It is difficult to appreciate the United States in terms of order rather than the law.  Indeed, when asking those in government their opinions concerning what is special about the United States, lawyers will respond mostly, as they make up over ninety percent of government, leaning towards the praising of themselves and the legal functions they perform in society.

In response, we fail to perceive that there exists a subtle difference between what is the original established order and what are the necessary laws created to further advance that order.  One difference is how the interpretation of law for the sake of law can't be determined specifically without the establishment of an order.  This is why the interpretation of the U.S. Constitution has led the governments of our United States unto a shambles.

In other words, the United States is fast becoming no different than any other sovereign Union in the world.  For example, in the poor nation of Greece, there are still a select few empowered today who think their society is the greatest place on earth.

Chaos:  Happens when those empowered as the law work to corrupt the order that the laws were established upon originally.

Tantamount to shooting ones feet out from beneath.       

Between the processes of law and order, if I am the highest authority in Greece blessed with the sovereign right to empower others and, in regards to my best interests, I decide to empower the process of law over others who speak of the process of order, then between the empowered and those who aren't, who would the fearful masses choose to listen?

If the Constitution of the United States today is indeed losing its sovereignty corrupting and dissolving into a New World Order, then what prior order within the United States would this New World Order be replacing?

Because law for the sake of law is no better than chaos, we have all been blinded!  While the U.S. Constitution is the law of the land, the Declaration of Independence should be proclaimed by the people living today to be the order of the land.  Any civilization, for the purpose of avoiding future chaos, must trump the process of law with an established order.

How has a New World Order managed to advanced the prior order which came out of Socrates?  How has the development of the so-called "Arab Spring" managed to advance the order of Western Civilization?

Cutting through the confusion, there is no New World Order or a so-called Arab Spring, but a return to the prior old order of tyranny.

For if this romantic notion of an Arab Spring isn't somehow reconnecting itself with the primary overall order that came out of Socrates, we are speaking of Western Civilization here, then the movement should be considered nothing more than nonsense concocted by a select few senior editors within the world's media corporations.

Understand, in the United States, if you are a true American, then you should believe that only one true movement ever existed with it being a phenomenon called "The American Movement."  While lawyers, for the purpose of benefiting themselves, will always prefer to point to the two-party system as the next significant phenomenon to happen to our United States over the prior legal document of the U.S. Constitution and the formal document of the Declaration of Independence, the real advancement that happened was actually the American Movement process started by a few gentlemen philosophers, the American transcendentalists like Ralph Waldo Emerson, Henry Thoreau, and Samuel Clemens.  It was philosophers like them who worked to advance the disadvantaged returning them to the revering of our Founding Fathers, to the new order they established within the Declaration of Independence as our Civil Purpose, and to the U.S. Constitution they created to advance our Civil Purpose.

This American Movement process takes place wholly outside of the legal (electoral) process.

Again, if looking at it as a tree, the best we should ever appreciate these minor growths in history referred to as the civil rights movement and the labor movement are as mere branches off of the overall American Movement process which, again, is the returning of the people to the revering of our Founding Fathers, of the new order they established within the Declaration of Independence as our Civil Purpose, and of the more perfect Union they created within the U.S. Constitution to advance our Civil Purpose.

Otherwise, such minor events as the civil rights movement, the labor movement, the tea party movement,and the Ron Paul movement should all be considered false movements.

While narrowing this Proclamation of Sovereignty down to a letter holding our governments to a higher judgement and to a greater penalty, I intend to illuminate further philosophically concerning the question of what should be considered truly American versus what should be the rest of the world.