In the end, tyranny always wins, and the people always lose. Take the campaign of Ron Paul for example. While he has never won the presidency, he has made a fabulous living for himself. So, win or lose, those involved within the two party electoral process make a fabulous living. At the same time, the vast majority of the people lose regardless of whether their candidate wins or not.
So, what is the alternative? Well, the American Movement is the only alternative to the electoral process. When it gets down to it, the only reason the United States is special is because of our Civil Purpose. It certainly isn't because we have the best government officials, the best lawyers, the best professors, the best schools, and the like. What makes us different is the new order our Founders established for us within The Declaration of Independence, and the Amendments they created within the U.S. Constitution to advance that new order, with this being our Civil Purpose.
In contrast to the spouting today of vain hope and change for the sake of it, the greatest of benefits are derived from the most precious of alterations.
viernes, 29 de marzo de 2013
jueves, 28 de marzo de 2013
What those limited ones who live within the shell of an egg have a hard time understanding and what mothers know with certainty in raising children is how, concerning the nurturing required in doing so, an absolute requirement in the process is the daily dosage of an ever increasing amount of contentment and enjoyment, exponentially speaking.
And so says our Founding Father's natural law that they so thoughtfully declared for our sake within The Declaration of Independence.
A mother will fight for the happiness of her children; or, she will wither away and die taking them all with her.
Causing much confusion within the limited resources of the egg we all live today are a tyranny of a few who spout freedom and equality as goals. Yet, outside of the egg, once again, as mothers will know, these are mere prerequisites required for the advancement of our Civil Purpose.
And this is the conflict we live today as people desiring to advance the contentment of all, in the process of doing so, will have to go to war against seemingly nice people, brothers and sisters attempting to advance liberty and equality as causes.
Yet, the very Fullness Himself didn't come to be responsible, but for fulfillment.
So, really, all wars can be thought of as conflicts between those few, on one side, who deceive the majority to the benefit of themselves, with these being those glamorous ones who give emotional speeches all the while waving banners of freedom and equality as virtues worth dying for, and those many disadvantaged who, on the other side, desire to increase the contentment for all knowing that, in doing so, such virtues as freedom and equality will have to exist as a prerequisite foundation.
Regarding the mess we live in today, we no longer have a government made up of a congress of representatives and of senators, made up of a president, and made up of a supreme court of justices. Indeed, instead of having legislators, administrators, and judicators serving us, we have lawyers. Everywhere one looks today in our government, all we can see is layer upon layer of lawyers. Yet, just as our Founders intended for our government to be rational, they didn't intend for it to be governed by lawyers.
As our Founders reduced rationally to a single new order made up of a natural law, with this being our Civil Purpose, the anti-founders, those who would one day become legal strangers to us (delegating us all from citizens down to clients), would then set themselves busily about stumbling up future American children by the establishment of what they themselves have always thought to be a totally new order: The irrational process of a two-party system.
Think about it, while our Founders attempted to be rational by reducing unalienable and self evident to one natural law, the American people were then immediately usurped by the development of the two party system.
Let me explain please. Look at the situation in terms of the law being equivalent to the ten commandments. As the ten commandments were laws blessed by the Fullness for the Jewish religion, the New Covenant would later on become an order established by Him for the Gentiles (future Christians) which was to "Love thy neighbor as thyself."
This is rational because it was reduced down to from ten to one.
When our Founders established a new order within The Declaration of Independence, they reduced by the utilization of the scientific method of natural law. In congregating together to establish this new natural law, they reduced to one. Therefore they were rational.
When the government later on expanded to a new order of the two party system, they became irrational for, you see, while the U.S. Constitution speaks of rationality, at the time our Founders were creating it, they weren't expecting that, one day, the government would later create another competing new order of the two party system. This two party system would then further pollute the system with bastions upon bastions of lawyers.
The only reason we have survived for as long as we have today as these United States is because of the American Movement, a process which returns the American people constantly to the revering of our Founding Fathers, to the Declaration of Independence, and the new order they declared within it - with this being our Civil Purpose.
So, how can one make our government rational once more? Again, the people need to take the authority to assign the Supreme Court their duties.
And so says our Founding Father's natural law that they so thoughtfully declared for our sake within The Declaration of Independence.
A mother will fight for the happiness of her children; or, she will wither away and die taking them all with her.
Causing much confusion within the limited resources of the egg we all live today are a tyranny of a few who spout freedom and equality as goals. Yet, outside of the egg, once again, as mothers will know, these are mere prerequisites required for the advancement of our Civil Purpose.
And this is the conflict we live today as people desiring to advance the contentment of all, in the process of doing so, will have to go to war against seemingly nice people, brothers and sisters attempting to advance liberty and equality as causes.
Yet, the very Fullness Himself didn't come to be responsible, but for fulfillment.
So, really, all wars can be thought of as conflicts between those few, on one side, who deceive the majority to the benefit of themselves, with these being those glamorous ones who give emotional speeches all the while waving banners of freedom and equality as virtues worth dying for, and those many disadvantaged who, on the other side, desire to increase the contentment for all knowing that, in doing so, such virtues as freedom and equality will have to exist as a prerequisite foundation.
Regarding the mess we live in today, we no longer have a government made up of a congress of representatives and of senators, made up of a president, and made up of a supreme court of justices. Indeed, instead of having legislators, administrators, and judicators serving us, we have lawyers. Everywhere one looks today in our government, all we can see is layer upon layer of lawyers. Yet, just as our Founders intended for our government to be rational, they didn't intend for it to be governed by lawyers.
As our Founders reduced rationally to a single new order made up of a natural law, with this being our Civil Purpose, the anti-founders, those who would one day become legal strangers to us (delegating us all from citizens down to clients), would then set themselves busily about stumbling up future American children by the establishment of what they themselves have always thought to be a totally new order: The irrational process of a two-party system.
Think about it, while our Founders attempted to be rational by reducing unalienable and self evident to one natural law, the American people were then immediately usurped by the development of the two party system.
Let me explain please. Look at the situation in terms of the law being equivalent to the ten commandments. As the ten commandments were laws blessed by the Fullness for the Jewish religion, the New Covenant would later on become an order established by Him for the Gentiles (future Christians) which was to "Love thy neighbor as thyself."
This is rational because it was reduced down to from ten to one.
When our Founders established a new order within The Declaration of Independence, they reduced by the utilization of the scientific method of natural law. In congregating together to establish this new natural law, they reduced to one. Therefore they were rational.
When the government later on expanded to a new order of the two party system, they became irrational for, you see, while the U.S. Constitution speaks of rationality, at the time our Founders were creating it, they weren't expecting that, one day, the government would later create another competing new order of the two party system. This two party system would then further pollute the system with bastions upon bastions of lawyers.
The only reason we have survived for as long as we have today as these United States is because of the American Movement, a process which returns the American people constantly to the revering of our Founding Fathers, to the Declaration of Independence, and the new order they declared within it - with this being our Civil Purpose.
So, how can one make our government rational once more? Again, the people need to take the authority to assign the Supreme Court their duties.
martes, 26 de marzo de 2013
Back in times of old, the eldest child within every family of the aristocracy was typically employed into the monarchy. After all, the eldest offspring generally grew up to be more responsible and thus more concerned about the well being of his or her younger siblings. On occasion, an anomaly surely happened in nature as the eldest child would be delegated back in the family order because of some born sickness whether it be mental or physical. While such a condition would leave them at a disadvantage, these eldest children would still express a patriarchal-like concern for the well being of their younger siblings.
In spite of all the confusion happening in the world today, we would be better off just accepting it for what it is. Indeed, there are lots of empowered impostors ruling over us today just as there are lots of people with a God given love for tending to the people. The latter ones have been persecuted and, as a result, now live lost among the masses.
This demonstrates the need for limited government as, while those impostors functioning in such a government would be doing less with themselves, those lost amongst us with a God given ability to govern would be freed up to rule more.
In spite of all the confusion happening in the world today, we would be better off just accepting it for what it is. Indeed, there are lots of empowered impostors ruling over us today just as there are lots of people with a God given love for tending to the people. The latter ones have been persecuted and, as a result, now live lost among the masses.
This demonstrates the need for limited government as, while those impostors functioning in such a government would be doing less with themselves, those lost amongst us with a God given ability to govern would be freed up to rule more.
lunes, 25 de marzo de 2013
The empowered in our American society, those offspring born privileged and so uplifted to a position of intelligence, are constantly hanging over the heads of the majority the threat of Futt Bucking, the holding of the disadvantaged in contempt "of law just for the sake of the law, (with this being very "fiat" in fashion just because I said so - or else!). As a result, the people are allowed to be exposed to the ordeal of sexual abuse within the jail or prison systems they have to share with far worse criminals.
Yet, in the United States, there now exists no such contempt committed against the law for the sake of the law. Rather, the only true contempt are by those committing offenses against the people's Civil Purpose! As I have already pointed out, as has always been the case in history, it is after the lawyers get around to destroying the foundation of the narrowed down primary order, the base below which a structure of laws has been built upon, tantamount to them shooting their own legs out from underneath themselves, that the conditions of their societies are left in the worst kind of chaos - law for the sake of law - and, therefore, their civilizations crumbled into heaps of shambles.
Those parasites that choose not to be symbiotic to the benefit of all men will end up destroying their own societies by the killing off of their host bodies.
Go ahead and chuckle for it is amusing.
As we are learning rather slowly in the United States, chaos isn't the absence of laws, as one might first think; but, much the paradox, it is the utilization of the law for the sake of the law minus any foundation of order.
For the intelligent who would care, here is a subtle point that happened in American history. As The U.S. Constitution was derived as a legal document concerning law, The Declaration of Independence was derived as a formal document concerning a new order. As the legal document remarried us to a new limited government of a congress, a president, and a supreme court, the formal document divorced us from tyranny.
In other words, the formal document dealing with the new order, concerning the supreme judgement of the Truth that is, should take precedence over the legal document dealing with law.
Our Founders didn't create the U.S. Constitution as a box of laws to stick us in, but as a box to think outside of in order to advance our Civil Purpose.
The evils of Futt Bucking!
Indeed, as part of those who make up the disadvantaged in our society, most of us live under the threat of Futt Bucking. Meanwhile, the empowered go about their business having immunity from such persecution doing whatever they want with impunity.
Yet, in the United States, there now exists no such contempt committed against the law for the sake of the law. Rather, the only true contempt are by those committing offenses against the people's Civil Purpose! As I have already pointed out, as has always been the case in history, it is after the lawyers get around to destroying the foundation of the narrowed down primary order, the base below which a structure of laws has been built upon, tantamount to them shooting their own legs out from underneath themselves, that the conditions of their societies are left in the worst kind of chaos - law for the sake of law - and, therefore, their civilizations crumbled into heaps of shambles.
Those parasites that choose not to be symbiotic to the benefit of all men will end up destroying their own societies by the killing off of their host bodies.
Go ahead and chuckle for it is amusing.
As we are learning rather slowly in the United States, chaos isn't the absence of laws, as one might first think; but, much the paradox, it is the utilization of the law for the sake of the law minus any foundation of order.
For the intelligent who would care, here is a subtle point that happened in American history. As The U.S. Constitution was derived as a legal document concerning law, The Declaration of Independence was derived as a formal document concerning a new order. As the legal document remarried us to a new limited government of a congress, a president, and a supreme court, the formal document divorced us from tyranny.
In other words, the formal document dealing with the new order, concerning the supreme judgement of the Truth that is, should take precedence over the legal document dealing with law.
Our Founders didn't create the U.S. Constitution as a box of laws to stick us in, but as a box to think outside of in order to advance our Civil Purpose.
The evils of Futt Bucking!
Indeed, as part of those who make up the disadvantaged in our society, most of us live under the threat of Futt Bucking. Meanwhile, the empowered go about their business having immunity from such persecution doing whatever they want with impunity.
domingo, 24 de marzo de 2013
The people will always have difficulty accepting a harsh reality concerning government that the greatest part of those within it are either going to be born empowered, are going to be drunk on the false powers of manipulation, or are going to be both.
Once again, as the offspring of the ruling class are trained to their empowered positions over those who make up the disadvantaged majority in society, much like Alexander the Great was trained by Aristotle, the offspring of the disadvantaged majority are taught to their educated positions beneath those ruling over them as the ruling class, as the mind of a slave learned how to improve under the guidance of Socrates as depicted in Plato's dialogue called "Meno."
As the offspring of the disadvantaged need advancement, the offspring of the ruling class don't need any. Therefore, as state universities should be considered institutions of education, private universities, such as Harvard, should be considered institutions of empowerment. As it is in the best interest of the disadvantaged majority for society to advance, it has always been in the best interest of the ruling class to maintain society in a perpetual state of stasis.
Our Founders within The Declaration of Independence gave examples demonstrating how immaturity manifests itself within an empowered ruler when he or she lacks an education:
He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.
He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:
For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences
For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:
For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.
He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.
He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands. He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.
.
Once again, as the offspring of the ruling class are trained to their empowered positions over those who make up the disadvantaged majority in society, much like Alexander the Great was trained by Aristotle, the offspring of the disadvantaged majority are taught to their educated positions beneath those ruling over them as the ruling class, as the mind of a slave learned how to improve under the guidance of Socrates as depicted in Plato's dialogue called "Meno."
As the offspring of the disadvantaged need advancement, the offspring of the ruling class don't need any. Therefore, as state universities should be considered institutions of education, private universities, such as Harvard, should be considered institutions of empowerment. As it is in the best interest of the disadvantaged majority for society to advance, it has always been in the best interest of the ruling class to maintain society in a perpetual state of stasis.
Our Founders within The Declaration of Independence gave examples demonstrating how immaturity manifests itself within an empowered ruler when he or she lacks an education:
He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.
He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:
For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences
For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:
For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.
He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.
He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands. He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.
.
viernes, 22 de marzo de 2013
In trying to do whatever I can to advance the people's Civil Purpose, and thus preserve the U.S. Constitution, . . ..
Let's stop here for a second. Did you notice the coma that I placed between the phrase "Civil Purpose" and the word-conjunction "and" that follows it? By a rule of grammar, this means I can remove every bit of the dependent clause written between the two comas without altering any of the readers ability to comprehend the sentence.
For example, if I held the legal document of the U.S. Constitution to be more important than the formal document of the Declaration of Independence, then I would have had to write it like this:
In trying to do whatever I can to preserve the U.S. Constitution, and thus advance this nation's Civil Purpose, . . ..
Or, I might have written it like this:
In trying to do whatever I can to advance the people's Civil Purpose and thus preserve the U.S. Constitution, . . ..
All Americans should believe that the formal order is more important than any of the legal laws. By formal, I mean the conclusion our Founding Father's obtained within The Declaration of Independence by the utilization of the scientific method of natural law.
In other words, laws exist as productive laws only when they stand upon the foundation of an order. When it doesn't do so, it becomes chaos. Most think of chaos as pure "spontaneity" devoid of all laws, but this is a fallacy.
To further explain this subtle point, in reducing scientifically, spontaneity as a force should be thought of as half of a natural law equation, as reality actually presents itself metaphysically in the form of (2+0)=1/2. .
With the variable 2 equal to numbers, the law, and structure,
With the variable 0 equal to no numbers, spontaneity, and motion,
And with 1/2 oscillating the two forces to the sum of 1.
Again, true chaos is the enactment of a structure of laws without first having beneath them the support of an underlying foundation of order.
Let's stop here for a second. Did you notice the coma that I placed between the phrase "Civil Purpose" and the word-conjunction "and" that follows it? By a rule of grammar, this means I can remove every bit of the dependent clause written between the two comas without altering any of the readers ability to comprehend the sentence.
For example, if I held the legal document of the U.S. Constitution to be more important than the formal document of the Declaration of Independence, then I would have had to write it like this:
In trying to do whatever I can to preserve the U.S. Constitution, and thus advance this nation's Civil Purpose, . . ..
Or, I might have written it like this:
In trying to do whatever I can to advance the people's Civil Purpose and thus preserve the U.S. Constitution, . . ..
All Americans should believe that the formal order is more important than any of the legal laws. By formal, I mean the conclusion our Founding Father's obtained within The Declaration of Independence by the utilization of the scientific method of natural law.
In other words, laws exist as productive laws only when they stand upon the foundation of an order. When it doesn't do so, it becomes chaos. Most think of chaos as pure "spontaneity" devoid of all laws, but this is a fallacy.
To further explain this subtle point, in reducing scientifically, spontaneity as a force should be thought of as half of a natural law equation, as reality actually presents itself metaphysically in the form of (2+0)=1/2. .
With the variable 2 equal to numbers, the law, and structure,
With the variable 0 equal to no numbers, spontaneity, and motion,
And with 1/2 oscillating the two forces to the sum of 1.
Again, true chaos is the enactment of a structure of laws without first having beneath them the support of an underlying foundation of order.
jueves, 21 de marzo de 2013
It is difficult to appreciate the United States in terms of order rather than the law. Indeed, when asking those in government their opinions concerning what is special about the United States, lawyers will respond mostly, as they make up over ninety percent of government, leaning towards the praising of themselves and the legal functions they perform in society.
In response, we fail to perceive that there exists a subtle difference between what is the original established order and what are the necessary laws created to further advance that order. One difference is how the interpretation of law for the sake of law can't be determined specifically without the establishment of an order. This is why the interpretation of the U.S. Constitution has led the governments of our United States unto a shambles.
In other words, the United States is fast becoming no different than any other sovereign Union in the world. For example, in the poor nation of Greece, there are still a select few empowered today who think their society is the greatest place on earth.
Chaos: Happens when those empowered as the law work to corrupt the order that the laws were established upon originally.
Tantamount to shooting ones feet out from beneath.
Between the processes of law and order, if I am the highest authority in Greece blessed with the sovereign right to empower others and, in regards to my best interests, I decide to empower the process of law over others who speak of the process of order, then between the empowered and those who aren't, who would the fearful masses choose to listen?
If the Constitution of the United States today is indeed losing its sovereignty corrupting and dissolving into a New World Order, then what prior order within the United States would this New World Order be replacing?
Because law for the sake of law is no better than chaos, we have all been blinded! While the U.S. Constitution is the law of the land, the Declaration of Independence should be proclaimed by the people living today to be the order of the land. Any civilization, for the purpose of avoiding future chaos, must trump the process of law with an established order.
How has a New World Order managed to advanced the prior order which came out of Socrates? How has the development of the so-called "Arab Spring" managed to advance the order of Western Civilization?
Cutting through the confusion, there is no New World Order or a so-called Arab Spring, but a return to the prior old order of tyranny.
For if this romantic notion of an Arab Spring isn't somehow reconnecting itself with the primary overall order that came out of Socrates, we are speaking of Western Civilization here, then the movement should be considered nothing more than nonsense concocted by a select few senior editors within the world's media corporations.
Understand, in the United States, if you are a true American, then you should believe that only one true movement ever existed with it being a phenomenon called "The American Movement." While lawyers, for the purpose of benefiting themselves, will always prefer to point to the two-party system as the next significant phenomenon to happen to our United States over the prior legal document of the U.S. Constitution and the formal document of the Declaration of Independence, the real advancement that happened was actually the American Movement process started by a few gentlemen philosophers, the American transcendentalists like Ralph Waldo Emerson, Henry Thoreau, and Samuel Clemens. It was philosophers like them who worked to advance the disadvantaged returning them to the revering of our Founding Fathers, to the new order they established within the Declaration of Independence as our Civil Purpose, and to the U.S. Constitution they created to advance our Civil Purpose.
This American Movement process takes place wholly outside of the legal (electoral) process.
Again, if looking at it as a tree, the best we should ever appreciate these minor growths in history referred to as the civil rights movement and the labor movement are as mere branches off of the overall American Movement process which, again, is the returning of the people to the revering of our Founding Fathers, of the new order they established within the Declaration of Independence as our Civil Purpose, and of the more perfect Union they created within the U.S. Constitution to advance our Civil Purpose.
Otherwise, such minor events as the civil rights movement, the labor movement, the tea party movement,and the Ron Paul movement should all be considered false movements.
While narrowing this Proclamation of Sovereignty down to a letter holding our governments to a higher judgement and to a greater penalty, I intend to illuminate further philosophically concerning the question of what should be considered truly American versus what should be the rest of the world.
martes, 19 de marzo de 2013
As a Prince of an empowered king will be praised by the fearful masses as even greater than the king himself, so will the son of a common Man be condemned by the masses as even more worthless than the very least among Men.
Therefore, on this day of the twentieth of March, 2013 and forever onward from this date, we the people of the United States do declare the greatest and the most sovereign of all kings to be the Son of Man!
In determining our right of sovereignty, the difference between a declaration and a proclamation is that the latter is an order written as a royal decree of authority either directly or indirectly from above. As our Founders were actors within a little masterpiece called The Declaration of Independence bowing from their rightful social status on high to play the parts of mere commoners, as representatives before a king that is, so, today, should the people likewise declare that we represent the very least one among us -- that Great Burden within her.
Stand in faith. Walk in faith.
This is the significance of this People's Proclamation of Sovereignty as, because the Great Burden resides within the very least among us, and as the Lord proclaimed Himself to be the Son of Man, this gives us the sovereign right today to hold our governments to a higher judgement and to a greater penalty.
In other words, we should be holding the actions of our governments to a standard that is far more than just accountable, but holding them to the highest of judgements and the greatest of penalties, as we are justified in our actions because of the Great Burden within the very least among us.
As Plato might have reasoned it out, if the blessed one on his throne would have many informal problems to deal with, then his inverse or perverse, with her being the condemned one made to live homeless on the street, would have but one formal Problem.
With authority, overcome. Stand in faith in darkness. Walk in faith out of darkness.
As our Founders were justified in divorcing the people out from under the persecution of a wayward tyrant, and as they were legal in their remarrying us to the more perfect Union administered by a head president, and as the highest authority is the son of the very least one, we the people of the United States do not need a king ruling over us today.
From this date, we the people of the United States do hold our president, administer, and commander and chief to a higher judgement and to a greater penalty even to the threat of divine intervention by the Great Burden.
Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins
(Founder)
Therefore, on this day of the twentieth of March, 2013 and forever onward from this date, we the people of the United States do declare the greatest and the most sovereign of all kings to be the Son of Man!
In determining our right of sovereignty, the difference between a declaration and a proclamation is that the latter is an order written as a royal decree of authority either directly or indirectly from above. As our Founders were actors within a little masterpiece called The Declaration of Independence bowing from their rightful social status on high to play the parts of mere commoners, as representatives before a king that is, so, today, should the people likewise declare that we represent the very least one among us -- that Great Burden within her.
Stand in faith. Walk in faith.
This is the significance of this People's Proclamation of Sovereignty as, because the Great Burden resides within the very least among us, and as the Lord proclaimed Himself to be the Son of Man, this gives us the sovereign right today to hold our governments to a higher judgement and to a greater penalty.
In other words, we should be holding the actions of our governments to a standard that is far more than just accountable, but holding them to the highest of judgements and the greatest of penalties, as we are justified in our actions because of the Great Burden within the very least among us.
As Plato might have reasoned it out, if the blessed one on his throne would have many informal problems to deal with, then his inverse or perverse, with her being the condemned one made to live homeless on the street, would have but one formal Problem.
With authority, overcome. Stand in faith in darkness. Walk in faith out of darkness.
As our Founders were justified in divorcing the people out from under the persecution of a wayward tyrant, and as they were legal in their remarrying us to the more perfect Union administered by a head president, and as the highest authority is the son of the very least one, we the people of the United States do not need a king ruling over us today.
From this date, we the people of the United States do hold our president, administer, and commander and chief to a higher judgement and to a greater penalty even to the threat of divine intervention by the Great Burden.
Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins
(Founder)
In the introduction of the Declaration of Independence, our Founders felt a need to elaborate. The significance is how the king never felt burdened to explain himself. While his royal propaganda machine reminded everyone that they lived within his kingdom as the owners of nothing, the king also reminded them how he owned all property and things. So, there wasn't much need for elaboration. By legal precedence, if you wanted to start your own kingdom, you needed to either crown yourself or someone else as a king and go to war with him challenging his sovereign right as the ruler.
In contrast, our Founders abolished the legal precedence involved in splitting from a king and his kingdom by utilizing the scientific process of natural law.
In contrast, our Founders abolished the legal precedence involved in splitting from a king and his kingdom by utilizing the scientific process of natural law.
lunes, 18 de marzo de 2013
On this day, the eighteenth of March, 2013, his vain hope is still flying as an eloquent banner fluttering above the masses as if it were a cool breeze which, upon the souls of the shallow and carefree, seems to have a calming effect.
In the game of life, how can full grown men find pleasure in the defeating of small boys?
Well, think about it, those concerned about life will always be at a disadvantage in contrast to those trained to be unconscionable just as those diverted inwardly with a burden will always be deemed less intelligent in contrast to the liberated extroverts, and just as those who pain themselves to be rational will always be perceived as weak in contrast to those whose actions are whimsical and thoughtless.
As a confused shepherd would tend to mislead his or her flock spontaneously into an unfathomable wilderness, all the while spouting change for the sake of change, in contrast, the simple truth has always had its basis on a foundation of history. As we already possess most of what we need for the advancement of our Civil Purpose, regarding what we already possess as an inheritance from our ancestors, the greatest of benefits are derived from the most precious of alterations.
What other reason would lead full grown men to pleasure in the defeat of small boys?
The order for western civilization came out of an unofficial person called Socrates. As the empowered privileged officials ruling over him during that time would have liked to have had both the owning of the cake as well as the eating of it, just as the empowered today would like for everyone alive to think the same of them, in the end, one can't claim both designations as one who is empowered by birth and one who has received a rational education towards advancement.
Meditate a little on this: For many in society, they aren't educated knowers; but, they are born empowered as such.
Indeed, what should be concluded above all else concerning the masterful efforts of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle is a basic paradox concerning what is true: Even to this day, the offspring of the empowered in modern society are not being educated, but are still being trained at the likes of Harvard and other such institutions of empowerment all for the purpose of training them how to best take over and rule when it is time for them to take the rightful places of their parents. What is hard to realize is how these empowered aren't the best educated in society nor are they the most rational as such privileged people will never have a need or desire instilled in them to be either.
Or else!
"Oh? You don't think I am educated as a judge? Thirty days in jail for contempt!"
"You don't think that I am educated as a business executive? Your fired!"
"You don't think that I am educated as a police officer?" Talk to my gun about it!"
To put it even more bluntly, in life, what can never be properly appreciated is how the irrational will always end up ruling over the rational.
This perplexing oddity about life has been known for thousands of years when it was made most clear back when a new type of education came out of Socrates, who, as Plato managed to express within his dialogue entitled "Meno," Socrates demonstrated how the mind of a slave could learn to advance just as long as a mid-wife philosopher such as himself was willing to serve him or her.
In other words, the Greek people at that time believed certain people were born into society with empowerment as their birthright.. As a child of a slave wasn't born from wealthy parents, it was believed they couldn't ever advance beyond their lot in life. But, as Socrates was working around to realize, this wasn't the truth as they could be educated!
So, as most of us are educated and rational, Jed Bush, for example, should be considered empowered and irrational.
For the reason that those born empowered in life will always be more out of touch with reality than those of us who have to suffer the elements, so shall tyranny always exploit the rational with its irrationality. As much of their lives will be made easy and downhill for them by their wealthy parents, so they will grow up to become spoiled irrational rulers.
Don't be so quick to dismiss what I say. Let it sink in.
As the Truth alone is the greatest power over all the other lessor powers of false manipulation, then knowing this one truth alone will best benefit the people. Indeed, while best any government can be is a bastion of impostors, as a consequence, those precious ones best fitted to govern over us will always be out there lost among a multitude of worthless masses.
Therefore, as one of the fathers of the American Movement Henry Thoreau once said, "That government is best which governs least."
Meditate a little on this: For many in society, they aren't educated knowers; but, they are born empowered as such.
Indeed, what should be concluded above all else concerning the masterful efforts of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle is a basic paradox concerning what is true: Even to this day, the offspring of the empowered in modern society are not being educated, but are still being trained at the likes of Harvard and other such institutions of empowerment all for the purpose of training them how to best take over and rule when it is time for them to take the rightful places of their parents. What is hard to realize is how these empowered aren't the best educated in society nor are they the most rational as such privileged people will never have a need or desire instilled in them to be either.
Or else!
"Oh? You don't think I am educated as a judge? Thirty days in jail for contempt!"
"You don't think that I am educated as a business executive? Your fired!"
"You don't think that I am educated as a police officer?" Talk to my gun about it!"
To put it even more bluntly, in life, what can never be properly appreciated is how the irrational will always end up ruling over the rational.
This perplexing oddity about life has been known for thousands of years when it was made most clear back when a new type of education came out of Socrates, who, as Plato managed to express within his dialogue entitled "Meno," Socrates demonstrated how the mind of a slave could learn to advance just as long as a mid-wife philosopher such as himself was willing to serve him or her.
In other words, the Greek people at that time believed certain people were born into society with empowerment as their birthright.. As a child of a slave wasn't born from wealthy parents, it was believed they couldn't ever advance beyond their lot in life. But, as Socrates was working around to realize, this wasn't the truth as they could be educated!
So, as most of us are educated and rational, Jed Bush, for example, should be considered empowered and irrational.
For the reason that those born empowered in life will always be more out of touch with reality than those of us who have to suffer the elements, so shall tyranny always exploit the rational with its irrationality. As much of their lives will be made easy and downhill for them by their wealthy parents, so they will grow up to become spoiled irrational rulers.
Don't be so quick to dismiss what I say. Let it sink in.
As the Truth alone is the greatest power over all the other lessor powers of false manipulation, then knowing this one truth alone will best benefit the people. Indeed, while best any government can be is a bastion of impostors, as a consequence, those precious ones best fitted to govern over us will always be out there lost among a multitude of worthless masses.
Therefore, as one of the fathers of the American Movement Henry Thoreau once said, "That government is best which governs least."
viernes, 15 de marzo de 2013
On this day, the fifteenth of March, 2013, that eloquent banner of vain hope is still flying above fluttering in a breeze which, towards the souls of the shallow and carefree, seems to have a cool, calming effect.
Indeed, as it will always be the case with ashes to ashes and dust to dust, so will the confused masses always be easily confused.
Huh?
Huh?
Fortunately, to the few of us who are wise and truly educated, all this spontaneous chaos being blown about as a substitution for the new order established by our Founders is nothing more than a lot of flapping in the wind, a front for a more devious agenda!
Who are these strangers absconding our United States? As odd as it might sound, as it is with every tyranny, they are the parasitic cowards and weak minded in our society who stand behind a defense made up of good, strong, and brave Americans!
Wake up America to what is our one true American dichotomy! Indeed, as every good German now knows, there is only one true "Mein Kamph!" As long as there has been the light of day and the darkness of night, so has a disadvantaged majority desired, not to destroy tyranny mind you; but, we have only desired to control it for the purpose of advancing our happiness!.
While this is the one true American dichotomy, all other such conflicts, things such as black versus white, male versus female, rich against poor, and so on should all be considered falsehoods.
And that isn't all! Unfortunately, if it is true that a protagonist in a story is only as sophisticated as the antagonists that are in opposition to him and her, then the twisting, slimy, knotted up worms are going to have to get a lot deeper!
Quickly shifting over to mix in yet another metaphor, as our governments once served the people more as a hive of productive honey bees would, oh, one would surely get stung on occasion in fetching honey, the associations of strangers who rule over us today, yes, they do speak their very own legal language of law, have become the paper nests of unproductive hornets and wasps!
Behold!
As if to rewrite the classic German masterpiece, "My Struggle," even the prime golden voice himself cannot see the folly of his speaking in endless false dichotomies while peering from one directing to the other, appearing painfully when doing so and yet fancifully, stopping just short of uttering blasphemies, in great contempt of our American Civil Purpose, eroding away all our hard sought gains under the guise of change for the sake of it, a process which is stumbling up the children of these United States, withering away our dignity and authority unto shame, mocking the blood that has been so preciously shed for us in the process, and utilizing the bullying tactics of a pimp by threatening and menacing to dissolve our Union towards a more nameless and faceless state.
Meanwhile, in stark contrast to these puffed up winds of change, the greatest of benefits are derived from the most precious of alterations! As this has always been the case, so will it always be the case.
In preserving the lightening in a bottle our Founders had persevered and worked so hard to capture, change should never be allowed to happen beyond the process of "amending," which means to cherish to the extent of clarity. In turn, this clarification of reality requires that one consider the topic carefully. Therefore, the word "amendment" within the U.S. Constitution goes beyond the darkness of "law for the sake of the law," with these being the false powers of manipulation; but, the law of the land should always be treated with the lightness of careful consideration, with a type of meditation leaning towards the supreme power of the Truth.
As Socrates himself once narrowed constantly towards this unapproachable Truth, likewise, our Founders, by the scientific process of natural law, narrowed their way, , towards the establishment of a new order within The Declaration of Independence assembling themselves in fellowship when doing so. In turn, this formal declaration of a new order, with this being a natural law, justified our divorce formally out from under the wrongful rule of a tyrant.
As our justified divorce is formal, in contrast, our new marriage to a more perfect Union within the U.S. Constitution is legal. Therefore, legally speaking, the natural law our Founders declared within The Declaration of Independence abolished every past tradition of legal precedence. One needs the most careful of consideration of the new order, established by our formal divorce from tyranny, with this being our Civil Purpose, in order so our new marriage to a more perfect Union within The U.S. Constitution might be interpreted properly.
This new order is now being threatened either with the lambasting of the characters of our Founding Fathers, by the usurping of our U.S. Constitution with the inferior laws of the United Nations, and with the thoughtless demeaning of our American Civil Purpose with a new world order of chaos.
As this eloquence of hope and change blows like the wind thrashing itself about spontaneously out of our control, an endless flow of taxes are similarly being lobbied away from us towards the treasuries of impostors who have gained control over us. These "officials" are supposed to be of, by, and for the people, but are now strangers having evolved to speak a different legal language altogehter. Likewise, as we are supposed to be citizens sharing sovereign power with a limited federal government, they have worked their inequity to confuse us, mixing us up turbulently into a mess of different languages, trashing us into whoring states of competing lessor clients. Paradoxically, as the power to proclaim much come from a sovereign king, the Word of the ultimate King Himself ushers forth from within, a Great Burden crying out from the soul of the very least of us, with her being the most wretched among the homeless.
Therefore, we the People now declare, by proclamation of sovereignty, to possess the power to direct, to hold our government not just accountable for their actions; but, we now hold them to an even higher judgement and to a greater penalty!
For we are not here to govern the endeavors of responsibility and equality onto the backs of the already burdened, as, by nature, drunkard officials intoxicated on the lessor false powers of manipulation will trade their souls for folly abandoning all posterity; but, as our Founders declared these truths to be self evident and unalienable declaring the natural law that we were all born equally endowed with the same business agenda for Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness, with this becoming our Civil Purpose.
As our Founders lowered their station to represent us, so do we today lower ourselves to be represented by the Great Burden within the very least among us.
In the power of the Truth, we the people now order the Supreme Court to "dissolve its political bonds which have connected them" with Congress, relegating back to the Legislature the duty of judges over what is and is not constitutional. As for your new role in serving us, we now direct you to a higher station to that of the most Supreme of Courts, as true champions of the people, by holding every principality and power over them under judgement of the Truth in regards to what should be or should not be in contempt of our Civil Purpose.
From this day on, under judgement of the truth, we the people now hold every one of our government officials of these United States to stand in a higher judgement and to a greater penalty!
*They utilized the scientific method of Natural Law within the Declaration of Independence in order to establish a new natural law conclusion
.
.
jueves, 14 de marzo de 2013
Between efforts to rewrite and revise this proclamation of sovereignty to that of a formal work, I'd like to color in a picture as pieces of a puzzle.
The reason why the sovereign right of proclamation belongs on the side of the people is because of the Great Burden they possess. As Plato might have put it, while an enthroned king would have lots of little problems to tend to on a daily basis, a worthless prostitute would have the burden of one major Problem. Likewise, the prostituted majority too would be concerned with this deeper Problem.
While the king and those within his immediate monarchy would have the free time to be concerned with matters of personal enrichment, for the enjoyment of it so to speak, in contrast, the little prostitute and the prostituted she represents would rarely have enough time for advancement.
There is a subtlety in life concerning how we treat others socially. While the son of a rich father would be viewed as greater than his rich father, the son of a poor father would be viewed as less than his poor father.
As the ultimate Truth is unapproachable, the next best truths would be those best principled, formal paths that lead towards it.
The reason why the sovereign right of proclamation belongs on the side of the people is because of the Great Burden they possess. As Plato might have put it, while an enthroned king would have lots of little problems to tend to on a daily basis, a worthless prostitute would have the burden of one major Problem. Likewise, the prostituted majority too would be concerned with this deeper Problem.
While the king and those within his immediate monarchy would have the free time to be concerned with matters of personal enrichment, for the enjoyment of it so to speak, in contrast, the little prostitute and the prostituted she represents would rarely have enough time for advancement.
There is a subtlety in life concerning how we treat others socially. While the son of a rich father would be viewed as greater than his rich father, the son of a poor father would be viewed as less than his poor father.
As the ultimate Truth is unapproachable, the next best truths would be those best principled, formal paths that lead towards it.
lunes, 11 de marzo de 2013
On this day, the thirteenth of March, 2013, a banner of vain hope is still being flown eloquently, a breeze which seems to flow of a cool breeze, but is instead working behind the scenes inequitably for the deliberate purpose of misleading many unto darkness; furthermore, the golden voice is still speaking in endless false dichotomies, peering fancifully from one direction to the other while doing so as if in great pain, stopping just short of blasphemy, in great contempt of our American Civil Purpose, eroding away all hard sought gains under the guise of change for the sake of it, a process which is stumbling up the children of these United States, withering away to shame our dignity and authority, mocking the blood that was so preciously shed for us in the process, and threatening and menacing to dissolve our Union towards a more nameless and faceless state. Meanwhile, in stark contrast to these winds of deceit, the greatest of benefits are derived from the most precious of alterations!
In preserving the lightening in a bottle our Founders had persevered and worked so hard to capture, change should never be allowed to happen beyond the process of "amending," which means to cherish to the extent of clarity. In turn, this clarification of reality requires that one consider the topic carefully. Therefore, the word "amendment" within the U.S. Constitution goes beyond the darkness of "law for the sake of the law," with these being the false powers of manipulation; but, the law of the land should always be treated with the lightness of careful consideration, with a type of meditation leaning towards the supreme power of the Truth.
As Socrates himself once narrowed constantly towards this unapproachable Truth, likewise, our Founders, by the scientific process of natural law, narrowed their way, , towards the establishment of a new order within The Declaration of Independence assembling themselves in fellowship when doing so. In turn, this formal declaration of a new order, with this being a natural law, justified our divorce formally out from under the wrongful rule of a tyrant.
As our justified divorce is formal, in contrast, our new marriage to a more perfect Union within the U.S. Constitution is legal. Therefore, legally speaking, the natural law our Founders declared within The Declaration of Independence abolished every past tradition of legal precedence. One needs the most careful of consideration of the new order, established by our formal divorce from tyranny, with this being our Civil Purpose, in order so our new marriage to a more perfect Union within The U.S. Constitution might be interpreted properly.
This new order is now being threatened either with the lambasting of the characters of our Founding Fathers, by the usurping of our U.S. Constitution with the inferior laws of the United Nations, and with the thoughtless demeaning of our American Civil Purpose with a new world order of chaos.
As this eloquence of hope and change blows like the wind thrashing itself about spontaneously out of our control, an endless flow of taxes are similarly being lobbied away from us towards the treasuries of impostors who have gained control over us. These "officials" are supposed to be of, by, and for the people, but are now strangers having evolved to speak a different legal language altogehter. Likewise, as we are supposed to be citizens sharing sovereign power with a limited federal government, they have worked their inequity to confuse us, mixing us up turbulently into a mess of different languages, trashing us into whoring states of competing lessor clients. Paradoxically, as the power to proclaim much come from a sovereign king, the Word of the ultimate King Himself ushers forth from within, a Great Burden crying out from the soul of the very least of us, with her being the most wretched among the homeless.
Therefore, we the People now declare, by proclamation of sovereignty, to possess the power to direct, to hold our government not just accountable for their actions; but, we now hold them to an even higher judgement and to a greater penalty!
For we are not here to govern the endeavors of responsibility and equality onto the backs of the already burdened, as, by nature, drunkard officials intoxicated on the lessor false powers of manipulation will trade their souls for folly abandoning all posterity; but, as our Founders declared these truths to be self evident and unalienable declaring the natural law that we were all born equally endowed with the same business agenda for Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness, with this becoming our Civil Purpose.
As our Founders lowered their station to represent us, so do we today lower ourselves to be represented by the Great Burden within the very least among us.
In the power of the Truth, we the people now order the Supreme Court to "dissolve its political bonds which have connected them" with Congress, relegating back to the Legislature the duty of judges over what is and is not constitutional. As for your new role in serving us, we now direct you to a higher station to that of the most Supreme of Courts, as true champions of the people, by holding every principality and power over them under judgement of the Truth in regards to what should be or should not be in contempt of our Civil Purpose.
From this day on, under judgement of the truth, we the people now hold every one of our government officials of these United States to stand in a higher judgement and to a greater penalty!
*They utilized the scientific method of Natural Law within the Declaration of Independence in order to establish a new natural law conclusion.
In preserving the lightening in a bottle our Founders had persevered and worked so hard to capture, change should never be allowed to happen beyond the process of "amending," which means to cherish to the extent of clarity. In turn, this clarification of reality requires that one consider the topic carefully. Therefore, the word "amendment" within the U.S. Constitution goes beyond the darkness of "law for the sake of the law," with these being the false powers of manipulation; but, the law of the land should always be treated with the lightness of careful consideration, with a type of meditation leaning towards the supreme power of the Truth.
As Socrates himself once narrowed constantly towards this unapproachable Truth, likewise, our Founders, by the scientific process of natural law, narrowed their way, , towards the establishment of a new order within The Declaration of Independence assembling themselves in fellowship when doing so. In turn, this formal declaration of a new order, with this being a natural law, justified our divorce formally out from under the wrongful rule of a tyrant.
As our justified divorce is formal, in contrast, our new marriage to a more perfect Union within the U.S. Constitution is legal. Therefore, legally speaking, the natural law our Founders declared within The Declaration of Independence abolished every past tradition of legal precedence. One needs the most careful of consideration of the new order, established by our formal divorce from tyranny, with this being our Civil Purpose, in order so our new marriage to a more perfect Union within The U.S. Constitution might be interpreted properly.
This new order is now being threatened either with the lambasting of the characters of our Founding Fathers, by the usurping of our U.S. Constitution with the inferior laws of the United Nations, and with the thoughtless demeaning of our American Civil Purpose with a new world order of chaos.
As this eloquence of hope and change blows like the wind thrashing itself about spontaneously out of our control, an endless flow of taxes are similarly being lobbied away from us towards the treasuries of impostors who have gained control over us. These "officials" are supposed to be of, by, and for the people, but are now strangers having evolved to speak a different legal language altogehter. Likewise, as we are supposed to be citizens sharing sovereign power with a limited federal government, they have worked their inequity to confuse us, mixing us up turbulently into a mess of different languages, trashing us into whoring states of competing lessor clients. Paradoxically, as the power to proclaim much come from a sovereign king, the Word of the ultimate King Himself ushers forth from within, a Great Burden crying out from the soul of the very least of us, with her being the most wretched among the homeless.
Therefore, we the People now declare, by proclamation of sovereignty, to possess the power to direct, to hold our government not just accountable for their actions; but, we now hold them to an even higher judgement and to a greater penalty!
For we are not here to govern the endeavors of responsibility and equality onto the backs of the already burdened, as, by nature, drunkard officials intoxicated on the lessor false powers of manipulation will trade their souls for folly abandoning all posterity; but, as our Founders declared these truths to be self evident and unalienable declaring the natural law that we were all born equally endowed with the same business agenda for Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness, with this becoming our Civil Purpose.
As our Founders lowered their station to represent us, so do we today lower ourselves to be represented by the Great Burden within the very least among us.
In the power of the Truth, we the people now order the Supreme Court to "dissolve its political bonds which have connected them" with Congress, relegating back to the Legislature the duty of judges over what is and is not constitutional. As for your new role in serving us, we now direct you to a higher station to that of the most Supreme of Courts, as true champions of the people, by holding every principality and power over them under judgement of the Truth in regards to what should be or should not be in contempt of our Civil Purpose.
From this day on, under judgement of the truth, we the people now hold every one of our government officials of these United States to stand in a higher judgement and to a greater penalty!
*They utilized the scientific method of Natural Law within the Declaration of Independence in order to establish a new natural law conclusion.
Suscribirse a:
Entradas (Atom)