Here is the revision of my eight legged Chinese essay

PART II.

The People's Civil Purpose

==============================================================

Informal Wretch

Formal King

A Message Given 

In the Form of a Chinese

 Eight Legged Essay

The Wretch  <   Moderate Middle   >   The King

=============================================================

 I. 
When focusing our attention upon what is the one true dichotomy, we learn to discern what are the false ones.  This true dichotomy is a long enduring conflict between a formal king, whose character is depicted on the far right hand side of the above political spectrum, and an informal wretch, whose character is depicted on the far left hand side of it.          

II.  
     Utilizing the model above for better visualization, as the metaphor of the king would represent the greatest of rulers, the wretch, being she is his exact inverse or perverse, would represent the very least of slaves.  As the king is rational knowing much, the wretch is irrational knowing little.  On one side, as the king would own every piece of property and all things on that property, on the other, the wretch owns nothing and is deemed an illegal trespasser.  As he at one end is sovereign having exempt status and immunity in all matters, she on the other end is condemned, powerless and judged criminal.  As the wretch will have to learn how to prostitute herself in order to survive, the king on the other end is well able bodied as, when he was still a young prince, he was taught how to prostitute others in order to thrive.

III.
     Being inverse to one another, while the great authority of the king would always be expanding, the diminished authority of the wretch would always be withering.  When each were younger, while he was sent to school to be trained how to control his authority, she had to learn how to survive by manipulating authority.  After maturing into adults, while the king would be honored as the one who knows most, in turn, the wretch would be deemed to know little.
     Pertaining to the rest of us remaining individuals between the king and the wretch,  all those who reside within the moderate middle of the above political spectrum, there are at least three types of rational people.  They are the sophists, the philosophers, and the alphas.
     The eloquent sophist is rational because he or she is skilled in the art of debate.  They are orators who entertain paying audiences with debates concerning the question of what is the truth and demonstrations of how knowing such a virtue isn't possible.  He or she substantiates this conclusion by putting on demonstrations arguing both sides of a topic spending half of the performance presenting one point of view and afterwards, perhaps after taking a break, spending the other half of it presenting the opposing point of view.  Granted, as the ultimate Truth is an infinite measure of all of eternity and as such a place would be unapproachable to us, the point made by the sophists does have validity.

     The second type of rational people are the philosophers.  While they do acknowledge that the sophist argument has some validity, they further train their minds in the utilization of truth engines.  Indeed, these philosophers develop mental disciplines in which raw information (data) is collected and inputted for the purpose of reducing large informal quantities of it down to that of a smaller outputs of quality truths.  So, while it is a fact that one can't arrive at an absolute Truth by the use of truth engines, it is possible for one to arrive at certain best-principled statements.
     The third type of rational people are the alphas.  They are deemed rational by the position of their births.  To put it simply, the alphas are sovereign by inheritance.  Society either chooses to respect the rational decisions of these alphas or else there will be consequences.  Any disagreement with this bully rationale gets overpowered quickly.
     Of the three types of rational people depicted above, the alphas have always remained somewhat of a mystery.  Indeed, in ancient records, fearful writers have always had to avoid making any direct reference to the brutal methods they utilized.

     A paradox exists involving the rational alphas and their majority control of government.  While, on one hand, we do need to be practical in our approach, on the other, it is impossible to control ourselves by thoughtless changes brought about by the endless legislation of laws.  Rather than choose a best-principled middle ground between the two extremes of governing ourselves in an impractical method and, just the opposite, of governing ourselves by both the thoughtless implementations of changes and endless enactments of laws, we invariably resign ourselves to a perpetual state of abuse under the rule of alphas.  They dish out their abuse by stumbling up the people.  They do so by utilizing false powers of manipulation.  

     They maintain power over us by way of disinformation.   To understand the difference between misinformation and disinformation, while misinformation are lies perpetuated by the state for reasons deemed to be in the best interest of the people, disinformation are justifications for utilizing those lies.  In other words, while misinformation deals with the deception of others, disinformation deals more with the deceiving of oneself.  While misinformation is deceit caused by the deliberate propagation of untruths, disinformation is self deception caused by the propagation of fraudulent dichotomies.  These fraudulent dichotomies are poison.  Indeed, they work to intoxicate both the alphas and those under their rule.  This is why the alpha rulers don't follow their consciences as they have become political drunkards.  By their partaking in these false powers of manipulation, they have lost their political souls.  

    Such fraudulent dichotomies are most often expressed as conflicts between male and female.  Understand, in the one true dichotomy expressed in the introduction between the king and the wretch, the ongoing conflict is not male versus female.  Indeed, a man can live wretched just as a woman can rule over her children as a king.
     Other than male against female, other fraudulent dichotomies to be wary of are white against black, the young against the old, the poor against the rich, and on and on endlessly.  Simply put, the drunken alphas manufacture deceit on a foundation of fraudulent dichotomies.  They feel they are justified in spreading lies because of a deception of disinformation has deceive them into believing that they will one day be standing blameless under the Light of Truth.  Yet, these false powers of manipulation stumble up the people by distracting their focus away from the one true dichotomy.  Again, the model dichotomy above is the formal one as it depicts what has long been an eternal conflict ongoing between a king of the highest rank and that of a wretch of the lowest.

     Today, we shouldn't just consider what every past philosopher and sage wrote and said; but, we should also appreciate what they couldn't write or say about those who were ruling over them.  Neither Tao Te Ching, Confucius, Socrates, or Plato, along with many others, could write or speak freely about the alphas, but had to be submissive to them lowering their eyes when addressing such rulers in either rational conversation or in written prose.  So, while one won't read much about these alphas in ancient texts, realize how their threatening stares were always ever present over society.  But remember also how we are so helpless as people that we can't even help ourselves.  Indeed, the best we can seem to institute as a rule over ourselves are governments of bullies.  This human frailty is why our Founding Fathers chose to circumcise authority relegating it to the status of a necessary tyranny.  As the people are more than capable of taking care of themselves, this necessary tyranny would function, as our Founders had it envisioned, as just part of what would become a dynamic, ever improving, more perfect Union.
     Considering this more perfect Union, law and order is not the same.  Indeed, proper government is a procedural relationship needing to be put into perspective concerning both law and order.  The tyranny of thoughtless changes and endless laws is a chaotic process.  It is a process which implements changes for the sake of change and enacts endless laws for the sake of change and for the law.  As a consequence, the minority making up the government become the glory and serving them as the focus becomes the purpose of the lessor people.  In contrast, the people weren't created in order to be equal or responsible, but to be exponential in their happiness.     

     The processes of implementing changes and enacting laws are not ends, but mere means to a greater end.  That greater end is to advance the Civil Purpose of the wretch's offspring.  Indeed, as the sophists would say, it is impractical to think that we can govern ourselves by the Truth as such a virtue is unapproachable to us.  However, at the same time, as the philosophers would say, we should never give into being enslaved by deceit involving the false powers of manipulation.  The idea is to create government as a necessary tyranny.  However, as one would desire to limit any necessary evil, authority too should be limited through a process of careful circumcision.             

                     

IV.
     Much to their benefit, as the king and his supporting tyranny have managed to avoid having their roles defined clearly in society, so has the character of the lowly wretch remained a mystery also.  This is because society has always been thought to be divided into just two classifications of a master-class and a slave-class.  However, upon closer examination, society reveals the existence of a third class.  These three classes as a whole are a master class, a slave class, and an outcast class.  While the master class has long exploited the slave class, in turn, they together as an acting society then exploit another class of outcast.      

The Outcast Wretch

V.
As the king is the master on one end of the political spectrum, the wretch is the outcaste on the other.  Metaphorically, she is the very least rated among three types of slaves.  These three types are the wife, the commoner, and the wretch.  Among these who are prostituted in society, the highest rated is the wife.  She is a woman who is rated worthy enough to sleep in the bed of the king.  The second highest rated of the prostitutes is the commoner woman.  While she is not rated worthy enough to sleep in the bed of the king, her life will be spared as long as she is willing to kneel in his presence.  Finally, the lowest rated of the prostituted is the wretch.  She has been outcast by the king from his kingdom even to the extent that she will be killed on sight.

     Compared to the wretch, the king is divided into two types. These are a Son-of-God and a Son-of-man.  As he was born of a king, a Son of God is renowned and intimately known possessing a namesake.  The fearful people will honor a princely Son of God treating him greater in worth than even his own father the king.  In contrast to a Son of God, a Son of man is a stranger.  He is the offspring of the wretch, a metaphor for the very least. In contrast to how they will praise a Son of God, the fearful people will show disdain towards a son of man rating his worth as even less than his nameless and faceless parents. A paradox is expressed here for, as the term "God" denotes an intimate meaning, the term "man" denotes an impersonal classification. So, the one who is blessed as a Son of God will tend to be exalted by the fearful masses as greater than the very greatest:  Meanwhile, in stark contrast, the one who is a cursed son of man(kind) will be rejected by them as they will tend to degrade such a lowly person rating him as more worthless than the very least.
     As a person's face represents their authority, so the king possesses a glorious face.  In contrast, the wretch has no face.  As it is with dogs, prostitutes are recognized by their behinds.  Indeed, dogs recognize each other by the sniffing of their behinds.  However, a wretch is rated less than a dog as she isn't even valued for her behind.        

The Master King

     Just the opposite of a dog, a Son of God is empowered by the praises of the people just as governments receive their power from the consent of the governed.  For example, the Buddha received his empowerment from the wise men who sought after him.  To find his whereabouts, as people will read a page of a book, they were born with a gift to read the universe.  So, they were able to seek out the Buddha by interpreting the stars.  When they did finally pinpoint his residence, they found the Buddha inside had not yet been born as he was still within his pregnant mother's womb.  So, they picked him up by carrying the whole bed along with his mother still laying upon it.  Unfortunately, during the birthing process, his mother died.  I must pause here to marvel at the question of, what if the Buddha had ended up being born female?  As he grew, it was the people who taught the Buddha teaching him about ideal perfection for, being Hindus, they believed in their hearts that he was the very manifestation of God Himself.
     Problem is, someone left the door of the palace open one day allowing the Buddha to venture out from his ideal palace into the real world.  Here he would become traumatized after witnessing for the first time the harsh realities of sickness, hunger, poverty, crime, and old age.  Quite offended at being so misled in his education, the Buddha would then demand that he be further taught everything pertaining to the reality of the outside world.  So, as they believed he was the very manifestation of God, the people then had to teach him about reality also.  The point here being that the people were the ones who were responsible for empowering the Buddha.  In the beginning, the Buddha was taught an ideal life within a palace isolated from the world and what it was like to live as a king.   Later, he would then be taught about a real life outside in the world and what it was like to have to live as a wretch.

     Similarly, Saul of Tarsus had to live the life of the worst human being to ever live.  He was the unforgivable one who offended the Holy Spirit by his actions of hunting down and persecuting Christian believers.  Indeed, during His torture and crucifixion, Jesus in the flesh did not ask king Herod or the preface Pontius Pilate the question of why they were persecuting Him.  No, that question was reserved for Saul, the one who would be truly held responsible for His persecution.  In other words, Saul of Tarsus was the greatest one among the very worst who offended the Holy Spirit.  The worst I speak of here were the ones who were responsible for empowering the wayward emperors - those empowered ones who would dare to declare themselves living gods and would demand to be worshiped as such.  So, the judgement of the Holy Spirit was preserved to fall upon Saul as the lone responsible one.  As a consequence, the person of Saul had to suffer a spiritual death, indeed, the person of Saul could never be forgiven.  As a result, Saul was born again and transformed into the Apostle Paul, the highest authority over all other apostles as God's chosen vessel. 

     To add another example, later on, it wasn't a king of England who would pronounce himself, by way of proclamation, to possess absolute power. No, it was a subject under him named Sir Robert Filmer.  Robert Filmer wrote a book of political philosophy called "The Partriarcha" which leaned towards an argument of increasing the king's empowerment.  Of course, in writing such a book, Robert Filmer was looking for the king's favor concerning his own advancement and increased empowerment within the ruling monarchy.  In contrast, John Locke had to write a challenge to Sir Robert Filmer in secret to the extent that his identity and would only reveal it after his death by a request put within his last will and testament. 

      Similar to the Buddha, Moses had to be first raised as a king.  Along the way, his rise to power was challenged as he was exposed to the fact that his true family were actually the Hebrew slaves in bondage to the Egyptians under the rule of the Pharaoh his father.  After coming to this realization, Moses chose to lower himself by becoming a slave.  In this way, Moses could first understand the plight of the most wretched from the point of view of a king.  When the stuttering and stammering Moses would later return to free his people, in order not to offend the predatory nature of Pharaoh, he was wise enough to hide his lameness by utilizing his brother Aaron as a strong interpreting mouthpiece.
                

VI.
     Similarly as Moses, as the voice of the most worthless wretch among us might warn, so we should be careful speaking in fear or in threats towards the king's authority as to do so will only serve in getting us beaten on every level.  Indeed, the alpha king, the metaphorical lion, both devours what he fears and what is a threat to his domain.  Like the wretch, except for our inborn natural rights, we possess no power.  Like our Founders, while we should remain submissive to the king's authority, we should always be on our guard willing to both disobey any violation committed against both our natural rights to live as free souls, and, at a moments notice, to enslave ourselves of our own free will to the common duty of fighting for those rights.  But we should also be wise kings knowing in our hearts that, as it is one thing to have to face a band of crazed men fighting for God only knows, it is quite another to be run over by a wretch intent, for the sake of her litter, on finding exponential contentment for them!
      

VII.
     In order to ordain our new nation, the hearts of our Founding Fathers reduced towards a natural law.  Their blessing of this new order was in opposition to the traditional ordainment of the day which, based on the legal precedence of the Old World, required the blessing and crowning of a new king.  Our Founders could have made themselves Lords over us.   Indeed, under the authority of a new king, they could have governed over us as conquering officials.  Instead, they chose to function intimately of, by, and for the people - as Abraham Lincoln once so elegantly perceived - for the purpose of addressing all future tyrants and tyrannies that might rise up to threaten our new nation.  As they stood upon a foundation constructed of their own ancestors, they themselves made a precious alteration to world history.  When doing so, they were mindful of His possible divine providence moving against them as they all had both signed their names of their own free will and taken a sacred oath all under penalty of His judgement.  Rather than cower and continue to perpetuate the same old tyranny, they took a thoughtful step forward narrowing with the declaration that we hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

Necessary Tyranny

The People

VIII.
     As all our ancestors have braved the same great darkness and then perished for our sake, so we all should focus our attention towards a single dichotomy, perceiving with a subtle eye the true tyranny that now threatens our Union.  Indeed, aren't they the very best mannered, the most pleasant, and the very kindest among us?  As they uplift us with the most eloquent of speeches, aren't they tricking us into selling our souls, cheating us with empty boxes of goods adorned with the prettiest of outer wrappings, and stumbling us up with false hope and quick changes implemented for the sake of change?  Such chaos has divided our people against themselves to the extent of atrocity.  Behold as white fathers are being blinded into fighting against their own black sons, as people are being forced to reject their natural rights  —  the very inborn powers provided to them by God Almighty —  and, worst of all, the wretch is being distracted into abandoning her children for political causes.    

     This desperation today has us looking to salvage from what we most treasure from a scattered inheritance.  As the same would be true among all the multitude of the earth, concerning the messages that were left to us by our Founding Fathers, so should we never amend beyond what are the most precious of alterations.  As already stated, our Founders once acted out a little masterpiece on our behalf, daring to perish with us during its enactment, indeed, even to sit and tarry with us as common members of the congregation.  They were burdened during that crucial time to the extent that they were willing to throw off their rightful social statuses as Gentlemen.  They did forfeit those honorific titles willingly when they divorced us rightfully from tyranny  — when they cut our new nation off from the Old World economy.  As our desperate Founders once thoughtfully and carefully narrowed to what they most treasured as their own inheritance, so do we reject every false dichotomy today in order to focus our attention on a single conflict between a king and a wretch.

     As our Founders once declared, so do "we the people" of these United States today declare both the highest of kings and the lowest of wretches as equal in their power and in the endowment provided to them by their Creator, with each possessing in their beings the same exact business agenda for Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.