Perpetuation of a false dichotomy by The Dallas Morning News

By claiming charges being brought against John Wiley Price and subsequent reporting on the event is stirring up old racial tensions, the columnist who wrote this article, a Mr. James Ragland of The Dallas Morning News, is stirring up racial tensions that don't exist.  Here is the article below:

Let’s not lose our heads in judging or defending John Wiley Price

Again, a few of the political false-dichotomies utilized to stumble up the Children of God are black against white, male against female, rich against poor, old against young, left against right, Republicans against Democrats, and so on endlessly.  In the case of the above article, the columnist is stumbling up readers by reducing reality down to an absurd notion of black against white.  The utilization of this false dichotomy contrasts with the one true dichotomy, the dichotomy which our Founders established as a natural law within The Declaration of Independence, which portrays tyranny on one side against the people on the other.

Mongering by The Dallas Morning News

Mongering:  The marketing of harmful businesses such as war as somehow beneficial, positive, and profitable.  In the article below, the writer is attempting to validate by lessening a serious offense by an elected official by pushing the blame onto others.  

Floyd: Is it worse to receive a bribe than to give one?

Answer:  It is worse to receive a bribe than to give it because that person recieving it is an official and they have sworn to uphold the U.S. Constitution.  In other words, there is no contempt committed against the law for the sake of the law; rather, whenever one fails to uphold the U.S. Constitution, one is committing contempt against the American people's Civil-Purpose.

What is Natural Law Versus What is Legal Law

Though most people are submissive to legal laws, most of us as born customers are disobedient to their deception.  Even if it means losing our lives, we still won't buy products against our nature.  Though we might enter into a store as potential shoppers because a law was passed forcing us to do so, this only means that we are willing, that we are being submissive to authority.  However, this doesn't mean that we are capable of being obedient against our nature.  Indeed, if we find that the prices for the items are deceptive, that they were different at the cash register than they were at the shelves, then, by natural law, we would leave the store buying nothing.  If it has been proven that the salespeople working at the store are constant liars, then again, by natural law, we would leave the store buying nothing.

By natural law, as a born customer, I am the boss.  This doesn't mean that I have authority, but simply means that I have the freedom to agree or not to agree concerning my purchase of a product.  If the money we possess to purchase products isn't viable, if the money they have to provide change isn't viable, if it is all printed up out of thin air so to speak, then the marketplace they have established isn't viable but a shambles.

When we fail to take the courage to face this fear we all have within ourselves, we are no longer legitimate citizens.  We are no longer a potential bride with the veil lifted shining a face of authority.  This authority we possess as a bride is our right as born customers to either buy a product or to say no.  Right?  We own our souls meaning that we aren't slaves.  We have a choice as customers to either buy products or not as free citizens, as customer boss by natural law, or we can give into our fear by becoming legal clients and sick patients to a nanny state.

When choosing to give into our fears, to go against the laws of nature, we return to rock bottom, to a state of tyranny, to the harsh reality of pimping and whoring.

By his business nature, a pimp won't be able to afford precious gifts to give to all his whores.  So, what will he do to keep them all together under his rule and all in economic ruin?  Well, first off, as each whore, by natural law, will be trying to hold out on him so that she might save enough money to escape his tyranny, he will constantly be resorting to sticking his grubby hands into their purses.  In fact, in many cases, he will be having to resort to the tactic of physically beating them into submission.  Second, another managing tactic pimps utilize is dividing the whole against themselves.  He will create distrust among the group by spreading lies.  He will offer favors to his good whores who share information about his bad ones.  He will give gifts of trinkets and cheap bling bling to those positive good whores with good attitudes especially since he won't be able to afford to buy them anything better.

A whore isn't a whore by natural law, but because she fears being disobedient to the laws which force her to go against her nature -- against her nature within.  Indeed, in the end, we all know that this pimp is going to lose.  Still, that glorious end isn't enough.  Beyond this, we need to turn away from the false powers of manipulation that control us, that rob us all of a face of authority.  Indeed, we need to quit listening to the false dichotomies which tell us what we want to hear while dividing us against ourselves.

By natural law, as born customers, if they can't stop being deceptive towards us, if they can't stop lying to us, if they can't exchange goods with us in real money, then we need to quit buying their product.

The best way for us to help another whore is for us all to quit acting like ones ourselves.  This means taking the courage to be disobedient by saying no.  This means coming clean with the realization that some lifestyles aren't worth buying into.  This means understanding that some causes are worth dying for as they are more important than our individual lives.  Just as mankind can't live by bread alone, so we aren't here for the express purpose of maintaining our health.  Indeed, beyond the deception which has limited us here on this earth, we are truly here to exponentially advance our Civil Purpose.

Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins.
Editor and Chief
Prime Minister of these united States
First Attorney to our Founders under the Light of Truth
Acting Supreme Court                
  
                      

What is the most supreme of all courts?

The Supreme Court Daily News

by Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins

Under the new implemented legal system of healthcare, there appears to be the development of three classes of patients.  The highest class of patients to be most honored are those fully insured under a national healthcare system.  The second highest class most honored are the criminal ones who are  either injured while being arrested for breaking the law, are now jailed while awaiting trial, or have been imprisoned for breaking the law.  Finally, the lowest class of patient honored is the illegal one has decided to remain unfunded under Obamacare.

In the past, we always thought of Marxist socialism in terms of a fallacy, as a wayward process which was supposed to lead to the perfect, ideal communism.  Likewise, on the other hand, we recognized those opposite evils of the corrupt capitalist banking systems and how they ultimately lead the people to the ruins of fascism.  In this modern age of social networking, this contrivance of Old and New world terms can be difficult for younger people to understand.  

Reducing in terms, we should think of the whole problem as legalism.  In other words, the only way the necessary evil of law-making can ever advance itself to the detriment of the people is to continue its absurd selling of the two-party system as the most significant advancements beyond our Founders, beyond the new laws they instituted within the united States Constitution, beyond the people's bill of (natural) Rights they proclaimed as the first ten amendments also within the united States Constitution, and beyond the new order (with this being a scientific conclusion they presented as a new natural law) they declared within The Declaration of Independence.

As I've already made clear, the one true advancement beyond the reverence for our Founding Father's age of Enlightenment, beyond the new laws they instituted and the bill of natural Rights they proclaimed within the united States Constitution, as well as beyond the new order of a Natural Law they founded and utilized within The Declaration of Independence . . . indeed, the only advancement beyond all this precious gold,  is the American Movement.  What does this mean?  Well, this means those making up our government, the two party and banking systems they adopted from the Old World, and their businesses of inequity of legislating laws, instituting policies, and judiciating judgements were all created as mere necessary evils by our Founding Fathers - not for the benefit of government itself - God Forbid - but for the prerequisite and exponential advancement of the people's Civil Purpose.

This means the necessary tyranny that our Founders established, with it being the government, is not an end to cherish, but merely a means to the greater prerequisite and exponential end of advancing the people's Civil Purpose.   

So, you might ask, what is so wrong with the continued setting up of this legal world of laws?  Well, in determining an answer to this question, let's once again utilize the New World political scale of Exceptionalism.   You see, in a legal tyranny of laws, the wretch has no purse of her own.  Bye utilizing the cognitive and physical sciences he has deemed official, the tyrant can rape her mind and violate her soul at will.  Ultimately, tyranny will rob the wretch of her rightful face of authority.  In turn, as he continues getting more and more drunken on the false powers of manipulation, such intoxication allowing him to shun the Light of Truth within his conscience,  he has set about to reestablish his harmful businesses, his war mongering, his whore mongering, and his health mongering.     

This represents the long road back to tyranny which, as many of us now realize, if such is allowed to continue, will continue happening on an exponential scale.   I can remember my own father predicting twenty years ago that in fifty years time, if we didn't do something about government corruption, that certain contempt would be committed by our government towards the people.   What my father failed to include in the equation is the exponential factor.  Indeed, the worst my father spoke about has already come and gone.  

Look what we have been left with today?  Instead of the poor being able to help send their offspring to college in an effort to advance their Civil Purpose, the legal system made up of a combination of socialism and fascism is going to require them to pay for healthcare instead.  At the same time, this legal system is now competing head to head with money being donated to the healthcare system by the wealthy.  

Oh, don't bother trying to describe the depths of the corruption, the can-of-worms created by the implementation of this legal system.  

In the end, the people are abandoned as the ones responsible for all debts.  So, let it be known that the people are the responsible ones.  As such, it is tyranny and not the ever hopeful people under them who have something to fear from God's judgement.  As laws they legislate for the sake of the law are no better than chaos, and as the strong for their own benefit will pass legislation, policies, and judgements intended to persecute the weak; so, working inequity against the prerequisite advancement of the people's Civil Purpose is the same as stumbling up the children of God.

As you should now know better, so consider yourselves held to a higher standard and to a greater penalty under His Light of Truth.  

Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins

Prime Minister of these united States

First Attorney to our Founders under the Light of Truth

Acting Supreme Court    

Rewrite, Revision, and Finish: The most supreme of courts would be serving the people as their primary media

What is causing a media frenzy concerning the number 666 sprayed around central Dallas by a young white suspect?  Before the Dallas Morning News evolves this minor event into a hate crime, allow me to explain just a little about this not so mysterious number 666 and the reasons the Apostle John had to utilize it as a code.

First off, understand that the Apostle John when he wrote the Book of Revelation was about to be crucified just as Jesus Christ, the original convicted false prophet he was following after, was also crucified.  In other words, by Roman law, the followers of a false prophet had to suffer the same fate as the false prophet in which they followed.

I'd like to end this post by speaking a little about the immense power possessed by Saul of Tarsus.

Anyway, the Apostle John knew the Romans would screen and tear up any of his letter that included information pertaining to Jesus Christ, the almighty expression of His Fullness as the Holy Trinity, the church, and so on.  So, he had to write a lot of the contents of the letter in a secret code.

Simple enough.

Next, the Apostle John suffered from mental problems as during his life he first had to lean his head constantly against the bosom (heart) of the Lord.  Later, he had to lean his head against the Holy Spirit in Christ's church.  So, this would imply that the Isle called Patmos was a prison for the mentally insane.  If the contents of the Apostle John's letter did indeed seem insane to those Romans responsible for reading and screening its message, such a sickness would aid in passing Christ's Revelation on to surviving members of the church.

Also simple.

The number 666 is no mystery and has long been known to represent the name of Caesar Nero.

Again, simple enough.

This doesn't mean that the flesh and blood of Caesar Nero himself was considered the very anti-Christ, but that his position of authority as an emperor represented evil, in terms of the principalities and powers so to speak, which centered around the Roman Emperorship.

Check.

The Roman Emperors ruled as war mongerers.  They defeated many kingdoms and then made friends with the kings promising, at a cost, to supply them with armies for their protection.  They also imprisoned the souls of helpless young ladies and small boys in secret harems.  Drunkenness and sexual perversity was the norm.  They all declared themselves to be living gods and were worshipped as such even before they died.  Indeed, numerous false prophets including Jesus Christ Himself along with the millions who followed after them were crucified by these far away emperor gods.      

Check.

In the book of Revelation, the words Holy, holy, holy have long been known to signify the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.

No mystery here.

In the end, the Apostle John was able to pass on the book of Revelation to many future generations because he either wrote in code or, as many in the world still think today, he spoke insane.

So, this 666 number has no mysterious evil connotations.  Indeed, to spray paint the number upon a wall isn't a hate crime.  If anything, the numbers 666 are a warning to the world's population of the reestablishment of a wayward authority which includes those ruling in an Emperorship (the anti-Christ).

And what position of authority in the world today best fits that of an Emperor?  Well, if we were to be honest about it, we would have to say the executive branch of the U.S. presidency best fits that role.  And many do think that president Obama and his ravenous hunger for executive privilege has elevated his authority to the  power approaching that of an anti-Christ (an Emperor).

Once again, the large gay agenda working over at the Dallas Morning News is trying to stir up the hate pot.  

Okay, a little about Saul of Tarsus, as the Apostle Paul was known prior to his conversion and transformation to Christianity.  He welded enormous power as he could accuse anyone of being a follower of a false prophet.  Indeed, all he had to do was sign his name to a death warrant and they were arrested and led away to be crucified.  Jesus did not ask either the Roman governor Pilate nor King Herod during His crucifixion why they were persecuting Him.  No!  It was later on when He asked Saul of Tarsus that question as the resurrected Holy Spirit!  This demonstrates how Jesus never recognized the authority of the Emperors, but recognized the authority of His future chosen vessel instead as the future Apostle Paul.

Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins

Rewrite, Revision, and Finish. What is the most supreme of all courts?

The united States Supreme Court does not exist in and of itself.  Yet, the Supreme Court isn't the most supreme above all others, but is only most supreme outside of God Himself.  Concerning our Founder's new order dealing with the exponential and prerequisite advancement of the people's Civil Purpose, supreme court justices should not be acting as lawyers.  For, concerning the law of the land, the representatives and senators in Congress are supposed to be filling that role.  Indeed, it is Congress who are supreme as they possess the false powers of manipulation enabling them to abolish the Supreme Court and to impeach and prosecute from office a president turned tyrant.

By nature, concerning the law, rightful citizens degrade to the level of clients (legal idiots).  So, the most supreme of courts would not deal with the law, but with the order in which the laws are established upon.    

Congress can abolish the law, but they can't abolish the Truth (greatest order) as such is unapproachable.  After all, I as the prime minister of these united States have been acting as the Supreme Court during this present age of corruption making our governments accountable under the Light of Truth by holding them both to a higher standard and to a greater penalty.  Indeed, I was never officially appointed to my position, but raised ideally, as Abraham Lincoln once said, of, by, and for the people.  While the Supreme Court now within Washington DC has been functioning to the detriment of the people's Civil Purpose and to the benefit of our enemies, I have been holding them in contempt.  As the Supreme Court has been allowing a wayward presidency to stumble up the children of God, which is the greatest of all offenses under heaven, I have revealed how, in their quest for more legal power by way of executive privilege, the position of the presidency has been taking on more and more of the characteristics of an anti-Christ (Emperor).

In other words, though it might sound paradoxical, the following holds true:  Governments can't be controlled by the legislation of endless laws -- we know this to be painfully true today -- but only by holding them to their consciences.

The most supreme of all courts within these united States should be dealing with the new order our Founders established which deals specifically with the nameless and faceless and the prerequisite advancement of their Civil Purpose.      

Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins
Prime Minister of these united States
First Attorney to our Founding Fathers under the Light of Truth
Acting Supreme Court

What is our duty as Americans? What is our (natural) right? Concerning our natural rights, what are we enslaved to do concerning tyranny and its threat towards the people?

===============================================
===============================================

The Wretch at one end of the
spectrum represents the people.

The King at the other end
of the spectrum represents
tyranny.

Exceptionalism:

A Political Model 

For a New World

The People<=========\\Moderate Middle//=========>Tyranny

===================================================

===================================================

Concerning tyranny, our Founders made the following affirmation within the Declaration of Independence:

But then a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security ~ Declaration of Independence

The phrase, "But then a long train of abuses and usurpations, . . . " implies a willful and deliberate manufacturing of consent of the people -- to stumble them up so to speak.  The phrase "pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design . . . " implies a narrowing towards a clear agenda.  Finally, the phrase "to reduce them under absolute Despotism, . . ." implies a return to tyranny under the rule of a king vested with absolute power.    

Furthermore, the words, "it is their right, . . ." implies the kind of natural right spoken about by John Locke which is quite different from legal (civil) rights.  This inborn natural right needn't be granted or legislated and, so, it cannot be repealed.  Such a right reduces on the physical level to the extent of the soul.  According to this understanding of natural rights, we the people are enslaved "to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."  Our Founders then expound on this point further by the very next affirmation of "it is their (our) duty, . . .."  This type of duty our Founders speak of takes precedence over the value of our own lives.  

Doing our duty as Americans means fighting against the false dichotomies (lies), the enemy that is now poisoning our nation.  Beyond that, we also need to establish what is the one true dichotomy.  Metaphysically, once we understand reality as an eternal conflict which has been on going between a sovereign king and a worthless wretch, then we will see the false dichotomies for the nonsense they truly are and, from that time on, avoid all discussions of them.   

Again, to name just a few, these false dichotomies, or political conflicts, are male against female, black against white, rich against poor, and so on endlessly.  In the political spectrum presented above, the people stand at the moderate middle between these two political extremes.  The two inverse character symbols of a wretch and a king, or perverses if you will, should be considered equal as they were once declared to be so in the Declaration of Independence by our Founders.  While the King may appear greater than the wretch, she is more distracted within.  In the end, as our Founders affirmed:

all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness ~ Declaration of Independence

Ultimately, the philosophical foundation of our Founding Fathers and their age of Enlightenment reached all the way back to Socrates.  In Plato's dialogue entitled Meno, Socrates dared to believe that the supposed inferior minds of slaves could learn to improve their livelihoods if they were only served by a different type of teacher.  To accentuate his point, he reasoned, as only he knew how to do, that if, as the Greeks believed, every soul within human beings were part of a single perfect Soul.  If the latter of these two the perfect Soul is all-knowing, then why is each soul born so different?  Why would one soul grow up to sit as a king on a throne while another is born to live wretched on the street?  To answer this question, he developed a theory called "recollection."   As souls during their birthing process would suffer different amounts of trauma; so, each is going to forget different amounts of knowledge.

To help souls recollect the lost knowledge that they had lost at birth, Socrates likened himself as a serving mid-wife philosopher to the poor (His mother worked as a mid-wife helping poor women give birth).        

The very same poison Socrates once faced off against is once again trying to reestablish itself as tyranny.  Another poison destroying our nation today is change for the sake of change.  We must understand this nonsense as the worst kind of chaos.  After all, the greatest of benefits are those that are derived from the most precious of alterations.  As Americans, the lightening in a bottle we have today is the inheritance that was passed down to us both from the age of Enlightenment and from our Founding Fathers. 

*Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins
**Acting Supreme Court Justice   

*What a "widget" is to the hypothetical manufacturing and marketing of a product, so is the character "Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins" being utilized hypothetically here.  Indeed, Abraham Lincoln once said, he is a character developed of, by, and for the people.  He was created with the express purpose for advancing the people's Civil Purpose.  I am now playing the part of this character in order to keep the government -- the necessary tyranny our Founders established to be the lessor part of a more perfect Union -- from taking up council against and usurping the people.  The title Fd. which is at the beginning of his name literally means "Founder."  This title of Founder would be worn by any person skilled in a position of leadership other than those skilled as an attorney including such positions as law making, lawyering, and / or legal education.

**During this corrupt age of judicial corruption, Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins has stepped in temporarily to act as the most supreme of all courts.   

Rewrite #2: What is Formal-Culture Versus What is Diversity For the Sake of Diversity?

While she lives homeless at one

end of the spectrum, the Wretch
represents the people 

While he sits enthroned at the

other end of the spectrum, the king
represents tyranny.

Exceptionalism: 

A Political Model 

For the New World

The People<================\\Moderate Middle//================>Tyranny

Concerning tyranny, our Founders made the following affirmation within the Declaration of Independence:

But then a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

The phrase, "But then a long train of abuses and usurpations, . . . " implies a willful and deliberate manufacturing of consent of the people -- to stumble them up so to speak.  The phrase "pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design . . . " implies a narrowing towards a clear agenda.  Finally, the phrase "to reduce them under absolute Despotism, . . ." implies a return to tyranny under the rule of a king vested with absolute power.      

Furthermore, the words, "it is their right, . . ." implies the kind of natural right spoken about by John Locke.  This inborn natural right needn't be granted legally and, so, it cannot be repealed.  Such a right reduces on the physical level to the extent of the soul.  According to this understand of natural rights, we the people are enslaved "to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."  Our Founders repeat this point further by the next affirmation of "it is their (our) duty, . . .." 

Doing our duty means fighting against the false dichotomies that are now poisoning our nation.  Beyond that, we need to establish what is the true dichotomy.  Metaphysically, once we understand reality as an eternal conflict going on between a sovereign king and a worthless wretch, then we will see the false dichotomies for the nonsense they truly are and, from that time on, avoid any discussions of them.   

Again, to name just a few of these false dichotomies, or political conflicts, there are male against female, black against white, rich against poor, and so on endlessly.  In the political spectrum presented above, the people stand at the moderate middle between two political extremes.  These two inversed symbols of a wretch and a king, or perverses if you will, should be considered equal as they were once declared to be so in the Declaration of Independence by our Founders.  While he may appear greater than her, she is more distracted within.  In the end, as our Founders affirmed:

all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

As Socrates once pondered, if every soul is part of one single Soul, with the latter of the two being all knowing, then why are souls born so different?  Why would one soul grow to sit as a king on a throne while another is born to live wretched on the street?  To answer this question, he developed a theory called "recollection."   As souls during their birthing process suffer different amounts of trauma; so, each is going to forget different amounts of knowledge.

To help souls recollect the lost knowledge that they lost at birth, Socrates likened himself as a serving mid-wife philosopher to the poor (His mother worked as a mid-wife helping poor women give birth).        

Another poison destroying our nation today is change for the sake of change.  We must understand this nonsense as the worst kind of chaos.  After all, the greatest of benefits are those that are derived from the most precious of benefits.  As Americans, our lightening in a bottle is the inheritance that was passed down to us both from the age of Enlightenment and from our Founding Fathers. 

*Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins
**Acting Supreme Court Justice   

*What a "widget" is to the hypothetical manufacturing and marketing of a product, so is the name "Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins" being used here.  Indeed, he is a character I developed, as Abraham Lincoln once said, of, by, and for the people.  He was created with the prerequisite advancement of the people's Civil Purpose in mind.  I am now playing the part of this character in order to keep the government -- the necessary tyranny our Founders established as part of a more perfect Union -- from taking up council against the people.  The title Fd. which is at the beginning of his name literally means "Founder."  This title of Founder would be worn by any person skilled in a position of leadership other than those skilled as an attorney including such positions as law making, lawyering, and / or legal education.

**During this corrupt age of judicial corruption, Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins has stepped in temporarily to act as the most supreme of all courts.   

Major revision and rewriting. What is Formal-Culture versus what is diversity?

The King

The Wretch

The Exceptionalism 

Model of 

New World 
Politics:

What is Formal-Culture?

The People<===============\\Moderate Middle//===============>Tyranny

Concerning tyranny, our Founders made the following affirmation within the Declaration of Independence:

But then a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

The phrase, "But then a long train of abuses and usurpations, . . . " implies a willful and deliberate manufacturing of consent of the people -- to stumble them up so to speak.  The phrase "pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design . . . " implies a narrowing towards a clear agenda.  Finally, the phrase "to reduce them under absolute Despotism, . . ." implies a return to tyranny under the rule of a king vested with absolute power.        

Furthermore, the words, "it is their right, . . ." implies natural right.  The inborn natural right of John Locke cannot be granted and, so, it cannot be repealed.  Such a right reduces on the physical level to the extent of the soul.  According to this understand of natural rights, we are enslaved "to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."  Our Founders make this point clear by their next affirmation of "it is their (our) duty, . . .." 

Fighting a war against the false dichotomies now destroying our nation isn't enough. Beyond that, we need to concentrate on reestablishing the philosophical foundation beneath our Founder's Enlightenment.  By better understanding what is the one true dichotomy, the American Movement can return us to revering this philosophy.  Once we understand this higher idea, we can then see the false dichotomies for the nonsense they truly are and, from that time on, have the capacity to walk away from any discussions of them.   

Again, to mention just a few of these false dichotomies, or political conflicts, they are male against female, black against white, rich against poor, and so on.  In the political spectrum presented above, the people become a single audience standing at the moderate middle between the two political extremes of a worthless wretch and a sovereign king.  These two inverses, or perverses. are, as our Founders once declared in the Declaration of Independence, already equal.  While he may appear greater than her, she is more distracted from an inward burden than him.  In the end, as our Founders all declared, both of these extreme characters should be treasured equally as they were both born endowed with the same exact business agenda for Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.   

As Socrates once marveled to himself, if every soul is part of one single Soul, with the latter of the two being the all knowing perfect Soul, then why are souls born so different?  Why would one soul grow to sit as a king on a throne while another is born to live wretched on the street?  To answer this question, he developed a theory called "recollection."   As each soul suffers different amounts of trauma during the birthing process, so each soul is going to forget different amounts of knowledge.

To help souls recollect the knowledge that they lost at birth, Socrates likened himself as a mid-wife philosopher to the poor (His mother worked as a mid-wife helping poor women give birth).        

Another poison destroying our nation today is change for the sake of change.  We must understand how this nonsense is nothing more than the worst kind of chaos.  After all, the greatest of benefits are those that are derived from the most precious of benefits.  As Americans, we understand our greatest benefit, our lightening in a bottle so to speak, to be the inheritance provided to all Americans both from the age of Enlightenment and from our Founding Fathers. 

*Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins
**Acting Supreme Court Justice   

*What a "widget" is to the hypothetical manufacturing and marketing of a product, so is the name "Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins" being used here.  Indeed, he is a character I developed, as Abraham Lincoln once said, of, by, and for the people.  He was created specifically for the prerequisite advancement of the people's Civil Purpose as well as to serve as a deterrent to any enemy threatening to revert us back to tyranny.  I am now playing the part of this character in order to keep our government, the necessary tyranny established as part of a more perfect Union, from taking up council against the people.  The title Fd. which is at the beginning of his name literally means "Founder."  This Founder would include any person skilled in a position of leadership other than those skilled as an attorney in such endeavors as law making, lawyering, and / or legal education.

**During this corrupt age of judicial corruption, Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins has stepped in temporarily to act as the most supreme of all courts.          

   

Holding Today's Supreme Court to a Higher Standard and to a Greater Penalty Under the Light of Truth

Wretch

Blessed King 

The Exceptionalism 

Political Model:

The One True 

American Dichotomy

The People<===============\\Moderate Middle//===============>Tyranny

Concerning tyranny, our Founders made this affirmation within the Declaration of Independence: But then a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

The phrase, "But then a long train of abuses and usurpations, . . . " implies a willful and deliberate manufacturing of consent from the people - to stumble them up so to speak.  Furthermore, the phrase "pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design . . . " implies a narrowing towards a clear agenda.  Moreover, the final phrase "to reduce them under absolute Despotism, . . ." implies a return to a rule of tyranny under a king vested with absolute power.          

Fighting a war against the false dichotomies which are destroying our nation today isn't enough. Beyond that, we need to concentrate on achieving the reestablishment of a philosophical foundation beneath our Founder's age of Enlightenment.  By better understanding what is the one true dichotomy, the American Movement can return us to revering this philosophy.  Once we understand this higher idea, we can see the false dichotomies for the nonsense they truly are and, from that time on, have the capacity to walk away from any discussions of them.   

Again, just a few of these false dichotomies, or political conflicts, are male against female, black against white, rich against poor, and so on.  In the political spectrum presented above, the people become a single audience standing at the moderate middle between the political extremes of a worthless wretch and a sovereign king.  These two inverses, or perverses, as our Founders pmce declared as a new natural law, are already equal.  While he may appear greater than her, she is more distracted from an inward burden than him.  In the end, as our Founders all declared, both of these characters should be equally treasured as they were both endowed having been created equal with the same exact business agenda for Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.   

As Socrates once marveled to himself, if every soul is part of a greater perfect Soul, the perfect Soul which knows all, then why is each soul born so different?  To answer this question, he developed a theory called "recollection."   As each soul suffers different amounts of trauma during the birthing process, so each soul is going to forget different amounts of knowledge.         

Another poison destroying our nation today is change for the sake of change.  We must understand how this nonsense is nothing more than the worst kind of chaos.  After all, the greatest of benefits are derived from the most precious of benefits.  As Americans, we understand our greatest benefit, our lightening in a bottle so to speak, to be the inheritance provided to us both from the age of Enlightenment and from our Founding Fathers. 

*Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins
**Acting Supreme Court Justice   

*What a "widget" is to the making and the marketing of a hypothetical product, the name "Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins" is to the American Movement.  Indeed, he is a character I developed of, by, and for the people.  He was created specifically for the prerequisite advancement of their Civil Purpose as well as a deterrent to a reversion back to tyranny.  I am now playing the part of this character in order to keep our government, the necessary tyranny established as part of a more perfect Union, from taking council with an agenda to usurp the people.  The title Fd. at the beginning of his name literally means "Founder."  This Founder would include any person skilled in a position of leadership.  So, this individual would include every American citizen other than those skilled as an attorney in law making, in lawyering, and in legal education.

**During this age of judicial corruption, Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins has stepped in to act as the most supreme of all courts.          

   

(Second Rewrite) The Most Supreme of all Courts of These United States Would be Acting as the Primary Media For the Sake of the People

The united States Supreme Court does not exist in and of itself.  But the Supreme Court is that one which is most supreme above all the others.  Concerning the new order dealing with the essential advancement of the people's Civil Purpose, supreme court justices should not be acting as lawyers.  The representatives and senators in Congress are supposed to fill that role.  Indeed, concerning the law of the land, it is Congress which is supreme as they possess the greatest power, in matters concerning the law, which enables them to abolish the Supreme Court.

By nature, concerning the law, rightful citizens degrade to the level of clients (legal idiots).  So, the most supreme of courts would deal with the order in which the laws are erected upon.      

Congress can abolish the law, but they can't abolish the Truth (greatest order) as such a an unapproachable Truth.  After all, I as the prime minister of these united States have been acting as the Supreme Court during this present age of corruption making our governments accountable under the Light of Truth by holding them both to a higher standard and to a greater penalty.  Indeed, I was never officially appointed to my position, but raised ideally, as Abraham Lincoln once said, of, by, and for the people.  While the Supreme Court now within Washington DC has been functioning to the detriment of the people's Civil Purpose and to the benefit of our enemies, I have been holding them in contempt.  As the Supreme Court has been allowing a wayward presidency to stumble up the children of God, which is the greatest of all offenses under heaven, I have revealed how, in his quest for more legal power by way of executive privilege, the position has been taking on the characteristics of an anti-Christ (Emperorship).

In other words, though it might sound paradoxical, the following holds true:  Governments can't be controlled by the legislation of endless laws -- we know this to be painfully true -- but only by holding them to their consciences.

The most supreme of all courts within these united States should be dealing with the new order our Founders established which deals specifically with the nameless and faceless commoners and the prerequisite advancement of their Civil Purpose.        

The most supreme of courts within these united States should act as the primary media on the side of the people.

Again, I must repeat, the united States Supreme Court does not exist in and of itself.  But the Supreme Court is that one most supreme above all others.  In these united States, supreme court justices should not act as lawyers.  The representatives and senators in Congress are supposed to fill that role.  Indeed, concerning the law of the land, it is Congress which is supreme as they possess the greatest power, in matters concerning the law, which enables them to abolish the Supreme Court.

But Congress can't abolish the Truth (greatest order) as such a virtue is unapproachable.  After all, I as the prime minister of these united States have been acting as the Supreme Court during this present age of corruption making our governments accountable under the Light of Truth holding them both to a higher standard and to a greater penalty.  Indeed, I was never officially appointed to my position, but raised ideally, as Abraham Lincoln once said, of, by, and for the people.  While the Supreme Court in Washington DC has been functioning to the detriment of the people's Civil Purpose and to the benefit of our enemies, I have been holding them in contempt.  As the Supreme Court has been allowing a wayward presidency to stumble up the children of God, which is the greatest of all offenses under heaven, I have revealed how, through his zeal for more legal power by way of executive privilege, the position has been taking on the characteristics of an anti-Christ (Emperorship).

In other words, though it might sound paradoxical, the following is true:  Governments can't be controlled by the legislation of endless laws, but only by holding them to their consciences.

The most supreme of all courts within these united States should be dealing with the new order our Founders established which is the prerequisite advancement of our Civil Purpose.          




                

The most Supreme of all Courts would serve as the primary media of, by, and for the people.

What is causing a media event concerning the number 666 sprayed around central Dallas by a young white suspect?  Before the Dallas Morning News develops this into a hate crime, allow me to explain just a little about this not so mysterious number and the reasons the Apostle John had to create and utilize it as a code.

First off, understand that the Apostle John when he wrote the Book of Revelation was just about to be crucified just as Jesus Christ, the original convicted false prophet he followed, was crucified.  In other words, by Roman law, the followers of a false prophet had to suffer the same fate as the false prophet they followed.

I'd like to end this post by speaking a little about the immense power possessed by the Apostle Paul.

Anyway, the Apostle John knew the Romans would screen and tear up his letter if it included anything pertaining to the Almighty Jesus Christ, the Holy Trinity which was the total expression of His Fullness, the church, and so on.  So, he had to write a lot of the letters contents in code.

Simple enough.

Next, the Apostle John suffered from mental problems as, during his life he had to have his head in constant contact with either the bosom (heart) of the Lord, or, later on, with the Holy Spirit in His church.  So, this would imply that the Isle called Patmos was a prison for the mentally insane.  If the contents of the Apostle John's letter did indeed seem insane to those Romans responsible for reading and screening its message, this mental sickness by John would help pass Christ's Revelation on to surviving members in the church.

Also simple enough.

The number 666 is no mystery and has long been known to represent the name of Caesar Nero.

Again, simple enough.

This doesn't mean that the flesh and blood Caesar Nero himself was considered the very anti-Christ, but he represented a position of evil authority, of principalities and powers so to speak, which was the Roman Emperorship.

Check.

The Roman Emperors ruled as war mongerers.  They defeated kingdoms and then made friends with kings promising them to supply armies for their protection at a cost.  They also imprisoned the souls of helpless young ladies and small boys in harems.  Drunkenness and sexual perversity was the norm.  They all declared themselves to be living gods and were worshipped as such even before they died.  Indeed, numerous false prophets including Jesus Christ Himself along with the millions who followed after them were crucified by these far away emperor gods.        
  
Check.

In the book of Revelation, the words Holy, holy, holy have long been known to signify the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.

No mystery here.

In the end, the Apostle John was able to pass on the book of Revelation to many future generations because he either wrote in code or, as many in the world still think today, he spoke insane.

So, this 666 number has no mysterious evil connotations.  Indeed, to spray paint the number upon a wall isn't a hate crime.  If anything, the numbers 666 are a warning to the world's population of the reestablishment of the wayward authority of the Emperorship (the anti-Christ).

And what position of authority in the world today best fits that of an Emperor?  Well, if we were to be honest about it, we would have to say the executive position of U.S. presidency best fits that role.  And many do think that president Obama and his ravenous hunger for executive privilege has elevated his authority to the power of an anti-Christ (an Emperor).  

Once again, the large gay agenda working over at the Dallas Morning News is trying to stir up the hate pot.    

Okay, a little about the Apostle Paul.  Saul of Tarsus, as he was known prior, had few enemies as he welded the power to accuse anyone of being a follower of a false prophet.  All he had to do was sign his name to a death warrant and they were arrested and led away to be crucified.  Jesus did not ask either of his two judges the Roman governor Pilate nor king Herod concerning the persecution he was receiving.  No!  He asked Saul much later on as the resurrected Holy Spirit!  Jesus never did recognize the authority of the Emperorship, but recognized the authority of His future chosen vessel instead as the Apostle Paul and the apostleship he had authority over.  

Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins

Preaching the Gospel of Christ on a high level

The following is a statement of eloquent mush recently printed in a newspaper:  have given their lives to uphold the principles of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution upon which our representative democracy is based . . .. 

In the bold writing above, are these just a lot of colorful words strung together by a sophisticate?

Indeed, I am positive not a single person working in today's media could answer the above question.  Just what does they mean these so-called great "principles" within The Declaration of Independence?  Similarly, what are these significant points to be considered within the U.S. Constitution?  Just what is the relationship between the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution?  How many black holes exist within a large one?

Sophisticated writers in the art of media will generally speak of general principles because they have avoided the longer journey required in developing a more formal understanding.  By formal, I'm talking about the philosophical foundation long established beneath every issue, subject, or media event.  As media customers, we deserve the best!  After all, we don't live in just any other nation, you know, those inferior which were created through a legal process, or through the utilization of the traditions of Old World legal precedence.  Instead, simply put, our Founders established us as a nation by declaring a whole new order under our feet.

Not to worry about these media sophisticates, rest assured they won't be able to answer any kind of questioning without having first gone back to school and, this time, having to do real studying.

Fact is, these sophisticates now running the modern media are more likely to know more about Marxism and Leninism.  For example, what are the subtle differences between these two social and political ideologies?  And what are the differences between socialism and communism for that matter?

Again, don't worry, these same media today won't be able to answer most questioning in depth.

Welcome to a new age of the false dichotomy when little effort is utilized in reducing the student's focus towards what is the one formal, ideal culture.  Instead, the parts of the whole today are being divided against themselves in many diverse ways.  These conflicts work to pit male against female, young against old, rich against poor, black against white, homosexual against heterosexual, and so on.

Blame the two sleazy party system on this seeming advancement into chaos.

Contrary to the two party system, the American Movement is our true advancement over the U.S. Constitution.  This process was, as Abe Lincoln might say, born of, by, and for the people, awakening in them during past times when the two party breaks down.  During such a state of unfathomable chaos and crises,  the American Movement brings the people back to the revering of our Founding Fathers, to the cherishing of the new order they declared within the Declaration of Independence, and to the honoring of the new laws they established within the U.S. Constitution.  Finally, the people are brought back to appreciating our Bill of Rights as our proclaimed rights.

Our proclaimed Bill of Rights express God's authority over even any king who would proclaim himself to possess absolute power.  Okay, and what is the significance you might ask?  Well, the king is the one who wrote proclamations such as the proclamation of 1653 meaning that he believed himself to dictate while possessing God's authority.  Meanwhile, in stark contrast, within our Founder's Declaration of 1776, a declaration was made by our Founders while they understood themselves to be standing submissive under God's authority.  

Indeed, as our civil rights were granted to us illegally by mere lawyers, our natural rights within the Bill of Rights were proclaimed by our Founders as such rights reduce on the physical level to the extent of the soul.  Therefore, as our already possessed natural rights can't be also granted to us later on, so they can never be repealed with such being an offense committed under threat of God's judgement.

This brings us around full circle to answering the questions in the first paragraph.  There are no so-called "principles" within The Declaration of Independence, but a singular new order.  That new order was an oral declaration made by our *Founding Fathers of a new Natural law which states that:

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness." 

Our Founders signed their names to this declared document under threat and danger of God's judgement.        

Likewise, as it is with the Declaration of Independence, there are no flippant principles within the U.S. Constitution, but new practical laws meant to narrow the heart of the American people towards the original new order - with it being the establishment of a new Natural Law.  Our proclaimed Bill of Rights, a separate document within the U.S. Constitution from the document of new laws which have been already mentioned, bind the new order within the Declaration of Independence, with it being the people's righteous divorce from tyranny, to that of the new laws erected within the U.S. Constitution, with they being practical laws which remarried us to a "more perfect Union."        

* As I have mentioned often, the Almighty can heal people either by His touch or by His spoken Gospel.  In other words, God is not concerned with such abstracts as equality and responsibility; but, rather, He is concerned solely with happiness.  As Watchman Nee a Chinese brother in the Lord once said, it is God's Willful Nature to provide for us twice what we need.  In contrast to Him, because it is our willful nature to cheat ourselves, the best we can receive for ourselves is nothing.  The Almighty Himself said that one can commit any offense against the Son of Man and He will have to forgive you.  However, the only offense which is unforgivable is to offend (stumble up) the Holy Spirit.  This is a paradox.  Indeed,  killing and maiming children would seem to be the far more serious offense.  To the contrary, God, being wise and knowing the functioning of the predatory mind, understands how the preservation of His children is more dependent upon the assured advancement of their Civil Purpose.

**When speaking of the American founders, their title should be expressed in the formal higher case as they are the ones who dealt in matters concerning the Truth as a virtue.  In other words, any time "Founding Fathers" is written, a person from Egypt should recognize the material as relating with the American Founding Fathers.  After all, they are the ones who willfully stripped themselves of their titles of "Gentlemen" in English high society.  They are the ones who created a new nation not officially so, but more as shepherds as they themselves sat among an audience of commoner people as nameless and faceless members.  Indeed, they also understood how our nation would become a shambles economically upon any commencement of divorcing our nation out from under the evil and corrupt order of the Old World.