Part III. The People's Civil Purpose
Written in the Form
of a Chinese
Eight Legged Essay
The Singular Political Spectrum

Wretch on Left or Right side <------- moderate middle-------> King on Right or Left side
I.
When focusing our attention upon the one true dichotomy, we learn to discern it from the many false ones. This singular dichotomy depicts a conflict between a formal king, I’ve created a metaphorical image of him within the model above, and that of an informal wretch, a depiction of her is shown next to him.
II.
Utilizing the model above for better visualization, as the metaphor of the king would represent the greatest of rulers, the wretch, being that she is his exact inverse or perverse, would represent the very least of slaves. As the king is rational knowing much, so the wretch would be irrational knowing little. On one side, as the king would own every piece of property and all possessions on that property, on the other side, the wretch would own nothing and be deemed an illegal trespasser. As he at one end of the spectrum is sovereign having exempt status and immunity in all matters, so she on the other would be condemned, powerless and judged a criminal. As the wretch on the disadvantaged side will have to learn how to prostitute herself in order to survive, so the king on the more privileged side would be well able bodied as, when he was still a young prince, he was taught how to prostitute others in order to thrive.
III.
Being inverse to one another, while the decisions of the king are treated sovereign even if he is ignorant, the wretch is ignored even if she knows best. When each were younger, while he was sent to school to be trained how to control his authority, she had to learn how to survive by manipulating authority. After maturing into adults, while the king would be honored as the one who knows much, in turn, the wretch would be deemed to know little.
Pertaining to the rest of those remaining between the king and the wretch within the moderate middle of the above political spectrum, there are at least three types of rational people. They are the sophists, the philosophers, and the alphas.
The eloquent sophist is rational because he or she is skilled in the art of debate. They are orators who entertain paying audiences with debates concerning the question of what is the truth and demonstrations of how knowing such a virtue is impossible. He or she substantiates this conclusion by putting on performances arguing both sides of a topic spending the first half of the show presenting one point of view and afterwards, perhaps after taking a break, spending the second half presenting the opposing point of view. Granted, as the ultimate Truth is an infinite measure of all of eternity and as such a place would be unapproachable to us, the point made by the sophists does have validity.
The second type of rational people are the philosophers. While they do acknowledge that the sophist argument has validity, they venture further by training their minds in the utilization of truth engines. Indeed, these philosophers develop mental disciplines in which raw information is collected and inputted for the purpose of reducing large informal quantities of data down to smaller outputs of quality truths. So, while it is a fact that one can't arrive at an absolute Truth by the use of truth engines, it is quite possible for one to arrive at certain best-principled paths which travel in a general direction of that Truth.
The third type of rational people are the alphas. They are deemed rational by the position of their births. To put it simply, the alphas are sovereign by inheritance. Society either chooses to respect the rational decisions made by these alphas or else there will be consequences. Any disagreement with this bully rationale gets overpowered quickly.
Of the three types of rational people depicted above, the alphas have always remained somewhat of a mystery. This is because fearful writers and orators in the past have had to avoid making any direct references towards them. A paradox exists involving these alphas and the irrational state they have established and maintained by the use of brute force. While, on one hand, we do need to be practical by utilizing the rule of law as a necessary tyranny, on the other, it is impossible to control ourselves by thoughtless political changes brought about by the endless legislation of laws. However, rather than choose a platonic best-principled middle ground between these two extremes, we invariably resign ourselves to a state of perpetual abuse under the rule of the alphas. In turn, by utilizing the false powers of manipulation, the alphas are able to maintain an irrational state over us.
As the manipulative false powers are the same as the faulty dichotomies, the faulty dichotomies themselves are disinformation. To understand the difference between misinformation and disinformation, while misinformation are lies perpetuated by the state for reasons deemed to be in the best interest of the people, disinformation is justification for utilizing those lies. In other words, while misinformation deals with the deception of others, disinformation deals more with the deceiving of oneself. While misinformation is deceit caused by the deliberate propagation of untruths, disinformation is self deception caused by the propagation of the fraudulent dichotomies. These fraudulent dichotomies are poison. Indeed, they work to intoxicate both the alphas and those under their rule. This is why the alpha rulers don't acknowledge when light has been shown unto their consciences as they have become blinded by these false powers of manipulation into legislating laws for the sake of the law.
Such fraudulent dichotomies are most often expressed as conflicts between male and female. Understand, in the narrowed dichotomy expressed at the beginning of this essay, the ongoing conflict depicted is not between a male and a female. Indeed, a man can live wretched just as a woman can rule over her children as a king.
Other than male against female, some of the other fraudulent dichotomies to be wary of are white against black, the young against the old, the poor against the rich, and on and on endlessly. Simply put, the drunken alphas manufacture their deceit on a foundation of fraudulent dichotomies. They feel they are justified in spreading lies among the people because disinformation has deceive them into believing that they will one day stand blameless under the Light of Truth. Yet, these false powers of manipulation do stumble up the people by distracting their focus away from the singular dichotomy. Again, the model dichotomy depicted above is the true one as it depicts what has long been an eternal conflict ongoing between a king of the highest rank and that of a wretch of the lowest.
Today, we shouldn't just appreciate the writings and sayings of every past philosopher and sage; but, we should honor them for what they couldn't write or say about the alphas ruling over them. Neither Tao Te Ching, Confucius, Socrates, nor Plato, among many others could write or speak freely about the alphas, but had to be watchful lowering their eyes when addressing such rulers. So, while one won't read much about these alphas in ancient texts, realize how their threatening dominion was always ever present. But remember also how we are so helpless as people that we can't even help ourselves. Indeed, the best we can seem to institute as a rule over our own heads are governments made up of bullies. This human frailty is why our Founding Fathers chose to circumcise authority relegating it to the status of a necessary tyranny. As the people are more than capable of taking care of themselves, this necessary tyranny would ideally function, as our Founders had it envisioned, only as part of what would become a dynamic, ever improving, more perfect Union.
Considering this more perfect Union, realize how law and order are not the same. Indeed, proper government is a procedural relationship needing to be put into perspective concerning both the law and the order. The tyranny of thoughtless political changes and endless laws is the system that is chaos. It is an out of control process of implementing changes for the sake of change and enacting endless laws for the sake of the law. As a consequence, the minority making up the government become the glory and the purpose.
The process of implementing changes and enacting laws is not and should not be the purpose -- the end of all end alls, but is and should be a necessary tyranny -- a mere means towards an ever greater end towards the Truth. That greater end is the advancement of the people’s Civil Purpose. Indeed, as the sophists would say, it is impractical to think that we can govern ourselves by the Truth as such a virtue is unapproachable to us. However, at the same time, as the philosophers would say, we should never give into being enslaved by the false powers of manipulation. The idea wasn’t to create government, but to preserve and redeem it in order to utilize it as a necessary tyranny. However, as it would be wise to limit the amount of any necessary evil, authority too should be limited through a process of careful circumcision.
IV.
Much to their benefit, as the king and his supporting tyranny have managed to avoid having their roles defined clearly in society, so has the character of the lowly wretch remained a mystery as well. This is because society has always been thought to be divided into just two classifications of a master-class and a slave-class. However, upon closer examination, society reveals the existence of a third class. These three classes as a whole are a master class, a slave class, and an outcast class. While the master class has long exploited the slave class, in turn, they as a society together have exploited yet another class of outcast. As the master class props up a king, so the slave class shuns an outcast wretch.
V.
So, as the king should be considered the master on one end of the political spectrum, the wretch should be considered the outcaste on the other. Metaphorically, she is the very least rated among three types of prostituted. These three types are the wife, the commoner, and the wretch. Among those who are prostituted in society, the highest rated is the wife. Being highly valued, she is a woman who is rated worthy enough to sleep in the bed of the king. The second highest rated of these prostitutes is the commoner. While she is not rated worthy enough to sleep in the bed of the king, her life will be spared as long as she is willing to kneel down in his presence. Finally, the lowest rated of the prostituted is the wretch. She has been outcast by the king and from his kingdom even to the extent that she will be killed on sight.
Compared to the wretch, the king is divided into two types. These two are a Son-of-God and a Son-of-man. As he was born of a king, a Son of God is renowned and intimately known possessing a namesake. The fearful people will honor a princely Son of God treating him greater in worth than even his own father the king. In contrast to a Son of God, a Son of man is a stranger. He is the offspring of the wretch, a metaphor for the very least. In contrast to how they will praise a Son of God, the fearful people will show disdain towards a son of man rating his worth as even less than his nameless and faceless parents. A paradox is expressed here for, as the term "God" denotes an intimate meaning, the term "man" denotes an impersonal classification. So, the one who is blessed as a Son of God will tend to be exalted by the fearful masses as greater than the very greatest: Meanwhile, in stark contrast, the one who is a cursed son of man(kind) will be rejected by them as they will tend to degrade such a lowly person rating him as more worthless than the very least.
As a person's face represents their authority, so the king possesses a glorious face. In contrast, the wretch has no face. As it is with dogs, prostitutes are recognized by their behinds. Indeed, dogs recognize each other by the sniffing of their behinds. However, a wretch is rated less than a dog as she isn't even valued for her behind.
Just the opposite of a dog, a Son of God is empowered by the praises of the people just as governments receive their power from the consent of the governed. For example, the Buddha received his empowerment from the wise men who sought after him. To find his whereabouts, as people will read a page of a book, they were born with a gift to read the universe. So, they were able to seek out the Buddha by interpreting the stars. When they did finally pinpoint his residence, they found the Buddha inside had not yet been born as he was still within his pregnant mother's womb. So, they picked him up by carrying the whole bed along with his mother still laying upon it. Unfortunately, during the birthing process, his mother died. I must pause here to marvel at the question of, what if the Buddha had ended up being born female? As he grew, it was the people who taught the Buddha teaching him about ideal perfection for, being Hindus, they believed in their hearts that he was the very manifestation of God Himself.
Problem is, someone left the door of the palace open one day allowing the Buddha to venture out from his ideal palace into the real world. Here he would become traumatized after witnessing for the first time the harsh realities of sickness, hunger, poverty, crime, and old age. Quite offended at being so misled in his education, the Buddha would then demand that he be further taught everything pertaining to the reality of the outside world. So, as they believed he was the very manifestation of God, the people then had to teach him about reality also. The point here being that the people were the ones who were responsible for empowering the Buddha. In the beginning, the Buddha was taught an ideal life within a palace isolated from the world and what it was like to live as a king. Later, he would then be taught about a real life outside in the world and what it was like to have to live as a wretch.

In contrast to The Buddha, Saul of Tarsus had to live the life of the worst human being to ever live. He was the unforgivable one who offended the Holy Spirit by his actions of hunting down and persecuting Christian believers. Indeed, during His torture and crucifixion, Jesus in the flesh did not ask king Herod or the preface Pontius Pilate the question of why they were persecuting Him. No, that question was reserved for Saul, the one who would be truly held responsible for His persecution. In other words, Saul of Tarsus was the greatest one among the very worst who offended the Holy Spirit. The worst I speak of here were the ones who were responsible for empowering the wayward emperors - those empowered ones who would dare to declare themselves living gods and would demand to be worshiped as such. So, the judgment of the Holy Spirit was preserved to fall upon Saul as the lone responsible one. As a consequence, the person of Saul had to suffer a spiritual death, indeed, the person of Saul could never be forgiven. As a result, Saul was born again and transformed into the Apostle Paul, the highest authority over all other apostles as God's chosen vessel.
To add another example, later on, it wasn't a king of England who would pronounce himself, by way of proclamation, to possess absolute power. No, it was a subject under

him named Sir Robert Filmer. Robert Filmer wrote a book of political philosophy called "The Partriarcha" which leaned towards an argument of increasing the king's empowerment. Of course, in writing such a book, Sir Robert Filmer was looking for the king's favor concerning his own advancement and increased empowerment within the ruling monarchy -- within the British Crown. In contrast, John Locke had to write a challenge to Sir Robert Filmer in secret to the extent that his true identity would be revealed only after his death by a request placed within his last will and testament.
Similar to the Buddha, Moses first had to be raised as a king. Along the way, his rise to power was challenged as he was exposed to the reality that his true blood family were actually the Hebrew slaves in bondage to the Egyptians and under the rule of Pharaoh his father. After coming to this realization, Moses chose to lower himself by becoming a slave himself. In this way, Moses understood the plight of the most wretched from the point of view of a king. When the stuttering and stammering Moses would later return to free his people, in order to avoid offending the predatory nature of Pharaoh, he was wise enough to hide his lameness by utilizing his brother Aaron as a strong interpreting mouthpiece.
VI.
As it was with Moses, the voice of the most worthless wretch might warn us to both never speak in fear or to act in a threatening manner towards the king and those ruling under his authority. For, as she knows only too well, to do so will only earn us a severe beating on every level of society. Indeed, the alpha king is a metaphorical lion that both devours what he fears and consumes what is a threat to his domain. Like the wretch, except for our inborn natural rights, we should be silent possessing no power. However, like our Founders, while we should remain submissive to the king's authority, we should always be on our guard both willing to disobey any violation committed against both our natural rights to live as free souls and, at a moments notice, to enslave ourselves of our own free wills to a common duty of fighting for those rights. But we should also be wise kings ourselves knowing in our hearts that, as it would be one thing having to go up against a band of crazed men fighting for God only knows, it is quite on another level altogether to be run over by a wretch concerned for the sake of her worthless offspring on finding exponential contentment for their sake.
VII.
In order to ordain a new order under our nation, the hearts of our Founding Fathers reduced towards a natural law. Their blessing of this new order was in opposition to the traditional ordainment of the day which, based on the legal precedence of the Old World, required the blessing and crowning of a new king. Our Founders could have made themselves Lords over us. Indeed, under the authority of a new king, they could have governed over us as conquering officials. Instead, they chose to function intimately of, by, and for the people - as Abraham Lincoln once so elegantly perceived - for the purpose of addressing all future tyrants and tyrannies that might rise up to threaten our new nation. As they stood upon a foundation constructed of their own ancestors, they themselves made a precious alteration to world history. When doing so, they were mindful of His possible divine providence moving against them as they all had both signed their names of their own free will and taken a sacred oath all under penalty of His judgment. Rather than cower and continue to perpetuate the same old tyranny, they took a thoughtful step forward narrowing with the declaration that:
we hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
VIII.
All our ancestors have braved the same great darkness and then perished for our sake. So, while we should all be focusing a gentle eye upon a singular dichotomy, we should be perceiving with a more subtle eye how a tyranny of faulty dichotomies now threatens our Union. They have forsaken the supreme power of the Truth for vain evil doings -- the manipulative false powers. Such chaos has divided our people against themselves to the extent of atrocity. Behold as white fathers are being blinded into fighting against their own black sons, as people are being confused into rejecting their natural rights — the very inborn powers provided to them by God — and, worst of all, the wretch herself is being distracted by political fervor into abandoning her children.
This desperation today has us looking to salvage from what we most treasure from a scattered inheritance. As the same would be true among all the multitude of the earth, concerning the valuable documents that we inherited from our Founding Fathers, so should we never amend beyond making the most precious of alterations to them. As already stated, our Founders once acted out a little masterpiece on our behalf, daring to perish with us during its enactment. They were burdened during that crucial time to the extent that they were willing to throw off their rightful high ranking statuses as Gentlemen in British Society. In order to divorce us from tyranny, they were prepared to suffer personal poverty by cutting our new nation off from the Old World economy. As our desperate Founders once thoughtfully and carefully narrowed to what they most treasured as their inheritance, so do we reject every false dichotomy today in favor of a long standing conflict between a king and a wretch.
As our Founders once declared, so do we the people of today declare all men whether the highest of kings or the lowest of wretches as equal in their power and in the endowment provided to them by their Creator, with each possessing in their beings the same exact business agenda for Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.
