What is the equation (∞2+∞0)1/2 = 1?

What is (∞2+∞0)1/2 = 1

Natural Law:  Every phenomenon and infinite possibility exists within the brackets of the equation ( ∞2+ ∞0)1/2 = 1. 

With the variable 2 being unapproachable (∞, infinite) and equal to a sum of "numbers,"

and the variable 0 also being unapproachable ( ∞, infinite) and equal to a sum of "no numbers,"

and 1/2 oscillating the two variables to a sum of 1.  

While math possesses virtuous characteristics concerning what is true, it is a rational process only half the time.  For instance, as the variable 2 is a rational number, the variable 0 is an irrational number - as it isn't equal to any number whatsoever.  So, the sum of 1 (universe) is derived from an oscillation of "all numbers" in one instant and then of "no numbers" the next.

 

A Letter Written Of, By, and For the People to the Most Supreme of All Courts

Part I.

The Rule of Manifestation

While lessor courts deal in matters concerning the law, the one that is the most supreme would make judgments by manifestation.  This type of authority would rule by illuminating light unto the conscience.  In scripture, rather than they be enlightened in this way, as they were intoxicated by the law, the twelve disciples could not perceive His Light and, as a result, expressed very little concern in the way of fear and remorse.  In contrast to them, the very least of wretches who sought after Him perceived this light and, in doing so, acted in fear and trembling.  Indeed, while it was ordered that He be hunted and killed, the law could never find Him.  In contrast, the aforementioned wretches sought after His Light and, out of concern for others, found Him!  Yet, as it is written in the four gospels, the Lord did not judge these lowest of the worthless; but, to the contrary, it was a cruel and harsh law within His disciples who judged and condemned them.  It is written clearly that instead of these wretches being rebuked by Him, His Glory was charmed to the extent of marveling at their persistence.

As our Lord has immeasurable tolerance for these very least who interfere with His Holy ministry, therefore, the people too are empowered by natural right to intervene into the affairs of lessor governments.  Any attempt to manipulate these natural rights away from the people shall be judged contempt and considered to be the most serious of offenses tantamount to stumbling up the children of God.

As all should know better, let us now consider ourselves held to a higher reward and to a greater penalty under the Light of Truth.

Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins

Part II. 

The Truest of Dichotomies

Left or Right of Middle

To the Left or Right of Middle



< Moderate >

Middle 

I. The One True Dichotomy

When we focus our attention upon what is the truest of dichotomies, many deceptive faulty-dichotomies become exposed.  This most virtuous political spectrum, of which a model of it is depicted above, slices reality into an eternal ongoing conflict between that of a formal king at one extreme end of a scale and of an informal wretch at the other extreme end of it.        

II.  They are not opposite, but inverse

At one end of the model, either towards the left or right side of it, is a blessed king.  Meanwhile, towards the other side, also either the left or right side, is positioned a cursed wretch as his exact inverse.  Therefore, as the king is rational knowing much, the wretch on the other side is irrational knowing little. As the king benefits by owning every piece of property and all possessions upon that property; meanwhile, the wretch is just the inverse owning nothing.  As he is sovereign, so she is a criminal trespasser.  As he possesses immunity in all matters, she is condemned.  As the wretch is at a disadvantaged having to resort to learning how to prostitute herself, the king is privileged having received ample amounts of training in how to prostitute others.

III.  Being inverse, the two sides of this political spectrum are a perversity to each other.

Moreover, while the worst decisions made by the king are accepted as wisdom, so the best decisions made by the wretch are considered foolish.  Pertaining to those remaining people living between the two extremes within what is the moderate middle of the spectrum, there are at least three types of rational thought.  These three are expressed as the sophist, the philosopher, and the bully.

The eloquent sophist is rational because he or she are masters in the art of oratory debate.  They perform their skill in front of audiences entertaining them concerning the question of the truth and demonstrations of how such a virtue is impossible to know.  He or she substantiates this conclusion by arguing both sides of a topic spending half their time presenting one point of view and afterwards, perhaps after taking a break, spending the other half presenting the opposing point of view.  Granted, as the ultimate Truth is an infinite measure of all of eternity and as such a place would be unapproachable to us, the rational argument made by the sophist does have some validity.
   
The second type of people within the moderate middle are the philosophers.  Like the sophists, they too are rational.  While acknowledging the validity of the sophist argument, by utilizing the skills of reading and writing, they venture even further by training their minds in the discipline of truth engines.  Indeed, these philosophers develop rational processes in which raw informal knowledge is collected and inputted for the purpose of reducing a large quantity of data down to smaller more formal qualitative outputs of truth.  So, while it is a fact that one can't arrive at an absolute Truth by the use of truth engines -- which is the argument of the sophist, it is quite possible for one to arrive at quality best-principled statements.  In other words, because the paths created by these truth engines travel in a general direction of the overall Truth, they possess virtue.

The third type of rational people are the bullies.  They are deemed rational by the position of their births.  To put it simply, the bullies are sovereign by inheritance.  Society either chooses to respect the rationale of these bullies or else there will be consequences.  Any disagreement gets overpowered quickly by them.
 
Of the three types of rational people depicted above, the bullies have always remained somewhat of a mystery.  Indeed, because they have always been feared by the masses, the many writers and orators of the past have had to avoid making direct references to them.   A paradox exists involving these bullies.  While on one hand we need to be practical utilizing laws in the government as a necessary tyranny, on the other it is impossible to control ourselves by pointless changes brought about by the endless legislation of laws.  However, rather than choose a platonic best-principled middle ground between these two extremes, we can't help but be the animals we are after all invariably resigning ourselves to a state of perpetual abuse.  In turn, by utilizing the false powers of manipulation, the alphas are able to maintain society in a chronic state of irrationality.    
   
As the manipulative false powers are expressed as faulty dichotomies, the faulty dichotomies themselves are disinformation.  To understand the difference between misinformation and disinformation, while misinformation are lies perpetuated by the state for reasons deemed to be in the best interest of the people, disinformation is information given justifying those lies told.  In other words, while misinformation deals with the deception of others, disinformation deals more with the deceiving of oneself.  While misinformation is deceit caused by the deliberate propagation of untruths, disinformation is self-deception caused by the over indulging in the fraudulent dichotomies.  These fraudulent dichotomies are intoxicating.  Indeed, they work to poison both the bullies in charge of the state and those under their rule.  This is why a bully can't see his or her conscience even when light has been shown unto them.

The different kinds of fraudulent dichotomies are most oftentimes expressed as conflicts between male and female. Understand, in the narrowed dichotomy expressed at the beginning of this essay, the ongoing conflict depicted is not between a male and a female.  Indeed, a man can live wretched just as a woman can rule over her children as a king.  Other than male versus female, some of the other fraudulent dichotomies to be wary of are white versus black, youth against the elderly, poor competing economically with the rich, and on and on endlessly.  Simply put, a house of cards has been manufactured upon a foundation of fraudulent dichotomies.  Yet, the bullies feel justified today in spreading misinformation among the people because disinformation has deceive them into believing that they will avoid one day having to stand under the Light of Truth.  Yet, these false powers of manipulation do stumble up the people by distracting their focus away from the one truest of dichotomies.  Again, the model dichotomy depicted above is the truest of them all as it depicts what has long been an eternal conflict between a king of the highest rank and a wretch of the lowest.

IV.  The Fleeing Elite are made up of the royal family and those who support them

To enjoy an unfair advantage within the marketplace, the fleeing elites utilize their political influence to avoid definition.  Indeed, the better defined a social function is, the more efficient and economical it becomes to society.  Much to their benefit, as the king and his or her supporting tyranny have managed to avoid having their roles defined clearly in society, so has the character of the lowly wretch remained a mystery as well.  This is because society has always sliced reality into just two classifications of a master-class and a slave-class.  However, upon closer examination, reality reveals the existence of a third class.  These three classes as a whole are a class of masters, a class of slaves, and a class of outcasts.  While the master class has long exploited the slave class, in turn, those two together as a society have exploited yet another class of outcast.   As a master class props up a king, so, at the other inverse side, a slave class expels an outcast wretch from society.

V.  As the king is the master at one end of the political spectrum, the wretch is the outcast at the other.

Metaphorically, the wretch is the very least rated among three types of prostituted.  These three types are a master wife, a slave commoner, and an outcast wretch.  Among these three, the highest rated is the master wife.  Being highly valued, she is a woman who is rated worthy enough to sleep with the king.  The second highest rated of these prostitutes is the slave commoner.  While she is not rated worthy enough to sleep in the bed of the king, her life will be spared by him as long as she is willing to kneel in his presence.  Finally, the lowest rated of the prostituted is the wretch.  She has been outcast by the king and from his kingdom even to the extent that she will be killed on sight.

Compared to the wretch, the king is divided into two types. These two are a great Son-of-God and a least Son-of-man.  As he would be born of a king, a Son of God is renowned and intimately known possessing a namesake.  The fearful people honor a Son of God treating his princely social status as greater in status than even his own father the king.  In contrast to a Son of God, a Son of man is a stranger.  As a Son of God is the offspring of a king, A son of man is the offspring of a wretch.  In contrast to how a Son of God is praised, a son of man is shown disdain and treated less than his nameless and faceless parents.   Quite paradoxical, as the term "God" denotes an intimate classification, the term "man" is impersonal.  As a person's face represents their authority, so a king's face is majestic.  In contrast, a wretch has no face.  As it is with dogs, a wretch is recognized by her behind.  Indeed, dogs do recognize each other by sniffing their behinds.  However, as she isn't even valued for her behind, a wretch is rated even less than a dog.

VI.  The Wretch's Warning

The voice of the most worthless wretch might warn us to neither speak in fear nor to act in a threatening manner.  For, as she knows only too well, such unwise behavior will only serve in getting us a beating on every level of society.  Indeed, a bully is like a lion devouring what he fears and consuming what is a threat to his domain.  Like the wretch, except for our inborn natural rights, we should be silent possessing little else.  As there exists no such right as a legal one, at the same time, such concocted rights dilute the power of our in-born natural rights.

In the end, the ultimate power is in the Truth.  In establishing the truest of dichotomies above all others, we can slice reality forming a distinction between what is in the best interest of the king and what is the Civil Purpose of the wretch and her prerequisite right to advance them on a level which is exponential.    

VII.  Rejecting the legislation of effectual change just for the sake of effectual change
 
To ordain a whole new order, our Founding Fathers reduced and refined towards a golden natural law.  This formal act of theirs was in opposition to the traditional way of ordainment which, based on the legal precedence of the Old World, required that they crown a new king.  Indeed, in submitting to such a rule, our Founders could have lived the life of Lords.  After all, under the laws of Old World legal precedence, they had every justification in their doing so as conquerors.  Instead, they chose to function intimately among the people -- of, by, and for as Abraham Lincoln once so elegantly described this action of theirs -- for the purpose of addressing any future threat from tyrants and tyrannies.  As they stood reverent upon a mighty foundation constructed by their own ancestors, they made a precious alteration to it.  As they did so, they stood under threat of penalty from his judgment being mindful of His possible divine providence moving against them.  Furthermore, they had both, of their own free wills, signed their names against the rightful rule of a king and taken a sacred oath against his best interest.  Indeed, rather than they cower and continue to perpetuate the same old tyranny, they took a thoughtful step forward narrowing with the declaration that:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

VIII.  The greatest of benefits are derived from the most precious of alterations.  

Indeed, all our ancestors grieved mightily braving the same great darkness before perishing for our sake.  While we can revere them all today by focusing a gentle eye upon the one truest of dichotomies; so, we should be wary with our other more subtle eye keeping watchful vigilance for the faulty dichotomies.  As the vain legislation of effectual change continues to scatter our inheritance, desperation has led our hearts to seeking to salvage what we most treasure.  As the same is true among every soul, concerning the valuable documents that we inherited from our Founders, so we should never make an alternation beyond what is deemed most crucial.   As already stated, our Founding Fathers once acted out a little masterpiece on our behalf.  During their performance, they were burdened to the extent of throwing off their rightful statuses as high ranking gentlemen in British Society.  Even beyond that, in order to divorce us from tyranny, they were willing to suffer the impoverished consequences caused by fighting a war and, thus, cutting our new nation from the Old World economy.  As our desperate Founders narrowed thoughtfully to what they once most treasured, so do We the People today reject every faulty dichotomy for the truest of one.

As our Founders once declared, so we also declare that all men are born equal -- whether they be the highest of kings or the lowest of wretches -- with each possessing in their beings the same exact business agenda for Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.

A Letter Written Of, By, and For the People to The Most Supreme of All Courts

Preface

We have already undertaken actions in divorcing ourselves from tyranny by the writing of a Declaration of Independence, by the instituting of a new government of laws within a Constitution, and by the indelible eternal engraving of certain unalienable Natural Rights upon every soul.  Furthermore, we have already tested our new Union by the fighting of a revolutionary war, by the waging of a civil conflict, and by the people's participation in two global events against tyranny.  And, finally, we have already returned as a people by way of the American Movement process in observance and reverence of these many milestones in our nation's history.  For us to forever repeat over and over the same old history again and again would be vain.  Therefore, we must move forward.

However, our next step shouldn't be like a spontaneous wind tossed about by just any kind of change for the sake of it; rather, only the most precious of alterations should be made by us upon that which we already possess as our inheritance.  At long last, those cruel laws of Old World legal precedence need to be overcome.  To lead us towards a greater Civil Purpose today -- towards a greater Enlightenment -- our nation needs to call upon a new type of leader.  Indeed, we need a new kind of leadership to challenge the legal profession of bullies now possessing power over us.  Ultimately, this necessary evil of lawyers sitting upon the backs of the people need to be locked up and kept isolated within the court system.  We can achieve this task by weeding them out of the process of government altogether.

In order to narrow down to what is both crucial and existential concerning the people's Civil Purpose, I have left some of my writings behind in the prior posts.  For instance, in support of my overall argument, I developed a new foundation of science by reducing to the equation (2+0) 1/2 = 1.  

Let the variables of 2 and 0 equal all things with the greatest of what there is less than two and the least of what there is greater than 0.  No thing is equal to the variables 2 and 0 as they are unapproachable.  The variable of 1/2 following the set works to oscillate the two variables to a sum which is equal to 1 (universe).

Similarly to this New World science, in order to challenge the deception caused by the utilization of classic essays, I created a new writing method called a "writ."  Simply put, a writ shrinks the world's audience down to within a single person. This person is a wretch who, having been outcast, is being made to survive on the street.  The message of a writ should be written not for our convenience, but for the wretch's.  So, only one side on the front page should be written upon.  The authors of writs should think of themselves as warriors, as if going into battle, writing while they are suffering outside within the harshest of conditions in elements of both hot and cold and in the same dangerous situations that the wretch would suffer. The purpose for writing writs is to mold a new form of leadership for our New World.    

While the position of prime minister should be created of, by, and for the people, those in power today have abandoned any notion of an advancing Civil Purpose for the best interests of powerful individuals within a few parasitic groups.  In order to fend off this menacing threat to our nation, I have made the bold decision to take on the title of prime minister myself.  In other words, our Founders never meant for those in government to be officials.  After all, when they created a more perfect Union, our Founders acted as if they were mere commoners sitting out in the congregation with us -- as We the people!

If I am a friend, I am just a friend.  However, if, as a bully, I make a choice of my own free will to convert to your side and be your friend, then I will become your friend forever.

Part I.

The Rule of Manifestation

While lessor courts deal in matters concerning the rule of law, the one that is the most Supreme would make judgments by manifestation.  This manifestation would rule by illuminating a gentle light unto the conscience.  In scripture, rather than they be enlightened by this light, as they were intoxicated by the law, the twelve disciples could not see their own consciences and, as a result, expressed very little concern in the way of fear and remorse.  In contrast to them, the very least of wretches who sought after His light did so in fear and trembling.  Indeed, while the law had ordered Him to be hunted down and killed, they never found Him.  In contrast, the aforementioned wretches sought after and found Him!  Yet, as it is written in the four gospels, the gentle Light of our Lord did not judge these lowest of the most worthless; but, to the contrary, it was the law within His disciples who judged and condemned them.  It is clearly written that instead of Him rebuking them, His Glory was charmed to the extent of marveling at their persistence.

As our Lord has immeasurable tolerance for wretches who interfere with His Holy ministry, therefore, the people are empowered by natural right to intervene into the affairs of lessor governments.  Any attempt to manipulate these natural rights away from the people shall be judged contempt and considered to be the most serious of offenses tantamount to stumbling up the children of God!

As all should now know better, let us consider ourselves held to a higher reward and to a greater penalty under the Light of Truth.

Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins

Part II. 

The Truest of Dichotomies

Left or Right of Middle

To the Left or Right of Middle



< Moderate >

Middle 

The Following is Written in the Form of an Eight Legged Chinese Essay

Part I. The One True Dichotomy

When we focus our attention upon what is the truest of dichotomies, many deceptive faulty-dichotomies are exposed.  This most virtuous of political models depicts an eternal conflict going on between a formal king on one extreme end of the scale and an informal wretch at the other extreme end of it.        

II.  They are not opposite, but inverse

On one end of the model, either towards the left or the right, is a blessed king.  Meanwhile, on the other side, also either the left or the right side, is positioned a cursed wretch as his exact inverse.  Therefore, as the king is rational knowing much, the wretch on the other side will be irrational knowing little. As the king benefits by owning every piece of property and all possessions upon that property; meanwhile, the wretch owns nothing.  As he is sovereign, she is a criminal trespasser.  As he possesses immunity in all matters, she is condemned.  As the wretch is at a disadvantaged having to resort to learning how to prostitute herself, the king is privileged having received ample amounts of training in how to prostitute others.

III.  Being inverse, the two sides of this political spectrum are perverse to each other.

Moreover, while the worst decisions made by the king are accepted as wisdom, so the best decisions made by the wretch are considered foolish.  Pertaining to the remaining people living between the two within the moderate middle, there are at least three types of rational thought.  These three are expressed as the sophist, the philosopher, and the bully.

The eloquent sophist is rational because he or she is skilled in the art of oratory debate.  They perform in front of audiences entertaining them concerning the question of the truth and demonstrations of how such a virtue is impossible to know.  He or she substantiates this conclusion by arguing both sides of a topic spending half their time presenting one point of view and afterwards, perhaps after taking a break, spending the other half presenting the opposing point of view.  Granted, as the ultimate Truth is an infinite measure of all of eternity and as such a place would be unapproachable to us, the rational argument made by the sophist does have validity.
   
The second type of rational people are the philosophers.  While acknowledging the validity of the sophist argument, they venture even further by training their minds in the utilization of truth engines.  Indeed, these philosophers develop mental disciplines in which raw informal data is collected and inputted for the purpose of reducing a large quantity down to smaller more formal quality outputs of truth.  So, while it is a fact that one can't arrive at an absolute Truth by the use of truth engines, it is quite possible for one to arrive at quality best-principled statements.  In other words, because they travel in the general direction of the overall Truth, these paths possess virtue.

The third type of rational people are the bullies.  They are deemed rational by the position of their births.  To put it simply, the bullies are sovereign by inheritance.  Society will either choose to respect the rationale of the bullies or else there will be consequences.  Any disagreement gets overpowered quickly.
   
Of the three types of rational people depicted above, the bullies have always remained somewhat of a mystery.  Indeed, because they have always been feared by the masses, the many writers and orators of the past have had to avoid making direct references to them.   A paradox exists involving these bullies and the irrational state that, by the use of brute force, they have long established and maintained.  On one hand, while we do need to be practical utilizing law as a necessary tyranny, on the other, it is impossible to control ourselves by pointless changes brought about by the endless legislation of laws.  However, rather than choose a platonic best-principled middle ground between these two extremes, as we are animals after all, we invariably resign ourselves to a state of perpetual abuse under a rule of bullies.  In turn, by utilizing the false powers of manipulation, the alphas are able to maintain society in a chronic irrational state.    
   
As the manipulative false powers are expressed as faulty dichotomies, the faulty dichotomies themselves are disinformation.  To understand the difference between misinformation and disinformation, while misinformation are lies perpetuated by the state for reasons deemed to be in the best interest of the people, disinformation is information justifying those lies told.  In other words, while misinformation deals with the deception of others, disinformation deals more with the deceiving of oneself.  While misinformation is deceit caused by the deliberate propagation of untruths, disinformation is drunken self-deception caused by over indulging in the fraudulent dichotomies.  These fraudulent dichotomies are intoxicating.  Indeed, they work to poison both the bullies in charge and those under their rule.  This is why a bully can't see their conscience even when light is shown unto them.

The fraudulent dichotomies are most oftentimes expressed as conflicts between male and female. Understand, in the narrowed dichotomy expressed at the beginning of this essay, the ongoing conflict depicted is not between a male and a female.  Indeed, a man can live wretched just as a woman can rule over her children as a king.  Other than male versus female, some of the other fraudulent dichotomies to be wary are white versus black, the youth against the elderly, poor competing against the rich, and on and on endlessly.  Simply put, a house of cards has been manufactured upon a false foundation of fraudulent dichotomies.  They feel justified today in spreading misinformation among the people because disinformation has deceive them into believing that they will one day stand blameless under the Light of Truth.  Yet, these false powers of manipulation do stumble up the people by distracting their focus away from the singular dichotomy.  Again, the model dichotomy depicted above is the true one as it depicts what has long been an eternal conflict ongoing between a king of the highest rank and a wretch of the lowest.

IV.  The Fleeing Elite are made up of the royal family and those who support them

To enjoy an unfair advantage within the marketplace, the fleeing elites utilize their political influence to avoid definition.  Indeed, the better defined a social function is, the more efficient and economical it becomes to society.  Much to their benefit, as the king and his or her supporting tyranny have managed to avoid having their roles defined clearly in society, so has the character of the lowly wretch remained a mystery as well.  This is because society has always sliced reality into just two classifications of a master-class and a slave-class.  However, upon closer examination, reality reveals the existence of a third class.  These three classes as a whole are a class of masters, a class of slaves, and a class of outcastes.  While the master class has long exploited the slave class, in turn, those two together as a society have exploited yet another class of outcast.   As a master class props up a king, so, at the other inverse side, a slave class expels an outcast wretch.

V.  As the king is the master at one end of the political spectrum, the wretch is the outcast at the other.

Metaphorically, the wretch is the very least rated among three types of prostituted.  These three types are a master wife, a slave commoner, and an outcast wretch.  Among these three, the highest rated is the master wife.  Being highly valued, she is a woman who is rated worthy enough to sleep with the king.  The second highest rated of these prostitutes is the slave commoner.  While she is not rated worthy enough to sleep in the bed of the king, her life will be spared as long as she is willing to kneel in his presence.  Finally, the lowest rated of the prostituted is the wretch.  She has been outcast by the king and from his kingdom even to the extent that she will be killed on sight.
Compared to the wretch, the king is divided into two types. These two are a greatest Son-of-God and a least Son-of-man.  As he would be born of a king, a Son of God is renowned and intimately known possessing a namesake.  The fearful people honor a Son of God treating his princely social status as greater in worth than even his own father the king.  In contrast to a Son of God, a Son of man is a stranger.  As a Son of God is the offspring of a king, A son of man is the offspring of a wretch.  In contrast to how a Son of God is praised, a son of man is shown disdain and treated less than his nameless and faceless parents.   Quite paradoxical, as the term "God" denotes an intimate classification, the term "man" is impersonal.  As a person's face represents their authority, so a king's face is majestic.  In contrast, a wretch has no face.  As it is with dogs, a wretch is recognized by her behind.  Indeed, dogs do recognize each other by sniffing their behinds.  However, as she isn't even valued for her behind, a wretch is rated less than even a dog.

VI.  The Wretch's Warning

The voice of the most worthless wretch might warn us to neither speak in fear nor to act in a threatening manner.  For, as she knows only too well, such unwise behavior will only serve in getting us a beating on every level of society.  Indeed, a bully is like a lion devouring what he fears and consuming what is a threat to his domain.  Like the wretch, except for our inborn natural rights, we should be silent possessing nothing else.  As there exists no such right as a legal one, at the same time, such concocted rights dilute the power of our in-born natural rights.

VII.  Rejecting the legislation of effectual change just for the sake of effectual change
   
To ordain a whole new order, our Founding Fathers reduced and refined towards a golden natural law.  This formal act of theirs was in opposition to the traditional way of ordainment which, based on the legal precedence of the Old World, required that they crown a new king.  Indeed, in submitting to such a rule, our Founders could have lived the life of Lords.  After all, under the laws of Old World legal precedence, they had every justification to do so as conquerors.  Instead, they chose to function intimately among the people -- of, by, and for as Abraham Lincoln once so elegantly described this action of theirs -- for the purpose of addressing any future threat from tyrants and tyrannies.  As they stood reverent upon a mighty foundation constructed by their own ancestors, they made a precious alteration to it.  As they did so, they stood under threat of penalty from his judgment being mindful of His possible divine providence moving against them as they had both, of their own free wills, signed their names against the rule of a king and taken a sacred oath.  Indeed, rather than they cower and continue to perpetuate the same old tyranny, they took a thoughtful step forward narrowing with the declaration that:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

VIII.  The greatest of benefits are derived from the most precious of alterations.  

Indeed, all our ancestors grieved mightily braving the same great darkness before perishing for our sake.  While we can revere them all today by focusing a gentle eye upon the one truest of dichotomies; so, we should be wary with our other more subtle eye keeping it watchful for the faulty dichotomies.  As the vain legislation of effectual change continues to scatter our inheritance, desperation has led our hearts to seeking to salvage what we most treasure.  As the same is true among every soul, concerning the valuable documents that we inherited from our Founders, so we should never make an alternation beyond what is deemed most crucial.   As already stated, our Founding Fathers once acted out a little masterpiece on our behalf.  During their performance, they were burdened to the extent of throwing off their rightful statuses as high ranking gentlemen in British Society.  Even beyond that, in order to divorce us from tyranny, they were willing to suffer the impoverished consequences divorcing us from the Old World economy caused by the fighting of a war.  As our desperate Founders narrowed thoughtfully to what they most treasured, so do We the People today reject every faulty dichotomy.

As our Founders once declared, so we also declare that all men are born equal -- whether they be the highest of kings or the lowest of wretches -- with each possessing in their beings the same exact business agenda for Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.
 

A Letter Of, By, and For the People 

Written to the most Supreme of All Courts

Part I.

While lessor courts deal in matters concerning the rule of law, the one that is the most Supreme would rule by manifestation.  This manifestation rules by illuminating a gentle light unto the conscience.  In the scripture, when they were in this light, being they were intoxicated by the law, the twelve disciples could not see their consciences and as a result of this expressed very little concern in the way of fear and remorse.  In contrast to them, the very least of wretches sought out His light in fear and trembling.  Indeed, while the law wanted to kill the Lord hunting him for many years as a child and failing to find Him, out of concern for others, these most worthless of wretches sought out and found Him!  Yet, as it is written in the four gospels, our Lord did not judge these lowest of wretches, but it was the law within His disciples that condemned them.  Instead, His Glory was charmed to the extent of marveling at their persistence.

As our Lord was tolerant of the many interventions into His Holy ministry by these lowest of wretches, therefore, the people are empowered by natural right to intervene into the affairs of lessor governments.  Any attempt to manipulate these natural rights away from the people shall be judged contempt and considered to be the most serious of offenses tantamount to stumbling up the children of God!

As now we should all know better, let us consider ourselves held to a higher reward and to a greater penalty under the Light of Truth.

Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins
Acting Supreme Court

Further revision and rewriting of my letter to the Supreme Court

The People's Proclamation of Sovereignty

by Uncle Emanuel Watkins

Preface

The primary reason for my developing the position of prime minister of these United States was both for the purpose of challenging the legal professionals now in power and, over time, to weed them out.  While such a position should be created of, by, and for the people, those in power today have become turncoats to powerful special interest groups.  In order to fend off these menacing groups, I have made the bold decision to take on the title of prime minister myself.  In other words, our Founders never meant for those in government to be officials.  After all, when they themselves were creating our government, they did so as if mere commoners sitting out in the congregation:  They ordained and established a more perfect Union while acting as “We the people.”    

Here are a few other points I address in the following letter:  

• I create a character named "Uncle Emanuel Watkins" to replace the old parochial ones of uncle Tom and / or uncle Sam.

• I introduce a new form of writing called a “simple writ” which,  when put into practice, will challenge the formal essay.  This is necessary in order to establish a new kind of leader other than a legal professional.  He or she will address themselves as “Founders“  (Example: Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins).    

• I have tweaked an antiquated left/right political spectrum creating a new model by narrowing towards what is the one true dichotomy.  This "conflict" depicts a king on one side and the inverse of a wretch on the other.  This development has been a burden of mine in order to expose the many faulty dichotomies that the government and the media utilize in deceiving the people.  These faulty dichotomies are in opposition to the Will of the Truth and its supreme power.

• I define our American Civil Purpose and how its advancement is a prerequisite.  I also demote government in importance to that of a necessary tyranny and its business of law making to that of necessary evil doings.

• I have found the U.S. Supreme Court, the U.S. Congress, and the U.S. president all to be in contempt of the people and the prerequisite advancement of their Civil Purpose.

• I have manifested the position of prime minister of these United States within an ordainment.

• I link indelibly the Declaration of Independence with that of the U.S. Constitution.  The first formal document ordains the people's divorce from tyranny while the second legal document establishes our rightful remarriage to a more perfect Union.

• I establish a new science called “exponentialism.“  I did so in order to support both our metaphysical Founding Fathers and the American Movement process which originated after their time.  The emphasis taught in our schools shouldn't just focus on change and the incredible amounts of it involved, but also on the tremendous amounts of energy required to cause even the slightest amounts of change.

• I define the American Movement as the only true movement.  Every other contrived political gimmick such as the labor movements, suffrage movements, and civil rights movements should be considered distractions perpetuated by the two party legal system and referred to as false movements.  The one true American Movement brings people back to revering our Founding Fathers, to cherishing the new order they established within the Declaration of Independence, to honoring the new laws they instituted within the U.S. Constitution, and both to a central understanding of the embodiment of our Bill of Rights and how they cannot be taken away from us as they are inborn, unalienable, and God given.  

• I justify the people’s intermittent sovereignty and their right to intervene concerning the actions of government and the affairs of those who operate within it.

• I define the difference between what is a person’s right and what is their duty.  In order to perform our duty, we must first exercise a free will by right.  After achieving our rights, we can then choose to be bind ourselves to a duty by our own free will.

If I am your friend, I am just your friend.  If, as a bully, it is a choice of my own free will to convert over to your side to be your friend, then I will be your friend forever.

Vote with your feet.

Feet following after the hands of the law are defiled:  Hands following after the spontaneity of the feet are cleansed -- Uncle Emanuel Watkins.

Our natural rights are not legal rights as the first are more powerful than the second.  How so?  Well, our natural rights reduce to the soul and, as our souls are broken parts from the whole of a larger perfect soul, they can't be destroyed.  Socrates demonstrates this fact in Plato's dialogue "Meno."  Before being born, our souls were part of one perfect soul that knew all things.  Depending on how much trauma they received at birth, each broken soul would forget different amounts of knowledge.

Animals are analogous with plants in this sense.  When we are born, we are in a broken and fetal state.  Over time, we unwind towards light.  As our hearts are born sensing a wonderful order, our heads are both fearful and injured.  This is why a dying puppy will welp for its life even though it doesn't understand what life is.  It senses that it is being separated from this special order.  As he had it figured out, Socrates determined himself to be midwife philosopher.  His duty was to serve broken souls to help them recollect the knowledge that was lost to them.  The idea here isn't to destroy kings (of Greece), but to help the most damaged of souls gain control over their lives and to live like kings themselves as much as possible.

While it was impossible for Socrates to be a Christian as he proceeded Christ, we can still see him playing the part of a good shepherd.  As Plato so masterfully portrayed him, He was surely greater and braver than all the kings leading over the flock of Greece.  Indeed, Socrates could have made a great living as an eloquent sophist entertaining the most intelligent and wealthy of Greece charging them lots of money to provide answers to their questions.  Instead, Socrates would venture down to the marketplace to ask questions of the very least of souls.  As a serving teacher, he provided this service for free.        

As the law can't destroy souls, it has resorted to creating marketplaces as prisons of banishment.  Problem is, there is no place to hide a soul permanently.  Send a Jewish person to hell and the Lord will simply touch them.  Banish a righteous Gentile to Hades and the Lord, because by Jewish law He is not allowed to touch them, will call upon them with His gospel  (Hades is not the same as hell, but is a Greek place at the center of the earth).

Now to introduce a paradox.  As the law today has us voting with our hands, the Lord commands that we vote with our feet:

Mathew 10: 21 A brother will betray his brother to death, a father will betray his own child, and children will rebel against their parents and cause them to be killed. 22And all nations will hate you because you are my followers.  But everyone who endures to the end will be saved. 23When you are persecuted in one town, flee to the next. I tell you the truth, the Son of Mang will return before you have reached all the towns of Israel.

As the people will vote with their feet, tyranny deceives our hearts with the kind of voting we do with our hands.  As our lowly feet express our hearts, our hands express what we have on our minds.

The function of voting with our hands is a necessary evil.  Indeed, we have no natural born right to vote.  If we did, we would never die.  But many of us don't live long enough to vote in such a fashion.  The legal process depends on our hands.  In turn, our hands manufacture by way of evil doing.  In contrast, the spontaneity of our feet are pure.  The legal process entices equal souls into a courtroom to resolve their differences.  In the end, one will come out richer and the other poorer.  Yet, if souls cannot be destroyed, then it is the law itself that is death.

The people vote with their feet in order to flee evil.  Aren't people today in the United States fleeing towards the state of Texas?  As a born Texan myself, I wouldn't ever want to leave the state.  However, if I am a true Christian, I might have to do so one day.  What states might I flee towards?  Well, I have considered the states of Alaska and North Dakota as good places to flee towards.  In other words, even the state of Texas today is beginning to rot at the core.

Narrowing down to what is crucial concerning our natural rights and then utilizing them in the most effective way

During this critical time, we, the people, should focus our peaceful assemblies to protesting the police and the media.  In other words, we should be just like Bruce Lee.  No waste of motion!  Every defense should also be, by design, an offensive strike.  

That takes care of the narrowing.  In the future, the political situation could change.  In other words, we don't have to exercise all our rights at the same time.  Instead, we should become experts in how to best use them.  In the future, as the situation alters, we might choose to utilize other combinations of our natural rights.

When peacefully assembling in front of the police stations and the commercial media, we need to remember how the Truth always wins out over the false powers of manipulation.  We should also be on our best behavior during these times.  After all, as it is with ourselves and the other meat eaters, those making up the police and the media today are also predators.    

How to control a lion

It has been said that lions, tigers, and the other predators view the emotions of fear and anger as a threat.   Below is a video which demonstrate this odd paradox:

Note how the lions reacted violently the same way towards both threats and lameness.  In the last video, the lions couldn't take their focus away from the trainer's lame locomotion to limp caused by a lion's attack.  In contrast, when a boy stepped on the paw of a chained up lion by accident, the lion attacked him.  Like predators, lions will try to invoke a sign of weakness which is either a reaction of a threat or of fear.  This reaction by the lions is depicted in the video with the man in the white shirt.

We should remember how the sophisticates in society are always the ones who behave the most predatory.    

In the following video are two extreme examples of how not to act when peacefully assembling:

On one side of the debate in this video is a kind of weakness expressed as threats while on the other side is another kind of weakness expressed as lameness.  Lions would devour all the people in this video.  The secret when peacefully assembling is to avoid being either way too Laurel or too Hardy.  The point is to rule as the people and that action pertains to expressing the Truth.  In the end, the Truth will rule over the lions just as it will rule over over the false powers of manipulation.    

While they can't take our rights away from us, they can provoke us into making fatal mistakes.  Remember, concerning our Civil Purpose, no investigation will ever make a judgement in favor of the people.  The only way to preserve and protect our power is to prevent an attack upon it.