I can't work on this letter in here any more as I assume its length has exceeded the limit of Blogger.  It now has over 10,000 words which should be about the size of the finished letter once it is tightened up a bit.  In my scientific foundation called Exponentialism, I've included an Epistemology argument.  Allow me to explain.

Science and math has been dealing with Exponentialism for thousands of years.  This phenomenon isn't as difficult to understand as it is subtle.  In order to explain it better, science and math have narrowed down to the extent that they have weeded out a lot of the philosophy and history.  On the other hand, they have also now narrowed down to the extent that they provide formulas which is a good thing.

But weeding out the philosophy and history has been detrimental.  This is why a student will lose knowledge of math and science in as little time as a few years away from school.

Rather than blame philosophy and history for confusion, my argument pinpoints another culprit.  Instead of weeding out philosophy and history from math and science, the faulty dichotomies need to be weeded out.  Indeed, that is the poison keeping children from understanding the subtle exponential aspect about life.  These faulty dichotomies can't be weeded out altogether, but they need to be put into better perspective.  To prevent us from any further metaphoric veering off the road into a ditch, they need to be tossed into the backseat.

Okay, you might ask, why the scientific groundwork?  Well, the best way to attack any problem is on many levels.  And one of the main problems threatening our nation today is theoretical science and its threat to the metaphysical science in which our Founders utilized in forming a new natural law.