests have become instituted with very little sweet honey concerning our American Civil purpose to made up purely of legal paper which, in its effect, has led us to breeding ominous wasp-like weapons of mass destruction.

What crack is to a drug addict and booze is to an alcoholic, so weapons of mass destruction are to a warmonger.  

viernes, 13 de septiembre de 2013

Our American Civil Purpose

A writ by Uncle Emanuel Watkins



Forward


While we all benefit from increased understanding, only a very few of us advance as a result of selective explanation. Therefore, during this darkened age of deception, orderly understanding should now take precedence over political explanation.  If the Truth is the one virtue that will set us free, and if freedom is an absolute prerequisite for the advancement of our American Civil Purpose, then we must suffer to overcome in our accepting that there will never exist such a reality as rational thought as the irrational legal process of politics will always rise up to triumph over it.  

To deal with this paradox, while understanding depends on trust, valid conclusions require that virtues be strung together in a certain coherent order.  Therefore, tyranny has always managed to stumble up the people quite easily by defining the meaning of each individual word correctly while, at the same time, twisting around the virtue of a complete thought (sentence) by stringing numerous words and thus virtues together incorrectly.  

For example, in the United States, the endeavor of law today is still being allowed to take precedence over the endeavor of order.  Yet, before they could institute any new laws within The U.S. Constitution, our Founding Fathers first had to establish a new base within The Declaration of Independence as a whole new order.  

The old world process of law for the sake of the law works to benefit tyranny.  Indeed, a tyrant has the fiat (make it so) power to make whatever he so wishes to do into law.  Reading carefully though, one can establish order out of such chaos by determining that:  1)  when his feet are trained to follow after his hands, a tyrant will lead the whole of a nation towards evil; 2) or, in contrast, when his hands are taught to follow after his feet, a tyrant will lead the whole of a nation towards the Truth. In the United States, the natural law as a new order should always take precedence over every law instituted for the sake of the law.  

In other words, as the tyranny of the Old World was made up of laws established upon a foundation of chaos - think of laws being implemented for the sake of the law - a new law should never be established within the New World of the United States, but it should be instituted, established, or erected upon the establishment, the base, or the foundation of a whole new order -- the natural law our Founder's declared within the Declaration of Independence - with this being the justification they found in divorcing the people out from under what many believed wrongly to be a rightful rule of a king.    

Perspective is so very crucial in life.  Indeed, we aren't here to be responsible and equal.  Likewise, we aren't here to be free.  Indeed, our primary purpose in life is to further our contentment exponentially meaning that such virtues as responsibility, equality, and liberty are all prerequisites - they are not virtuous ends; but, they are all virtuous means to a greater end.  Yet, in the end, after being left alone to decide, if a person feels burdened to convert over to place their own happiness second for the sake of others, then that is their Will to do so.  But, understand, there decision to convert over still doesn't change the proper sequence of how the order manifests itself.  

This is why we should never transgress upon a person's Civil Purpose.  They shouldn't be made to do what is in their own best interest as such a person after being so processed into society can't be fully trusted.  In contrast, a person who converts over to your side freely of their own Will can be trusted forever.                    
             
To overcome the deception of today, the people need to understand a matter that is quite complex.  Therefore, we should never choose the easy path bowing to condescension   Indeed, the king on the high ground of the conflict has long been utilizing his secret agencies to deceive the people in directions which are against the advancement of their Civil-Purpose.  In turn, these secret agencies have long been in control of the private news media corporations.  This was the case even before the advent of our Founding Fathers.  Therefore, for the sake of future posterity, Americans should now reject every seeming virtuous explanation written in the form of the standard essay for the better understanding that can be conveyed in the use of writs.  For this reason, I am now rejecting the long established use of the standard essay.  While, in the crafting of an essay, one must learn to divides the audience members into varying degrees of expert and general readers, in the crafting of a writ, one simply reduces the sum total of all those who live upon the earth into the being of a single homeless prostitute.  As a result, trust in understanding no longer becomes a matter of what I know, of how wise I might be, or of how intelligent I rate; but, trust in understanding becomes a matter of the person I am speaking with. In this way, hopefully our understanding will become more empowered, enlightened, and envisioned to understand that which our nation today is so dearly needing us to understand. 


Our American Civil Purpose      

by Uncle Emanuel Watkins

This is an opening argument on the side of our Founding Fathers who together participated willfully in the establishment of a whole new order knowing that they were confiding in each other in fellowship under the Light of the Truth.  Justification in my giving of this defense has been granted to me by the People's Proclamation of Sovereignty. Therefore, from this date onward, let it be known that the seeming petty offense of stumbling up of the children of God shall be considered the worst of  contempt with these being any action committed with the intent of hindering the people in the advancement of their Civil Purpose and that any transgressor from this day on who willfully threatens to further violate their self-evident and unalienable natural rights won't be held just accountable; but, they shall be held to a much higher standard and to a far greater penalty under Light of the Truth.  After all, we weren't created as a people to be glorified as a legal purpose, as a militant purpose, as a religious purpose, or even as a responsible, intelligent purpose, but all these things have been laid down as a prerequisite foundation for the achievement of a greater Civil-Purpose.

Indeed, while managing to keep the majority of the people in perpetual poverty is the nature of all governments, by way of maintaining them in constant stasis in a state that is neither here nor there, neither advancing nor corrupting; in contrast, it is the nature of the people to advance in their well being exponentially.

Being envisioned and empowered to understand this subtlety in life during the time of their Enlightenment, our Founders as rightful designated gentlemen of high status in British society chose to lower themselves for our sake in order to act on our behalf.  Indeed, they were much like the Son of Man who persevered lost among the nameless and faceless never having a place to rest His head, like His mother Mary who, while at the same time she was being hunted as a wretched outcast, persevered against a world of laws that were treating her even less than one would a lowly prostitute, and, finally, much like Joseph who, as a converted husband and step-father, chose to remain at her side serving her burden.

As this was the case, so it was the case also with many others in history who chose to risk everything for the sake of the nameless and the faceless. Indeed, such was the case with John Lock who did not write for personal gain, but wrote anonymously in secret for the sake of future generations revealing his true identity as the author of his treatises within his last will and testament after his death.  It was also the case many years before in ancient times when Plato as a former student of Socrates would dutifully perform his dialogues before a live audience doing so in a Sophist-like oral tradition delivering them in the guise of a play having to code the true meaning hidden in the messages tactfully in the realm of the sublime so as to convey beneath the conscience of the present ruling elite.  Like Plato, so was it the case with his own student Aristotle also who, as a member of the audience Plato was speaking to, would write down every word that his teacher would speak, both Plato and Aristotle were often left alone in their endeavor as every other member of the audience had many times, being quite bored of what they felt was nonsense, had all gotten up to leave.  The significance here being that both Plato and Aristotle understood the value in the message they were both preaching and etching into history and how it would never mean much to their own generation, but to future ones.

One might stop to ponder considering many others in history, of the similar efforts made by the Chosen Vessel Paul, by the Apostle Peter, by Galileo, and by Martin Luther, the way they also had led the nameless and the faceless in bettering themselves.  While the people have never benefited from the evil-doings of official fiat (make it so) sanctioning, all of mankind have benefited collectively when authority was charmed into circumcising itself towards accepting what is the most ideal, a kind of reduction which leaves the nameless and faceless unhindered in the advancement of their Civil Purpose.  Indeed, when our Founders spoke of the term "endowment," they weren't speaking in a material fashion about of mankind behaving animalistically in nature; but, they were speaking in a more esoteric fashion in what would be the most ideal way in leading others towards furthering their contentment.  

Again, much to the contrary of what is being conveyed today by those with limited capacity, our Founders aren't outdated; but, because of their vision, they were empowered during their time to act out of concern for us.  As this was the case with them and with their own founders in history, so let this be the case today with the people of these United States who in taking a step beyond what our Founding Fathers declared now, in courage, stand collectively in faith to walk, also in faith, out from this present darkness overcoming in the process all our conflicts, our confusion, and our divisions in order to rightfully sit upon a throne as One people empowered with the Proclamation of Sovereignty.  Indeed, as our Founders once, under great peril to their well being, signed their names upon the formal document of the Declaration of Independence, (understanding while doing so that their souls were being held accountable under Light of the Truth) so do we the people of these United States now stand as representative of the very least One among us.  In doing so, we now possess the ultimate power as supreme judges over our government.    

This ultimate power is an unapproachable, immovable Truth that is in  constant opposition with the false powers of manipulation.  As these false powers must be expressed as the process of government, as a necessary evil in a practical sense, in response, our Founders both etched and instituted both their evocations and the laws of the land within the U.S. Constitution - with these being the people's Bill of Rights and the laws as guidelines for a more ideal government - all for the purpose of producing "a more perfect Union."

As the ultimate Truth exists in the Holy, the endeavor of government must fall back relying on the lessor formal truths.  These would be those kinds of practical conclusions envisioned by Plato as the next best-principled paths one should take in leading one in a general direction towards the ultimate foraml Truth itself.  Indeed, these virtues are the same ones that were utilized and declared by our Founding Fathers as "unalienable" and "self-evident" truths as they would utilized them in the crafting of a new natural law - of a whole new order that would work to separate the American people from the Old World.

From this day onward, any further deceit perpetuated for the purpose of threatening these narrowed cherished ways given to us as an inheritance by our Founders will be held in contempt of the people's Civil Purpose. Indeed, as they shall never find ground in which to support themselves, the propagation of all these lies upon this earth depend solely on the working of inequity, upon the manufacturing of the consent of the people to their detriment, and upon the causing of fear, confusion, and division among their ranks towards the betterment of  tyranny.

Again, as this is now clearly perceived to be the case, let every soul in government now be held to a greater standard and to a greater penalty under the Judgement of the Truth.

Substantiating the point even further, before instituting the U.S. Constitution as a realistic way of dealing with the false powers of manipulation, our Founders first established within The Declaration of Independence a whole new order as a rock solid base not for the specific purpose of establishing laws for the same old government; but, their burden was to establish a foundation for the evocation of the people's Bill of Rights. After all, as instituting a law for the sake of the law is no better than suffering death for the sake of death, and as the purpose of government is not for the governmental purpose of maintaining the people - which as an endeavor is also no better than death - but, rather, much to the contrary, our Founders preserved government as an institution to serve the people as a necessary tyranny for the purpose of advancing them towards a forever-perfecting "more perfect Union.'

A "more perfect Union" as an ideal wasn't established, once again, asa necessary tyranny for the betterment of tyranny; but, government was preserved and utilized by the people when our Founders themselves were acting on the behalf of commoners for the purpose of  advancing our Civil-Purpose. For, as has already been mentioned above, we aren't guaranteed to have a legal purpose, a militant purpose, a religious purpose, or even a responsible, intelligent purpose; but, we were born by natural right to have a Civil-Purpose.

As it is the creature of a lamb that is revealed upon the throne, in the end, the ultimate of Glory won't be going to those who survive this eventful conflict, but the prize will be going to both those who are touched by the very least One among us and, even more so than this even, to those who have been called forth to rise in faith by His voice.

lunes, 9 de septiembre de 2013

Further work upon "Our American Civil Purpose" performed on 09/13//2013

 

Fallacy 1:  A tyranny isn't only two parts constructed of a master class ruling over a slave class; rather, there are actually three parts in the overall relationship making it up involving the two classes already mentioned above which collectively as a whole then exert further persecution upon another third class of untouchables.  This persecution often times amounts to a condemnation of death.  So, the minority isn't the slave class as is commonly believed, but is the unrepresented class of outcasts persecuted by the society made up of a master and a slave class.  

Believe otherwise and it is you who is willingly following after a lie.  

Opening up the can of worms to take an even better look inside, while in any two-party system the victorious party is supposed to be elected by the majority of the people in order to play the part of a temporary master class, the defeated party is similarly left to play out the part of a temporary slave class.  While we desire to live greater than the animals, this is what the animals do in nature.  Causing the present downfall of our nation, Republican attorneys are willfully allowing themselves to be run out of business by Democratic attorneys.  All positions in our government are presently being absconded by lawyers, those led astray by the false powers of manipulation.


In any tyranny made up of just a few, a tyrant will need to be established as a figurehead in order to, once again, create a third class of outcasts.  These outcasts are then persecuted in order to terrorize the subordinate class back into the condition of slavery.

In opposition with this legal two-party system was the advent of the formal American Movement in our history.  Indeed, this latter process developed out from the people and was the true advancement over the U.S. Constitution As any advancement of the people is going to be formal and in opposition to the legal process that is We haven't survived as a nation all this time because of the two-party system, but because of the American Movement    

Mary, the mother of Jesus, was an outcast.  Joseph, the step-father of Jesus, was a convert over to the side of Mary.  Jesus Himself was the "Son of Man."

Mary wasn't even considered a prostitute by tyranny, but was considered even less of a person as a prostitute represents the lowest form of a slave.  Instead, Mary was a wretch.

Three classes of women in society:

Woman:  This person is worthy enough to be slept with by a king.
Prostitute:  This person is worthy enough to kneel before a king.
Wretch:  This person is condemned to death by the king.

When king Herod committed infanticide by sentencing every first born to be put to death, he sentenced both Mary and Joseph to also being put to death by the people themselves, the parents of many first born.

Okay, think of mankind as a factory and the wretch as its highest quality product.  Indeed, the ministry of Jesus increased immeasurably whenever a lowly wretch preached the gospel to Him.  This is why it is important for government to take care of the nameless and faceless by narrowing their authority to operate under His commandment that "You give them something to eat!"  Under the Light of the Truth, there will be no forgiveness for allowing the people to starve even in the most desolate of places.       

As Mary herself was an untouchable wretch who was hated and despised by tyranny, Joseph was a convert who chose to serve by her side as a converted step-father.  

Therefore, in the New World, water should be thicker than blood, just as, with great risk, Joseph served future generations unto eternity.    

As Joseph was an ideal step father, Christ was the perfect Step Son.  As a stepchild, Christ referred to Himself as the Son of Man.  This means that He was the very least one born from among the most worthless.  This is why Peter's response that Jesus was supreme declaring Him to be the Son of the Living God so surprised and caused Him to rejoice.  As a Son of God would be considered an offspring who is greater than God Himself, in contrast, the Son of Man, a nameless and faceless classification in comparison, would be considered an offspring who is lessor than the most worthless.   

    
Fallacy 2:  
Metaphorically speaking, there was a time not so very long ago when tyranny would have us fixing our roofs inside the house from beneath the ceiling working from the bottom up.  While it is possible, with lots of determination, to repair a leaky roof in such a fashion, unfortunately, a legal precedent of how not to go about doing something had become, over a lengthy period of time, a long standing tradition. So, doing nothing at times can actually be more productive than doing something.  Complicating matters, again with this being part of the metaphor provided above, when their own roofs would start leaking, the rulers themselves issued legal decrees with these being "fiat" type make-it-so commandments to have whole new houses built for them.  So, for a very long time, the philosophical notion of best-principled "form" of "what is a leaky roof" and "what is the best way to fix it" never had to be considered.  These types of persecutions happened in a quite casual fashion as no alternate points of view ever existed challenging them.

Fallacy 1:  Tyranny isn't made up of only two parts of a master class ruling over a slave class, but it is three parts made up of what has already been mentioned above while both the master and slave classes together as society exert persecution upon another class of outcast untouchables even to the extent of death.  So, the minority who needs protection isn't the slave class, but the class that is being persecuted by this two-party system.

The idea of "Formal Knowledge" was introduced by the ancient philosopher Plato with the intentions of being conveyed many years later to posterity which includes the modern audiences of today.  Indeed, he had to write and perform his dialogues deceptively expressing their meaning below the conscience of tyranny.  Perhaps attempting to lead the Greeks away from religious folly, with this being the godhood their underlying economy was based upon (imagine trying to ban both Santa Claus and Christmas?), Plato described a huge gray area of virtue, high quality truths existing between the two far extremes of what was the unapproachable Truth, and what was no Truth, as the Sophists themselves believe no such virtue even existed.  His "theory of the forms" helped further define terms philosophically by creating endless relationships between what were the lessor informal ideas relative to the greater formal ones, helping form points of views of the issues being discussed.

In other words, it wasn't that Plato disagreed with the point the eloquent Sophists were making regarding the lack of any truth; rather, he went a full step further by arguing it was possible to obtain a certain degree of virtue by utilizing such truth-engines as inductive, best-principled, and deductive reasoning.  In the writing of The Declaration of Independence, our Founders utilized all of these methods.

Oddly, when they were given the chance, our rational Founders didn't abolish tyranny, but utilized it as a necessary tyranny in later forming "a more perfect Union."  For, as they declared in our nation's collective oath of independence, we aren't here to be responsible and equal people primarily; rather, we are here for contentment's sake on an exponential scale.  In other words, in order to keep smiles on their faces, the minds of children must be in a constant state of advancement.  If those smiles ever disappeared veiling their face with darkness, then mothers would perceive immediately a problem. This is why, in the United States, such virtues as freedom and equality shouldn't be considered ends to a mean, but means-to-an-end prerequisites necessary for achieving an exponential contentment.  This quest wasn't meant by our Founders to be a tremendous burden placed upon those in government, but, as the American Movement has determined over time, a call for them to limit the size of government.

Indeed, in the endeavor of fixing a leaky roof correctly, less government will always lead to the most efficient way of doing the job.

In separating the American people from the Old World, our Founders chose not to do it in the legal customary way; rather, they refrained from doing anything first in a formal way by utilizing the scientific method of Natural Law in divorcing the people justifiably from tyranny.  In this way, they avoided committing promiscuity.  Only after this divorce was signed by our Founders holding each to a higher standard and to a greater penalty under God's judgement did they then set about doing something - tending to the task of remarrying us to a "more perfect Union."

We Took a Step Backwards Adopting a Two - Party System

Following their establishing this new Union with the instituting of the U.S. Constitution, our Founding Fathers seemed rather perplexed by the rapid creation of a two-party political system soon after.  It is almost as if after all the tremendous effort they had exerted shutting out tyranny, a gust of wind blew through at the last moment forcing the door ajar just enough to allow much of it back in. Unfortunately, as it is now sapping our nation of everything green and fruitful, this hybrid two-party system has grown into an out of control weed overshadowing every ray of hope from our Founder's age of Enlightenment.  As many modern Americans would mislead us into believing, with most of these being lawyers, this contempt committed against the people's Civil Purpose wasn't a major set to worry about, no, not at all; but, rather, this quick sucker punch to the gut of the people was actually a good thing - bad tasting like medicine it might be - as a great advancement over the U.S. Constitution! Yet, as the two - party system functions today, it is stumbling up the children of God dividing them into many parts, instigating strife and inequality among their ranks, and benefiting parasitically off them by turning the whole inward against itself.

To recover from this present corruption, a pause is needed to mediate on the new order our Founders established under our feet.  As, in the Old World, the law itself was the order of tyranny; much to the contrary, in the New World, our Founders established a whole new order as a new foundation before new laws were then erected upon it.  In the process, this abolished the tyranny of the Old World, those legal precedents that persecuted the people, replacing that with a positive New World government; one that was instituted of men, by men, and for men.

From forever beforehand, to the early ancient founders of 
Ancient Greece, to our American Founding Fathers of today


During the time of Socrates, there were three types of intellectuals:  the Sophists, the Philosophers, and the All Knowers.  As the Sophists argued rather eloquently on both sides of an argument for the purpose of proving that no such virtue as the truth existed, the philosophers argued that greater virtues could indeed be obtainable ed by the utilization of truth engines, inductive and deductive reasoning for example. In the case of the All Knowers, those blessed born of the ruling class, it was understood that they, being born royal, knew everything in a bullying sort of way or else there would be hell to pay.       

1)  What is "Recollection?"

The soul was a magical kind of essence that waked a person in the morning.  It made the heart beat. It caused blood to squirt out of a body after it was severely injured.  As each soul itself was born from another soul, so, every soul must have originated from one primary Soul.  Was it any wonder that Socrates would ponder as to why one soul would be born to appear so different from another soul? For example, while a majestic king would grow up to sit upon a throne having most every function concerning his survival performed for him, a worthless prostitute would grow up to do tedious tasks such as walking everyday a good distance down to the banks of a river to retrieve buckets of water.

According to Socrates, whose mother served as a midwife to poor pregnant women, while every soul was once exactly the same knowing everything there was to know, they were born diverse into this world because of the trauma each had to suffer at birth.  Each soul forget different amounts of knowledge depending on varying degrees of suffering.  Therefore, if each of these traumatized souls were to be served by a kind of midwife philosopher such as himself, in time, they could then be taught to learn how to "recollect" that knowledge they once knew.        

2)  Not Law and Form, but Law versus Form

Very enlightened by Socrates, Plato the student advanced to pondering the existence of a formal, deeper Beauty in life as opposed to the more informal, shallower kinds of beauty that existed.  He envisioned having beautiful laws as something greater than having laws themselves.  He wondered if having a beautiful government was possible of the kinds which went beyond the corrupt ways they had always functioned in the past to working on the side of the people in making them happier - the idea of positive government!  Again, using the king and the prostitute as an example here, as the high king would have lots of small informal problems challenging him everyday, the lowly prostitute would have one big formal Problem burdening her.

As her soul is distracted inwardly, this masks the fact that both the souls of the king and the prostitute are exactly equal.

3)  The left and right dichotomy of the Golden Mean

Aristotle had good intentions in developing his political model "The Golden Mean."  Very much distorted today from what Aristotle intended, he meant to use the model to depict the Greek people as left and right, conservative and liberal extremists in their views in hopes that they would be persuaded to think in a more centered, compromising, and moderate way.

To preserve the New World today, we need to abolish this Old World political spectrum that originated from Aristotle. In its place, we should now depict a new American political spectrum by the placement of a king, the same figure I used above as an example, enthroning him at one far end of this new model, either on the left or right side of it as such a designation is no longer going to apply in this case.  As his inverse or perverse, we should next place the figure of a homeless prostitute on the other end.  Next, while the term "Law" should be written under the enthroned king, the term "Form" should be written under the lowly figure of a homeless prostitute on the other far end of the scale.

In other words, as not a lot of thought goes into using either of the words today, the meanings of each become clearer when they are understood to be in conflict.

As the American people were once made to suffer from the "laws" of a tyrant who resided too great of a distance away to rule responsibly, our Founders responded by utilizing "form" to divorce us justly out from under the prior traditions of legal precedence (persecutions).

Again, metaphorically speaking, while in the Old World it was always deemed that commoners could only fix their roofs from the bottom up, our Founding Fathers used "form" to find a "best-principled" way of going about it.  In the end, the American people were given the authority to fix their roofs from the top down.

We don't live in a legal nation, but a formal nation.  

Indeed, as aforementioned, during the time of our Founding Fathers, both the legal precedence of law and the formal scientific method of Natural Law were processes blessed by the church.  So, instead of utilizing the method of legal precedence, as was the standard practice of that time, when they set about creating a whole new nation; instead, our Founders utilized the alternate method of Natural Law.  In this way, they found justification for divorcing us out from under the rule of tyranny.  This action then justified them in proceeding with remarrying us to a more perfect Union.

Therefore, we don't live within a legal nation today as is the case with others living in nations of the Old World; but, we live in a formal nation of the New World.  While it was justified for a person to be persecuted by legal precedence in the Old World, our Founders utilized the scientific method of Natural Law to abolish those sufferings.  Indeed, our government today is a "more perfect Union," with the intentions here being a necessary tyranny, or a kind of government which today is ideally able to forever perfect itself.

So, love thy neighbor as thyself.  Indeed, don't come out fighting with blind courage and hatred, but step forth into the light as a guard in faith and love.  For they surely are trying to divide us today just as a wise pimp will at times deem it in the best interests of all to do the same with his prostitutes, attempting to manufacture our consent, in coaxing one side into attacking the other side.  As has always been the case in the past, having succeeding in dividing us, tyranny will have established justification in attacking the whole body.  

Being converts over to the side of the disadvantaged, as members who have determined to switch fighting the much more difficult and uphill battle against a leisure class, tyrants who have the benefit of the high ground, we can't afford any wasted motion. Indeed, as, on one hand, we are constantly shamed from finding the courage to face our fears, on the other, it is always going to be the Truth within that sets us free.  So, in opening our eyes in faith today to see what is happening around us, while fewer and fewer of the able bodied among us are now being deployed by tyranny in their traditional, long established precedence of confusing,  manipulating, exploiting, and humiliating the disadvantaged into submission, even fewer of the disadvantaged themselves are now being put to work gainfully employed.

In other words, concerning the endeavor of business at its very worst, always remember how it never takes more than a specialized corp of a few "pimps" to control, in calling tyranny for what it is, a multitude of many "whores."

One might wonder why all this evil is even happening.  Well, firstly, our leaders have become drunkards intoxicated by the false powers of manipulation.  As such, they rule with no conscience which makes them an enemy of God.  Second, as has always been the case in history, the ultimate quest of every tyranny is to revert back to the pleasure principle:  backsliding unto the state of constant drunkenness, unto the business of warmongering, and unto the reconstituting of those darkest of times back when many poor young ladies and small boys were made to be imprisoned within secret harems and forced to serve the sexual appetites of rich old men.

And what more might there be of this truth?  Well, as aforementioned, when our Founders established our new *formal nation justifying it by the utilization of the scientific method of natural law, they managed a way of freeing the people by divorcing them from the prior legal precedence of the Old World.  In succeeding, they drove a wedge between what, on the right side, has become a more perfect Union of today and, on the wrong side, what is now considered unacceptable organized crime committed in contempt of the people and the advancement of their Civil Purpose.  In other words, prior to our Founding Fathers, both the royal government ruling rightfully over Americans and the insidious organized crime taking advantage of them were both one in the same.

Indeed, after all the pain, the effort, and the suffering endured by the disadvantaged in their eternal efforts not to destroy, but to control tyranny, our hard-fought-for nation was taken away during its infancy and reorganized into a false dichotomy of the two-party system, a process which, as noted above, was instituted out of greed from the prior Old World with little thought.  This evil has so fully corrupted today that even illegal aliens crossing over our borders have been misled into supposing that the greatest aspect about these United States was never meant to be the abilities of its nameless and faceless, but of the government meant to serve them.

(As you now know this, so, consider yourselves held to a higher standard and to a greater penalty under the Light of the Truth.)

This kind of disillusionment would imply that most believe our Union isn't any more special of a Democratic Republic than are the other lessor nations residing outside of our borders, and that the monumental work performed in the past by our Founding Fathers was no more significant than any of the other supremacist kinds of nationalistic achievements by those founders in other supposed great nations. And, in turn, that our Union today isn't any different than any other collection of states that also think of themselves as the greatest in the world, and who also believe, for the same material reason many disillusioned in this nation do, that that greatness was achieved as a result of an elite class of leaders, of lawyers, of business executives, of doctors, of teachers, and so on.

Finally, this leads us full circle back to the two-party system as the big lie itself, to a time when things went astray for our Union.  And what would arise from this darkened time in our history to challenge this wayward system that has so infected our Union and endangered our Civil-Purpose?  Indeed, what process arose from the ashes to bring about a slow recovery lifting these United States back up as a shining beacon among the many other countless political systems that failed? Why, it was the advent of the American Movement!  Indeed, the true advancement over the U.S. Constitution arose not as the two-party system, but as the American Movement!  This phenomenal happening ushered forth from within the collective conscience of the American people originating fully outside of the two-party political system.  The American Movement was also the same kind of solution as were the great achievements of the prior U.S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and The Declaration of Independence. Indeed, just as the above mentioned were never recognized by the British government, the American Movement process today has never been recognized by the official sanctioned state now ruling over us.

The premise of this American Movement should never alter in its focus as the process aids the nameless and faceless in the redeeming of our American souls, leads us to the revering of our Founding Fathers, and to the honoring of the laws and rights these great men assembled in fellowship to establish as lightning in a bottle for future posterity. Indeed, they handed down to us not only the legal documentation that is both the U.S. Constitution and the evocation of our Bill of Rights; but, they also passed down a formal order to us as well that we should all be cherishing today - the natural law they declared and each signed their names to within the formal document of the Declaration of Independence.  But beyond even all this, the American Movement has always argued singularly in purpose for the virtue of limiting the size of government. Indeed, when achieving such a circumcised authority, the abilities of the nameless and the faceless shine forth for all the world to see as the one and only true greatness about these United States.

As the children of God today are being stumbled up misled into both hoping unto vain darkness and following after change for-the-sake-of-it, in total opposition, the greatest of benefits have always been and will always be derived from the most precious of alterations.  Therefore, to advance ever so slightly beyond that which we have already received as our American inheritance, the people should now commence in prohibiting every kind of attorney from serving in any government within these United States, the district of Columbia, and territories.

From this day on, let every member of our government understand that they are no longer held to be just accountable, but they are now by this proclamation of sovereignty to be held to a greater standard and to a greater penalty under the Light of the Truth.

FD.  (Uncle) Emanuel Watkins
**Formal Prime Minister of These United States &
First Attorney to Our Founding Fathers Under the Light of the Truth

*We don't have a legal nation, but a formal one.  As every nation prior to ours was created by way of legal precedence, with these being long established traditions of persecutions, our Founding Fathers established a new nation based on the scientific method of National Law.  The significance here was how the latter method they utilized, along with legal precedence, was also a process blessed by the church.  

**This title of Formal Prime Minister is not to be a legal position created on the side of tyranny, by tyranny, for tyranny, but is now being raised on the side of the people, by the people, for the people.