The U.S. Constitution is not a single document as is the case with the formal document of The Declaration of Independence, but is documentation containing two documents. While it does contain a legal document dealing with matters concerning laws and how they are to be instituted in the forming of a more ideal government, the U.S. Constitution also contains a judicial document dealing with the matter of the Bill of Rights and how such natural rights should be understood as a warning towards those in contempt of the people's Civil Purpose. Our Founder's pronuciation of our Bill of Rights served to threaten such offenders with judgement under Light of the Truth.
Therefore, the Bill of Rights should be understood as one of two documents within The U.S. Constitution while both of them together should be considered necessary for the instituting of a more perfect Union. This more perfect Union differs from that of a better ideal government. As demonstrated by the functioning of an ant colony in the last post, the nameless and faceless can function without that of a government, but government cannot function without the nameless and faceless. Indeed, without the understanding of this sobering Pronuciation by our Founders, our present government has become a tyranny of drunkards. This is a very simple subtle point which is why it is quite difficult to understand.
From now on, I'm going to refer to the document of our Bill of Rights as the people's Pronuciation (pro - new - see - a - shun) just as our Founders once referred to the people's independence from tyranny as a written "declaration." Pronuciation refers to the warning written within the U.S. Constitution as the people's Bill of Rights. Our Founders ushered a threat to any future government, to any necessary tyranny that is, whether it be domestic or foreign, concerning the true power in the natural rights of the people versus the false but necessary powers of manipulation welded by those who function in government.
sábado, 28 de septiembre de 2013
sábado, 21 de septiembre de 2013
Our American Civil Purpose
Because of a recent realization leading me to a new conclusion, I now consider my last blog sufficiently finished.
New conclusion: Management isn't a necessity endeavor concerning our survival, but is an absolute prerequisite function for leading us towards exponential expansion of our Civil Purpose. Again, the greatest of benefits ever achieved are those derived by the most precious of alterations made upon a preexisting foundation, a base which has already been established for us by our ancestors. For we once learned to recognize the faces of our parents by first learning what their faces looked like. We then advanced ever so slightly over our parents after learning that our faces appeared similar to theirs. We are human beings because the faces of the grandchild and the grandparent are quite similar. Therefore, when we follow willfully away from that which we have already inherited choosing instead to walk along that path encouraging the abandonment of our ancestors and every preexisting foundation laid down by them, we are the ones freely choosing to lose our identity, freely choosing to become personified as the very least of all creatures, and freely choosing to become like the insect that too has no recognizable face of authority.
As Americans, we need to quit losing our American souls to the misleading two party traps of political "movements." Rather than being distracted by such vain efforts - gimmicks promising that we can have our cake and eat it too - instead, we should be carefully building upon the philosophical base already provided for us. In plain view, there has always been the American Movement concerning what is in the best interest of the people. It is this one and only American Movement and not the two party system which ushered forth of, by, and for the people as a slight alteration beyond our Bill of Rights, beyond the laws within the U.S. Constitution, and beyond the new order declared for our sake within The Declaration of Independence.. This process should never be altered from how it is still returning Americans today to revering our Founding Fathers, to focusing our attention on what is the new order they declared together in fellowship, and to the understanding, deeply and profoundly, of both what are our proclaimed Bill of Rights and our laws ratified within the U.S. Constitution concerning our Union.
As already pointed out, the two party system was concocted in contempt of the people's Civil Purpose as it functions as a false dichotomy in clear opposition with the American Movement process, with the New World order that was declared within the formal document of the Declaration of Independence, and with both the forewarning and legal documents within the U.S. Constitution as both the Bill of Rights and as laws instituting a new government.
Lord, as your children, how much are we being stumbled by tyranny? As of 09/28/2013, the Republican party is dead. As this only leaves us with the one party that controls the media, the people don't even have the voice to declare the Republican party dead. Therefore, the dead thing just keeps right on living as a fiction.
Again, the greatest of benefits are derived from the most precious of alterations to that which has already been provided to us as our inheritance. There is something quite special here that our Founders didn't quite envision to convey. As The Declaration of Independence was a formal document divorcing us rightfully out from under the rule of tyranny, so the Bill of Rights became a forewarning document.
In other words, just as they were justified in declaring a natural law as a whole new order, so did the evocations they made within the Bill of Rights become rightful proclamations, and so did the new laws they instituted within the U.S. Constitution become legal.
This is a big breakthrough in understanding.
From this day onward, the U.S. Constitution being the law of the land should be understood both as legal documentation concerning the instituting of a more perfect Union, and as a Proclamation of the Bill of Rights of the people concerning judgement over future tyranny - whether foreign or domestic - under Light of the Truth.
Therefore, just as everything concerning the law is superseded by proclamation, and as the U.S. Constitution is the law of the land dealing both with legal documentation and proclaimed documentation, so should he U.S. Congress concern itself with the legal documentation side of the U.S. Constitution and the Supreme Court concern itself with the proclaimed side of it.
From this date onward, allow every member of the U.S. Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court be held beyond just accountable for their actions to that of a higher standard and to a greater penalty under Light of the Truth.
With that out of the way, concerning our survival, let's get on with the matter of why management shouldn't be considered a necessary endeavor. In the Book of Revelation, an insect is considered the least of all creatures because of how it is poorly personified lacking a face. After all, a face represents authority. In comparison, while dogs do recognize themselves poorly by their tail ends, they still have a face of authority which will cause their superior owners to recognize and care about them.
Of all the insects, the ants are the very least of the least. I say they are the very least only in the sense that if they were to grow any smaller, they would be in danger of losing their identities becoming like enslaved organelles incorporated as parts of the cells of larger creatures. Indeed, in her small size, think of the female ant as on the borderline having been reduced to the releasing of God's Will. I say female as every active member of an ant society are female and I say God's Will as there exists no wasted motion by any member of the colony as every one of their action is tuned to survival. As it is the female ants who manages and defends the colony, the drones, the angelic winged males have been tucked away below ground helpless having to be fed and tended to as babies. Therefore, concerning survival, the males are not even needed other than for reproduction. Similarly, the people of the United States don't need a management instituted over them for their survival; but, the reason we choose to have the endeavor of management as a necessary tyranny instituted over us is so we might thrive towards further contentment on an exponential scale.
Continuing with the use of insects as metaphorical examples, our government has evolved over the years from behaving like productive honey bees to that of wasteful hornets. Their nests have become instituted with very little sweet honey concerning our American Civil purpose to made up purely of legal paper which, in its effect, has led us to breeding ominous wasp-like weapons of mass destruction.
What crack is to a drug addict and booze is to an alcoholic, so weapons of mass destruction are to a warmonger.
New conclusion: Management isn't a necessity endeavor concerning our survival, but is an absolute prerequisite function for leading us towards exponential expansion of our Civil Purpose. Again, the greatest of benefits ever achieved are those derived by the most precious of alterations made upon a preexisting foundation, a base which has already been established for us by our ancestors. For we once learned to recognize the faces of our parents by first learning what their faces looked like. We then advanced ever so slightly over our parents after learning that our faces appeared similar to theirs. We are human beings because the faces of the grandchild and the grandparent are quite similar. Therefore, when we follow willfully away from that which we have already inherited choosing instead to walk along that path encouraging the abandonment of our ancestors and every preexisting foundation laid down by them, we are the ones freely choosing to lose our identity, freely choosing to become personified as the very least of all creatures, and freely choosing to become like the insect that too has no recognizable face of authority.
As Americans, we need to quit losing our American souls to the misleading two party traps of political "movements." Rather than being distracted by such vain efforts - gimmicks promising that we can have our cake and eat it too - instead, we should be carefully building upon the philosophical base already provided for us. In plain view, there has always been the American Movement concerning what is in the best interest of the people. It is this one and only American Movement and not the two party system which ushered forth of, by, and for the people as a slight alteration beyond our Bill of Rights, beyond the laws within the U.S. Constitution, and beyond the new order declared for our sake within The Declaration of Independence.. This process should never be altered from how it is still returning Americans today to revering our Founding Fathers, to focusing our attention on what is the new order they declared together in fellowship, and to the understanding, deeply and profoundly, of both what are our proclaimed Bill of Rights and our laws ratified within the U.S. Constitution concerning our Union.
As already pointed out, the two party system was concocted in contempt of the people's Civil Purpose as it functions as a false dichotomy in clear opposition with the American Movement process, with the New World order that was declared within the formal document of the Declaration of Independence, and with both the forewarning and legal documents within the U.S. Constitution as both the Bill of Rights and as laws instituting a new government.
Lord, as your children, how much are we being stumbled by tyranny? As of 09/28/2013, the Republican party is dead. As this only leaves us with the one party that controls the media, the people don't even have the voice to declare the Republican party dead. Therefore, the dead thing just keeps right on living as a fiction.
Again, the greatest of benefits are derived from the most precious of alterations to that which has already been provided to us as our inheritance. There is something quite special here that our Founders didn't quite envision to convey. As The Declaration of Independence was a formal document divorcing us rightfully out from under the rule of tyranny, so the Bill of Rights became a forewarning document.
In other words, just as they were justified in declaring a natural law as a whole new order, so did the evocations they made within the Bill of Rights become rightful proclamations, and so did the new laws they instituted within the U.S. Constitution become legal.
This is a big breakthrough in understanding.
From this day onward, the U.S. Constitution being the law of the land should be understood both as legal documentation concerning the instituting of a more perfect Union, and as a Proclamation of the Bill of Rights of the people concerning judgement over future tyranny - whether foreign or domestic - under Light of the Truth.
Therefore, just as everything concerning the law is superseded by proclamation, and as the U.S. Constitution is the law of the land dealing both with legal documentation and proclaimed documentation, so should he U.S. Congress concern itself with the legal documentation side of the U.S. Constitution and the Supreme Court concern itself with the proclaimed side of it.
From this date onward, allow every member of the U.S. Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court be held beyond just accountable for their actions to that of a higher standard and to a greater penalty under Light of the Truth.
With that out of the way, concerning our survival, let's get on with the matter of why management shouldn't be considered a necessary endeavor. In the Book of Revelation, an insect is considered the least of all creatures because of how it is poorly personified lacking a face. After all, a face represents authority. In comparison, while dogs do recognize themselves poorly by their tail ends, they still have a face of authority which will cause their superior owners to recognize and care about them.
Of all the insects, the ants are the very least of the least. I say they are the very least only in the sense that if they were to grow any smaller, they would be in danger of losing their identities becoming like enslaved organelles incorporated as parts of the cells of larger creatures. Indeed, in her small size, think of the female ant as on the borderline having been reduced to the releasing of God's Will. I say female as every active member of an ant society are female and I say God's Will as there exists no wasted motion by any member of the colony as every one of their action is tuned to survival. As it is the female ants who manages and defends the colony, the drones, the angelic winged males have been tucked away below ground helpless having to be fed and tended to as babies. Therefore, concerning survival, the males are not even needed other than for reproduction. Similarly, the people of the United States don't need a management instituted over them for their survival; but, the reason we choose to have the endeavor of management as a necessary tyranny instituted over us is so we might thrive towards further contentment on an exponential scale.
Continuing with the use of insects as metaphorical examples, our government has evolved over the years from behaving like productive honey bees to that of wasteful hornets. Their nests have become instituted with very little sweet honey concerning our American Civil purpose to made up purely of legal paper which, in its effect, has led us to breeding ominous wasp-like weapons of mass destruction.
What crack is to a drug addict and booze is to an alcoholic, so weapons of mass destruction are to a warmonger.
viernes, 13 de septiembre de 2013
Our American Civil Purpose
A writ by Uncle Emanuel Watkins
Forward
While we all benefit from increased understanding, only a very few of us advance as a result of selective explanation. Therefore, during this darkened age of deception, orderly understanding should now take precedence over political explanation. If the Truth is the one virtue that will set us free, and if freedom is an absolute prerequisite for the advancement of our American Civil Purpose, then we must suffer to overcome in our accepting that there will never exist such a reality as rational thought as the irrational legal process of politics will always rise up to triumph over it.
To deal with this paradox, while understanding depends on trust, valid conclusions require that virtues be strung together in a certain coherent order. Therefore, tyranny has always managed to stumble up the people quite easily by defining the meaning of each individual word correctly while, at the same time, twisting around the virtue of a complete thought (sentence) by stringing numerous words and thus virtues together incorrectly.
For example, in the United States, the endeavor of law today is still being allowed to take precedence over the endeavor of order. Yet, before they could institute any new laws within The U.S. Constitution, our Founding Fathers first had to establish a new base within The Declaration of Independence as a whole new order.
The old world process of law for the sake of the law works to benefit tyranny. Indeed, a tyrant has the fiat (make it so) power to make whatever he so wishes to do into law. Reading carefully though, one can establish order out of such chaos by determining that: 1) when his feet are trained to follow after his hands, a tyrant will lead the whole of a nation towards evil; 2) or, in contrast, when his hands are taught to follow after his feet, a tyrant will lead the whole of a nation towards the Truth. In the United States, the natural law as a new order should always take precedence over every law instituted for the sake of the law.
In other words, as the tyranny of the Old World was made up of laws established upon a foundation of chaos - think of laws being implemented for the sake of the law - a new law should never be established within the New World of the United States, but it should be instituted, established, or erected upon the establishment, the base, or the foundation of a whole new order -- the natural law our Founder's declared within the Declaration of Independence - with this being the justification they found in divorcing the people out from under what many believed wrongly to be a rightful rule of a king.
Perspective is so very crucial in life. Indeed, we aren't here to be responsible and equal. Likewise, we aren't here to be free. Indeed, our primary purpose in life is to further our contentment exponentially meaning that such virtues as responsibility, equality, and liberty are all prerequisites - they are not virtuous ends; but, they are all virtuous means to a greater end. Yet, in the end, after being left alone to decide, if a person feels burdened to convert over to place their own happiness second for the sake of others, then that is their Will to do so. But, understand, there decision to convert over still doesn't change the proper sequence of how the order manifests itself.
This is why we should never transgress upon a person's Civil Purpose. They shouldn't be made to do what is in their own best interest as such a person after being so processed into society can't be fully trusted. In contrast, a person who converts over to your side freely of their own Will can be trusted forever.
To overcome the deception of today, the people need to understand a matter that is quite complex. Therefore, we should never choose the easy path bowing to condescension Indeed, the king on the high ground of the conflict has long been utilizing his secret agencies to deceive the people in directions which are against the advancement of their Civil-Purpose. In turn, these secret agencies have long been in control of the private news media corporations. This was the case even before the advent of our Founding Fathers. Therefore, for the sake of future posterity, Americans should now reject every seeming virtuous explanation written in the form of the standard essay for the better understanding that can be conveyed in the use of writs. For this reason, I am now rejecting the long established use of the standard essay. While, in the crafting of an essay, one must learn to divides the audience members into varying degrees of expert and general readers, in the crafting of a writ, one simply reduces the sum total of all those who live upon the earth into the being of a single homeless prostitute. As a result, trust in understanding no longer becomes a matter of what I know, of how wise I might be, or of how intelligent I rate; but, trust in understanding becomes a matter of the person I am speaking with. In this way, hopefully our understanding will become more empowered, enlightened, and envisioned to understand that which our nation today is so dearly needing us to understand.
Our American Civil Purpose
by Uncle Emanuel Watkins
This is an opening argument on the side of our Founding Fathers who together participated willfully in the establishment of a whole new order knowing that they were confiding in each other in fellowship under the Light of the Truth. Justification in my giving of this defense has been granted to me by the People's Proclamation of Sovereignty. Therefore, from this date onward, let it be known that the seeming petty offense of stumbling up of the children of God shall be considered the worst of contempt with these being any action committed with the intent of hindering the people in the advancement of their Civil Purpose and that any transgressor from this day on who willfully threatens to further violate their self-evident and unalienable natural rights won't be held just accountable; but, they shall be held to a much higher standard and to a far greater penalty under Light of the Truth. After all, we weren't created as a people to be glorified as a legal purpose, as a militant purpose, as a religious purpose, or even as a responsible, intelligent purpose, but all these things have been laid down as a prerequisite foundation for the achievement of a greater Civil-Purpose.
Indeed, while managing to keep the majority of the people in perpetual poverty is the nature of all governments, by way of maintaining them in constant stasis in a state that is neither here nor there, neither advancing nor corrupting; in contrast, it is the nature of the people to advance in their well being exponentially.
Being envisioned and empowered to understand this subtlety in life during the time of their Enlightenment, our Founders as rightful designated gentlemen of high status in British society chose to lower themselves for our sake in order to act on our behalf. Indeed, they were much like the Son of Man who persevered lost among the nameless and faceless never having a place to rest His head, like His mother Mary who, while at the same time she was being hunted as a wretched outcast, persevered against a world of laws that were treating her even less than one would a lowly prostitute, and, finally, much like Joseph who, as a converted husband and step-father, chose to remain at her side serving her burden.
As this was the case, so it was the case also with many others in history who chose to risk everything for the sake of the nameless and the faceless. Indeed, such was the case with John Lock who did not write for personal gain, but wrote anonymously in secret for the sake of future generations revealing his true identity as the author of his treatises within his last will and testament after his death. It was also the case many years before in ancient times when Plato as a former student of Socrates would dutifully perform his dialogues before a live audience doing so in a Sophist-like oral tradition delivering them in the guise of a play having to code the true meaning hidden in the messages tactfully in the realm of the sublime so as to convey beneath the conscience of the present ruling elite. Like Plato, so was it the case with his own student Aristotle also who, as a member of the audience Plato was speaking to, would write down every word that his teacher would speak, both Plato and Aristotle were often left alone in their endeavor as every other member of the audience had many times, being quite bored of what they felt was nonsense, had all gotten up to leave. The significance here being that both Plato and Aristotle understood the value in the message they were both preaching and etching into history and how it would never mean much to their own generation, but to future ones.
One might stop to ponder considering many others in history, of the similar efforts made by the Chosen Vessel Paul, by the Apostle Peter, by Galileo, and by Martin Luther, the way they also had led the nameless and the faceless in bettering themselves. While the people have never benefited from the evil-doings of official fiat (make it so) sanctioning, all of mankind have benefited collectively when authority was charmed into circumcising itself towards accepting what is the most ideal, a kind of reduction which leaves the nameless and faceless unhindered in the advancement of their Civil Purpose. Indeed, when our Founders spoke of the term "endowment," they weren't speaking in a material fashion about of mankind behaving animalistically in nature; but, they were speaking in a more esoteric fashion in what would be the most ideal way in leading others towards furthering their contentment.
Again, much to the contrary of what is being conveyed today by those with limited capacity, our Founders aren't outdated; but, because of their vision, they were empowered during their time to act out of concern for us. As this was the case with them and with their own founders in history, so let this be the case today with the people of these United States who in taking a step beyond what our Founding Fathers declared now, in courage, stand collectively in faith to walk, also in faith, out from this present darkness overcoming in the process all our conflicts, our confusion, and our divisions in order to rightfully sit upon a throne as One people empowered with the Proclamation of Sovereignty. Indeed, as our Founders once, under great peril to their well being, signed their names upon the formal document of the Declaration of Independence, (understanding while doing so that their souls were being held accountable under Light of the Truth) so do we the people of these United States now stand as representative of the very least One among us. In doing so, we now possess the ultimate power as supreme judges over our government.
This ultimate power is an unapproachable, immovable Truth that is in constant opposition with the false powers of manipulation. As these false powers must be expressed as the process of government, as a necessary evil in a practical sense, in response, our Founders both etched and instituted both their evocations and the laws of the land within the U.S. Constitution - with these being the people's Bill of Rights and the laws as guidelines for a more ideal government - all for the purpose of producing "a more perfect Union."
As the ultimate Truth exists in the Holy, the endeavor of government must fall back relying on the lessor formal truths. These would be those kinds of practical conclusions envisioned by Plato as the next best-principled paths one should take in leading one in a general direction towards the ultimate foraml Truth itself. Indeed, these virtues are the same ones that were utilized and declared by our Founding Fathers as "unalienable" and "self-evident" truths as they would utilized them in the crafting of a new natural law - of a whole new order that would work to separate the American people from the Old World.
From this day onward, any further deceit perpetuated for the purpose of threatening these narrowed cherished ways given to us as an inheritance by our Founders will be held in contempt of the people's Civil Purpose. Indeed, as they shall never find ground in which to support themselves, the propagation of all these lies upon this earth depend solely on the working of inequity, upon the manufacturing of the consent of the people to their detriment, and upon the causing of fear, confusion, and division among their ranks towards the betterment of tyranny.
Again, as this is now clearly perceived to be the case, let every soul in government now be held to a greater standard and to a greater penalty under the Judgement of the Truth.
Substantiating the point even further, before instituting the U.S. Constitution as a realistic way of dealing with the false powers of manipulation, our Founders first established within The Declaration of Independence a whole new order as a rock solid base not for the specific purpose of establishing laws for the same old government; but, their burden was to establish a foundation for the evocation of the people's Bill of Rights. After all, as instituting a law for the sake of the law is no better than suffering death for the sake of death, and as the purpose of government is not for the governmental purpose of maintaining the people - which as an endeavor is also no better than death - but, rather, much to the contrary, our Founders preserved government as an institution to serve the people as a necessary tyranny for the purpose of advancing them towards a forever-perfecting "more perfect Union.'
A "more perfect Union" as an ideal wasn't established, once again, asa necessary tyranny for the betterment of tyranny; but, government was preserved and utilized by the people when our Founders themselves were acting on the behalf of commoners for the purpose of advancing our Civil-Purpose. For, as has already been mentioned above, we aren't guaranteed to have a legal purpose, a militant purpose, a religious purpose, or even a responsible, intelligent purpose; but, we were born by natural right to have a Civil-Purpose.
As it is the creature of a lamb that is revealed upon the throne, in the end, the ultimate of Glory won't be going to those who survive this eventful conflict, but the prize will be going to both those who are touched by the very least One among us and, even more so than this even, to those who have been called forth to rise in faith by His voice.
lunes, 9 de septiembre de 2013
Further work upon "Our American Civil Purpose" performed on 09/13//2013
Fallacy 1: A tyranny isn't only two parts constructed of a master class ruling over a slave class; rather, there are actually three parts in the overall relationship making it up involving the two classes already mentioned above which collectively as a whole then exert further persecution upon another third class of untouchables. This persecution often times amounts to a condemnation of death. So, the minority isn't the slave class as is commonly believed, but is the unrepresented class of outcasts persecuted by the society made up of a master and a slave class.
Believe otherwise and it is you who is willingly following after a lie.
Opening up the can of worms to take an even better look inside, while in any two-party system the victorious party is supposed to be elected by the majority of the people in order to play the part of a temporary master class, the defeated party is similarly left to play out the part of a temporary slave class. While we desire to live greater than the animals, this is what the animals do in nature. Causing the present downfall of our nation, Republican attorneys are willfully allowing themselves to be run out of business by Democratic attorneys. All positions in our government are presently being absconded by lawyers, those led astray by the false powers of manipulation.
In any tyranny made up of just a few, a tyrant will need to be established as a figurehead in order to, once again, create a third class of outcasts. These outcasts are then persecuted in order to terrorize the subordinate class back into the condition of slavery.
In opposition with this legal two-party system was the advent of the formal American Movement in our history. Indeed, this latter process developed out from the people and was the true advancement over the U.S. Constitution As any advancement of the people is going to be formal and in opposition to the legal process that is We haven't survived as a nation all this time because of the two-party system, but because of the American Movement
Mary, the mother of Jesus, was an outcast. Joseph, the step-father of Jesus, was a convert over to the side of Mary. Jesus Himself was the "Son of Man."
Mary wasn't even considered a prostitute by tyranny, but was considered even less of a person as a prostitute represents the lowest form of a slave. Instead, Mary was a wretch.
Three classes of women in society:
Woman: This person is worthy enough to be slept with by a king.
Prostitute: This person is worthy enough to kneel before a king.
Wretch: This person is condemned to death by the king.
When king Herod committed infanticide by sentencing every first born to be put to death, he sentenced both Mary and Joseph to also being put to death by the people themselves, the parents of many first born.
Okay, think of mankind as a factory and the wretch as its highest quality product. Indeed, the ministry of Jesus increased immeasurably whenever a lowly wretch preached the gospel to Him. This is why it is important for government to take care of the nameless and faceless by narrowing their authority to operate under His commandment that "You give them something to eat!" Under the Light of the Truth, there will be no forgiveness for allowing the people to starve even in the most desolate of places.
As Mary herself was an untouchable wretch who was hated and despised by tyranny, Joseph was a convert who chose to serve by her side as a converted step-father.
Therefore, in the New World, water should be thicker than blood, just as, with great risk, Joseph served future generations unto eternity.
As Joseph was an ideal step father, Christ was the perfect Step Son. As a stepchild, Christ referred to Himself as the Son of Man. This means that He was the very least one born from among the most worthless. This is why Peter's response that Jesus was supreme declaring Him to be the Son of the Living God so surprised and caused Him to rejoice. As a Son of God would be considered an offspring who is greater than God Himself, in contrast, the Son of Man, a nameless and faceless classification in comparison, would be considered an offspring who is lessor than the most worthless.
Fallacy 2:
Metaphorically speaking, there was a time not so very long ago when tyranny would have us fixing our roofs inside the house from beneath the ceiling working from the bottom up. While it is possible, with lots of determination, to repair a leaky roof in such a fashion, unfortunately, a legal precedent of how not to go about doing something had become, over a lengthy period of time, a long standing tradition. So, doing nothing at times can actually be more productive than doing something. Complicating matters, again with this being part of the metaphor provided above, when their own roofs would start leaking, the rulers themselves issued legal decrees with these being "fiat" type make-it-so commandments to have whole new houses built for them. So, for a very long time, the philosophical notion of best-principled "form" of "what is a leaky roof" and "what is the best way to fix it" never had to be considered. These types of persecutions happened in a quite casual fashion as no alternate points of view ever existed challenging them.Fallacy 1: Tyranny isn't made up of only two parts of a master class ruling over a slave class, but it is three parts made up of what has already been mentioned above while both the master and slave classes together as society exert persecution upon another class of outcast untouchables even to the extent of death. So, the minority who needs protection isn't the slave class, but the class that is being persecuted by this two-party system.
The idea of "Formal Knowledge" was introduced by the ancient philosopher Plato with the intentions of being conveyed many years later to posterity which includes the modern audiences of today. Indeed, he had to write and perform his dialogues deceptively expressing their meaning below the conscience of tyranny. Perhaps attempting to lead the Greeks away from religious folly, with this being the godhood their underlying economy was based upon (imagine trying to ban both Santa Claus and Christmas?), Plato described a huge gray area of virtue, high quality truths existing between the two far extremes of what was the unapproachable Truth, and what was no Truth, as the Sophists themselves believe no such virtue even existed. His "theory of the forms" helped further define terms philosophically by creating endless relationships between what were the lessor informal ideas relative to the greater formal ones, helping form points of views of the issues being discussed.
In other words, it wasn't that Plato disagreed with the point the eloquent Sophists were making regarding the lack of any truth; rather, he went a full step further by arguing it was possible to obtain a certain degree of virtue by utilizing such truth-engines as inductive, best-principled, and deductive reasoning. In the writing of The Declaration of Independence, our Founders utilized all of these methods.
Oddly, when they were given the chance, our rational Founders didn't abolish tyranny, but utilized it as a necessary tyranny in later forming "a more perfect Union." For, as they declared in our nation's collective oath of independence, we aren't here to be responsible and equal people primarily; rather, we are here for contentment's sake on an exponential scale. In other words, in order to keep smiles on their faces, the minds of children must be in a constant state of advancement. If those smiles ever disappeared veiling their face with darkness, then mothers would perceive immediately a problem. This is why, in the United States, such virtues as freedom and equality shouldn't be considered ends to a mean, but means-to-an-end prerequisites necessary for achieving an exponential contentment. This quest wasn't meant by our Founders to be a tremendous burden placed upon those in government, but, as the American Movement has determined over time, a call for them to limit the size of government.
Indeed, in the endeavor of fixing a leaky roof correctly, less government will always lead to the most efficient way of doing the job.
In separating the American people from the Old World, our Founders chose not to do it in the legal customary way; rather, they refrained from doing anything first in a formal way by utilizing the scientific method of Natural Law in divorcing the people justifiably from tyranny. In this way, they avoided committing promiscuity. Only after this divorce was signed by our Founders holding each to a higher standard and to a greater penalty under God's judgement did they then set about doing something - tending to the task of remarrying us to a "more perfect Union."
We Took a Step Backwards Adopting a Two - Party System
Following their establishing this new Union with the instituting of the U.S. Constitution, our Founding Fathers seemed rather perplexed by the rapid creation of a two-party political system soon after. It is almost as if after all the tremendous effort they had exerted shutting out tyranny, a gust of wind blew through at the last moment forcing the door ajar just enough to allow much of it back in. Unfortunately, as it is now sapping our nation of everything green and fruitful, this hybrid two-party system has grown into an out of control weed overshadowing every ray of hope from our Founder's age of Enlightenment. As many modern Americans would mislead us into believing, with most of these being lawyers, this contempt committed against the people's Civil Purpose wasn't a major set to worry about, no, not at all; but, rather, this quick sucker punch to the gut of the people was actually a good thing - bad tasting like medicine it might be - as a great advancement over the U.S. Constitution! Yet, as the two - party system functions today, it is stumbling up the children of God dividing them into many parts, instigating strife and inequality among their ranks, and benefiting parasitically off them by turning the whole inward against itself.
To recover from this present corruption, a pause is needed to mediate on the new order our Founders established under our feet. As, in the Old World, the law itself was the order of tyranny; much to the contrary, in the New World, our Founders established a whole new order as a new foundation before new laws were then erected upon it. In the process, this abolished the tyranny of the Old World, those legal precedents that persecuted the people, replacing that with a positive New World government; one that was instituted of men, by men, and for men.
From forever beforehand, to the early ancient founders of
Ancient Greece, to our American Founding Fathers of today
Ancient Greece, to our American Founding Fathers of today
During the time of Socrates, there were three types of intellectuals: the Sophists, the Philosophers, and the All Knowers. As the Sophists argued rather eloquently on both sides of an argument for the purpose of proving that no such virtue as the truth existed, the philosophers argued that greater virtues could indeed be obtainable ed by the utilization of truth engines, inductive and deductive reasoning for example. In the case of the All Knowers, those blessed born of the ruling class, it was understood that they, being born royal, knew everything in a bullying sort of way or else there would be hell to pay.
1) What is "Recollection?"
The soul was a magical kind of essence that waked a person in the morning. It made the heart beat. It caused blood to squirt out of a body after it was severely injured. As each soul itself was born from another soul, so, every soul must have originated from one primary Soul. Was it any wonder that Socrates would ponder as to why one soul would be born to appear so different from another soul? For example, while a majestic king would grow up to sit upon a throne having most every function concerning his survival performed for him, a worthless prostitute would grow up to do tedious tasks such as walking everyday a good distance down to the banks of a river to retrieve buckets of water.
According to Socrates, whose mother served as a midwife to poor pregnant women, while every soul was once exactly the same knowing everything there was to know, they were born diverse into this world because of the trauma each had to suffer at birth. Each soul forget different amounts of knowledge depending on varying degrees of suffering. Therefore, if each of these traumatized souls were to be served by a kind of midwife philosopher such as himself, in time, they could then be taught to learn how to "recollect" that knowledge they once knew.
2) Not Law and Form, but Law versus Form
Very enlightened by Socrates, Plato the student advanced to pondering the existence of a formal, deeper Beauty in life as opposed to the more informal, shallower kinds of beauty that existed. He envisioned having beautiful laws as something greater than having laws themselves. He wondered if having a beautiful government was possible of the kinds which went beyond the corrupt ways they had always functioned in the past to working on the side of the people in making them happier - the idea of positive government! Again, using the king and the prostitute as an example here, as the high king would have lots of small informal problems challenging him everyday, the lowly prostitute would have one big formal Problem burdening her.
As her soul is distracted inwardly, this masks the fact that both the souls of the king and the prostitute are exactly equal.
3) The left and right dichotomy of the Golden Mean
Aristotle had good intentions in developing his political model "The Golden Mean." Very much distorted today from what Aristotle intended, he meant to use the model to depict the Greek people as left and right, conservative and liberal extremists in their views in hopes that they would be persuaded to think in a more centered, compromising, and moderate way.
To preserve the New World today, we need to abolish this Old World political spectrum that originated from Aristotle. In its place, we should now depict a new American political spectrum by the placement of a king, the same figure I used above as an example, enthroning him at one far end of this new model, either on the left or right side of it as such a designation is no longer going to apply in this case. As his inverse or perverse, we should next place the figure of a homeless prostitute on the other end. Next, while the term "Law" should be written under the enthroned king, the term "Form" should be written under the lowly figure of a homeless prostitute on the other far end of the scale.
In other words, as not a lot of thought goes into using either of the words today, the meanings of each become clearer when they are understood to be in conflict.
As the American people were once made to suffer from the "laws" of a tyrant who resided too great of a distance away to rule responsibly, our Founders responded by utilizing "form" to divorce us justly out from under the prior traditions of legal precedence (persecutions).
Again, metaphorically speaking, while in the Old World it was always deemed that commoners could only fix their roofs from the bottom up, our Founding Fathers used "form" to find a "best-principled" way of going about it. In the end, the American people were given the authority to fix their roofs from the top down.
We don't live in a legal nation, but a formal nation.
Indeed, as aforementioned, during the time of our Founding Fathers, both the legal precedence of law and the formal scientific method of Natural Law were processes blessed by the church. So, instead of utilizing the method of legal precedence, as was the standard practice of that time, when they set about creating a whole new nation; instead, our Founders utilized the alternate method of Natural Law. In this way, they found justification for divorcing us out from under the rule of tyranny. This action then justified them in proceeding with remarrying us to a more perfect Union.
Therefore, we don't live within a legal nation today as is the case with others living in nations of the Old World; but, we live in a formal nation of the New World. While it was justified for a person to be persecuted by legal precedence in the Old World, our Founders utilized the scientific method of Natural Law to abolish those sufferings. Indeed, our government today is a "more perfect Union," with the intentions here being a necessary tyranny, or a kind of government which today is ideally able to forever perfect itself.
So, love thy neighbor as thyself. Indeed, don't come out fighting with blind courage and hatred, but step forth into the light as a guard in faith and love. For they surely are trying to divide us today just as a wise pimp will at times deem it in the best interests of all to do the same with his prostitutes, attempting to manufacture our consent, in coaxing one side into attacking the other side. As has always been the case in the past, having succeeding in dividing us, tyranny will have established justification in attacking the whole body.
Being converts over to the side of the disadvantaged, as members who have determined to switch fighting the much more difficult and uphill battle against a leisure class, tyrants who have the benefit of the high ground, we can't afford any wasted motion. Indeed, as, on one hand, we are constantly shamed from finding the courage to face our fears, on the other, it is always going to be the Truth within that sets us free. So, in opening our eyes in faith today to see what is happening around us, while fewer and fewer of the able bodied among us are now being deployed by tyranny in their traditional, long established precedence of confusing, manipulating, exploiting, and humiliating the disadvantaged into submission, even fewer of the disadvantaged themselves are now being put to work gainfully employed.
In other words, concerning the endeavor of business at its very worst, always remember how it never takes more than a specialized corp of a few "pimps" to control, in calling tyranny for what it is, a multitude of many "whores."
One might wonder why all this evil is even happening. Well, firstly, our leaders have become drunkards intoxicated by the false powers of manipulation. As such, they rule with no conscience which makes them an enemy of God. Second, as has always been the case in history, the ultimate quest of every tyranny is to revert back to the pleasure principle: backsliding unto the state of constant drunkenness, unto the business of warmongering, and unto the reconstituting of those darkest of times back when many poor young ladies and small boys were made to be imprisoned within secret harems and forced to serve the sexual appetites of rich old men.
And what more might there be of this truth? Well, as aforementioned, when our Founders established our new *formal nation justifying it by the utilization of the scientific method of natural law, they managed a way of freeing the people by divorcing them from the prior legal precedence of the Old World. In succeeding, they drove a wedge between what, on the right side, has become a more perfect Union of today and, on the wrong side, what is now considered unacceptable organized crime committed in contempt of the people and the advancement of their Civil Purpose. In other words, prior to our Founding Fathers, both the royal government ruling rightfully over Americans and the insidious organized crime taking advantage of them were both one in the same.
Indeed, after all the pain, the effort, and the suffering endured by the disadvantaged in their eternal efforts not to destroy, but to control tyranny, our hard-fought-for nation was taken away during its infancy and reorganized into a false dichotomy of the two-party system, a process which, as noted above, was instituted out of greed from the prior Old World with little thought. This evil has so fully corrupted today that even illegal aliens crossing over our borders have been misled into supposing that the greatest aspect about these United States was never meant to be the abilities of its nameless and faceless, but of the government meant to serve them.
(As you now know this, so, consider yourselves held to a higher standard and to a greater penalty under the Light of the Truth.)
This kind of disillusionment would imply that most believe our Union isn't any more special of a Democratic Republic than are the other lessor nations residing outside of our borders, and that the monumental work performed in the past by our Founding Fathers was no more significant than any of the other supremacist kinds of nationalistic achievements by those founders in other supposed great nations. And, in turn, that our Union today isn't any different than any other collection of states that also think of themselves as the greatest in the world, and who also believe, for the same material reason many disillusioned in this nation do, that that greatness was achieved as a result of an elite class of leaders, of lawyers, of business executives, of doctors, of teachers, and so on.
Finally, this leads us full circle back to the two-party system as the big lie itself, to a time when things went astray for our Union. And what would arise from this darkened time in our history to challenge this wayward system that has so infected our Union and endangered our Civil-Purpose? Indeed, what process arose from the ashes to bring about a slow recovery lifting these United States back up as a shining beacon among the many other countless political systems that failed? Why, it was the advent of the American Movement! Indeed, the true advancement over the U.S. Constitution arose not as the two-party system, but as the American Movement! This phenomenal happening ushered forth from within the collective conscience of the American people originating fully outside of the two-party political system. The American Movement was also the same kind of solution as were the great achievements of the prior U.S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and The Declaration of Independence. Indeed, just as the above mentioned were never recognized by the British government, the American Movement process today has never been recognized by the official sanctioned state now ruling over us.
The premise of this American Movement should never alter in its focus as the process aids the nameless and faceless in the redeeming of our American souls, leads us to the revering of our Founding Fathers, and to the honoring of the laws and rights these great men assembled in fellowship to establish as lightning in a bottle for future posterity. Indeed, they handed down to us not only the legal documentation that is both the U.S. Constitution and the evocation of our Bill of Rights; but, they also passed down a formal order to us as well that we should all be cherishing today - the natural law they declared and each signed their names to within the formal document of the Declaration of Independence. But beyond even all this, the American Movement has always argued singularly in purpose for the virtue of limiting the size of government. Indeed, when achieving such a circumcised authority, the abilities of the nameless and the faceless shine forth for all the world to see as the one and only true greatness about these United States.
As the children of God today are being stumbled up misled into both hoping unto vain darkness and following after change for-the-sake-of-it, in total opposition, the greatest of benefits have always been and will always be derived from the most precious of alterations. Therefore, to advance ever so slightly beyond that which we have already received as our American inheritance, the people should now commence in prohibiting every kind of attorney from serving in any government within these United States, the district of Columbia, and territories.
From this day on, let every member of our government understand that they are no longer held to be just accountable, but they are now by this proclamation of sovereignty to be held to a greater standard and to a greater penalty under the Light of the Truth.
FD. (Uncle) Emanuel Watkins
**Formal Prime Minister of These United States &
First Attorney to Our Founding Fathers Under the Light of the Truth
*We don't have a legal nation, but a formal one. As every nation prior to ours was created by way of legal precedence, with these being long established traditions of persecutions, our Founding Fathers established a new nation based on the scientific method of National Law. The significance here was how the latter method they utilized, along with legal precedence, was also a process blessed by the church.
**This title of Formal Prime Minister is not to be a legal position created on the side of tyranny, by tyranny, for tyranny, but is now being raised on the side of the people, by the people, for the people.
jueves, 5 de septiembre de 2013
Further major revision and rewriting
The ultimate power is both an immovable and an unapproachable Truth. In opposition to this solid foundation are the false powers of manipulation which deal with relative change and motion. As best-principled conclusions lead one in a general direction towards this Truth ethically, and as these virtues are the same as the ones utilized and declared by our Founding Fathers as "unalienable" and "self-evident" truths - with these working together in making up a whole new natural law - any threats made against these narrowed ways should be considered contempt committed against the advancement of the people's Civil Purpose. Indeed, as it will never find any grounds in which to support itself, the propagation of a lie will always depend fully upon tyranny working inequity by manufacturing consent of the people - the causing of fear, confusion, and division for both the benefit of tyranny and the detriment of the people.
As it still follows after the long stranding traditions of legal precedence, the Old World tyranny will always feel enmity towards the newly found virtue of the New World.
Let us see clear how in the Almighty's wisdom the worst offense isn't to cheat a child, to beat a child, or even to kill a child, but the worst offense that a government can ever commit is to stumble up of the children of God from advancing their Civil-Purpose.
As you now perceive this, so are your souls now held to a greater standard and to a greater penalty under the Judgement of the Truth.
Before instituting the U.S. Constitution as a realistic way of dealing with affairs of these false powers of manipulation, our Founders first established within The Declaration of Independence rock solid base of a whole new order - not for the purpose of instituting laws, but - as a foundation for the evocations of our Bill of Rights. After all, as instituting a law for the sake of the law is no better than being dead, and as the purpose of government is not for the governmental purpose of maintaining the people, which is also no better than death, government was preserved by our Founding Fathers to be utilized as a necessary tyranny in order to advance the people towards a forever-perfecting "more perfect Union.'
A "more perfect Union" is a necessary tyranny established not for the benefit of tyranny, but utilized by the people to further advance their Civil-Purpose. For as Americans, we aren't guaranteed by natural right to have a legal purpose, a militant purpose, a religious purpose, or even an intelligent purpose, but to have a Civil-Purpose.
If all of eternity is pollution falling short of the glory of God, as the Chosen Vessel Paul once noted, then the worst of all pollution is the existential crime of tyranny which, as a process, has been ongoing forever against mankind.
Fallacy 1: A tyranny isn't only two parts constructed of a master class ruling over a slave class; rather, there are actually three parts in the overall relationship making it up involving the two classes already mentioned above which collectively as a whole then exert further persecution upon another third class of untouchables. This persecution often times amounts to a condemnation of death. So, the minority isn't the slave class as is commonly believed, but is the unrepresented class of outcasts persecuted by the society made up of a master and a slave class.
Believe otherwise and it is you who is willingly following after a lie.
Opening up the can of worms to take an even better look inside, while in any two-party system the victorious party is supposed to be elected by the majority of the people in order to play the part of a temporary master class, the defeated party is similarly left to play out the part of a temporary slave class. While we desire to live greater than the animals, this is what the animals do in nature. Causing the present downfall of our nation, Republican attorneys are willfully allowing themselves to be run out of business by Democratic attorneys. All positions in our government are presently being absconded by lawyers, those led astray by the false powers of manipulation.
In any tyranny made up of just a few, a tyrant will need to be established as a figurehead in order to, once again, create a third class of outcasts. These outcasts are then persecuted in order to terrorize the subordinate class back into the condition of slavery.
In opposition with this legal two-party system was the advent of the formal American Movement in our history. Indeed, this latter process developed out from the people and was the true advancement over the U.S. Constitution As any advancement of the people is going to be formal and in opposition to the legal process that is We haven't survived as a nation all this time because of the two-party system, but because of the American Movement
Mary, the mother of Jesus, was an outcast. Joseph, the step-father of Jesus, was a convert over to the side of Mary. Jesus Himself was the "Son of Man."
Mary wasn't even considered a prostitute by tyranny, but was considered even less of a person as a prostitute represents the lowest form of a slave. Instead, Mary was a wretch.
Three classes of women in society:
Woman: This person is worthy enough to be slept with by a king.
Prostitute: This person is worthy enough to kneel before a king.
Wretch: This person is condemned to death by the king.
When king Herod committed infanticide by sentencing every first born to be put to death, he sentenced both Mary and Joseph to also being put to death by the people themselves, the parents of many first born.
Fallacy 1: Tyranny isn't made up of only two parts of a master class ruling over a slave class, but it is three parts made up of what has already been mentioned above while both the master and slave classes together as society exert persecution upon another class of outcast untouchables even to the extent of death. So, the minority who needs protection isn't the slave class, but the class that is being persecuted by this two-party system.
The idea of "Formal Knowledge" was introduced by the ancient philosopher Plato with the intentions of being conveyed many years later to posterity which includes the modern audiences of today. Indeed, he had to write and perform his dialogues deceptively expressing their meaning below the conscience of tyranny. Perhaps attempting to lead the Greeks away from religious folly, with this being the godhood their underlying economy was based upon (imagine trying to ban both Santa Claus and Christmas?), Plato described a huge gray area of virtue, high quality truths existing between the two far extremes of what was the unapproachable Truth, and what was no Truth, as the Sophists themselves believe no such virtue even existed. His "theory of the forms" helped further define terms philosophically by creating endless relationships between what were the lessor informal ideas relative to the greater formal ones, helping form points of views of the issues being discussed.
In other words, it wasn't that Plato disagreed with the point the eloquent Sophists were making regarding the lack of any truth; rather, he went a full step further by arguing it was possible to obtain a certain degree of virtue by utilizing such truth-engines as inductive, best-principled, and deductive reasoning. In the writing of The Declaration of Independence, our Founders utilized all of these methods.
Oddly, when they were given the chance, our rational Founders didn't abolish tyranny, but utilized it as a necessary tyranny in later forming "a more perfect Union." For, as they declared in our nation's collective oath of independence, we aren't here to be responsible and equal people primarily; rather, we are here for contentment's sake on an exponential scale. In other words, in order to keep smiles on their faces, the minds of children must be in a constant state of advancement. If those smiles ever disappeared veiling their face with darkness, then mothers would perceive immediately a problem. This is why, in the United States, such virtues as freedom and equality shouldn't be considered ends to a mean, but means-to-an-end prerequisites necessary for achieving an exponential contentment. This quest wasn't meant by our Founders to be a tremendous burden placed upon those in government, but, as the American Movement has determined over time, a call for them to limit the size of government.
Indeed, in the endeavor of fixing a leaky roof correctly, less government will always lead to the most efficient way of doing the job.
In separating the American people from the Old World, our Founders chose not to do it in the legal customary way; rather, they refrained from doing anything first in a formal way by utilizing the scientific method of Natural Law in divorcing the people justifiably from tyranny. In this way, they avoided committing promiscuity. Only after this divorce was signed by our Founders holding each to a higher standard and to a greater penalty under God's judgement did they then set about doing something - tending to the task of remarrying us to a "more perfect Union."
We Took a Step Backwards Adopting a Two - Party System
Following their establishing this new Union with the instituting of the U.S. Constitution, our Founding Fathers seemed rather perplexed by the rapid creation of a two-party political system soon after. It is almost as if after all the tremendous effort they had exerted shutting out tyranny, a gust of wind blew through at the last moment forcing the door ajar just enough to allow much of it back in. Unfortunately, as it is now sapping our nation of everything green and fruitful, this hybrid two-party system has grown into an out of control weed overshadowing every ray of hope from our Founder's age of Enlightenment. As many modern Americans would mislead us into believing, with most of these being lawyers, this contempt committed against the people's Civil Purpose wasn't a major set to worry about, no, not at all; but, rather, this quick sucker punch to the gut of the people was actually a good thing - bad tasting like medicine it might be - as a great advancement over the U.S. Constitution! Yet, as the two - party system functions today, it is stumbling up the children of God dividing them into many parts, instigating strife and inequality among their ranks, and benefiting parasitically off them by turning the whole inward against itself.
To recover from this present corruption, a pause is needed to mediate on the new order our Founders established under our feet. As, in the Old World, the law itself was the order of tyranny; much to the contrary, in the New World, our Founders established a whole new order as a new foundation before new laws were then erected upon it. In the process, this abolished the tyranny of the Old World, those legal precedents that persecuted the people, replacing that with a positive New World government; one that was instituted of men, by men, and for men.
According to Socrates, whose mother served as a midwife to poor pregnant women, while every soul was once exactly the same knowing everything there was to know, they were born diverse into this world because of the trauma each had to suffer at birth. Each soul forget different amounts of knowledge depending on varying degrees of suffering. Therefore, if each of these traumatized souls were to be served by a kind of midwife philosopher such as himself, in time, they could then be taught to learn how to "recollect" that knowledge they once knew.
2) Not Law and Form, but Law versus Form
Very enlightened by Socrates, Plato the student advanced to pondering the existence of a formal, deeper Beauty in life as opposed to the more informal, shallower kinds of beauty that existed. He envisioned having beautiful laws as something greater than having laws themselves. He wondered if having a beautiful government was possible of the kinds which went beyond the corrupt ways they had always functioned in the past to working on the side of the people in making them happier - the idea of positive government! Again, using the king and the prostitute as an example here, as the high king would have lots of small informal problems challenging him everyday, the lowly prostitute would have one big formal Problem burdening her.
As her soul is distracted inwardly, this masks the fact that both the souls of the king and the prostitute are exactly equal.
3) The left and right dichotomy of the Golden Mean
Aristotle had good intentions in developing his political model "The Golden Mean." Very much distorted today from what Aristotle intended, he meant to use the model to depict the Greek people as left and right, conservative and liberal extremists in their views in hopes that they would be persuaded to think in a more centered, compromising, and moderate way.
To preserve the New World today, we need to abolish this Old World political spectrum that originated from Aristotle. In its place, we should now depict a new American political spectrum by the placement of a king, the same figure I used above as an example, enthroning him at one far end of this new model, either on the left or right side of it as such a designation is no longer going to apply in this case. As his inverse or perverse, we should next place the figure of a homeless prostitute on the other end. Next, while the term "Law" should be written under the enthroned king, the term "Form" should be written under the lowly figure of a homeless prostitute on the other far end of the scale.
In other words, as not a lot of thought goes into using either of the words today, the meanings of each become clearer when they are understood to be in conflict.
As the American people were once made to suffer from the "laws" of a tyrant who resided too great of a distance away to rule responsibly, our Founders responded by utilizing "form" to divorce us justly out from under the prior traditions of legal precedence (persecutions).
Again, metaphorically speaking, while in the Old World it was always deemed that commoners could only fix their roofs from the bottom up, our Founding Fathers used "form" to find a "best-principled" way of going about it. In the end, the American people were given the authority to fix their roofs from the top down.
Indeed, as aforementioned, during the time of our Founding Fathers, both the legal precedence of law and the formal scientific method of Natural Law were processes blessed by the church. So, instead of utilizing the method of legal precedence, as was the standard practice of that time, when they set about creating a whole new nation; instead, our Founders utilized the alternate method of Natural Law. In this way, they found justification for divorcing us out from under the rule of tyranny. This action then justified them in proceeding with remarrying us to a more perfect Union.
Therefore, we don't live within a legal nation today as is the case with others living in nations of the Old World; but, we live in a formal nation of the New World. While it was justified for a person to be persecuted by legal precedence in the Old World, our Founders utilized the scientific method of Natural Law to abolish those sufferings. Indeed, our government today is a "more perfect Union," with the intentions here being a necessary tyranny, or a kind of government which today is ideally able to forever perfect itself.
So, love thy neighbor as thyself. Indeed, don't come out fighting with blind courage and hatred, but step forth into the light as a guard in faith and love. For they surely are trying to divide us today just as a wise pimp will at times deem it in the best interests of all to do the same with his prostitutes, attempting to manufacture our consent, in coaxing one side into attacking the other side. As has always been the case in the past, having succeeding in dividing us, tyranny will have established justification in attacking the whole body.
Being converts over to the side of the disadvantaged, as members who have determined to switch fighting the much more difficult and uphill battle against a leisure class, tyrants who have the benefit of the high ground, we can't afford any wasted motion. Indeed, as, on one hand, we are constantly shamed from finding the courage to face our fears, on the other, it is always going to be the Truth within that sets us free. So, in opening our eyes in faith today to see what is happening around us, while fewer and fewer of the able bodied among us are now being deployed by tyranny in their traditional, long established precedence of confusing, manipulating, exploiting, and humiliating the disadvantaged into submission, even fewer of the disadvantaged themselves are now being put to work gainfully employed.
In other words, concerning the endeavor of business at its very worst, always remember how it never takes more than a specialized corp of a few "pimps" to control, in calling tyranny for what it is, a multitude of many "whores."
One might wonder why all this evil is even happening. Well, firstly, our leaders have become drunkards intoxicated by the false powers of manipulation. As such, they rule with no conscience which makes them an enemy of God. Second, as has always been the case in history, the ultimate quest of every tyranny is to revert back to the pleasure principle: backsliding unto the state of constant drunkenness, unto the business of warmongering, and unto the reconstituting of those darkest of times back when many poor young ladies and small boys were made to be imprisoned within secret harems and forced to serve the sexual appetites of rich old men.
And what more might there be of this truth? Well, as aforementioned, when our Founders established our new *formal nation justifying it by the utilization of the scientific method of natural law, they managed a way of freeing the people by divorcing them from the prior legal precedence of the Old World. In succeeding, they drove a wedge between what, on the right side, has become a more perfect Union of today and, on the wrong side, what is now considered unacceptable organized crime committed in contempt of the people and the advancement of their Civil Purpose. In other words, prior to our Founding Fathers, both the royal government ruling rightfully over Americans and the insidious organized crime taking advantage of them were both one in the same.
Indeed, after all the pain, the effort, and the suffering endured by the disadvantaged in their eternal efforts not to destroy, but to control tyranny, our hard-fought-for nation was taken away during its infancy and reorganized into a false dichotomy of the two-party system, a process which, as noted above, was instituted out of greed from the prior Old World with little thought. This evil has so fully corrupted today that even illegal aliens crossing over our borders have been misled into supposing that the greatest aspect about these United States was never meant to be the abilities of its nameless and faceless, but of the government meant to serve them.
(As you now know this, so, consider yourselves held to a higher standard and to a greater penalty under the Light of the Truth.)
This kind of disillusionment would imply that most believe our Union isn't any more special of a Democratic Republic than are the other lessor nations residing outside of our borders, and that the monumental work performed in the past by our Founding Fathers was no more significant than any of the other supremacist kinds of nationalistic achievements by those founders in other supposed great nations. And, in turn, that our Union today isn't any different than any other collection of states that also think of themselves as the greatest in the world, and who also believe, for the same material reason many disillusioned in this nation do, that that greatness was achieved as a result of an elite class of leaders, of lawyers, of business executives, of doctors, of teachers, and so on.
Finally, this leads us full circle back to the two-party system as the big lie itself, to a time when things went astray for our Union. And what would arise from this darkened time in our history to challenge this wayward system that has so infected our Union and endangered our Civil-Purpose? Indeed, what process arose from the ashes to bring about a slow recovery lifting these United States back up as a shining beacon among the many other countless political systems that failed? Why, it was the advent of the American Movement! Indeed, the true advancement over the U.S. Constitution arose not as the two-party system, but as the American Movement! This phenomenal happening ushered forth from within the collective conscience of the American people originating fully outside of the two-party political system. The American Movement was also the same kind of solution as were the great achievements of the prior U.S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and The Declaration of Independence. Indeed, just as the above mentioned were never recognized by the British government, the American Movement process today has never been recognized by the official sanctioned state now ruling over us.
The premise of this American Movement should never alter in its focus as the process aids the nameless and faceless in the redeeming of our American souls, leads us to the revering of our Founding Fathers, and to the honoring of the laws and rights these great men assembled in fellowship to establish as lightning in a bottle for future posterity. Indeed, they handed down to us not only the legal documentation that is both the U.S. Constitution and the evocation of our Bill of Rights; but, they also passed down a formal order to us as well that we should all be cherishing today - the natural law they declared and each signed their names to within the formal document of the Declaration of Independence. But beyond even all this, the American Movement has always argued singularly in purpose for the virtue of limiting the size of government. Indeed, when achieving such a circumcised authority, the abilities of the nameless and the faceless shine forth for all the world to see as the one and only true greatness about these United States.
As the children of God today are being stumbled up misled into both hoping unto vain darkness and following after change for-the-sake-of-it, in total opposition, the greatest of benefits have always been and will always be derived from the most precious of alterations. Therefore, to advance ever so slightly beyond that which we have already received as our American inheritance, the people should now commence in prohibiting every kind of attorney from serving in any government within these United States, the district of Columbia, and territories.
From this day on, let every member of our government understand that they are no longer held to be just accountable, but they are now by this proclamation of sovereignty to be held to a greater standard and to a greater penalty under the Light of the Truth.
FD. (Uncle) Emanuel Watkins
**Formal Prime Minister of These United States &
First Attorney to Our Founding Fathers Under the Light of the Truth
*We don't have a legal nation, but a formal one. As every nation prior to ours was created by way of legal precedence, with these being long established traditions of persecutions, our Founding Fathers established a new nation based on the scientific method of National Law. The significance here was how the latter method they utilized, along with legal precedence, was also a process blessed by the church.
**This title of Formal Prime Minister is not to be a legal position created on the side of tyranny, by tyranny, for tyranny, but is now being raised on the side of the people, by the people, for the people.
As it still follows after the long stranding traditions of legal precedence, the Old World tyranny will always feel enmity towards the newly found virtue of the New World.
Let us see clear how in the Almighty's wisdom the worst offense isn't to cheat a child, to beat a child, or even to kill a child, but the worst offense that a government can ever commit is to stumble up of the children of God from advancing their Civil-Purpose.
As you now perceive this, so are your souls now held to a greater standard and to a greater penalty under the Judgement of the Truth.
Before instituting the U.S. Constitution as a realistic way of dealing with affairs of these false powers of manipulation, our Founders first established within The Declaration of Independence rock solid base of a whole new order - not for the purpose of instituting laws, but - as a foundation for the evocations of our Bill of Rights. After all, as instituting a law for the sake of the law is no better than being dead, and as the purpose of government is not for the governmental purpose of maintaining the people, which is also no better than death, government was preserved by our Founding Fathers to be utilized as a necessary tyranny in order to advance the people towards a forever-perfecting "more perfect Union.'
A "more perfect Union" is a necessary tyranny established not for the benefit of tyranny, but utilized by the people to further advance their Civil-Purpose. For as Americans, we aren't guaranteed by natural right to have a legal purpose, a militant purpose, a religious purpose, or even an intelligent purpose, but to have a Civil-Purpose.
If all of eternity is pollution falling short of the glory of God, as the Chosen Vessel Paul once noted, then the worst of all pollution is the existential crime of tyranny which, as a process, has been ongoing forever against mankind.
Fallacy 1: A tyranny isn't only two parts constructed of a master class ruling over a slave class; rather, there are actually three parts in the overall relationship making it up involving the two classes already mentioned above which collectively as a whole then exert further persecution upon another third class of untouchables. This persecution often times amounts to a condemnation of death. So, the minority isn't the slave class as is commonly believed, but is the unrepresented class of outcasts persecuted by the society made up of a master and a slave class.
Believe otherwise and it is you who is willingly following after a lie.
Opening up the can of worms to take an even better look inside, while in any two-party system the victorious party is supposed to be elected by the majority of the people in order to play the part of a temporary master class, the defeated party is similarly left to play out the part of a temporary slave class. While we desire to live greater than the animals, this is what the animals do in nature. Causing the present downfall of our nation, Republican attorneys are willfully allowing themselves to be run out of business by Democratic attorneys. All positions in our government are presently being absconded by lawyers, those led astray by the false powers of manipulation.
In any tyranny made up of just a few, a tyrant will need to be established as a figurehead in order to, once again, create a third class of outcasts. These outcasts are then persecuted in order to terrorize the subordinate class back into the condition of slavery.
In opposition with this legal two-party system was the advent of the formal American Movement in our history. Indeed, this latter process developed out from the people and was the true advancement over the U.S. Constitution As any advancement of the people is going to be formal and in opposition to the legal process that is We haven't survived as a nation all this time because of the two-party system, but because of the American Movement
Mary, the mother of Jesus, was an outcast. Joseph, the step-father of Jesus, was a convert over to the side of Mary. Jesus Himself was the "Son of Man."
Mary wasn't even considered a prostitute by tyranny, but was considered even less of a person as a prostitute represents the lowest form of a slave. Instead, Mary was a wretch.
Three classes of women in society:
Woman: This person is worthy enough to be slept with by a king.
Prostitute: This person is worthy enough to kneel before a king.
Wretch: This person is condemned to death by the king.
When king Herod committed infanticide by sentencing every first born to be put to death, he sentenced both Mary and Joseph to also being put to death by the people themselves, the parents of many first born.
Okay, think of mankind as a factory and the wretch as its highest quality product. Indeed, the ministry of Jesus increased immeasurably whenever a lowly wretch preached the gospel to Him. This is why it is important for government to take care of the nameless and faceless by narrowing their authority to operate under His commandment that "You give them something to eat!" Under the Light of the Truth, there will be no forgiveness for allowing the people to starve even in the most desolate of places.
As Mary herself was an untouchable wretch who was hated and despised by tyranny, Joseph was a convert who chose to serve by her side as a converted step-father.
Therefore, in the New World, water should be thicker than blood, just as, with great risk, Joseph served future generations unto eternity.
As Joseph was an ideal step father, Christ was the perfect Step Son. As a stepchild, Christ referred to Himself as the Son of Man. This means that He was the very least one born from among the most worthless. This is why Peter's response that Jesus was supreme declaring Him to be the Son of the Living God so surprised and caused Him to rejoice. As a Son of God would be considered an offspring who is greater than God Himself, in contrast, the Son of Man, a nameless and faceless classification in comparison, would be considered an offspring who is lessor than the most worthless.
Fallacy 2:
Metaphorically speaking, there was a time not so very long ago when tyranny would have us fixing our roofs inside the house from beneath the ceiling working from the bottom up. While it is possible, with lots of determination, to repair a leaky roof in such a fashion, unfortunately, a legal precedent of how not to go about doing something had become, over a lengthy period of time, a long standing tradition. So, doing nothing at times can actually be more productive than doing something. Complicating matters, again with this being part of the metaphor provided above, when their own roofs would start leaking, the rulers themselves issued legal decrees with these being "fiat" type make-it-so commandments to have whole new houses built for them. So, for a very long time, the philosophical notion of best-principled "form" of "what is a leaky roof" and "what is the best way to fix it" never had to be considered. These types of persecutions happened in a quite casual fashion as no alternate points of view ever existed challenging them.Fallacy 1: Tyranny isn't made up of only two parts of a master class ruling over a slave class, but it is three parts made up of what has already been mentioned above while both the master and slave classes together as society exert persecution upon another class of outcast untouchables even to the extent of death. So, the minority who needs protection isn't the slave class, but the class that is being persecuted by this two-party system.
The idea of "Formal Knowledge" was introduced by the ancient philosopher Plato with the intentions of being conveyed many years later to posterity which includes the modern audiences of today. Indeed, he had to write and perform his dialogues deceptively expressing their meaning below the conscience of tyranny. Perhaps attempting to lead the Greeks away from religious folly, with this being the godhood their underlying economy was based upon (imagine trying to ban both Santa Claus and Christmas?), Plato described a huge gray area of virtue, high quality truths existing between the two far extremes of what was the unapproachable Truth, and what was no Truth, as the Sophists themselves believe no such virtue even existed. His "theory of the forms" helped further define terms philosophically by creating endless relationships between what were the lessor informal ideas relative to the greater formal ones, helping form points of views of the issues being discussed.
In other words, it wasn't that Plato disagreed with the point the eloquent Sophists were making regarding the lack of any truth; rather, he went a full step further by arguing it was possible to obtain a certain degree of virtue by utilizing such truth-engines as inductive, best-principled, and deductive reasoning. In the writing of The Declaration of Independence, our Founders utilized all of these methods.
Oddly, when they were given the chance, our rational Founders didn't abolish tyranny, but utilized it as a necessary tyranny in later forming "a more perfect Union." For, as they declared in our nation's collective oath of independence, we aren't here to be responsible and equal people primarily; rather, we are here for contentment's sake on an exponential scale. In other words, in order to keep smiles on their faces, the minds of children must be in a constant state of advancement. If those smiles ever disappeared veiling their face with darkness, then mothers would perceive immediately a problem. This is why, in the United States, such virtues as freedom and equality shouldn't be considered ends to a mean, but means-to-an-end prerequisites necessary for achieving an exponential contentment. This quest wasn't meant by our Founders to be a tremendous burden placed upon those in government, but, as the American Movement has determined over time, a call for them to limit the size of government.
Indeed, in the endeavor of fixing a leaky roof correctly, less government will always lead to the most efficient way of doing the job.
In separating the American people from the Old World, our Founders chose not to do it in the legal customary way; rather, they refrained from doing anything first in a formal way by utilizing the scientific method of Natural Law in divorcing the people justifiably from tyranny. In this way, they avoided committing promiscuity. Only after this divorce was signed by our Founders holding each to a higher standard and to a greater penalty under God's judgement did they then set about doing something - tending to the task of remarrying us to a "more perfect Union."
We Took a Step Backwards Adopting a Two - Party System
Following their establishing this new Union with the instituting of the U.S. Constitution, our Founding Fathers seemed rather perplexed by the rapid creation of a two-party political system soon after. It is almost as if after all the tremendous effort they had exerted shutting out tyranny, a gust of wind blew through at the last moment forcing the door ajar just enough to allow much of it back in. Unfortunately, as it is now sapping our nation of everything green and fruitful, this hybrid two-party system has grown into an out of control weed overshadowing every ray of hope from our Founder's age of Enlightenment. As many modern Americans would mislead us into believing, with most of these being lawyers, this contempt committed against the people's Civil Purpose wasn't a major set to worry about, no, not at all; but, rather, this quick sucker punch to the gut of the people was actually a good thing - bad tasting like medicine it might be - as a great advancement over the U.S. Constitution! Yet, as the two - party system functions today, it is stumbling up the children of God dividing them into many parts, instigating strife and inequality among their ranks, and benefiting parasitically off them by turning the whole inward against itself.
To recover from this present corruption, a pause is needed to mediate on the new order our Founders established under our feet. As, in the Old World, the law itself was the order of tyranny; much to the contrary, in the New World, our Founders established a whole new order as a new foundation before new laws were then erected upon it. In the process, this abolished the tyranny of the Old World, those legal precedents that persecuted the people, replacing that with a positive New World government; one that was instituted of men, by men, and for men.
From forever beforehand, to the early ancient founders of
Ancient Greece, to our American Founding Fathers of today
Ancient Greece, to our American Founding Fathers of today
During the time of Socrates, there were three types of intellectuals: the Sophists, the Philosophers, and the All Knowers. As the Sophists argued rather eloquently on both sides of an argument for the purpose of proving that no such virtue as the truth existed, the philosophers argued that greater virtues could indeed be obtainable ed by the utilization of truth engines, inductive and deductive reasoning for example. In the case of the All Knowers, those blessed born of the ruling class, it was understood that they, being born royal, knew everything in a bullying sort of way or else there would be hell to pay.
1) What is "Recollection?"
The soul was a magical kind of essence that waked a person in the morning. It made the heart beat. It caused blood to squirt out of a body after it was severely injured. As each soul itself was born from another soul, so, every soul must have originated from one primary Soul. Was it any wonder that Socrates would ponder as to why one soul would be born to appear so different from another soul? For example, while a majestic king would grow up to sit upon a throne having most every function concerning his survival performed for him, a worthless prostitute would grow up to do tedious tasks such as walking everyday a good distance down to the banks of a river to retrieve buckets of water.
According to Socrates, whose mother served as a midwife to poor pregnant women, while every soul was once exactly the same knowing everything there was to know, they were born diverse into this world because of the trauma each had to suffer at birth. Each soul forget different amounts of knowledge depending on varying degrees of suffering. Therefore, if each of these traumatized souls were to be served by a kind of midwife philosopher such as himself, in time, they could then be taught to learn how to "recollect" that knowledge they once knew.
2) Not Law and Form, but Law versus Form
Very enlightened by Socrates, Plato the student advanced to pondering the existence of a formal, deeper Beauty in life as opposed to the more informal, shallower kinds of beauty that existed. He envisioned having beautiful laws as something greater than having laws themselves. He wondered if having a beautiful government was possible of the kinds which went beyond the corrupt ways they had always functioned in the past to working on the side of the people in making them happier - the idea of positive government! Again, using the king and the prostitute as an example here, as the high king would have lots of small informal problems challenging him everyday, the lowly prostitute would have one big formal Problem burdening her.
As her soul is distracted inwardly, this masks the fact that both the souls of the king and the prostitute are exactly equal.
3) The left and right dichotomy of the Golden Mean
Aristotle had good intentions in developing his political model "The Golden Mean." Very much distorted today from what Aristotle intended, he meant to use the model to depict the Greek people as left and right, conservative and liberal extremists in their views in hopes that they would be persuaded to think in a more centered, compromising, and moderate way.
To preserve the New World today, we need to abolish this Old World political spectrum that originated from Aristotle. In its place, we should now depict a new American political spectrum by the placement of a king, the same figure I used above as an example, enthroning him at one far end of this new model, either on the left or right side of it as such a designation is no longer going to apply in this case. As his inverse or perverse, we should next place the figure of a homeless prostitute on the other end. Next, while the term "Law" should be written under the enthroned king, the term "Form" should be written under the lowly figure of a homeless prostitute on the other far end of the scale.
In other words, as not a lot of thought goes into using either of the words today, the meanings of each become clearer when they are understood to be in conflict.
As the American people were once made to suffer from the "laws" of a tyrant who resided too great of a distance away to rule responsibly, our Founders responded by utilizing "form" to divorce us justly out from under the prior traditions of legal precedence (persecutions).
Again, metaphorically speaking, while in the Old World it was always deemed that commoners could only fix their roofs from the bottom up, our Founding Fathers used "form" to find a "best-principled" way of going about it. In the end, the American people were given the authority to fix their roofs from the top down.
We don't live in a legal nation, but a formal nation.
Indeed, as aforementioned, during the time of our Founding Fathers, both the legal precedence of law and the formal scientific method of Natural Law were processes blessed by the church. So, instead of utilizing the method of legal precedence, as was the standard practice of that time, when they set about creating a whole new nation; instead, our Founders utilized the alternate method of Natural Law. In this way, they found justification for divorcing us out from under the rule of tyranny. This action then justified them in proceeding with remarrying us to a more perfect Union.
Therefore, we don't live within a legal nation today as is the case with others living in nations of the Old World; but, we live in a formal nation of the New World. While it was justified for a person to be persecuted by legal precedence in the Old World, our Founders utilized the scientific method of Natural Law to abolish those sufferings. Indeed, our government today is a "more perfect Union," with the intentions here being a necessary tyranny, or a kind of government which today is ideally able to forever perfect itself.
So, love thy neighbor as thyself. Indeed, don't come out fighting with blind courage and hatred, but step forth into the light as a guard in faith and love. For they surely are trying to divide us today just as a wise pimp will at times deem it in the best interests of all to do the same with his prostitutes, attempting to manufacture our consent, in coaxing one side into attacking the other side. As has always been the case in the past, having succeeding in dividing us, tyranny will have established justification in attacking the whole body.
Being converts over to the side of the disadvantaged, as members who have determined to switch fighting the much more difficult and uphill battle against a leisure class, tyrants who have the benefit of the high ground, we can't afford any wasted motion. Indeed, as, on one hand, we are constantly shamed from finding the courage to face our fears, on the other, it is always going to be the Truth within that sets us free. So, in opening our eyes in faith today to see what is happening around us, while fewer and fewer of the able bodied among us are now being deployed by tyranny in their traditional, long established precedence of confusing, manipulating, exploiting, and humiliating the disadvantaged into submission, even fewer of the disadvantaged themselves are now being put to work gainfully employed.
In other words, concerning the endeavor of business at its very worst, always remember how it never takes more than a specialized corp of a few "pimps" to control, in calling tyranny for what it is, a multitude of many "whores."
One might wonder why all this evil is even happening. Well, firstly, our leaders have become drunkards intoxicated by the false powers of manipulation. As such, they rule with no conscience which makes them an enemy of God. Second, as has always been the case in history, the ultimate quest of every tyranny is to revert back to the pleasure principle: backsliding unto the state of constant drunkenness, unto the business of warmongering, and unto the reconstituting of those darkest of times back when many poor young ladies and small boys were made to be imprisoned within secret harems and forced to serve the sexual appetites of rich old men.
And what more might there be of this truth? Well, as aforementioned, when our Founders established our new *formal nation justifying it by the utilization of the scientific method of natural law, they managed a way of freeing the people by divorcing them from the prior legal precedence of the Old World. In succeeding, they drove a wedge between what, on the right side, has become a more perfect Union of today and, on the wrong side, what is now considered unacceptable organized crime committed in contempt of the people and the advancement of their Civil Purpose. In other words, prior to our Founding Fathers, both the royal government ruling rightfully over Americans and the insidious organized crime taking advantage of them were both one in the same.
Indeed, after all the pain, the effort, and the suffering endured by the disadvantaged in their eternal efforts not to destroy, but to control tyranny, our hard-fought-for nation was taken away during its infancy and reorganized into a false dichotomy of the two-party system, a process which, as noted above, was instituted out of greed from the prior Old World with little thought. This evil has so fully corrupted today that even illegal aliens crossing over our borders have been misled into supposing that the greatest aspect about these United States was never meant to be the abilities of its nameless and faceless, but of the government meant to serve them.
(As you now know this, so, consider yourselves held to a higher standard and to a greater penalty under the Light of the Truth.)
This kind of disillusionment would imply that most believe our Union isn't any more special of a Democratic Republic than are the other lessor nations residing outside of our borders, and that the monumental work performed in the past by our Founding Fathers was no more significant than any of the other supremacist kinds of nationalistic achievements by those founders in other supposed great nations. And, in turn, that our Union today isn't any different than any other collection of states that also think of themselves as the greatest in the world, and who also believe, for the same material reason many disillusioned in this nation do, that that greatness was achieved as a result of an elite class of leaders, of lawyers, of business executives, of doctors, of teachers, and so on.
Finally, this leads us full circle back to the two-party system as the big lie itself, to a time when things went astray for our Union. And what would arise from this darkened time in our history to challenge this wayward system that has so infected our Union and endangered our Civil-Purpose? Indeed, what process arose from the ashes to bring about a slow recovery lifting these United States back up as a shining beacon among the many other countless political systems that failed? Why, it was the advent of the American Movement! Indeed, the true advancement over the U.S. Constitution arose not as the two-party system, but as the American Movement! This phenomenal happening ushered forth from within the collective conscience of the American people originating fully outside of the two-party political system. The American Movement was also the same kind of solution as were the great achievements of the prior U.S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and The Declaration of Independence. Indeed, just as the above mentioned were never recognized by the British government, the American Movement process today has never been recognized by the official sanctioned state now ruling over us.
The premise of this American Movement should never alter in its focus as the process aids the nameless and faceless in the redeeming of our American souls, leads us to the revering of our Founding Fathers, and to the honoring of the laws and rights these great men assembled in fellowship to establish as lightning in a bottle for future posterity. Indeed, they handed down to us not only the legal documentation that is both the U.S. Constitution and the evocation of our Bill of Rights; but, they also passed down a formal order to us as well that we should all be cherishing today - the natural law they declared and each signed their names to within the formal document of the Declaration of Independence. But beyond even all this, the American Movement has always argued singularly in purpose for the virtue of limiting the size of government. Indeed, when achieving such a circumcised authority, the abilities of the nameless and the faceless shine forth for all the world to see as the one and only true greatness about these United States.
As the children of God today are being stumbled up misled into both hoping unto vain darkness and following after change for-the-sake-of-it, in total opposition, the greatest of benefits have always been and will always be derived from the most precious of alterations. Therefore, to advance ever so slightly beyond that which we have already received as our American inheritance, the people should now commence in prohibiting every kind of attorney from serving in any government within these United States, the district of Columbia, and territories.
From this day on, let every member of our government understand that they are no longer held to be just accountable, but they are now by this proclamation of sovereignty to be held to a greater standard and to a greater penalty under the Light of the Truth.
FD. (Uncle) Emanuel Watkins
**Formal Prime Minister of These United States &
First Attorney to Our Founding Fathers Under the Light of the Truth
*We don't have a legal nation, but a formal one. As every nation prior to ours was created by way of legal precedence, with these being long established traditions of persecutions, our Founding Fathers established a new nation based on the scientific method of National Law. The significance here was how the latter method they utilized, along with legal precedence, was also a process blessed by the church.
**This title of Formal Prime Minister is not to be a legal position created on the side of tyranny, by tyranny, for tyranny, but is now being raised on the side of the people, by the people, for the people.
martes, 3 de septiembre de 2013
Fallacy 1: A tyranny isn't constructed of only two parts of a master class ruling over a slave class, but three parts of what is stated above while both of these master and slave classes exert persecution collectively upon another class of untouchables even to the extent of causing them to be put to death. So, the minority isn't the slave class as is commonly believed, but is the unrepresented class of outcasts being persecuted by the two-party system.
Mary, the mother of Jesus, was an outcast. Joseph, the step-father of Jesus, was a convert over to the side of Mary. Jesus Himself was the "Son of Man."
Mary wasn't even considered a prostitute by tyranny, but was considered even less of a person as a prostitute represents the lowest form of a slave. Instead, Mary was a wretch.
Three classes of women in society:
Woman: This person is worthy enough to be slept with by a king.
Prostitute: This person is worthy enough to kneel before a king.
Wretch: This person is condemned to death by the king.
When king Herod committed infanticide by sentencing every first born to be put to death, he sentenced both Mary and Joseph to also being put to death by the people themselves, the parents of many first born.
Fallacy 1: Tyranny isn't made up of only two parts of a master class ruling over a slave class, but it is three parts made up of what has already been mentioned above while both the master and slave classes together as society exert persecution upon another class of outcast untouchables even to the extent of death. So, the minority who needs protection isn't the slave class, but the class that is being persecuted by this two-party system.
The idea of "Formal Knowledge" was introduced by the ancient philosopher Plato with the intentions of being conveyed many years later to posterity which includes the modern audiences of today. Indeed, he had to write and perform his dialogues deceptively expressing their meaning below the conscience of tyranny. Perhaps attempting to lead the Greeks away from religious folly, with this being the godhood their underlying economy was based upon (imagine trying to ban both Santa Claus and Christmas?), Plato described a huge gray area of virtue, high quality truths existing between the two far extremes of what was the unapproachable Truth, and what was no Truth, as the Sophists themselves believe no such virtue even existed. His "theory of the forms" helped further define terms philosophically by creating endless relationships between what were the lessor informal ideas relative to the greater formal ones, helping form points of views of the issues being discussed.
In other words, it wasn't that Plato disagreed with the point the eloquent Sophists were making regarding the lack of any truth; rather, he went a full step further by arguing it was possible to obtain a certain degree of virtue by utilizing such truth-engines as inductive, best-principled, and deductive reasoning. In the writing of The Declaration of Independence, our Founders utilized all of these methods.
Oddly, when they were given the chance, our rational Founders didn't abolish tyranny, but utilized it as a necessary tyranny in later forming "a more perfect Union." For, as they declared in our nation's collective oath of independence, we aren't here to be responsible and equal people primarily; rather, we are here for contentment's sake on an exponential scale. In other words, in order to keep smiles on their faces, the minds of children must be in a constant state of advancement. If those smiles ever disappeared veiling their face with darkness, then mothers would perceive immediately a problem. This is why, in the United States, such virtues as freedom and equality shouldn't be considered ends to a mean, but means-to-an-end prerequisites necessary for achieving an exponential contentment. This quest wasn't meant by our Founders to be a tremendous burden placed upon those in government, but, as the American Movement has determined over time, a call for them to limit the size of government.
Indeed, in the endeavor of fixing a leaky roof correctly, less government will always lead to the most efficient way of doing the job.
In separating the American people from the Old World, our Founders chose not to do it in the legal customary way; rather, they refrained from doing anything first in a formal way by utilizing the scientific method of Natural Law in divorcing the people justifiably from tyranny. In this way, they avoided committing promiscuity. Only after this divorce was signed by our Founders holding each to a higher standard and to a greater penalty under God's judgement did they then set about doing something - tending to the task of remarrying us to a "more perfect Union."
We Took a Step Backwards Adopting a Two - Party System
Following their establishing this new Union with the instituting of the U.S. Constitution, our Founding Fathers seemed rather perplexed by the rapid creation of a two-party political system soon after. It is almost as if after all the tremendous effort they had exerted shutting out tyranny, a gust of wind blew through at the last moment forcing the door ajar just enough to allow much of it back in. Unfortunately, as it is now sapping our nation of everything green and fruitful, this hybrid two-party system has grown into an out of control weed overshadowing every ray of hope from our Founder's age of Enlightenment. As many modern Americans would mislead us into believing, with most of these being lawyers, this contempt committed against the people's Civil Purpose wasn't a major set to worry about, no, not at all; but, rather, this quick sucker punch to the gut of the people was actually a good thing - bad tasting like medicine it might be - as a great advancement over the U.S. Constitution! Yet, as the two - party system functions today, it is stumbling up the children of God dividing them into many parts, instigating strife and inequality among their ranks, and benefiting parasitically off them by turning the whole inward against itself.
To recover from this present corruption, a pause is needed to mediate on the new order our Founders established under our feet. As, in the Old World, the law itself was the order of tyranny; much to the contrary, in the New World, our Founders established a whole new order as a new foundation before new laws were then erected upon it. In the process, this abolished the tyranny of the Old World, those legal precedents that persecuted the people, replacing that with a positive New World government; one that was instituted of men, by men, and for men.
According to Socrates, whose mother served as a midwife to poor pregnant women, while every soul was once exactly the same knowing everything there was to know, they were born diverse into this world because of the trauma each had to suffer at birth. Each soul forget different amounts of knowledge depending on varying degrees of suffering. Therefore, if each of these traumatized souls were to be served by a kind of midwife philosopher such as himself, in time, they could then be taught to learn how to "recollect" that knowledge they once knew.
2) Not Law and Form, but Law versus Form
Very enlightened by Socrates, Plato the student advanced to pondering the existence of a formal, deeper Beauty in life as opposed to the more informal, shallower kinds of beauty that existed. He envisioned having beautiful laws as something greater than having laws themselves. He wondered if having a beautiful government was possible of the kinds which went beyond the corrupt ways they had always functioned in the past to working on the side of the people in making them happier - the idea of positive government! Again, using the king and the prostitute as an example here, as the high king would have lots of small informal problems challenging him everyday, the lowly prostitute would have one big formal Problem burdening her.
As her soul is distracted inwardly, this masks the fact that both the souls of the king and the prostitute are exactly equal.
3) The left and right dichotomy of the Golden Mean
Aristotle had good intentions in developing his political model "The Golden Mean." Very much distorted today from what Aristotle intended, he meant to use the model to depict the Greek people as left and right, conservative and liberal extremists in their views in hopes that they would be persuaded to think in a more centered, compromising, and moderate way.
To preserve the New World today, we need to abolish this Old World political spectrum that originated from Aristotle. In its place, we should now depict a new American political spectrum by the placement of a king, the same figure I used above as an example, enthroning him at one far end of this new model, either on the left or right side of it as such a designation is no longer going to apply in this case. As his inverse or perverse, we should next place the figure of a homeless prostitute on the other end. Next, while the term "Law" should be written under the enthroned king, the term "Form" should be written under the lowly figure of a homeless prostitute on the other far end of the scale.
In other words, as not a lot of thought goes into using either of the words today, the meanings of each become clearer when they are understood to be in conflict.
As the American people were once made to suffer from the "laws" of a tyrant who resided too great of a distance away to rule responsibly, our Founders responded by utilizing "form" to divorce us justly out from under the prior traditions of legal precedence (persecutions).
Again, metaphorically speaking, while in the Old World it was always deemed that commoners could only fix their roofs from the bottom up, our Founding Fathers used "form" to find a "best-principled" way of going about it. In the end, the American people were given the authority to fix their roofs from the top down.
Indeed, as aforementioned, during the time of our Founding Fathers, both the legal precedence of law and the formal scientific method of Natural Law were processes blessed by the church. So, instead of utilizing the method of legal precedence, as was the standard practice of that time, when they set about creating a whole new nation; instead, our Founders utilized the alternate method of Natural Law. In this way, they found justification for divorcing us out from under the rule of tyranny. This action then justified them in proceeding with remarrying us to a more perfect Union.
Therefore, we don't live within a legal nation today as is the case with others living in nations of the Old World; but, we live in a formal nation of the New World. While it was justified for a person to be persecuted by legal precedence in the Old World, our Founders utilized the scientific method of Natural Law to abolish those sufferings. Indeed, our government today is a "more perfect Union," with the intentions here being a necessary tyranny, or a kind of government which today is ideally able to forever perfect itself.
So, love thy neighbor as thyself. Indeed, don't come out fighting with blind courage and hatred, but step forth into the light as a guard in faith and love. For they surely are trying to divide us today just as a wise pimp will at times deem it in the best interests of all to do the same with his prostitutes, attempting to manufacture our consent, in coaxing one side into attacking the other side. As has always been the case in the past, having succeeding in dividing us, tyranny will have established justification in attacking the whole body.
Being converts over to the side of the disadvantaged, as members who have determined to switch fighting the much more difficult and uphill battle against a leisure class, tyrants who have the benefit of the high ground, we can't afford any wasted motion. Indeed, as, on one hand, we are constantly shamed from finding the courage to face our fears, on the other, it is always going to be the Truth within that sets us free. So, in opening our eyes in faith today to see what is happening around us, while fewer and fewer of the able bodied among us are now being deployed by tyranny in their traditional, long established precedence of confusing, manipulating, exploiting, and humiliating the disadvantaged into submission, even fewer of the disadvantaged themselves are now being put to work gainfully employed.
In other words, concerning the endeavor of business at its very worst, always remember how it never takes more than a specialized corp of a few "pimps" to control, in calling tyranny for what it is, a multitude of many "whores."
One might wonder why all this evil is even happening. Well, firstly, our leaders have become drunkards intoxicated by the false powers of manipulation. As such, they rule with no conscience which makes them an enemy of God. Second, as has always been the case in history, the ultimate quest of every tyranny is to revert back to the pleasure principle: backsliding unto the state of constant drunkenness, unto the business of warmongering, and unto the reconstituting of those darkest of times back when many poor young ladies and small boys were made to be imprisoned within secret harems and forced to serve the sexual appetites of rich old men.
And what more might there be of this truth? Well, as aforementioned, when our Founders established our new *formal nation justifying it by the utilization of the scientific method of natural law, they managed a way of freeing the people by divorcing them from the prior legal precedence of the Old World. In succeeding, they drove a wedge between what, on the right side, has become a more perfect Union of today and, on the wrong side, what is now considered unacceptable organized crime committed in contempt of the people and the advancement of their Civil Purpose. In other words, prior to our Founding Fathers, both the royal government ruling rightfully over Americans and the insidious organized crime taking advantage of them were both one in the same.
Indeed, after all the pain, the effort, and the suffering endured by the disadvantaged in their eternal efforts not to destroy, but to control tyranny, our hard-fought-for nation was taken away during its infancy and reorganized into a false dichotomy of the two-party system, a process which, as noted above, was instituted out of greed from the prior Old World with little thought. This evil has so fully corrupted today that even illegal aliens crossing over our borders have been misled into supposing that the greatest aspect about these United States was never meant to be the abilities of its nameless and faceless, but of the government meant to serve them.
(As you now know this, so, consider yourselves held to a higher standard and to a greater penalty under the Light of the Truth.)
This kind of disillusionment would imply that most believe our Union isn't any more special of a Democratic Republic than are the other lessor nations residing outside of our borders, and that the monumental work performed in the past by our Founding Fathers was no more significant than any of the other supremacist kinds of nationalistic achievements by those founders in other supposed great nations. And, in turn, that our Union today isn't any different than any other collection of states that also think of themselves as the greatest in the world, and who also believe, for the same material reason many disillusioned in this nation do, that that greatness was achieved as a result of an elite class of leaders, of lawyers, of business executives, of doctors, of teachers, and so on.
Finally, this leads us full circle back to the two-party system as the big lie itself, to a time when things went astray for our Union. And what would arise from this darkened time in our history to challenge this wayward system that has so infected our Union and endangered our Civil-Purpose? Indeed, what process arose from the ashes to bring about a slow recovery lifting these United States back up as a shining beacon among the many other countless political systems that failed? Why, it was the advent of the American Movement! Indeed, the true advancement over the U.S. Constitution arose not as the two-party system, but as the American Movement! This phenomenal happening ushered forth from within the collective conscience of the American people originating fully outside of the two-party political system. The American Movement was also the same kind of solution as were the great achievements of the prior U.S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and The Declaration of Independence. Indeed, just as the above mentioned were never recognized by the British government, the American Movement process today has never been recognized by the official sanctioned state now ruling over us.
The premise of this American Movement should never alter in its focus as the process aids the nameless and faceless in the redeeming of our American souls, leads us to the revering of our Founding Fathers, and to the honoring of the laws and rights these great men assembled in fellowship to establish as lightning in a bottle for future posterity. Indeed, they handed down to us not only the legal documentation that is both the U.S. Constitution and the evocation of our Bill of Rights; but, they also passed down a formal order to us as well that we should all be cherishing today - the natural law they declared and each signed their names to within the formal document of the Declaration of Independence. But beyond even all this, the American Movement has always argued singularly in purpose for the virtue of limiting the size of government. Indeed, when achieving such a circumcised authority, the abilities of the nameless and the faceless shine forth for all the world to see as the one and only true greatness about these United States.
As the children of God today are being stumbled up misled into both hoping unto vain darkness and following after change for-the-sake-of-it, in total opposition, the greatest of benefits have always been and will always be derived from the most precious of alterations. Therefore, to advance ever so slightly beyond that which we have already received as our American inheritance, the people should now commence in prohibiting every kind of attorney from serving in any government within these United States, the district of Columbia, and territories.
From this day on, let every member of our government understand that they are no longer held to be just accountable, but they are now by this proclamation of sovereignty to be held to a greater standard and to a greater penalty under the Light of the Truth.
FD. (Uncle) Emanuel Watkins
**Formal Prime Minister of These United States &
First Attorney to Our Founding Fathers Under the Light of the Truth
*We don't have a legal nation, but a formal one. As every nation prior to ours was created by way of legal precedence, with these being long established traditions of persecutions, our Founding Fathers established a new nation based on the scientific method of National Law. The significance here was how the latter method they utilized, along with legal precedence, was also a process blessed by the church.
**This title of Formal Prime Minister is not to be a legal position created on the side of tyranny, by tyranny, for tyranny, but is now being raised on the side of the people, by the people, for the people.
Mary, the mother of Jesus, was an outcast. Joseph, the step-father of Jesus, was a convert over to the side of Mary. Jesus Himself was the "Son of Man."
Mary wasn't even considered a prostitute by tyranny, but was considered even less of a person as a prostitute represents the lowest form of a slave. Instead, Mary was a wretch.
Three classes of women in society:
Woman: This person is worthy enough to be slept with by a king.
Prostitute: This person is worthy enough to kneel before a king.
Wretch: This person is condemned to death by the king.
When king Herod committed infanticide by sentencing every first born to be put to death, he sentenced both Mary and Joseph to also being put to death by the people themselves, the parents of many first born.
Okay, think of mankind as a factory and the wretch as its highest quality product. Indeed, the ministry of Jesus increased immeasurably whenever a lowly wretch preached the gospel to Him. This is why it is important for government to take care of the nameless and faceless by narrowing their authority to operate under His commandment that "You give them something to eat!" Under the Light of the Truth, there will be no forgiveness for allowing the people to starve even in the most desolate of places.
As Mary herself was an untouchable wretch who was hated and despised by tyranny, Joseph was a convert who chose to serve by her side as a converted step-father.
Therefore, in the New World, water should be thicker than blood, just as, with great risk, Joseph served future generations unto eternity.
As Joseph was an ideal step father, Christ was the perfect Step Son. As a stepchild, Christ referred to Himself as the Son of Man. This means that He was the very least one born from among the most worthless. This is why Peter's response that Jesus was supreme declaring Him to be the Son of the Living God so surprised and caused Him to rejoice. As a Son of God would be considered an offspring who is greater than God Himself, in contrast, the Son of Man, a nameless and faceless classification in comparison, would be considered an offspring who is lessor than the most worthless.
Fallacy 2:
Metaphorically speaking, there was a time not so very long ago when tyranny would have us fixing our roofs inside the house from beneath the ceiling working from the bottom up. While it is possible, with lots of determination, to repair a leaky roof in such a fashion, unfortunately, a legal precedent of how not to go about doing something had become, over a lengthy period of time, a long standing tradition. So, doing nothing at times can actually be more productive than doing something. Complicating matters, again with this being part of the metaphor provided above, when their own roofs would start leaking, the rulers themselves issued legal decrees with these being "fiat" type make-it-so commandments to have whole new houses built for them. So, for a very long time, the philosophical notion of best-principled "form" of "what is a leaky roof" and "what is the best way to fix it" never had to be considered. These types of persecutions happened in a quite casual fashion as no alternate points of view ever existed challenging them.Fallacy 1: Tyranny isn't made up of only two parts of a master class ruling over a slave class, but it is three parts made up of what has already been mentioned above while both the master and slave classes together as society exert persecution upon another class of outcast untouchables even to the extent of death. So, the minority who needs protection isn't the slave class, but the class that is being persecuted by this two-party system.
The idea of "Formal Knowledge" was introduced by the ancient philosopher Plato with the intentions of being conveyed many years later to posterity which includes the modern audiences of today. Indeed, he had to write and perform his dialogues deceptively expressing their meaning below the conscience of tyranny. Perhaps attempting to lead the Greeks away from religious folly, with this being the godhood their underlying economy was based upon (imagine trying to ban both Santa Claus and Christmas?), Plato described a huge gray area of virtue, high quality truths existing between the two far extremes of what was the unapproachable Truth, and what was no Truth, as the Sophists themselves believe no such virtue even existed. His "theory of the forms" helped further define terms philosophically by creating endless relationships between what were the lessor informal ideas relative to the greater formal ones, helping form points of views of the issues being discussed.
In other words, it wasn't that Plato disagreed with the point the eloquent Sophists were making regarding the lack of any truth; rather, he went a full step further by arguing it was possible to obtain a certain degree of virtue by utilizing such truth-engines as inductive, best-principled, and deductive reasoning. In the writing of The Declaration of Independence, our Founders utilized all of these methods.
Oddly, when they were given the chance, our rational Founders didn't abolish tyranny, but utilized it as a necessary tyranny in later forming "a more perfect Union." For, as they declared in our nation's collective oath of independence, we aren't here to be responsible and equal people primarily; rather, we are here for contentment's sake on an exponential scale. In other words, in order to keep smiles on their faces, the minds of children must be in a constant state of advancement. If those smiles ever disappeared veiling their face with darkness, then mothers would perceive immediately a problem. This is why, in the United States, such virtues as freedom and equality shouldn't be considered ends to a mean, but means-to-an-end prerequisites necessary for achieving an exponential contentment. This quest wasn't meant by our Founders to be a tremendous burden placed upon those in government, but, as the American Movement has determined over time, a call for them to limit the size of government.
Indeed, in the endeavor of fixing a leaky roof correctly, less government will always lead to the most efficient way of doing the job.
In separating the American people from the Old World, our Founders chose not to do it in the legal customary way; rather, they refrained from doing anything first in a formal way by utilizing the scientific method of Natural Law in divorcing the people justifiably from tyranny. In this way, they avoided committing promiscuity. Only after this divorce was signed by our Founders holding each to a higher standard and to a greater penalty under God's judgement did they then set about doing something - tending to the task of remarrying us to a "more perfect Union."
We Took a Step Backwards Adopting a Two - Party System
Following their establishing this new Union with the instituting of the U.S. Constitution, our Founding Fathers seemed rather perplexed by the rapid creation of a two-party political system soon after. It is almost as if after all the tremendous effort they had exerted shutting out tyranny, a gust of wind blew through at the last moment forcing the door ajar just enough to allow much of it back in. Unfortunately, as it is now sapping our nation of everything green and fruitful, this hybrid two-party system has grown into an out of control weed overshadowing every ray of hope from our Founder's age of Enlightenment. As many modern Americans would mislead us into believing, with most of these being lawyers, this contempt committed against the people's Civil Purpose wasn't a major set to worry about, no, not at all; but, rather, this quick sucker punch to the gut of the people was actually a good thing - bad tasting like medicine it might be - as a great advancement over the U.S. Constitution! Yet, as the two - party system functions today, it is stumbling up the children of God dividing them into many parts, instigating strife and inequality among their ranks, and benefiting parasitically off them by turning the whole inward against itself.
To recover from this present corruption, a pause is needed to mediate on the new order our Founders established under our feet. As, in the Old World, the law itself was the order of tyranny; much to the contrary, in the New World, our Founders established a whole new order as a new foundation before new laws were then erected upon it. In the process, this abolished the tyranny of the Old World, those legal precedents that persecuted the people, replacing that with a positive New World government; one that was instituted of men, by men, and for men.
From forever beforehand, to the early ancient founders of
Ancient Greece, to our American Founding Fathers of today
Ancient Greece, to our American Founding Fathers of today
During the time of Socrates, there were three types of intellectuals: the Sophists, the Philosophers, and the All Knowers. As the Sophists argued rather eloquently on both sides of an argument for the purpose of proving that no such virtue as the truth existed, the philosophers argued that greater virtues could indeed be obtainable ed by the utilization of truth engines, inductive and deductive reasoning for example. In the case of the All Knowers, those blessed born of the ruling class, it was understood that they, being born royal, knew everything in a bullying sort of way or else there would be hell to pay.
1) What is "Recollection?"
The soul was a magical kind of essence that waked a person in the morning. It made the heart beat. It caused blood to squirt out of a body after it was severely injured. As each soul itself was born from another soul, so, every soul must have originated from one primary Soul. Was it any wonder that Socrates would ponder as to why one soul would be born to appear so different from another soul? For example, while a majestic king would grow up to sit upon a throne having most every function concerning his survival performed for him, a worthless prostitute would grow up to do tedious tasks such as walking everyday a good distance down to the banks of a river to retrieve buckets of water.
According to Socrates, whose mother served as a midwife to poor pregnant women, while every soul was once exactly the same knowing everything there was to know, they were born diverse into this world because of the trauma each had to suffer at birth. Each soul forget different amounts of knowledge depending on varying degrees of suffering. Therefore, if each of these traumatized souls were to be served by a kind of midwife philosopher such as himself, in time, they could then be taught to learn how to "recollect" that knowledge they once knew.
2) Not Law and Form, but Law versus Form
Very enlightened by Socrates, Plato the student advanced to pondering the existence of a formal, deeper Beauty in life as opposed to the more informal, shallower kinds of beauty that existed. He envisioned having beautiful laws as something greater than having laws themselves. He wondered if having a beautiful government was possible of the kinds which went beyond the corrupt ways they had always functioned in the past to working on the side of the people in making them happier - the idea of positive government! Again, using the king and the prostitute as an example here, as the high king would have lots of small informal problems challenging him everyday, the lowly prostitute would have one big formal Problem burdening her.
As her soul is distracted inwardly, this masks the fact that both the souls of the king and the prostitute are exactly equal.
3) The left and right dichotomy of the Golden Mean
Aristotle had good intentions in developing his political model "The Golden Mean." Very much distorted today from what Aristotle intended, he meant to use the model to depict the Greek people as left and right, conservative and liberal extremists in their views in hopes that they would be persuaded to think in a more centered, compromising, and moderate way.
To preserve the New World today, we need to abolish this Old World political spectrum that originated from Aristotle. In its place, we should now depict a new American political spectrum by the placement of a king, the same figure I used above as an example, enthroning him at one far end of this new model, either on the left or right side of it as such a designation is no longer going to apply in this case. As his inverse or perverse, we should next place the figure of a homeless prostitute on the other end. Next, while the term "Law" should be written under the enthroned king, the term "Form" should be written under the lowly figure of a homeless prostitute on the other far end of the scale.
In other words, as not a lot of thought goes into using either of the words today, the meanings of each become clearer when they are understood to be in conflict.
As the American people were once made to suffer from the "laws" of a tyrant who resided too great of a distance away to rule responsibly, our Founders responded by utilizing "form" to divorce us justly out from under the prior traditions of legal precedence (persecutions).
Again, metaphorically speaking, while in the Old World it was always deemed that commoners could only fix their roofs from the bottom up, our Founding Fathers used "form" to find a "best-principled" way of going about it. In the end, the American people were given the authority to fix their roofs from the top down.
We don't live in a legal nation, but a formal nation.
Indeed, as aforementioned, during the time of our Founding Fathers, both the legal precedence of law and the formal scientific method of Natural Law were processes blessed by the church. So, instead of utilizing the method of legal precedence, as was the standard practice of that time, when they set about creating a whole new nation; instead, our Founders utilized the alternate method of Natural Law. In this way, they found justification for divorcing us out from under the rule of tyranny. This action then justified them in proceeding with remarrying us to a more perfect Union.
Therefore, we don't live within a legal nation today as is the case with others living in nations of the Old World; but, we live in a formal nation of the New World. While it was justified for a person to be persecuted by legal precedence in the Old World, our Founders utilized the scientific method of Natural Law to abolish those sufferings. Indeed, our government today is a "more perfect Union," with the intentions here being a necessary tyranny, or a kind of government which today is ideally able to forever perfect itself.
So, love thy neighbor as thyself. Indeed, don't come out fighting with blind courage and hatred, but step forth into the light as a guard in faith and love. For they surely are trying to divide us today just as a wise pimp will at times deem it in the best interests of all to do the same with his prostitutes, attempting to manufacture our consent, in coaxing one side into attacking the other side. As has always been the case in the past, having succeeding in dividing us, tyranny will have established justification in attacking the whole body.
Being converts over to the side of the disadvantaged, as members who have determined to switch fighting the much more difficult and uphill battle against a leisure class, tyrants who have the benefit of the high ground, we can't afford any wasted motion. Indeed, as, on one hand, we are constantly shamed from finding the courage to face our fears, on the other, it is always going to be the Truth within that sets us free. So, in opening our eyes in faith today to see what is happening around us, while fewer and fewer of the able bodied among us are now being deployed by tyranny in their traditional, long established precedence of confusing, manipulating, exploiting, and humiliating the disadvantaged into submission, even fewer of the disadvantaged themselves are now being put to work gainfully employed.
In other words, concerning the endeavor of business at its very worst, always remember how it never takes more than a specialized corp of a few "pimps" to control, in calling tyranny for what it is, a multitude of many "whores."
One might wonder why all this evil is even happening. Well, firstly, our leaders have become drunkards intoxicated by the false powers of manipulation. As such, they rule with no conscience which makes them an enemy of God. Second, as has always been the case in history, the ultimate quest of every tyranny is to revert back to the pleasure principle: backsliding unto the state of constant drunkenness, unto the business of warmongering, and unto the reconstituting of those darkest of times back when many poor young ladies and small boys were made to be imprisoned within secret harems and forced to serve the sexual appetites of rich old men.
And what more might there be of this truth? Well, as aforementioned, when our Founders established our new *formal nation justifying it by the utilization of the scientific method of natural law, they managed a way of freeing the people by divorcing them from the prior legal precedence of the Old World. In succeeding, they drove a wedge between what, on the right side, has become a more perfect Union of today and, on the wrong side, what is now considered unacceptable organized crime committed in contempt of the people and the advancement of their Civil Purpose. In other words, prior to our Founding Fathers, both the royal government ruling rightfully over Americans and the insidious organized crime taking advantage of them were both one in the same.
Indeed, after all the pain, the effort, and the suffering endured by the disadvantaged in their eternal efforts not to destroy, but to control tyranny, our hard-fought-for nation was taken away during its infancy and reorganized into a false dichotomy of the two-party system, a process which, as noted above, was instituted out of greed from the prior Old World with little thought. This evil has so fully corrupted today that even illegal aliens crossing over our borders have been misled into supposing that the greatest aspect about these United States was never meant to be the abilities of its nameless and faceless, but of the government meant to serve them.
(As you now know this, so, consider yourselves held to a higher standard and to a greater penalty under the Light of the Truth.)
This kind of disillusionment would imply that most believe our Union isn't any more special of a Democratic Republic than are the other lessor nations residing outside of our borders, and that the monumental work performed in the past by our Founding Fathers was no more significant than any of the other supremacist kinds of nationalistic achievements by those founders in other supposed great nations. And, in turn, that our Union today isn't any different than any other collection of states that also think of themselves as the greatest in the world, and who also believe, for the same material reason many disillusioned in this nation do, that that greatness was achieved as a result of an elite class of leaders, of lawyers, of business executives, of doctors, of teachers, and so on.
Finally, this leads us full circle back to the two-party system as the big lie itself, to a time when things went astray for our Union. And what would arise from this darkened time in our history to challenge this wayward system that has so infected our Union and endangered our Civil-Purpose? Indeed, what process arose from the ashes to bring about a slow recovery lifting these United States back up as a shining beacon among the many other countless political systems that failed? Why, it was the advent of the American Movement! Indeed, the true advancement over the U.S. Constitution arose not as the two-party system, but as the American Movement! This phenomenal happening ushered forth from within the collective conscience of the American people originating fully outside of the two-party political system. The American Movement was also the same kind of solution as were the great achievements of the prior U.S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and The Declaration of Independence. Indeed, just as the above mentioned were never recognized by the British government, the American Movement process today has never been recognized by the official sanctioned state now ruling over us.
The premise of this American Movement should never alter in its focus as the process aids the nameless and faceless in the redeeming of our American souls, leads us to the revering of our Founding Fathers, and to the honoring of the laws and rights these great men assembled in fellowship to establish as lightning in a bottle for future posterity. Indeed, they handed down to us not only the legal documentation that is both the U.S. Constitution and the evocation of our Bill of Rights; but, they also passed down a formal order to us as well that we should all be cherishing today - the natural law they declared and each signed their names to within the formal document of the Declaration of Independence. But beyond even all this, the American Movement has always argued singularly in purpose for the virtue of limiting the size of government. Indeed, when achieving such a circumcised authority, the abilities of the nameless and the faceless shine forth for all the world to see as the one and only true greatness about these United States.
As the children of God today are being stumbled up misled into both hoping unto vain darkness and following after change for-the-sake-of-it, in total opposition, the greatest of benefits have always been and will always be derived from the most precious of alterations. Therefore, to advance ever so slightly beyond that which we have already received as our American inheritance, the people should now commence in prohibiting every kind of attorney from serving in any government within these United States, the district of Columbia, and territories.
From this day on, let every member of our government understand that they are no longer held to be just accountable, but they are now by this proclamation of sovereignty to be held to a greater standard and to a greater penalty under the Light of the Truth.
FD. (Uncle) Emanuel Watkins
**Formal Prime Minister of These United States &
First Attorney to Our Founding Fathers Under the Light of the Truth
*We don't have a legal nation, but a formal one. As every nation prior to ours was created by way of legal precedence, with these being long established traditions of persecutions, our Founding Fathers established a new nation based on the scientific method of National Law. The significance here was how the latter method they utilized, along with legal precedence, was also a process blessed by the church.
**This title of Formal Prime Minister is not to be a legal position created on the side of tyranny, by tyranny, for tyranny, but is now being raised on the side of the people, by the people, for the people.
Suscribirse a:
Entradas (Atom)