Clarifying what is our Civil Purpose

Thinking back on the great scientists in the past, I've come to realize what they could not quite grasp for a lack of data.  I've realized that all of life has one common denominator and that is a phenomena called exponentiality.  In other words, in the question of what is education, its highest classification should not reduce to a study of the false dichotomies such as the arts versus the sciences, but to the singular metaphysical conclusion of what is the phenomena of exponentiality.  In other words, the teaching of reading, writing, and arithmetic aren't end alls, but means to an end.  Narrowing even further to that of a singular purpose in education would imply a teaching that is apolitical.  That apolitical end is the teaching of what is exponentiality.

In other words, we shouldn't be corrupting our children with false dichotomies, but narrowing their minds singularly towards the concept of exponentiality.  In the end, the one common factor hidden in every relationship, endeavor, and phenomena is exponentiality.

In order to raise a child, a mother doesn't just maintain them, but an acceleration of care needs to be applied for them to grow and advance in life.    

          

The media has gone back to serving a dictatorship by supporting the authority of one man rather than a three dimensional one.

Concerning the quality of the news reported, the event which happened yesterday in San Francisco is more proof of educational insolvency.  Indeed, while the typical sophisticated reporter will know how to drive to the airport, know how to buy a ticket for a flight to San Francisco, know how to check into a hotel upon arrival, know how to interview experts there, know how to write up a news article about the earthquake, know how to rewrite and revision it, and, finally, know how to qualify it through the editing process, during the whole process mentioned he or she won't necessarily understand a thing about what an earthquake really is.

As I've already pointed out, concerning physics, this phenomena called an earthquake happens on an exponential scale.  This means the 1989 earthquake in San Francisco that measured 6.9 was nearly eight times bigger and a little over 22 times more powerful than the 6.0 earthquake that took place yesterday morning.

You can read the article here.

In other words, in all articles purporting to express the news, the subtle exponential aspect involved with the topic should be defined first.  This way the reader or readers aren't misled, deceived, or stumbled up.

Contrary to the many lies being reported by the media, the two-party system was not a great advancement over our Founding Fathers, over the new order they ordained within The Declaration of Independence, over the unalienable powers they proclaimed within the Bill of natural rights, and over the new laws they erected within the U.S. Constitution.  Yet, much to our society's detriment, this is exactly what our educational system is teaching today.

In actuality, in every endeavor of life, metaphysics (what is reality?) reduces towards a reality which is exponential.  This is the one absolute which should be taught meaning that there is no room for politics in school.  Instead, there exists a lone absolute above the present classification which depicts the various subjects taught and even beyond a false dichotomy which depicts reality as the arts and sciences.  In other words, when we go to school, we aren't sent to learn to read and write, to study the arts or the sciences, or to choose between mastering between the physical or cognitive sciences, but these are mere means to an end.  What we are sent to learn in school is a greater end which is how metaphysics reduces exponentially regarding every human endeavor and physical phenomenon.

Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins
Prime Minister of these united States
First Attorney to our Founders under judgement of the light of Truth
Acting supreme court            

The Process Ordaining The U.S. Constitution Took Place Previously Within The Declaration of Independence

The Ordainment of these united States

                                                                                                                                              
 ======================================================================

We The People

Necessary Tyrant

**************************
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain . . ..

<-----------------------><--------------------->

      Left or Right  //  Moderate  //  Left or Right

*******************************************************************************
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The above model is both a truth engine, a quality truth producing rational process requiring the input of raw data, and a political spectrum.  It is apolitical in method as there exists no left or right side as the wretch or king can be depicted on either side.  Metaphysically speaking, the one true dichotomy, what reality reduces towards metaphysically, is a long standing conflict between a tyrant king and a worthless old wretch.  The latter of the two is the lowest form of all the prostituted.    

Typed between the above two pictures of the man and woman the inverse characters representing a wretch and a king, I have written the preamble of the U.S. Constitution partially up to the term "ordain" after which I leave it trailing off with ellipses.  This was intentional as "ordain" infers to the justification for existence in relationship to God's authority while the following "create" infers the process of doing.  Our Founders first had to justify our state of being before any further creating of the U.S. Constitution could then rightfully commence.

Stepping back for a moment, during any age of enlightenment, the ones involved during such special times are immensely schooled in the appreciation of reduction and how the narrowing process does not reduce to cruelty; but, rather, reduction reduces to quality.  Indeed, other times of enlightenment have happened in the past which led to golden ages of high quality.  For example, at about the same time, around 450 BCE, both the Buddha of India and Confucius of China set about on journeys seeking enlightenment.  During this time, they each possessed disciples.  Similar to our own Founding Fathers, both of these ancient sages were desiring of an alternative to the overheated business of government, the same old legislating, administering, and judiciating of endless laws for the sake of law.    

In other words, great effort is always going to be required to view the endeavor of government in some other fashion rather than law.  This is why the special age during the time of our Founders is often referred to as "The Age of Enlightenment."  In comparison to our Founders, today's lawmakers have become intoxicated (poisoned) on the the false powers of manipulation, or on a cruel point of view which perceives the world reduced to two competing pimps fighting over a whore.  This contempt is derived from the Old World, from past times when the ruling class enjoyed, without giving the matter much thought, the richest of foods, the most luxurious of things, and the most leisure of living.  Indeed, such members of royalty, referred to as their majesties, and the excellency, referred to as the ladies and gentlemen of higher social class, were not too appreciative of the quality achieved through supreme uphill effort.  Our enlightened Founders came to appreciate such quality.

Before creating a more perfect Union within The U.S. Constitution, our Founders ordained it prior within The Declaration of Independence.  This latter document provided justification for divorcing the people out from under tyranny:

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the States of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved, and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent State may of right do.  And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.  

So, we the people, therefore, . . . by the establishment of a new order within The Declaration of Independence did ordain and create the U.S. Constitution.  In turn, the U.S. Constitution is the instituting of our new marriage - a more perfect Union.    

What is power versus what is money

I was recently watching a movie during which a scene in it impressed me deeply.  As a priest was addressing everyone in a room bowing submissive to them,  first to those in the royal family and then second to those in the lesser aristocracy.  While doing so, the priest first said "your royalty" and then "your excellencies."

In the old world, the royal family had no reason for money as they possessed power.  In other words, fiat (make if so) central bankers guaranteed the royal family received their share.  In contrast, the less powerful aristocracy, the excellencies in society, had to make a profit off money from commercial banks in order to earn wealth.  The Central Banks controlled the commercial banks.

Easy enough.

While those in the royal family were empowered at birth having need of nothing, the excellencies are entitled gentlemen and ladies at birth.  This means that, unlike the royal family, the excellencies have to take risks.  This also means that the excellencies have to do some uphill work in order to thrive.  

In order to guarantee the power of the royal families today and to those immediately tending to their needs, with these being those controlling ones within the central banks, the IRS was created.  In other words, the IRS isn't taking in money for the purpose of advancing the Civil Purpose of the people: but, to the contrary, they are taking in money to serve the best interests of those empowered within the royal families.  This allows the central banks to trash the world's economy in order to reap profits.  When the economy lay in ruins, the banks will simply reissue a new type of currency while keeping the fiat wealth brought in by the IRS in tact.  The IRS is better than gold because it steals gold from the people.  

Don't think about this process in terms of good and bad.  Instead, think as a crop farmer would.  He tends to his or her crops until it is time to harvest.  He then destroys them in the process of collecting the crop's fruit of grain.  In order to replant next year, seeds need to be preserved.  However, in order to increase the size of ones farm, it might be tempting to rob and sell from the seeds stored up for next years harvest in order to purchase added acreage.                              

The Greatest of Benefits are Those Derived From the Most Precious of Alterations: Careful Mending by Amendments

Saul of Tarsus was the most evil man to ever live.  In time, God transformed this most wayward of people into a converted Christian called the Apostle Paul - God's chosen vessel.  A chosen vessel is the ultimate authority upon earth.  As the person Saul of Tarsus was the most powerful member of the Emperor's aristocracy, the converted chosen vessel Paul worked later on at mending tents.
Indeed, as government thinks of change in terms of total replacement, God alters by way of redemption.  A good example of the latter type of change are the discarded used bottles that can be collected and redeemed for a nickle or a dime.

As passing Roman soldiers would use their knives and swords to cut into the tents of those on the bottom of Roman society - those made to eat in the shambles - the Apostle Paul specialized in mending those tears sewing the wounds to that of a scar.

Concerning unalienable natural rights, the only type of acceptable change is the process of careful amendment.  In contrast, radical change, any laws which can be repealed or totally abolished from the U.S. Constitution are not unalienable articles.  After all, an article is just part of the total expression of what is a natural right.  The other part of the expression is the amendment a natural right needs concerning its relationship with the unapproachable Truth, the slight change necessary to expand the people's Civil-Purpose.  So, any laws granted or able to be repealed within the U.S. Constitution aren't articles at all.  In such cases, the matters should be relegated to the state and local level.

As one should now know better, consider yourselves held to a higher standard and greater penalty under the Light of Truth.

Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins
Prime Minister of these united States
First Attorney to Our Founders Under Light of Truth
Acting Supreme Court

      
    

President Abe Lincoln Once Said that Our Founders did not act as officials, but of, by, and for the People. Therefore, the Constitution, the Schematics Created Instituting a more perfect Union, was Ordained by the People.

Necessary Tyranny

The Commoner People

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America ~ the preamble of the U.S. Constitution.



A pope did not ordain the U.S. Constitution by his blessing.  Neither did a junta of important excellencies ordain it by their wisdom.  Nor did a committee of gentlemen from the upper social class, those who were born sovereign in a caste society and so were entitled with authority and power, ordain it as official by the deeming or granting it so.

This is because when our Founders were instituting the ideal of a more perfect Union (necessary tyranny), they did not so while acting as officials of a government -- as God's rightful authority that is.  After all, our nation was never deemed official by the Old World as, after ordaining a constitution, our Founders didn't establish it properly by the same long standing traditions and the legal precedence utilized by the Old World.  Instead, they utilized the scientific method of natural law in justifying our divorce out from under tyranny.  Indeed, prior to the establishment of the U.S. Constitution, our Founders did not issue decrees of proclamation when writing the Declaration of Independence; rather, they signed that document while they stood under God's judgement, as a declaration showing that they were not acting in rebellion to God's authority.  To the contrary, they were acting in submission.  

In order to advance the prerequisite of the People's Civil-Purpose as ideal, our Founders, while sitting in as members of the congregation, established a necessary tyranny, our government, as a means to that ideal.

This ordaining by the people is significant as it means they possess the greatest part of the overall power within the relationship with the government, the necessary tyranny that our Founders, as representatives among the people, instituted as a more perfect Union.
    

The People's Civil Purpose Expressed in the Form of a Chinese Eight Legged Essay

A Wretch as a
Worthless Multitude

A King as a 
Necessary Tyrant

Our Civil Purpose 

an eight legged Chinese  essay 

by Uncle Emanuel Watkins

As a king is a necessary tyrant over society, an old wretch is not even deemed necessary by society.  Likewise, as a young man can be utilized as a metaphor to represent the king, so a worthless multitude can be utilized to represent the Wretch.

As he is rational seeing all things outward, she is inward distracted.  As, on one hand, the wretch represents the least of all the prostituted people, on the other, the king represents the greatest of those who prostitute others.  However, the king, being sovereign, is immune from any wrong doing.  As the wretch is the least of all who are prostituted, in turn, the empowered king, once again being that he is sovereign, needs nothing.  As she is the lowest rated of three kinds of prostitutes, he is the greatest of two kinds of sons.

As the greatest of these three kinds of prostitutes is allowed to sleep in the king's bedroom, and as the second most rated is allowed to live within his kingdom as long as she is willing to kneel before him, in contrast, the least wretch is rejected from his kingdom as an outcast even to the extent that she is killed on sight.

A wretch represents the nameless and faceless.  As the name of a person represents their function in society, so their face represents their authority.  As she is outcast from society, so the wretch is an illegal trespasser.  Because she is nameless and faceless, there is never much to say or to write about her.  Indeed, she is spontaneous having been born irrational and unlawful.  The old wretch is even rated less than a dog as, unlike the other prostitutes ranked above her, she is not even recognized by her behind.  After all, as a face represents authority, so do dogs recognize each other by the sniffing of the other's behind.  However, though she be so worthless, the wretch is born with the same exact business agenda for life as the sovereign king.

Unlike the wretch, the king will be remembered in recorded history.  He is the owner of all property and possessions meaning that the trespassing wretch is being made to survive as both a trespasser and a thief on his land.  He is born the greatest of two kinds of sons.  The greatest of these sons was born rational possessing absolute power or else.  So, he represents God.  As the fathers of princes were also kings, so they too were born sons of God.  As the other nameless and faceless sons in the kingdom are deemed commoners, they are classified as lessor sons of men.  Indeed, as the classification of "God" represents one who is intimate known, the classification of "man" expresses one who is nameless and faceless and therefore a stranger.  As the fearful people would consider a blessed Son of God, a prince, to be greater in quality than his father, a king, in contrast, they would despise a cursed son of man as less in quality than even his own nameless and faceless parents!

A great battle is taking place between the king and the wretch today!  Indeed, as it is the quest of every wise king to maintain his kingdom so that it will be passed down to his blessed sons of God, so is it the quest of every worthless wretch to advance exponentially the contentment of their nameless and faceless sons of men.  While the king and the wretch were both born equal with the same exact burden for life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, her power is at a great disadvantage, she is distracted inwardly after all, in relationship to his ability.  As she is injured by her nature, so there exist three types of rational thought:  There are the sophists who speak eloquently on both sides of a truth, those philosophers who develop quality proofs which fall short of the one supreme and unapproachable Truth, and those who were born rational knowing all things, or else.  As the king will tolerate the first two types of rational thought in his kingdom, he, being a sovereign ruler, was born the supreme rational person over all other forms of rational thought.      

In his rational world, while someone who is sovereign in power needs no money, someone who is abandoned with need will be easily enticed and cheated by counterfeit.  As kings train their sovereign sons of God to maintain the tyranny they built, the worthless sons of men learn from the most wretched how to advance themselves exponentially.  For even when the least wretch has never had any children, she still loves her children by natural law.

As tyranny utilizes the law to benefit off the disadvantaged, the wretch will bring her sick offspring to the law, her worst enemy, out of desperation having no other place to go.  They do so because they recognize, by natural law, that their children are sick.  They don't see the exponential development in them needed to put a smile upon their faces.  The minds of their children have become depressed, fearful, and feeble and their bodies thin and starving.      

The kings have been preserved as necessary tyrannies by the least of wretches because the natural law she understands in her heart is for happiness solely.  So, the exponential advancement of our Civil Purpose is prerequisite in maintaining smiles upon the faces of all her children.            

First rewrite of a letter I am writing to the Supreme Court

We the People

By Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins

"We the People" does not imply the majority of the people as law making lawyers like to spout.  Indeed, as Abraham Lincoln so eloquently put it in his Gettysburg Address, it implies "of, by, and for people."  In other words, it means our Founders shedded their high ranking statuses as Gentlemen in British society.  After rejecting their high ranking social statuses, they then called a time-out to sit in with the commoner people.  During that recess, they reject the Old World traditions of creating new nations while of, by, and for commoner people.  Again, as no official government of high ranking gentlemen existed when the recess was taking place, our Founders created a new government while being members of, by, and for people.

This is because, within the British Empire, social roles were caste at birth meaning that one was born in society with inborn power.  Or, if you will, a few in the royal family did not need to have any money as they possessed power instead which originated from them welding God's ruling authority.  So, such blessed people did not depend on investments, but their lavish lifestyle was guaranteed by fiat (make it so or else).  Lower in society, those highly designated as ladies and gentlemen were necessary in supporting and protecting the royal family.  Indeed, while they themselves were quite wealthy as members of the ruling Aristocracy and the military Nobility, they depended more on profits from investments made.  This represented the Old World tyranny which our Founders cut us off from.

In a tyranny, the "central bank" tended to those born with fiat power who received their wealth by entitlement.  In contrast, those "commercial banks" under the authority of the central bank tended to the business of those who needed to work earning a living.    
            
In contrast to our Founding Fathers method of creating a new nation, when the united States of Mexico was created, no official time-out was ever called.  Instead their Founding Fathers created a pretentious junta of important figures to sign their Declaration of Independence.  Therefore, Mexico is not a true united States when compared to the original united States which, again, was created of, by, and for people.

So, even today, Mexico should be considered against the American people as part of Old World tyranny.

Traditions of Old World Legal Precedence 

Versus New World Natural Law

Prior to these united States, nations were created by the traditions of legal precedence.  This first required that a king be established.  This king was then blessed by God's authority by way of blessings from the church and by a crowning by the authority of someone like the pope.  Our Founders did not utilize this method in creating a new nation however; but, rather, they established a New World by utilizing the scientific method of natural law.  The trick here being that the metaphysical scientific method of natural law was also a method blessed by the church and therefore legitimate.

As the Declaration of Independence is an official document justifying our divorce out from under the tyranny of the Old World, only part of the documentation that is the U.S. Constitution utilizes laws necessary to remarry us to a "more perfect Union."  Therefore, we the people weren't born yearning to become part of a glorious government; but, government is here as a necessary tyranny for our benefit in order to advance exponentially our Civil Purpose.

The first ten amendments to the U.S. Constitution provides the people with a face of authority, their Bill of Rights.  These powers were not deemed legal by Old World (Legal) Precedence; but, they were unalienable natural rights established by the utilization of the scientific method of Natural law.  Therefore, while The Declaration of Independence is a single document, the U.S. Constitution is documentation containing two documents.  The legal laws instituted within the U.S. Constitution pertain to the false powers of manipulation concerning what our Founders had to create as a necessary tyranny.  Indeed, they, we the people that is, found it necessary to place government over our heads, not for the sake of government in and of itself, but for the express purpose of advancing our Civil Purpose.

In contrast to the laws pertaining to the false powers utilized by the government, the first ten amendments within the U.S. Constitution pertain to the Truth which has ultimate power over all.

This is why government can't be made to behave itself by way of legislating, policing, and judiciating endless laws; but, rather, government can only be made to behave by making it look upon its conscience.

Knowing that our government should now be operating under a new order, it was the Supreme Court of these united States which overstepped its authority.  Indeed, its functions were not created of, by, and for people.  Instead, they functioning guidelines they instituted already existed in the Old World.

In contrast, Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins, the character I am playing now, is being instituted of, by, and for the people.

Therefore, concerning the ultimate power which is the Truth, I, Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins, being of the new order our Founders established, do on this date of the second of August, 2014, hold the U.S. Supreme Court in contempt of people's Civil Purpose.

As you all should now know better, consider yourselves held to a higher standard and a greater penalty under the Light of Truth.

Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins
Prime Minister of these united States
(I was not officially appointed to my position by officials, but I was raised to such a responsibility as of, by, and for commoners.  This means I am a commoner, elected by commoners, for the sake of the advancement of commoners)
First Attorney to our Founders under the Light of Truth
(As our Founders signed their names holding themselves in threat of judgement beneath the Light of Truth, so am I bound by natural right, by the duty they defined, to act as their first attorney) 
Acting Supreme Court
(Outside of God Himself, the Supreme Court of these united States should always be acting as the most supreme of all courts)




         




 

What is our Civil-Purpose?

I can remember reading something a long time ago, but can't find it now.  It was a classification of the different creatures on the earth which had the insects as rated lowest because they did not have a recognizable face.  As a face represents authority, then an insect is least personified by mankind.  It is important to accept this ranking so that we can then utilize the ant as the lowest of all insects to glorify Christ.

Concerning order, these tiny ant lifeforms are the littlest of sisters.  I say they are sisters because they are all females.  However, they are kin to us as, like us, they are in a desperate fight for their survival.  Survival means to work and fight to be closest to the order.  In other words, an ant doesn't have a spirit, but they have souls which sense a wonderful order.  A sick dying pup, for example, longs to be close to this order which is why they will cry out when forced to leave too soon as members among the living.    

So, nameless ants are fighting constantly against shrinking even further.  For if they do, they could lose their souls as living organisms.  For example, the mitochondria at one time was its own living organism, but now it has become a symbiotic part of the much larger living cell.  Biologists know this to be a fact because, like the larger cell that they have become a part, the Mitochondria still possess their very own DnA.

To remain among us as significant living organisms and to avoid falling further to the state of a lost organelle like the Mitochondria, every waking moment is a constant battle for ants.  While in this constant state of war, ant colonies don't need the males in the colony to do any working or fighting.  In fact, they hide them along with their eggs and queens out of the way.  Once again, this is because every functional member of a colony is female as they perform all the tasks such as management, the gathering of food, and all the fighting that is necessary to protect the nest.

So, during times of survival, living organisms do not need the males of their species to do anything.  The ultimate purpose for creating males is for profit.  For achieving the individual designation of having a name of someone with a significant function along with a face of authority.  Not just to achieve a profit, but that of a happiness which is exponential in scale.  As the ability for living organisms to survive instinctively is inborn, so the ability for them to thrive and to advance exponentially is learned.

One day, if and when the ant does manage to fight her way out from her predicament, she will then be able to free up her males.   These males only know one thing which is about ways to increase happiness exponentially.

So, as people and as higher living organisms, we don't need any one doing any thing for us.  These socialist political claims being made today are deceitful on the scale of stumbling up the children of God.  After all, the ability to survive is both inborn in us while the functions involved in the process of survival itself are female.        

                              

First version of a writ that I am writing and sending in a letter to the Supreme Court

We the People

By Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins

"We the People" does not imply the majority of the people.  Indeed, as Abraham Lincoln so eloquently put it in his Gettysburg Address, it implies "of, by, and for the people."  In other words, it means our Founders shedded their rightful, high-ranking social statuses as recognized Gentlemen in British society in order to call a time-out.  During that recess, they through rejected the formert Old World by getting up to go sit of, by, and for the people.  While no official government existed when this recess was taking place, they, our Founders were acting as commoners when creating a new government doing so of, by, and for the people.

This is because in the British Empire roles were caste at birth meaning the power one welded in society was inborn.  Or, if you will, those in the royal family did not need any money as they possessed God's ruling authority.  So, such blessed people did not depend on investments, but their lavish livelihoods were guaranteed to them by fiat (make it so, or else).  Those lessor designated ladies and gentlemen necessary in supporting and protecting the royal family were still quite wealthy in comparison with they being the ruling Aristocracy and the military Nobility.  However, they depended more on profits from investments.  This represented the Old World tyranny which our Founders cut us off from.
              
In contrast to our Founding Fathers, in creating the state of Mexico, no official time-out was ever called.  Instead their founding fathers created a pretentious junta to utilize, with these being a gathering of important figures, to sign their Declaration of Independence.  Therefore, the so-called United States of Mexico is a fallacy when compared to the original united States which was of, by, and for the people.

So, even today, Mexico should be considered against the American people as part of the Old World tyranny.

Old World Legal Precedence 

Versus New World Natural Law

Prior to these united States, nations were created by the Old World traditions of legal precedence.  This first required that a king be established.  This king was then blessed by God's authority by way of the church by the process of being crowned by popes.  Our Founders did not utilize this method in creating a new nation; but, rather, they established a New World by utilizing the scientific method of natural law.  The trick here being that the scientific method of natural law was also blessed by the church and therefore legitimate.

As the Declaration of Independence is an official document justifying our divorce out from under the tyranny of the Old World, only part of the documentation that is the U.S. Constitution utilizes laws remarrying us to a "more perfect Union."  Therefore, we the people aren't living to be part of a glorious government; but, government is here as a necessary tyranny for our benefit in order to advance our American Civil Purpose.  

The first ten amendments to the U.S. Constitution provides the people with a face of authority, their Bill of Rights.  These powers were not deemed legal by Old World (Legal) Precedence; but, they were unalienable natural rights established by the utilization of the scientific method of Natural law.  Therefore, while The Declaration of Independence is a single document, the U.S. Constitution is documentation containing two documents.  The legal laws instituted within the U.S. Constitution pertain to the false powers of manipulation regarding what had to be created as a necessary tyranny.  Indeed, we found it necessary to place a government over our heads.  In contrast to the laws pertaining to these false powers, the first ten amendments within the U.S. Constitution pertain to the Truth which has ultimate power over that which was deemed to be a necessary tyranny.

This is why government can't be made to behave itself by the legislating, policing, and judiciating of endless laws; but, rather, government has only been made to control itself when forced to look upon its conscience.

Knowing this, it was the Supreme Court of these united States which overstepped its authority.  Indeed, in its creation, the functions of the Supreme Court were not determined by the new order established by our Founders -- which was of, by, and for the people -- but was a reinstitution of an Old World process through the traditions of tyranny (legal precedence) - as an official process officially deemed official by self-appointed officials.  In contrast, Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins, the character I am playing now, was instituted of, by, and for the people.

Therefore, concerning the ultimate power which is the Truth, I, Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins, on this date of the second of August, 2014, do now hold the U.S. Supreme Court in contempt of people's Civil Purpose.

As you should now no better, consider yourselves held to a higher standard and a greater penalty under threat of the Light of Truth.

Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins
Minister of these united States
(I was not officially appointed to my position by officials, but I was raised to such a responsibility of, by, and for the people)
First Attorney to our Founders under the Light of Truth
(As our Founders signed their names holding them in threat of judgement beneath the Light of Truth, so am I bound by natural right, by duty, to act as their first attorney) 
Acting Supreme Court
(Outside of God Himself, the Supreme Court should be acting as the most supreme of all courts)