Fifth rewrite of my finished Eight Legged Chinese Essay

The People's Civil Purpose

by Uncle Emanuel Watkins

==============================================================

Informal Wretch

Formal King

A Message Given 

In the Form of a Chinese

 Eight Legged Essay

The Wretch  <   Moderate Middle   >   The King

=============================================================

 I. 
     We should focus all our attention upon an ongoing conflict between a formal king, a figure of his character is depicted on the far right hand side of the above political spectrum, and, in turn, an informal wretch, a figure of her character is depicted on the far left hand side of it.  Also, every false dichotomy should be discerned from this true one.      

II.  
     Utilizing the model above for better visualization, as the metaphor of the king would represent the greatest of rulers, the wretch, in turn, being she is his exact inverse, or perverse, would represent the very least among the slaves.  The king is rational in his thinking knowing all things; meanwhile, the irrational wretch is distracted by a burden.  As the king owns every property and all things on that property, the wretch owns nothing as she is deemed an illegal trespasser.  As he is sovereign being exempt and immune in all matters, she is powerless and her existence judged criminal.  As she will have to learn how to prostitute herself in order to survive, so the king is well able bodied having been taught when he was a young prince how to prostitute others in order to thrive.

III.
     Being opposite forces, while the nature of the king's authority would always be growing and expanding, the nature of the wretch's authority would always be withering and shrinking.  When each of them were younger, while he was sent to school to be trained how to control his authority, she had to learn how to survive by manipulating his authority.
     After maturing into adults, while the king would be honored as an important knower, in turn, the wretch would be deemed to know nothing of importance.  Pertaining to the remaining rational knowers between these two both serving under the important king and ruling over the worthless wretch, there are at least three types.  They are the sophists, the philosophers, and the alphas.
     The eloquent sophist (literally means wisdomer) is skilled in the art of debate.  He or she is an orator who entertains audiences with debates concerning truth and demonstrations of how such a virtue cannot exist.  He or she substantiates their conclusion by arguing both sides of a topic spending half of their performance presenting one point of view and afterwards, perhaps after taking a break, spending the other half of it presenting the opposing point of view.  Granted, as the ultimate Truth is an infinite measure of eternity, the point made by these sophists has validity as such a place would be unapproachable to us.

     The second type of rational knowers are the philosophers (lovers of wisdom).  While they do acknowledge the validity of the sophist argument, they train their minds further by the utilization of truth engines.  Indeed, these philosophers develop mental disciplines in which quantities of raw information (data) are inputted for the purpose of reducing a large amount of content down to that of a smaller output of formal quality truths.  So, while, in fact, it is not possible to arrive at the Truth by the use of truth engines, one can arrive at certain best-principled paths which lead in a direction towards that ultimate virtue.  The third type of knowers are the alphas.  They are deemed to be knowers by the position of their births.  To put it simply, the alphas are sovereign by inheritance. Society either chooses to respect these alphas as supreme or else.  Any disagreement with their bully rationale will get quickly overpowered.    
     Of the three types of rational people depicted above, the alphas have always remained somewhat of a mystery.  Indeed, in ancient records, fearful writers would have to sidestep depicting and documenting the cruel and brutal methods utilized by these alphas.  Oh, sure, from time to time certain rulers will get called out as tyrants, but those types of accusations by the press pertain generally to such abstract rulers as Adolph Hitler, Saddam Hussein, or Fidel Castro.  These animated puppet-like tyrants serve a purpose as they help paint a pretty picture of a real and happy world ruled over by rational alpha knowers with good characters.  

     Not daring to give the pretty but irrational picture presented above much thought, we, instead, bow fearfully to these alpha rulers.  More than just that, the paradoxical fact is, we tend to elect these bullies into office.  Invariably, the system of choice is always to vote for those who rule by force of action.
     Indeed, a paradox exists involving the control of government.  While, on one hand, we do need to be practical in our approach, on the other, it is impossible to control government by the endless legislation of laws.  Indeed, we have been blinded today by the law.  To regain our vision, we need to stand upon this absolute -- While the supreme power is in the Truth, the ultimate Truth needs no action.  Meanwhile, the false powers of manipulation deceive us away from this Truth.   Unfortunately, it is impractical to be ruled by such a power as this ultimate Truth as such a place is unapproachable to us.  However, rather than choose a middle ground, we have chosen to resign ourselves to a perpetual state of abuse instead, one which utilizes the false powers of manipulation.  

     Such fallen power is maintained and increased by way of disinformation.   To understand the difference between misinformation and disinformation, while misinformation are lies perpetuated by the state for reasons deemed to be in the best interest of the people, disinformation are justifications for utilizing those lies.  In other words, while misinformation deals with the deception of others, disinformation deals more with the deceiving of oneself.  While misinformation is deceit caused by the deliberate propagation of untruths, disinformation is self deception caused by the spreading of fraudulent dichotomies.  These fraudulent dichotomies are poison.  Indeed, they work to intoxicate both the alpha knowers and those under their rule.  This is why the alpha rulers don't follow their consciences as they have become political drunkards.  By their partaking of the false powers of manipulation,, they have become political drunkards without a conscience.  

    Such fraudulent dichotomies are most often expressed as conflicts between male and female.  Understand, in the formal dichotomy expressed in the above model between the king and the wretch, the ongoing conflict is not male versus female.  Indeed, a man can live wretched just as a woman can rule as a king over her children.
     Other than male against female, other fraudulent dichotomies are white against black, the young against the old, the poor against the rich, and on and on endlessly.  Simply put, the drunken alphas manufacture deceit on a foundation of false dichotomies.  They feel they are justified in spreading lies because of a deception of disinformation has deceive them into believing that they will one day be standing blameless under the Light of Truth.  Yet, these false powers of manipulation cheat people by distracting their focus away from the one true dichotomy.  Again, the model dichotomy above is the formal one as it depicts what has long been an eternal conflict ongoing between a king of the highest rank and that of a wretch of the lowest.

     Today, we shouldn't just read what every past philosopher and sage wrote and said; but, we should also consider what they couldn't write or say about those ruling over them.  Neither Tao Te Ching, Confucius, Socrates, or Plato along with many others could write or speak freely about such alpha knowers, but had to be submissive lowering their eyes when addressing such rulers in either rational conversation or in written prose.  So, while one won't read much about these alpha knowers in ancient texts, realize how their threatening stares were always ever present over society.  But remember also how we are so helpless as people that we can't even help ourselves.  Indeed, the best we can seem to institute to rule over us are governments of bullies.  This human frailty is why our Founding Fathers chose to establish government as a necessary tyranny.  As the people by and large should and can take care of themselves, this necessary tyranny would function, as our Founders had it envisioned, as just a part of what would become a dynamic ever improving more perfect Union.
     Considering this more perfect Union, the endeavor of government does not revolve around laws alone or around order alone, understand these as different, but government is a proper, procedural relationship between both law and order.  When it acts as a tyranny on the whole body, the process of government backslides into an out of control cancer of laws legislated thoughtlessly for the sake of the law.  In other words, law in-and-of-itself is no better than chaos.  During such times, the people become burdened with establishing a whole new order outside of the vain process of the implementation of thoughtless endless laws.  After the new order is established as the end, then both a means of a new government is institutionalized as a necessary tyranny and whole new laws are erected as necessary evils all for the purpose of advancing the new order.  

     Again, this rates repeating, looking at government critically, tyranny is a chaotic process which follows the wrong order.  It is a process which legislates laws thoughtlessly for the sake of the law.  As a consequence, government itself becomes the glory and the purpose for the people living.  In contrast, the people weren't created to be equal or responsible, but to be exponential in their happiness.  So, by nature, they will seek out a higher new order of government as opposed to remaining under the old institution of legislating laws thoughtlessly, endlessly, and pointlessly.  After establishing such a new order as an end, they will then both institutionalize the means of a new government as a necessary tyranny and erect new laws not for the sake of the law, but as necessary evils all for the express purpose of advancing the new order.   

     The endeavor of government and the legislating of laws are not meant to be an end, but are means to achieving a greater end.  That greater end is to advance the wretch's Civil-Purpose.  Indeed, as the sophists would say, it is impractical to think that we can govern ourselves by the Truth as such a virtue is unapproachable to us.  At the same time, as the philosophers would say that we should not give in to being enslaved by alpha deceit involving the false powers of manipulation.  The idea is to create government as a necessary tyranny.  However, as it is with any necessary evil, authority needs to be circumcised.           

                     

IV.
     Much to their benefit, as the king and his supporting tyranny have always managed to avoid having their roles defined clearly in society, so has the character of the lowly wretch remained a mystery also.  This is because society has always been thought to be divided into just two classifications of a master-class and a slave-class.  However, upon closer examination, society reveals the existence of a third class.  These three classes as a whole are a master class, a slave class, and an outcaste class.  While the master class has long exploited the slave class, in turn, they together exploit another class of outcaste.      

The Outcaste Wretch

V.
As the king is the master on one hand, the wretch is the outcaste on the other.  Metaphorically, she is the very least rated among three types of slaves.  These three types are the wife, the commoner, and the wretch.  Of these prostituted in society, the highest rated is the wife.  She is a woman who is rated worthy enough to sleep in the king's bed.  The second highest rated of the prostitute is the commoner (serfdom) woman.  While she is not rated worthy enough to sleep with the king, her life will be spared as long as she is willing to kneel in his presence.  Finally, the lowest rated of the prostituted is the wretch.  She has been outcaste from the king and his kingdom even to the extent that she will be killed on sight.

     Compared to the wretch, the king is divided into two types. These two are a Son of God and a Son of man.  A Son of God is renowned as he is intimately known with a namesake being as he was born the offspring of a king. The fearful people will honor a princely Son of God as greater in worth than even his own father the king. In contrast, a Son of man is a stranger as he is the offspring of the wretch, with her being a metaphor for the very least. In contrast to how they will praise a Son of God, the fearful people will show disdain towards a Son of man rating him to be worth even less than his nameless and faceless parents. A paradox is expressed here for, just as the term "God" has an intimate meaning, the term "mankind" has just the opposite impersonal classification. So, the one who is blessed as a Son of God will tend to be exalted by the fearful masses as greater than the very greatest; meanwhile, in stark contrast, the one who is a cursed Son of man(kind) will be rejected by them as they will tend to degrade such a lowly person rating him as more worthless than the very least.
     As a person's face represents their authority, so the king possesses a glorious face.  In contrast, the wretch has no face as the Son of man is born out of her.  As it is with a dog, the wretch is recognized by her behind.  Indeed, dogs recognize each other by the sniffing of their behinds.      

The Master King

   
     Indeed, a Son of God is empowered by the praises of the people just as governments receive their power from the consent of the governed.  For example, the Buddha received his empowerment from wise men who sought after him.  To find his whereabouts, as they were born with a gift to see the universe as a page, so they were able to seek him out by reading the stars.  When they finally had pinpointed his residence, they found the Buddha inside had not yet been born as he was still within his pregnant mother's womb.  So, they picked him up by carrying the whole bed along with his mother still laying upon it.  Unfortunately, during the birthing process, his mother died.  As he grew, it was the people who taught the Buddha teaching him about ideal perfection for, being Hindus, they believed in their hearts that he was the very manifestation of God Himself.            Problem is, someone left the door of the palace wide open which one day allowing the Buddha to venture out from his ideal palace into the real world.  Here he would become traumatized after witnessing for the first time the harsh realities of sickness, hunger, poverty, crime, and old age.  Quite offended at being so misled in his education about the world, the Buddha would then demand that he be further taught everything pertaining to the reality of the outside world.  So, as they believed he was the very manifestation of God, the people then had to teach him about reality also.  The point here being that the people were the ones who were responsible for empowering the Buddha.  In the beginning, the Buddha was taught an ideal life within a palace apart from the world and what it was like to live as a king.   Later, he then learned about a real life outside in the world and what it was like to have to live as a wretch.

     Similarly, Saul of Tarsus had to live the life of the worst human being to ever live.  He was the unforgiven one who offended the Holy Spirit by his actions of hunting down and persecuting Christian believers.  Indeed, during His torture and crucifixion, Jesus in the flesh did not ask king Herod or the preface Pontius Pilate the question of why they were persecuting Him.  No, that question was reserved for Saul, the one who was truly held responsible for His persecution.  In other words, Saul of Tarsus was the greatest one among the very worst who offended the Holy Spirit.  The worst I speak of here were those responsible for empowering the wayward emperors -- those empowered ones who would dare to declare themselves living gods and would demand to be worshipped as such.  So, the judgement of the Holy Spirit was preserved to fall upon Saul as the lone responsible one.  As a consequence, the person of Saul had to be put to death spiritually, indeed, Saul could never be forgiven.  As a result, Saul was put to death and then born again as Paul and then transformed into the Apostle Paul, the highest authority over all the other apostles as God's chosen vessel. 

     To elaborate even further, later on, it wasn't a king of England who would pronounce himself, by way of proclamation, to possess absolute power. No, it was one of the subjects under him named Sir Robert Filmer.  Robert Filmer wrote a book of political philosophy called "The Partriarcha" which leaned towards increasing the king's empowerment.  Of course, in writing such a book, Robert Filmer was looking for the king's favor concerning his own advancement and increased empowerment within the ruling monarchy.  In contrast, John Locke had to write a challenge to Sir Robert Filmer in secret to the extent that it was only after his death that his true identity was revealed by request within his last will and testament. 

      Similar to the Buddha, Moses had to be first raised up as a king.  Along the way, his rise to power was challenged as he was exposed to the fact that his true family were actually the Hebrew slaves in bondage to the Egyptians.  After coming to this realization, Moses chose to lower himself to become a slave.  In this way, Moses could understand the plight of the most wretched from the point of view of a king.  When the stuttering and stammering Moses would later return to free his people, in order not to offend the predatory nature of Pharaoh, he was wise enough to hide his weakness by utilizing his brother Aaron as a strong interpreting mouthpiece.
                

VI.
     Similarly as Moses, as the voice of the most worthless wretch among us might warn, so we should be careful speaking in fear or in threats towards the king's authority as to do so will only serve in getting us a beaten on every level.  Indeed, the alpha king, the metaphorical lion, both devours what he fears and what is a threat to his domain.  Like the wretch, except for our inborn natural rights, we possess no power.  Like our Founders, while we should remain submissive to the king's authority, we should always be on guard willing to both disobey any violation committed against both our natural rights to live as free souls, and, at a moments notice, to enslave ourselves of our own free will, to the common duty of fighting for those rights.  But we should also be wise kings knowing in our hearts that, as it is one thing to have to face a band of crazed men fighting for who knows what, it is quite another to be run over by a wretch intent, for the sake of her litter, on finding exponential contentment for their development!
      

VII. 
     In order to ordain our new nation, the hearts of our Founding Fathers reduced towards a natural law.  Their blessing of this new order was in opposition to the traditional ordainment of the day which, based on the legal precedence of the Old World, required the blessing and crowning of a new king.  Our Founders could have made themselves Lords over us.   Indeed, under the authority of a new king, they could have governed over us as conquering officials.  Instead, they chose to function intimately among us - of, by, and for as Abraham Lincoln once so elegantly perceived - for the purpose of addressing all future tyrants and tyrannies that might rise up to threaten our new nation.  As they stood upon a foundation constructed of their own ancestors, they themselves made a precious alteration to world history.  When doing so, they were mindful of His possible divine providence moving against them, as they had both signed their names of their own free will and taken a sacred oath all under penalty of His judgement.  Rather than cower and continue to perpetuate the same old tyranny, they took a thoughtful step forward narrowing with the declaration that we hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

Necessary Tyranny

The People

VIII.
     As all our ancestors have braved the same great darkness and then perished for our sake, so we all should focus our attention towards a single dichotomy, perceiving with a subtle eye the true tyranny that now threatens our Union.  Indeed, aren't they the very best mannered, the most pleasant, and the very kindest among us?  Ast they uplift us with the most eloquent of speeches, aren't they tricking us into selling our souls, cheating us with empty boxes of goods adorned with the prettiest of outer wrappings, and stumbling us up with false hope and quick changes implemented for the sake of change?  Such chaos has divided our people against themselves to the extent of atrocity.  Behold as white fathers are being blinded into fighting against their own black sons, people are being forced to reject their natural rights, the very inborn powers provided to them by God Almighty, and, worst of all, the wretch is being distracted into abandoning her children for political causes.    

     This desperation today has us looking to salvage from what we most treasure from a scattered inheritance.  As the same would be true among all the multitude of the earth, concerning the messages that were left to us by our Founding Fathers, so should we never amend beyond what are the most precious of alterations.  As already stated, our Founders once acted out a little masterpiece on our behalf, daring to perish with us during its enactment, indeed, even to sit and tarry with us as common members of the congregation, burdened during that crucial time to the extent that they were willing to throw off their rightful social statuses as Gentlemen.  They did forfeit willingly those rightful empowered titles when they divorced us from tyranny - when they cut our new nation off from the Old World economy.  As our desperate Founders once thoughtfully and carefully narrowed to what they most treasured as their own inheritance, so do we the people today reject every false dichotomy in order to focus our attention on a single conflict between a king and a wretch.

     As our Founders once declared, so do "we the people" of these United States today declare the highest of kings and the lowest of wretches as both equal in their power and in the endowment provided to them by their Creator, with each possessing in their beings the same exact business agenda for Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.

Here is the 4th finished copy of my Chinese Eight Legged Essay

The People's Civil Purpose

by Uncle Emanuel Watkins

==============================================================

Informal Wretch

Formal King

A Message Given 

In the Form of a Chinese

 Eight Legged Essay

The Wretch  <   Moderate Middle   >   The King

=============================================================

 I. 
     Politically speaking, all our focus should be on a single dichotomy which has been enduring forever. This eternal dichotomy is a conflict taking place between a formal king, a figure of his character is depicted on the far right hand side of the above political spectrum, and, in turn, an informal wretch, a figure of her character depicted on the far left hand side of it.

II.
     Utilizing the model above for better visualization, as the king would represent the greatest of rulers, the wretch, in turn, being his exact inverse, or perverse, would represent the very least among the slaves.  The king is rational in his thinking knowing all things; meanwhile, the irrational wretch is distracted by a burden.  As the king owns every property and all things on that property, the wretch owns nothing as she is deemed an illegal trespasser.  As he is sovereign being exempt and immune in all matters, she is powerless and her existence judged criminal.  As she will have to learn how to prostitute herself in order to survive, so the king is well able bodied having been taught when he was a young prince how to prostitute others in order to thrive.

III.
     Being opposite forces, while the nature of the king's authority would always be growing and expanding, the nature of the wretch's authority would always be withering and shrinking.  When each of them were younger, while he was sent to school to be trained how to control his authority, she had to learn how to survive by manipulating his authority.
     After maturing into adults, while the king would be honored as an important knower, in turn, the wretch would be deemed to know nothing of importance.  Pertaining to all those rational knowers both serving under the important king and, thus, ruling over the worthless wretch, there are at least three types.  These are the sophists, the philosophers, and the alphas.  The eloquent sophist (literally wisdomer) is skilled in the art of debate.  He or she is an orator who entertains audiences with debates concerning truth as a virtue and demonstrations of how such can't exist.  He or she substantiates their conclusion by arguing both sides of a topic spending half of their performance presenting one point of view and afterwards, perhaps after taking a break, spending the other half of it presenting the opposing point of view.  Granted, as the ultimate Truth is an infinite measure of the full extent of eternity, the point made by these sophists has validity as such a place would be unapproachable to us.

     The second type of knowers are the philosophers (lovers of wisdom).  While they do acknowledge the validity of the sophist argument, they venture further by the utilization of truth engines.  Indeed, these philosophers develop processes in which quantities of raw information (data) are to be inputted for the purpose of reducing large amounts of content down to that of smaller outputs of quality truths.  So, while, in fact, it is not possible to arrive at the Truth, by the use of truth engines, one can arrive at certain best-principled formal paths which lead towards that ultimate virtue.  The third type of knowers are the alphas.  They are deemed to be knowers by the position of their births.  To put it simply, the alphas are sovereign by inheritance.  Society either chooses to respect the alphas as supreme or else.  Any disagreement with their bully rationale will get quickly overpowered.      
     Of the three types of rational people depicted above, the alphas have always remained somewhat of a mystery.  Indeed, in ancient records, wise and fearful writers would have to sidestep depictions and documentations about these alphas and their cruel and brutal methods.  Oh, sure, from time to time, certain rulers do get called out as tyrants, but those types of accusations by the press are reserved for such abstract rulers as Adolph Hitler, Saddam Hussein, and Fidel Castro.  These animated puppet-like tyrants serve a purpose as they help paint a pretty picture of a happy world made up of rational alpha knowers with good characters.  

     Without giving the pretty picture much thought, the fearful people bow in acceptance to the alpha rulers treating their actions as rational.  More than just that, the paradoxical fact is, a helpless people, in general, tend to elect bullies to rule over them.  Invariably, their system of choice are those who rule by force.  As it unfortunately is impractical to be ruled over fully by the power of the Truth, rather than choose a middle ground, we have resorted today to a system of abuse that utilizes the false powers of manipulation.  

     Such fallen power is maintained and increase  by the utilization of disinformation.   To understand the difference between misinformation and disinformation, while misinformation are lies perpetuated by the state for reasons deemed to be in the best interest of the people, disinformation are the justifications for utilizing those lies.  In other words, while misinformation deals with the deception of others, disinformation deals more with the deceiving of oneself.  While misinformation is deceit caused by the deliberate propagation of untruths, disinformation is self deception caused by the spreading of fraudulent dichotomies.  These fraudulent dichotomies are poison.  Indeed, they work to intoxicate both the alpha knowers and those under their rule.  This is why the alpha rulers don't follow their consciences.  They have become drunkards by their partaking of the false powers of manipulation.  

    Such fraudulent dichotomies are most often expressed as a conflicts between male against female.  Understand, in the formal dichotomy expressed in the above model between the king and the wretch, the ongoing conflict is not male versus female.  Indeed, a man can live wretched just as a woman can rule as a king over her children.
     Other than male against female, other fraudulent dichotomies are white against black, the young against the old, the poor against the rich, and on and on endlessly.  Simply put, the drunken alphas manufacture their deceit on a foundation of false dichotomies.  While they feel they are justified in spreading lies, a deception of disinformation has worked to deceive them into believing they will stand blameless one day under the Light of Truth.  Yet, these false powers of manipulation cheat the people by distracting their focus away from the formal dichotomy.  Again, the model dichotomy above is the formal one as it depicts what has long been an eternal conflict ongoing between a king of the highest rank and that of a wretch of the lowest.

     Today, we shouldn't just read what every past philosopher and sage wrote and said; but, we should also consider what they couldn't write or say about those ruling over them.  Neither Tao Te Ching, Confucius, Socrates, nor Plato could write or speak freely about such alpha knowers, but had to be submissive lowering their eyes when addressing such rulers in either rational conversation or in written prose.  So, while one won't read much about these alpha knowers in ancient texts, realize how their threatening stares were always ever present upon society.  But remember also how, as people, we are so helpless that we can't help ourselves.  Indeed, the best we can seem to institute to rule over us, are governments of bullies.  This is why our Founding Fathers chose to establish government as a necessary tyranny.  As they had it envisioned, as the people by and large took care of themselves, this necessary tyranny would function, as they had it envisioned, as just a part of what would become a dynamic ever improving more perfect Union.
     Considering this more perfect Union, the endeavor of government does not revolve around laws alone or around order alone, but government is a proper procedural relationship between both law and order.  When it acts as a tyranny on the whole body, the process of government becomes an out of control cancer of laws legislated thoughtlessly for the sake of the law.  In other words, law in and of itself is no better than chaos.  During such times, the people become burdened with establishing some new order outside of the vain process of the thoughtless endless laws.  After the new order is established as the end, then both a means of a new government is institutionalized as a necessary tyranny and whole new laws are erected as necessary evils all for the purpose of advancing the new order.  

     Again, this rates repeating, looking at government critically, tyranny is a chaotic process which follows the wrong order.  It is a process which legislates laws thoughtlessly for the sake of the law.  As a consequence, government itself becomes the glory and the purpose for the people living.  In contrast, the people weren't created to be equal or responsible, but to be exponential in their happiness.  So, by nature, they will seek out that higher new order of government as opposed to the old institution of legislating laws thoughtlessly and endlessly.  After establishing such a new order as an end, they will then both institutionalized the means of a new government as a necessary tyranny and erect new laws not for the sake of the law, but as necessary evils all for the express purpose of advancing the new order.   

     The endeavor of government and the legislating of laws are not meant to be an end, but are means to achieving a greater end.  That greater end is to advance the wretch's Civil-Purpose.  Indeed, as the sophists would say, it is impractical to think that we can govern ourselves by the Truth as such a virtue is unapproachable to us.  At the same time, as the philosophers would say, we shouldn't give in to being enslaved by alpha deceit involving the false powers of manipulation.  The idea is to create government as a necessary tyranny.  Indeed, as it is with any necessary evil, authority needs to be circumcised.           

                     

IV.
     Much to their benefit, as the king and his supporting tyranny have always managed to avoid having their roles defined clearly in society, so has the character of the lowly wretch remained a mystery also.  This is because society has always been thought to be divided into just two classifications of a master-class and a slave-class.  However, upon closer examination, society reveals the existence of a third class.  These three classes as a whole are a master class, a slave class, and an outcaste class.  While the master class has long exploited the slave class, in turn, they together exploit another class of outcaste.      

The Outcaste Wretch

 






































V.
As the king is the master on one hand, the wretch is the outcaste on the other.  Metaphorically, she is the very least rated among three types of slaves.  These are the wife, the commoner, and the wretch.  Of these prostituted, the highest rated is the wife.  She is a woman who is rated worthy enough to sleep in the king's bed.  The second highest rated of the prostitute is the commoner (serfdom) woman.  While she is not rated worthy enough to sleep with the king, her life will be spared as long as she is willing to kneel in his presence.  Finally, the lowest rated of the prostituted is the wretch.  She has been outcaste from the king and his kingdom even to the extent that she will be killed on sight.

     Compared to the wretch, the king is divided into two types. These two are a Son of God and a Son of man.  A Son of God is renowned as he is intimately known with a namesake being as he was born the offspring of a king. The fearful people will honor a princely Son of God as greater in worth than even his own father the king. In contrast, a Son of man is a stranger as he is the offspring of the wretch, with her being a metaphor for the very least. In contrast to how they will praise a Son of God, the fearful people will show disdain towards a Son of man rating him to be worth even less than his nameless and faceless parents. A paradox is expressed here for, just as the term "God" has an intimate meaning, the term "mankind" has just the opposite impersonal classification. So, the one who is blessed as a Son of God will tend to be exalted by the fearful masses as greater than the very greatest; meanwhile, in stark contrast, the one who is a cursed Son of man(kind) will be rejected by them as they will tend to degrade such a lowly person rating him as more worthless than the very least.

The Master King

     Indeed, a Son of God is empowered by the praises of the people just as governments receive their power from the consent of the governed.  For example, the Buddha received his empowerment from wise men who sought after him.  To find his whereabouts, as they were born with a gift to see the universe as a page, so they were able to seek him out by reading the stars.  When they finally had pinpointed his residence, they found the Buddha inside had not yet been born as he was still within his pregnant mother's womb.  So, they picked him up by carrying the whole bed along with his mother still laying upon it.  Unfortunately, during the birthing process, his mother died.  As he grew, it was the people who taught the Buddha teaching him about ideal perfection for, being Hindus, they believed in their hearts that he was the very manifestation of God Himself.       

     Problem is, someone left the door of the palace wide open which allowed the Buddha to venture out from his ideal palace into the real world.  Here he would become traumatized after witnessing for the first time the harsh realities of sickness, hunger, poverty, crime, and old age.  Quite offended at being so misled in his education about the world, the Buddha would then demand that he be further taught everything pertaining to the reality of the outside world.  So, as they believed he was the very manifestation of God, the people then had to teach him about reality also.  The point here being that the people were the ones who were responsible for empowering the Buddha.  In the beginning, the Buddha was taught about ideal life within a palace apart from the world and what it was like to live as a king.   Later, he then learned about real life outside in the world and what it was like to have to live as a wretch.

     Similarly, Saul of Tarsus had to live the life of the worst human being to ever live.  Indeed, he was the one who offended the Holy Spirit by his actions of hunting down and persecuting Christian believers.  Indeed, during His torture and crucifixion, Jesus in the flesh did not ask king Herod or the preface Pontius Pilate the question of why they were persecuting Him.  No, that question was reserved for Saul, the one who was truly held responsible for His persecution.  In other words, Saul of Tarsus was the greatest one among the very worst who offended the Holy Spirit.  The worst I speak of here were those responsible for empowering the wayward emperors -- those empowered ones who would dare to declare themselves living gods and would demand to be worshipped as such.  So, the judgement of the Holy Spirit was preserved to fall upon Saul as the lone responsible one.  As a consequence, the person of Saul had to be put to death spiritually, indeed, Saul could never be forgiven.  As a result, Saul was put to death and then born again as Paul and then transformed into the Apostle Paul, the highest authority over all the other apostles as God's chosen vessel. 

     To elaborate even further, later on, it wasn't a king of England who would pronounce himself, by way of proclamation, to possess absolute power. No, it was one of the subjects under him named Sir Robert Filmer.  Robert Filmer wrote a book of political philosophy called "The Partriarcha" which leaned towards increasing the king's empowerment.  Of course, in writing such a book, Robert Filmer was looking for the king's favor concerning his own advancement and increased empowerment within the ruling monarchy.  In contrast, John Locke had to write a challenge to Sir Robert Filmer in secret to the extent that it was only after his death that his his true identity was revealed by request within his last will and testament. 

      Similar to the Buddha, Moses had to be first raised up as a king.  Along the way, his rise to power was challenged as he was exposed to the fact that his true family were actually the Hebrew slaves in bondage to the Egyptians.  After coming to this realization, Moses chose to lower himself to become a slave.  In this way, Moses could understand the plight of the most wretched from the point of view of a king.  When the stuttering and stammering Moses would later return to free his people, in order not to offend the predatory nature of Pharaoh, he was wise enough to hide his weakness by utilizing his brother Aaron as a strong interpreting mouthpiece.           

VI.
     Similarly as Moses, as the voice of the most worthless wretch among us might warn, so we should be careful speaking in fear or in threats towards the king's authority as to do so will only serve in getting us a beaten on every level.  Indeed, the alpha king, the metaphorical lion, both devours what he fears and what is a threat to his domain.  Like the wretch, except for our inborn natural rights, we possess no power.  Like our Founders, while we should remain submissive to the king's authority, we should always be on guard willing to both disobey any violation committed against both our natural rights to live as free souls, and, at a moments notice, enslave ourselves, of our own free will, to the common duty of fighting for those rights.
      

VII.   
     In order to ordain our new nation, the hearts of our Founding Fathers reduced towards a natural law.  Their blessing of this new order was in opposition to the traditional ordainment of the day which, based on the legal precedence of the Old World, required the blessing and crowning of a new king.  Our Founders could have made themselves Lords over us.   Indeed, under the authority of a new king, they could have governed over us as conquering officials.  Instead, they chose to function intimately among us - of, by, and for as Abraham Lincoln once so elegantly perceived - for the purpose of addressing all future tyrants and tyrannies that might rise up to threaten our new nation.  Indeed, as they stood upon a foundation constructed of their own ancestors, they themselves made a precious alteration to world history.  As they were mindful of His possible divine providence moving against them, as they had both signed their names of their own free will and taken a sacred oath all under penalty of His judgement, they took a thoughtful step forward with the declaration that we hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

Necessary Tyranny

The People

VIII.  
     As all our ancestors have braved the same great darkness and then perished for our sake, so we all should focus our attention towards a single dichotomy, perceiving with a subtle eye the true tyranny that now threatens our Union.  Indeed, aren't they the very best mannered, the most pleasant, and the very kindest among us?  Ast they uplift us with the most eloquent of speeches, aren't they tricking us into selling our souls, cheating us with empty boxes of goods adorned with the prettiest of outer wrappings, and stumbling us up with false hope and quick changes implemented for the sake of change?  Such chaos has divided our people against themselves to the extent of atrocity.  Behold as white fathers are being blinded into fighting against their own black sons, people are being forced to reject their natural rights, the very inborn powers provided to them by God Almighty, and, worst of all, the wretch is being distracted into abandoning her children for political causes?     

     This desperation today has us looking to salvage from what we most treasure of our inheritance.  As the same would be true among all the multitude of the earth, concerning the scriptures that were left to us by our Founding Fathers, so should we never amend beyond what are the most precious of alterations.  As already stated, our Founders once acted out a little masterpiece on our behalf, daring to perish with us during its enactment, indeed, even to sit and tarry with us as common members of the congregation, burdened during that crucial time to the extent that they were willing to throw off their rightful social statuses as Gentlemen.  They did forfeit willingly those rightful empowered titles when they divorced us from tyranny - when they cut our new nation off from the Old World economy.  As our desperate Founders once thoughtfully and carefully narrowed to what they most treasured as their own inheritance, so do we the people today reject every false dichotomy in order to focus our attention on a single conflict between a king and a wretch.

     As our Founders once declared, so do "we the people" of these United States today declare the highest of kings and the lowest of wretches as both equal in their power and in the endowment provided to them by their Creator, with each possessing in their beings the same exact business agenda for Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.

This is finished copy #2 of my Eight Legged Chinese Essay

The People's Civil Purpose

by Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins

=======================================================================

Informal Wretch

Formal King

A Message Given 
In the Form of a Chinese

 Eight Legged Essay

The Wretch  <   Moderate Middle   >   The King

=======================================================================

     We should all reduce our focus mindfully towards a lone dichotomy which has been enduring forever. This dichotomy is expressed as a metaphoric conflict between a formal king, one can find his character depicted on the far right hand side of the above political spectrum, and an informal wretch, her character found depicted on the far left hand side of it.

     In the model above, as the king would represent the greatest of rulers, the wretch, being his exact inverse, or perverse, would represent the very least among the slaves.  Being the stronger of the two, the king is rational in his thinking knowing all things; meanwhile, the irrational wretch is distracted inwardly by a burden.  As the king owns every property and all things on that property, the wretch owns nothing as she is deemed by him to be an illegal trespasser and, thus, owned by him.  As he is sovereign in all civil matters and, thus, is exempt and immune from the law, she is judged criminal in her existence and, so, is powerless.  As she will have to learn how to prostitute herself in order to survive, so the king was well trained, when he was a young prince, how to thrive by the prostitution of others.

     Being opposing forces, while the nature of the king's authority would always be growing and expanding, the nature of the wretch's authority would always be withering and shrinking.  When they each were younger, he was sent to school to be trained how to control his authority.  Meanwhile, in order for her to survive, she had to learn how to manipulate his authority.  
     After growing into adults, the king would become an important knower while the wretch would be deemed to know nothing of importance.  Pertaining to all those who would be serving under the important king and would be ruling over the worthless wretch, there are three types of knowers.  Indeed, okay, while the king might know more than just these three types of knowers, the wretch would be too busy surviving to even care one way or the other.
     What ever the case might be concerning the total number of knowers, the three known types are the sophists, the philosophers, and the alphas.  The eloquent sophist (literally wisdomer) is skilled in the art of debate.  He or she is an orator who entertains audiences with a conclusion that truth cannot exist as a virtue.  He or she substantiates their point by arguing on both sides of a topic spending half of their performance presenting one point and then, perhaps after taking a break, the second half of it presenting the opposing counterpoint. Granted, as the ultimate Truth is an infinite measure of what is all of eternity, these sophists do have a point as such a place would be unapproachable to us.
     The second type of knowers are the philosophers (lovers of wisdom).  While they do acknowledge that the sophist argument has some validity, they venture further by the utilization of truth engines.  Indeed, these knowers develop processes in which quantities of raw data are inputted for the purpose of reducing large amounts of content to that of smaller outputs of quality truths.  So, while it is not possible to arrive at the Truth, one can find certain formal, best-principled paths leading towards that ultimate virtue.
     The third type of knowers are the alphas.  They are deemed to be knowers by the position of their births.  To put it simply, the alphas are sovereign by inheritance.  Society either will choose to respected the alphas above all the other knowers or else.  The alphas operate by utilizing a bully rationale which means they overpower anyone who might disagree with them.
     Of the three types of knowers depicted above, the alphas have always remained somewhat of a mystery in society.  Indeed, in past ancient writings, their cruel and brutal methods have managed to keep their characters hidden in world history.  Oh, sure, they have been called tyrants, but those  accusations of the world press have always focused abstractly on such anti-alpha rulers as Adolph Hitler, Saddam Hussein, and Fidel Castro.  These animated anti-alpha leaders serve a purpose as they help paint a pretty picture made up of alpha knowers and good characters.
     Without giving the pretty picture much thought, the fearful people will tend to accept their alpha rulers as rational.  However, the paradoxical fact is, people do not rule over themselves in a rational fashion, but they tend to operate instead under a system of bullies.  Indeed, in the end, the method of choice is to rule by force of action.  The alpha is rational by overpowering others.  This Machiavellian / organized crime type of government has been long accepted as a necessary evil by sophist and philosopher knowers alike.  In contempt of the ultimate power which is the Truth, these knowers have to accept a fate of being abused by false powers of manipulation.  Through the self deceptive use of disinformation, the alphas confuse their lessors into following after them down the wrong paths.  They increase their power and maintain it by utilizing a willing media to spread both their deceit of misinformation and disinformation.  To understand the difference between these two deceits, while misinformation are lies perpetuated by the state for reasons that are in the best interest of the people, disinformation are the justifications for utilizing those lies.  In other words, disinformation deals more with the deceiving of oneself.  While misinformation is deceit caused by the deliberate propagation of untruths, disinformation is self deception caused by the spreading of the fraudulent dichotomies.  The fraudulent dichotomies are poison.  They work to intoxicate both the alpha knowers and those serving under them.  Indeed, so the alphas are drunkards.
    Such fraudulent dichotomies are most often expressed as a conflict between male against female.  Understand, in the formal dichotomy expressed in the model above between that of a king and a wretch, the ongoing conflict is not male against female.  Indeed, a man can be wretched just as a woman can be royal.  Other than male against female, other fraudulent dichotomies pit white against black, the young against the old, the poor against the rich, and so on.  Simply put, the drunken alphas manufacture their deceit on a counterfeit foundation of false dichotomies.  While they feel they are justified in spreading lies, a deception of disinformation has worked to convince those in power that they will one day be blameless while standing under the Light of Truth.  Yet, these false powers of manipulation cheat the people by distracting their focus away from the formal dichotomy.  Again, the model dichotomy above is the formal one as it depicts what has long been an eternal conflict ongoing between a king of the highest rank, and that of a wretch of the lowest.
     Today, we should honor those philosopher kings and sages of the past not for just what they were allowed to write and say, but also for what they were not allowed to write and say about the alpha knowers born over them.  Such notable individuals as Tao Te Ching, Confucius, Socrates, and Plato could not write or speak directly about such alpha knowers, but had to lower their eyes submissively when both addressing them in rational conversation or in written prose.  So, while one won't read much about these alpha knowers in ancient texts, realize their menacing stares were always ever present focussed threateningly over everyone in society.  

     Much to their benefit, as the alpha knowers have always managed to avoid having his or her roles defined in society, so has the character of the lowly wretch also remained a mystery.  This is because society has always been thought to be divided into only the two classifications of a master-class and a slave-class.  However, upon closer examination, the subtle workings of society will reveal the existence of a third class.  These three classes as a whole are a master class, a slave class, and an outcaste class.  While the master class has long exploited the slave class, they together as a majority society made up of both master and slave classes, in turn, exploit by total rejection those who make up another class of minority outcaste.      

     As the king is the master, so the wretch is the outcaste.  Metaphorically, she is the very least rated among three types of prostitutes.  The highest rated prostitute would be a wife.  She is a woman who has been deemed worthy enough to sleep in the king's bed.  The second highest rated is the commoner (serfdom) woman.  While she is not deemed worthy enough to sleep with the king, her life may be spared by him as long as she is willing to kneel in his presence.  Finally, the lowest rated is the wretch.  She has been outcaste from the king and his society even to the extent that she will be killed on sight.
     Compared to the wretch, the king is divided into two types of sons. One type is the Son of God.  He is a renowned as he is intimately known with a namesake being as he was born the offspring of a king. The fearful people will honor a princely Son of God as greater in worth than even his own father the king. In contrast, a Son of man is a stranger as he is the offspring of the wretch, with her being a metaphor for the very least. In contrast to how they will praise a Son of God, the fearful people will show disdain towards a Son of man rating him to be worth less than even his nameless and faceless parents. A paradox is expressed in the above description for, just as the term "God" has an intimate meaning, the term "mankind" has just the opposite impersonal classification. So, the one who is blessed as a Son of God will tend to be exalted by the fearful masses as they will rate such a person as greater than even the very greatest; meanwhile, in stark contrast, the one who is a cursed Son of man(kind) will be rejected by those same fearful masses as they will tend to degrade such a lowly person rating them as even more worthless than the very least from which he was born.

     Indeed, a Son of God is empowered by the praises of the people -- from the consent of the governed.  For example, the Buddha received his empowerment from wise men who sought him out.  In order to find him, they were born gifted with abilities to read the stars which guided them.  When finally pinpointing his residence, they found the Buddha inside was not yet born and still within his pregnant mother's womb.  So, they picked him up by carrying the whole bed and his mother with her still laying upon it.  Unfortunately, during the time of his birth, his mother died.  As he grew up, the people would then teach the Buddha about ideal perfection for, being Hindus, they believed, because he was reincarnated into a human being not from an animal, but from another human being, he was the very manifestation of God.       

     Problem is, someone left the door of the palace wide open which allowed the Buddha to venture out into the real world.  Here he would become traumatized after witnessing for the first time the harsh realities of sickness, hunger, poverty, crime, and old age.  Quite offended at being so misled, the Buddha would then demand that he be further taught everything pertaining to the reality of the outside world.  So, as they believed he was the very manifestation of God, the people had to teach him about reality also.  The point here being that the people were the ones who were responsible for empowering the Buddha.  In the beginning, the Buddha was taught about ideal life within a palace apart from the world and what it was like to live as a king.   Later, he then learned about real life outside in the world and what it was like to have to live as a wretch.

     Similarly, Saul of Tarsus had to live the life of the worst human being to ever live.  Indeed, he was the one who offended the Holy Spirit by hunting down and persecuting Christian believers.  Indeed, during His torture and crucifixion, Jesus in the flesh did not ask king Herod or the preface Pontius Pilate the question of why they were persecuting Him.  No, that question was reserved for Saul, the true one responsible for His persecution.  In other words, Saul of Tarsus was the greatest among the very worst.  These worst I speak of here were the ones responsible for empowering the drunken and wayward emperors -- those who would declare themselves to be living gods and would demand to be worshipped as such.  So, the judgement of the Holy Spirit was preserved to fall upon Saul as the one responsible.  As a consequence, the very worst person of Saul was put to death spiritually, indeed, he could never be forgiven, so that he could then be reborn again and transformed into the Apostle Paul, the highest Apostle as God's chosen vessel. 

     To elaborate even further, it wasn't a king of England who later pronounced himself, by way of proclamation, to possess absolute power. No, it was one of his subjects under him named Sir Robert Filmer.  Robert Filmer wrote a book of political philosophy called "The Partriarcha" which favored empowering the king.  Of course, in writing such a book, Robert Filmer was finding favor in the king concerning his own advancement and increased empowerment within British society.  In contrast, John Locke had to write a challenge to Sir Robert Filmer in secret to the extent that he could only reveal his true identity after his death in his last will and testament. 

      Similar to the Buddha, Moses had to first be raised up as a king.  Along the way though, he was exposed to the fact that his true family were actually the Hebrew slaves in bondage to the Egyptians.  So, after understanding this, Moses lowered himself to become a slave.  In this way, Moses could understand the plight of the most wretched from the point of view of a king.  But when Moses returned to confront Pharaoh, he was wise enough to know to use his brother as a strong mouthpiece in order not to offend the lion with his weakness of stuttering.           

     As the worthless wretch would say, do not speak against the king out of fear or threat or you will find yourself beaten on every level of society.  Indeed, the king is a metaphorical lion that devours both what he fears and is a threat to his domain.  Like the wretch, except for our inborn natural rights, the people possess no power.  Like our Founders, we should remain submissive to the king's authority, but willing to both disobey any violation committed against both our natural rights of free will, and, of our own free will, to be enslaved to the duty of fighting for those rights.      

     In order to establish a justified ordainment for our nation, our Founder's reduced towards a natural law.  Their enactment of this natural law was in opposition to the past way of ordainment which, based on legal precedence, required one to bless and crown a new king.  Indeed, our Founders could have bettered themselves establishing a king's authority under which they could have then acted as conquering officials over us.  Instead, they chose to perform intimately of, by, and for the people, as Abraham Lincoln once said, doing so in order to address all future tyrants and tyrannies that might rise up to threaten our new nation.  Indeed, as they themselves stood upon a solid foundation constructed of their own ancestors, and as they were mindful of His possible divine providence having signed their own names of free will to a declaration under penalty of judgement, they took a thoughtful step forward by a declaration that we hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
     As all our ancestors on this earth have faced bravely the same great darkness and perished into it for our sake, so too should we all be standing in faith waiting with the supreme Truth, patient with the full realization that the worst tyranny threatening our Union today is being perpetuated by the very best mannered, the most pleasant, and the very kindest.  Indeed, we are being deceived today by words spoken in the most eloquent of speeches.  We are being tempted to sell our souls for a counterfeits boxes of goods adorned with pretty outer wrappings.  And, finally, we are being stumbled up with false promises of hope and by quick changes implemented for the sake of change.   Such chaos has divided the people against themselves to the extent of atrocity, blinding white fathers to fight against their own black sons, forcing motherhood to abandon her children for political causes, and confusing the people against the unbreakable natural laws, the very powers given to them from God Almighty, they possess within them.
     But the wretch will one day stand in faith and walk in faith.  Indeed, when reducing towards what we treasure most of our inheritance, as the same would be true among all the multitude of the earth, we too should never amend beyond making the most precious alterations to the scripture left to us by our ancestral Founders.  As already stated, our Founders once acted out a little masterpiece on our behalf, daring to perish with us during its enactment (indeed, even to sit among us as common members of the congregation), willing during the process to throw off their rightful social statuses as empowered Gentlemen.  They did forfeit those empowered titles in order to divorce us through a painful process of cutting our new nation's economy off from Old World tyranny.  As our Founders thoughtfully and carefully narrowed to what they most treasured as an inheritance, so do we the people today narrow towards a king and a wretch.
     We the people of these united States do declare this king and wretch to have been born equal, in some mysterious way, in both their power and in the endowment provided to them by their Creator, possessing within them, as our Founders once declared, the same exact business agenda for Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.

Here is the first finished copy of my Chinese Eight Legged Essay

The People's Civil Purpose

by Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins

=======================================================================

Informal Wretch

Formal King

A Message 
In the Form of a Chinese

 Eight Legged Essay

The Wretch  <   Moderate Middle   >   The King

=======================================================================
I.
Two sentences of prose whose function is to broach the topic.✔
(1)  We should all reduce our focus mindfully towards a dichotomy which has been enduring forever.  (2)  This dichotomy is expressed as a perpetual conflict between a formal king on one far end of a political spectrum and an informal wretch on the other.

II.
Five sentences of prose, elaborating upon and clarifying the theme.✔
(1)  Metaphorically, in the model above, as the king represents the greatest of rulers, the wretch is his exact inverse, or perverse, representing the very least among the slaves. (2)  Being the stronger of the two, the king is rational in his thinking knowing all things; meanwhile, the irrational wretch is distracted inwardly by a burden. (3)  As the king owns every property and all things on that property, the wretch owns nothing as she is deemed by him to be an illegal trespasser upon his property (and, thus, she is owned by him as his property). (4)  As he is sovereign in all civil matters, she is judged a criminal and, so, is powerless. (5) As she will learn how to prostitute herself in order to survive, so the king was trained, when he was a young prince, in how to thrive by prostituting others.

III.
Prose text.✔
As the king knows all, the wretch doesn't know anything.  Pertaining to the knowing, there have always existed three types of knowers in the world.  They are the sophists, the philosophers, and the alphas.  The eloquent sophist (wisdomer) knower is skilled in the art of oral debate.  He or she is an orator who entertains their audience with the notion that no virtue as truth can exist.  He or she substantiates this point by debating every side of a topic both the point and the counterpoint.  Granted, concerning the ultimate Truth, with it being the infinite measure of eternity, these sophist knowers do have a point as such a place would be unapproachable to us.  The second type of knowers are the philosophers (lovers of wisdom) who, while they do acknowledge the correctness of the sophist argument, venture further in their thought by the utilization of truth engines.  Indeed, these knowers develop processes in which quantities of raw data are inputted for the purpose of reducing large amounts of content to that of smaller outputs of quality truths.  So, while it is not possible to arrive at the Truth, one can find certain formal, best-principled paths in a direction towards that ultimate virtue.  The third type of knowers are the alphas.  They are the ones who are deemed to be knowers by the position of their births.  To put it simply, the alphas are sovereign knowers by inheritance.  They are either respected as knowers above all the other knowers in society or else.  This means the alphas will bully anyone into submission who might disagree with them.
Of the three types of knowers depicted above, the alphas have always remained somewhat of a mystery in society.  Indeed, in past ancient writings, they have managed to keep their cruel and brutal characters hidden.  They have been called tyrants, but that has always been a kind of self criticism describing the kind of menacing appearing anti-alpha leaders like Adolph Hitler, Saddam Hussein, or Fidel Castro.  Without giving it much thought, people today just assume that the good alpha knowers rule by rational thought.  However, the paradoxical fact is, the most powerful knowers in today's societies aren't rational, but operate as bullies.  Indeed, in the end, the ruling knowers are those who, by force of action, overpower others.  This Machiavellian / organized crime form of government has been long accepted as a necessary evil by sophist and philosopher knowers alike.  In contempt of the ultimate power which is the Truth, these knowers have to accept being abused by the false powers of manipulation.  Through the self deceptive use of disinformation, they confuse their lessors into following after them down the wrong paths.  They increase their power and maintain it by utilizing a willing media to spread both their deceit of misinformation and disinformation.  To perceive the difference between these two deceits, while misinformation are lies perpetuated by the state for reasons that are in the best interest of the people, disinformation are the justifications for utilizing those lies.  In other words, disinformation deals more with the deceiving of oneself.  While misinformation is deceit caused by the propagation of untruths, disinformation is self deceit caused by the spreading of fraudulent dichotomies.  Such fraudulent dichotomies are male against female, white against black, the young against the old, the poor against the rich, and so on.  Simply put, they manufacture deceit on a counterfeit foundation of false dichotomies.  While they feel they are justified in spreading the lies, a deception of disinformation has worked to convince those in power that they will one day be blameless while standing under the Light of Truth.  Yet, these false powers of manipulation cheat the people by distracting their focus away from the one model dichotomy.  Again, the model dichotomy above depicts what has long been an eternal conflict ongoing between a formal king of the highest rank, and that of an informal wretch of the lowest rank.
Today, we should honor those philosopher kings and sages of the past not for just what they were allowed to write and say, but also for what they were not allowed to write and say about the alpha knowers under threat of abuse. Such notable individuals as Tao Te Ching, Confucius, Socrates, and Plato could not write or speak directly about the alpha knowers, but had to lower their eyes submissively when addressing them in rational conversation or in written prose.  So, while one won't read much about these alpha knowers in ancient texts, realize their characters were always present with their menacing stares focussed threateningly over everyone in society.    

IV.
A specified number (4, 5, 8 or 9) of sentence pairs written in parallel, developing the initial argument. The parallel sentences address the topic and convey similar meanings, with similar structure but different words.✔

1)  Much to their benefit, as the alpha knowers have always managed to avoid having his or her roles defined in society, so has the character of the lowly wretch too remained a mystery.  2)  Society has always been thought to be divided into the two classifications of a master class and a slave class. 3)  But upon closer examination, the subtle workings of society reveal a third class.  4)  These three classes are a master class, a slave class, and an outcaste class.  5)  While the master class has long exploited the slave class, they together,  as a society of both master and slave classes, reject another class of outcastes from society.      

V.
Sentences written in parallel, with no limit as to their number, in which the central points of the essay are expounded freely.✔     Metaphorically, the outcaste wretch in the introductory model is the very least rated of three types of prostitutes.  The highest rated prostitute is the wife.  She is a woman who has been deemed worthy enough to sleep in the king's bed.  The second highest rated is the commoner (serfdom) woman.  While she is not deemed worthy enough to sleep with the king, her life may be spared by him as long as she is willing to kneel in his presence.  Finally, the lowest rated is the wretch.  She is outcaste from the king and his society even to the extent that she will be killed on sight.
     Compared to the wretch, the king is divided into two types of sons. One type is a Son of God. A Son of God is a renowned man as he is intimately known with a namesake being as he was born the offspring of a king. The fearful people will honor this princely Son of God as greater in worth than even the king himself his father. In contrast, a Son of man is a stranger and is the offspring of the wretch, with her representing the nameless and faceless. In contrast to how they will praise a Son of God, the fearful people will show disdain towards a Son of man rating him less than even his nameless and faceless parents. A paradox is expressed in the above description for, just as the term "God" has an intimate meaning, the term "mankind" has just the opposite impersonal classification. So, the one who is blessed as a Son of God will be exalted by the fearful masses as they will rate such a person greater than even the very greatest; meanwhile, in stark contrast, the one who is a cursed Son of man(kind) will be rejected contemptibly by those very same masses as they will degrade such a lowly person rating them as even more worthless than the very least from which he was born.

VI.

Sentences written in parallel, with no limit as to their number. Here, points not addressed in the previous section are discussed; otherwise, the writer may continue padding the ideas in the central argument. It is to be written in a serious tone rooted in realism.✔

     Indeed, the king receives his power from the people -- from the consent of the governed.  For example, the Buddha received his empowerment from wise men who sought him out.  In order to find him, they were born with a gift to read the stars which guided them.  When finally finding pinpointing his residence, they found the Buddha was not yet born and still within his pregnant mother's womb.  So, they picked him up by carrying the bed with his mother with her still laying upon it.  Unfortunately, during his birth, his mother died.  The people would then teach the Buddha about ideal perfection for, being Hindus, they believed, because he was reincarnated into one human being not from an animal, but from another human being, he was the very manifestation of God.       

     Problem is, someone left the door of the palace wide open which allowed the Buddha to venture out into the real world.  Here he would become traumatized after witnessing for the first time the harsh realities of sickness, hunger, poverty, crime, and old age.  Quite offended at being so misled, the Buddha then demanded that he be further taught everything pertaining to the reality of the outside world.  So, as they believed he was the very manifestation of God, the people taught him about reality also.  The point here being that the people were the ones who were responsible for empowering the Buddha.  In the beginning, the Buddha was taught about ideal life within a palace apart from the world and what it was like to live as a king.   Later, he then learned about real life outside in the world and what it was like to have to live as a wretch.

     Similarly, Saul of Tarsus had to live the life of the worst human being to ever live.  Indeed, he was the one who offended the Holy Spirit by hunting down and persecuting the Christian believers.  Indeed, Jesus in the flesh did not ask king Herod or the preface Pontius Pilate the question of why they were persecuting him, but He saved that question for the real one who was responsible.  In other words, Saul of Tarsus was the greatest of the worst.  These worst I speak of were the ones who were really responsible for empowering the drunken kings and the wayward emperors -- these latter ones being those who would declare themselves tp be living gods and worshipped as such.  So, the judgement of God as the Holy Spirit was reserved to fall upon Saul as the one responsible.  As a consequence, the very worst person of Saul had to be put to death spiritually, he could never be forgiven, so that he could then be reborn again into the Apostle Paul, as God's highest Apostle and, indeed, as God's chosen vessel. 

     To elaborate even further, it wasn't a king who later pronounced himself, by way of proclamation, to possess absolute power. No, it was one of his subjects named Sir Robert Filmer.  Robert Filmer wrote a book of political philosophy called "The Partriarcha" which favored empowering the king in order to find favor with him concerning his own increased empowerment.  In contrast, John Locke had to write a challenge to Sir Robert Filmer in secret to the extent that he would only reveal his true identity in his last will and testament. 

      Similar to the Buddha, Moses had to first be raised up as a king.  Along the way though, he was exposed to the fact that his true family were actually the Hebrew slaves of the Egyptians.  So, Moses lowered himself to become a slave.  In this way, Moses could understand the plight of the most wretched from the point of view of a king.

VII.              

 Parallel sentence groups, each one consisting of either two to three, or else four to five, lines. Here, the main theme is revisited and loose ends are tied up.✔

As the worthless wretch would say, do not complain against the king out of fear or threat or you will be beaten on every level of society.  Indeed, the king is a metaphorical lion that devours both what he fears and is a threat to his domain.  Like the wretch, except for our inborn natural rights, we possess no power.  Like our Founders, we should remain submissive to the king's authority, but willing to both disobey any violation against our natural right to free will, and to be enslaved to a duty of our own free will to fight for that right.      

VIII.
Prose text where free expression and creativity are allowed. The concluding remarks are made here.✔
     When establishing a justified ordainment for our nation, our Founder's reduced towards a natural law.  This natural law was in opposition to past ordainment which, based on legal precedence, required one to bless a new king.  Indeed, our Founders could have bettered themselves establishing a king's authority as they could have then acted under him as superior conquering officials over the nameless and faceless.  Instead, they chose to perform intimately of, by, and for the people, as Abraham Lincoln once said, doing so in order to address all future tyrants and tyrannies that might threaten our new nation.  Indeed, as they themselves stood upon a solid foundation constructed by their own ancestors, and as they were mindful of divine providence having signed their names to a declaration of free will under penalty of judgement, they took a thoughtful step forward by declaring that we hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
     As all our ancestors on this earth have faced bravely the same great darkness and perished into it for our sake, so too should we all be standing in faith waiting on the supreme Truth, patient with the full realization that the worst tyranny threatening our Union today is being perpetuated by the very best mannered, the most pleasant, and the very kindest.  Indeed, we are being deceived by words that are spoken in the most eloquent of speeches.  We are being tempted to sell our souls for an empty box of goods adorned with a pretty outer wrapping.  And, finally, we are being confused with the false promises of hope and by quick changes implemented for the sake of change.   Such chaos has divided the people against themselves to the extent of atrocity, blinding white fathers to fight against their own black sons, forcing motherhood to abandon her children for a political cause, and confusing the people against the unbreakable natural laws, the very powers given to them from God Almighty, they possess within them.  
     But she will one day stand in faith and walk in faith.  Indeed, when reducing towards what we treasure most as our inheritance, as the same would be true among all the multitude of the earth, we too should never amend beyond the most precious alterations to what our ancestral Founders have scripted for our sake.  As already stated, our Founders once acted out a little masterpiece on our behalf, daring to perish with us during its enactment (indeed, even to sit among us as common members of the congregation), willing during the process to throw off their rightful social statuses as empowered Gentlemen within society.  They did forfeit those rightful titles in order to divorce us from tyranny through a painful process of cutting off our new nation's economy from Old World tyranny.  As our Founders thoughtfully and carefully narrowed to what they most treasured as an inheritance, so do we the people today narrow towards a king and a wretch.
     We the people of these united States do proclaim this king and wretch to be born equal, in some mysterious way, in both the power they possess and in the endowment provided to them by their Creator, possessing within the free will of their souls, as our Founders declared, the same exact business agenda for Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.