Rewrite #5 of my Eight Legged Chinese Essay

The People's Civil Purpose

by Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins

A Wretch

A King

A Message to Asia 
In the Form of a Chinese

 Eight Legged Essay

The Wretch <<< Moderate Middle >>> The King 

As the Sage Laozi might appreciate, as the wretch in the model above is a metaphorical outcaste representing the very least among the worthless, the symbol of the king to her right represents the very best among the greatest.  Indeed, as she is his exact inverse representing a multitude of nameless and faceless, he represents a most important and necessary ruling tyranny over her.

So, metaphorically, as the king represents the greatest of rulers, the wretch is his exact inverse, or perverse, as she represents the very least among the slaves. While the king is rational in his thinking knowing all things (or else there will be hell to pay), in contrast, the wretch is distracted irrationally from her surroundings by an inward burden. As the king, through the utilization of the powers of manipulation, owns every property and all things on that property, the wretch, against the supreme Will of the Truth residing within her, owns nothing and thus is deemed an illegal trespasser upon his property. As he is sovereign in all matters, she is judged a criminal and, so, is powerless. As she will learn to prostitute herself in order to survive, so the king is trained to prostitute others in order to thrive.

The above depicted model showing a blessed king on one end and a condemned prostitute on the other is the one true dichotomy.  This division into two parts should be referred to as the Formal Dichotomy because the only virtue greater than it is Oneness itself.  The Formal Dichotomy portrays a conflict which has been enduring forever.  The purpose for my depicting such a cruel reality is for the establishment of a less divisive political scale.  This apolitical scale is neither left nor right or conservative and liberal.  Together, this allegory of a king and of a wretch creates a new rational thought process.  This rational process, in turn, is a truth engine.  In contrast to the Almighty Truth, that far away place which is unapproachable to us, a down to earth truth engine inputs large quantities of data in order to reduce its content to the output of a small quality truth. A quality truth is not the same as the Almighty Truth, but is a platonic best-principled path in the direction towards that Truth.  This particular quality truth is, once again, the one true dichotomy which, in turn, works to expose the many existing false dichotomies.  Examples of some of these false dichotomies are male against female, white versus black, rich against poor, old against young, social communist versus crony capitalist, left against right, conservative against liberal, and so on. 

To express this truth engine, let's utilize it when considering the issue of healthcare.  While the king above, by his blessed birth, will be provided with the richest of food and assured of the highest form of healthcare from the day he is born until he dies. the wretch will be left abandoned on the street having to eat the poorest of food and living in the unhealthiest of conditions.

Metaphorically, the wretch is part of three types of prostitutes.  The first type is the wife.  She is a woman who is worthy enough to sleep with the king in his bed.  The second type is the commoner (serfdom) woman.  While she is not deemed worthy enough to sleep with the king, her life may be spared by him as long as she is willing to kneel in his presence.  Finally, the third type is the wretched woman.  She is outcaste from the king and his society even to the extent that she will be killed on sight.  Compared to the wretch, the king is divided into two types of sons. One type is a Son of God.  A Son of God is a renowned man as he is intimately known with a namesake being that he was born the offspring of a king. The fearful people will honor this princely Son of God as greater in worth than even the king himself who is his father.  In contrast, a Son of man is a stranger and is the offspring of the nameless and faceless. In contrast to how they will praise a Son of God, the thoughtless people will show disdain towards a Son of man rating him even less than his nameless and faceless parents.  A paradox is hidden in the above description for, just as the term "God" has an intimate meaning, the term "mankind" has just the opposite meaning of an impersonal classification. So, the one who is blessed as a Son of God will be exalted by the fearful masses as and they will rate such a person greater than even the very greatest; meanwhile, in stark contrast, the one who is a cursed Son of man(kind) will be rejected contemptibly by those very same masses as they will degrade such a lowly person as even more worthless than the very least from which he was born.

I do not know a lot about Chinese history, but I do know a little about what is most vital.    

When they were reducing towards the ordainment of a natural law, and as they were later creating a new government upon that foundation, our Founding Fathers were not abide by the official legal precedence of the day, acting as superior and conquering officials over the nameless and faceless; but, instead, they performed intimately of, by, and for those people, as Abraham Lincoln once said, doing so in order to address all future tyrants and tyrannies.  Indeed, as they stood upon a solid foundation of their ancestors, they took a thoughtful step forward also by their declaration that we hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. 

Like our ancestors before us, we should be waiting patiently and faithfully upon the Truth with the full realization that the worst tyranny threatening our Union today is being delivered by the most pleasant and kind people in the most eloquent of speeches, as a false glory of hope, and as change implemented for the sake of change -- as laws enacted not for the advancement of our Civil Purpose, but for the sake of the law alone.   Such a condition is worse than inhumane as it perpetuates a cycle of abuse and hatred that divides the people against themselves.  Indeed, when whittling down the gifts we have received as an inheritance from the past, as the same would be true among all the multitude upon the earth, so, we too should never amend beyond the most precious alterations to that which was scripted by our Founding Fathers.  As already stated, our Founders once acted out a little masterpiece for our sake, daring to perish with us during the enactment of it (indeed, even to sit among us as common members of the congregation), willing to throw off their rightful social statuses as Gentlemen in British high society through the very painful process of divorcing our nation's economy from Old World tyranny.  As our Founders once narrowed their vision further towards those who are the common people, so do we today narrow ourselves towards those who are the most nameless and faceless, reducing all men to that of a single conflicting reality between a king and a wretch, proclaiming that both of them are born equal, in some mysterious way, in their power and in the endowment provided to them by their Creator, possessing in their beings, as our Founders once declared, the same exact business agenda for Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.