A Letter Written Of, By,
and For the People to the Most
Supreme of All Courts
by Uncle Emanuel Watkins
Table of Contents
Preface
Preamble
Introduction
Part I. Opening Argument
Part II. The People's Civil Purpose
Part III. Exponentialism
A. Metaphysical Reduction
B. Existential Unification
Conclusion
A. The People's Proclamation to Intermittent Sovereignty
B. Judgement
Preface
I created Uncle Emanuel Watkins as a hypothetical character. Much like when businessmen refer to 'gadgets' and 'widgets' when speaking about hypothetical business models and methods, so Uncle Emanuel Watkins is an ideal position of authority who I created of, by, and for the people. The title of 'Fd.' at the beginning of his name denotes 'Founder.' While a Founder is someone who is an ideal leader, he or she cannot be either a legal attorney or anyone having anything to do with law. In novel fashion, he or she will have earned their honorific title by the writing of many 'simple writs.'
A simple writ is a style of writing. In contrast to the more official essay which divides the potential reading audience into many classifications and dichotomies, a writer of a simple writ should imagine shrinking the whole world as their reading audience down to within the being of a lone wretch. If deciding that you too want to walk down this path, here are the rules to follow. First, write your writs while experiencing the harshest of elements both out on the hottest of days and the coldest of nights. As the wretch will be suffering from these same harsh conditions, limit the contents of your writs to one side of a single page. This way she won't become distracted by having to turn it over to read the other side. Don't reference your information as she won't have the means to validate it. While the king will have lots of leisure time for personal enrichment, in contrast, the wretch will be quite desperate. Next, never condescend to her. And, finally, remember, as she is only a metaphor, you don't ever have to give her the message.
The following is an example of a simple writ:
Reading towards the end of the Gospel of Mark, I had to marvel. As revealed in this gospel, the wretched little sisters who buried the body of Christ after His resurrection were already functioning as the church even to the extent that it was said they were already speaking with angels. So, being a typical man, I had to ask myself the question of why such people in their right minds would venture out to gather a lost flock of disciples for the purpose of placing them as an authority over their own heads? In considering the behavior of these sisters, don't get religious on me. Sure, one could argue that these sisters were broken in their beings and transformed to an extent that they were able and willing to follow after the Holy Spirit. I'm sure this reasoning is part of the correct answer.
Actually, I believe these sisters had to create this authority in order to take care of the head of John. See, the disciple John was born mentally ill which is why he had to keep his head in direct and constant contact with Christ. After Christ's crucifixion, he began to fall ill again. So, in order to care of him, the sisters realized John needed to keep his head in direct contact with the Holy Spirit. In order to usher in this Holy Spirit, the sisters had to build up the church which required establishing an authority.
These little sisters of the early church were like worthless insects to the fallen emperors and kings. Spiritually speaking, the lowest form of life on earth are supposed to be the insects. The reason for this is their lack of having any face. As a face represents a person's authority, insects are shown the least amount of respect. So, as the brilliant face of Christ would have the greatest of authority, the insects would have the very least. Only after establishing this proper perspective can we then take the very least among all the worthless insects and utilize them in order to glorify the greatest who created them. I'm speaking here about the little ants.
Like the wretch herself, these ants are always in a desperate battle for survival. They are our little sisters as they are fighting along with us in our battle to remain as living organisms with free wills. However, these ants can't devolve to become much smaller than they are. In doing so, they would be in danger of perishing into another living cell becoming nameless and faceless parts called organelles. Like being eaten and becoming part of a larger living organism, this condition is tantamount to losing ones soul.
So, for the time being, the ant has resorted to storing away the males of her species. Indeed, not being able to even feed themselves, the drone ants are as helpless as babes. In order to get matters under control, the ant colony of female ants are the ones who do all the working, the managing, and the fighting of wars. Indeed, the males in an ant colony aren't needed for the colonies survival, but for its potential grow to one day thrive as living beings with free wills.
So, the little sisters in the Gospel of Mark went out of their way to gather an authority over their heads not for the reason of behaving more responsible and equal. No, the reason they were able to do so was out of concern for the well-being of another.
Then again, my interpretation of that particular passage of the Gospel of Mark might be one hundred and eighty degrees off the mark!
Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins
Preamble
The greatest of benefits are derived from the most precious of alterations. Meanwhile, in stark contrast, political chaos is an overheated business of thoughtless persecution involving endless implementations of changes perpetuated through endless enactments of laws. While standing upon a solid foundation laid down for them by their own founders, our reverent Founding Fathers achieved much by doing little. Indeed, by narrowing their focus upon the declaration of a natural law, they established the base of a whole new order upon which was later constructed a New World. After ordaining this new order, our Founders then established a new Constitution for the purpose of creating a new form of government. Within the preamble of that new Constitution, they did not address us as a vanquished people as they had every right to do so as conquering officials, but stood among us as people themselves. Indeed, they stood of, by, and for the people for the purpose of warning all future tyrannies that the brilliant light from the Enlightenment period was never meant to shine upon officials, but upon the people themselves, upon the ones who congregated in fellowship to establish a new form of government, and upon the ones who chose to institute a more perfect Union by preserving authority for a greater purpose of advancing our Civil-Purpose.
By bringing a little precious wretch out of darkness and into the light, I Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins do ordain and establish of, by, and for the people the position of prime minister of these united States.
Introduction
While fearing God, our Founding Fathers wrote a document after which they signed their names to it and took a sacred oath. While performing this little masterpiece, they realized the threat both of His divine providence and His judgement. Though they were rightful gentlemen of high social esteem, they chose to strip themselves of those titles in order to act as our representatives.
Therefore, as of today, we the people have already made a declaration, have already fought in a revolutionary war, and have already created a more perfect Union by the institution of a new Constitution. So, there is no need of stumbling us up any further with doing these same things over and over again. Likewise, we have already salvaged this more perfect Union by a process known as the American Movement. The American Movement is the one true movement as it returns the people to the revering of our Founding Fathers, to the cherishing of the ordainment they justified within the Declaration of Independence, and to the honoring of the new laws they established within the U.S. Constitution. And to the realization that, as God is the supreme over all powers, and if all people are born with certain of His unalienable rights within, then, by the natural rights we possess, the greatest power concerning a more perfect Union is welded by the people.
So, we all should avoid the vain partaking in lessor false movements to instead favor the advancing of a greater Civil-Purpose.
In order to advance towards this greater end, the position of prime minister of these united States was both ordained and then established. Here are some of his or her duties:
1. Like is the case with Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins, all future prime ministers and deputies must earn the honorific title of 'Founder' to hold the position.
2. A function of the prime minister is to deputize others who are worthy enough to take on the unofficial role as well as to disqualify those who seem important enough but lack the character, for whatever reason, to hold the position. He or she will also provide reasons for their qualifications and / or disqualifications.
3. Serve as the most supreme of all courts during any time the U.S. supreme court has become corrupted concerning the people's Civil Purpose and the prerequisite advancement of it. The power welded by the prime minister will be wholly a matter of conscience and not of law. He or she when making a judgement has been ordained to do so as an intermittent sovereignty and, during such times, will be empowered to hold our government and its officials to a higher standard and to a greater penalty under the Light of Truth.
4. As the position of president has devolved to a commander and chief over special interests, the prime minister should be considered appointed unofficially so of, by, and for the people of these united States in a reality which acknowledges a conflict between the highest king and the lowest wretch.
5. The office of the prime minister is responsible for raising up other members with the honorific title of Founder. His or her clear agenda will be to raise up a new kind of leader to replace lawyers and law makers in government.
Part I.
Opening Argument
The Preamble of the U.S. Constitution is more than a manifesto expressing the desires of the people, but is a transitional document itself as it ties one document to the other for the purpose of demonstrating justification. After all, one cannot establish a new Constitution before ordaining it. So, the righteousness within the Declaration of Independence had to be transferred to that of the U.S. Constitution as the first serves as the ordainment of a new order and the second as the establishment of new laws:
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union (as a new order), (in Order to) establish Justice (in Order to), insure domestic Tranquility (in Order to), provide for the common defence (in Order to), promote the general Welfare, and (in Order to) secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do (first) ordain and (then second) establish this Constitution (of new laws) for the United States of America.So, the new order is first ordained before the new laws are then established upon that new foundation of a new order! This is how the end of the Declaration of Independence reads:
We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.
The ordainment is the rightful separation. But this is not a divorce from the king, but from the system of chaos which propped him up with they being the British Crown. Take note of what follows after this reference, "and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved . . .. "
So, as the Declaration of Independence dealt with the ordainment concerning our rightful divorce out from under the British Crown, with they representing the chaos of the Old World, the U.S. Constitution dealt with the establishment of new laws concerning a marriage to a more perfect Union.
As a face represents authority and as every individual has a face, so a rightful marriage is between two individuals with each of them possessing a face of authority. So, the prior bond between the people and the king in the Old World was not a rightful marriage, but a business involving pimping and prostitution.
Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins
First Attorney to our Founding Fathers under the Light of Truth
PART II.
The People's Civil Purpose
==============================================================
A Message Given
In the Form of a Chinese
Eight Legged Essay
< Moderate Middle >
=============================================================
I.
When focusing our attention upon what is the one true dichotomy, we learn to discern what are the false ones. This true dichotomy is a long enduring conflict between a formal king, whose character is depicted on the far right hand side of the above political spectrum, and an informal wretch, whose character is depicted on the far left hand side of it.
II.
Utilizing the model above for better visualization, as the metaphor of the king would represent the greatest of rulers, the wretch, being she is his exact inverse or perverse, would represent the very least of slaves. As the king is rational knowing much, the wretch is irrational knowing little. On one side, as the king would own every piece of property and all things on that property, on the other, the wretch owns nothing and is deemed an illegal trespasser. As he at one end is sovereign having exempt status and immunity in all matters, she on the other end is condemned, powerless and judged criminal. As the wretch will have to learn how to prostitute herself in order to survive, the king on the other end is well able bodied as, when he was still a young prince, he was taught how to prostitute others in order to thrive.
Utilizing the model above for better visualization, as the metaphor of the king would represent the greatest of rulers, the wretch, being she is his exact inverse or perverse, would represent the very least of slaves. As the king is rational knowing much, the wretch is irrational knowing little. On one side, as the king would own every piece of property and all things on that property, on the other, the wretch owns nothing and is deemed an illegal trespasser. As he at one end is sovereign having exempt status and immunity in all matters, she on the other end is condemned, powerless and judged criminal. As the wretch will have to learn how to prostitute herself in order to survive, the king on the other end is well able bodied as, when he was still a young prince, he was taught how to prostitute others in order to thrive.
III.
Being inverse to one another, while the great authority of the king would always be expanding, the diminished authority of the wretch would always be withering. When each were younger, while he was sent to school to be trained how to control his authority, she had to learn how to survive by manipulating authority. After maturing into adults, while the king would be honored as the one who knows most, in turn, the wretch would be deemed to know little.
Pertaining to the rest of us remaining individuals between the king and the wretch, all those who reside within the moderate middle of the above political spectrum, there are at least three types of rational people. They are the sophists, the philosophers, and the alphas.
The eloquent sophist is rational because he or she is skilled in the art of debate. They are orators who entertain paying audiences with debates concerning the question of what is the truth and demonstrations of how knowing such a virtue isn't possible. He or she substantiates this conclusion by putting on demonstrations arguing both sides of a topic spending half of the performance presenting one point of view and afterwards, perhaps after taking a break, spending the other half of it presenting the opposing point of view. Granted, as the ultimate Truth is an infinite measure of all of eternity and as such a place would be unapproachable to us, the point made by the sophists does have validity.
Being inverse to one another, while the great authority of the king would always be expanding, the diminished authority of the wretch would always be withering. When each were younger, while he was sent to school to be trained how to control his authority, she had to learn how to survive by manipulating authority. After maturing into adults, while the king would be honored as the one who knows most, in turn, the wretch would be deemed to know little.
Pertaining to the rest of us remaining individuals between the king and the wretch, all those who reside within the moderate middle of the above political spectrum, there are at least three types of rational people. They are the sophists, the philosophers, and the alphas.
The eloquent sophist is rational because he or she is skilled in the art of debate. They are orators who entertain paying audiences with debates concerning the question of what is the truth and demonstrations of how knowing such a virtue isn't possible. He or she substantiates this conclusion by putting on demonstrations arguing both sides of a topic spending half of the performance presenting one point of view and afterwards, perhaps after taking a break, spending the other half of it presenting the opposing point of view. Granted, as the ultimate Truth is an infinite measure of all of eternity and as such a place would be unapproachable to us, the point made by the sophists does have validity.
The second type of rational people are the philosophers. While they do acknowledge that the sophist argument has some validity, they further train their minds in the utilization of truth engines. Indeed, these philosophers develop mental disciplines in which raw information (data) is collected and inputted for the purpose of reducing large informal quantities of it down to that of a smaller outputs of quality truths. So, while it is a fact that one can't arrive at an absolute Truth by the use of truth engines, it is possible for one to arrive at certain best-principled statements.
The third type of rational people are the alphas. They are deemed rational by the position of their births. To put it simply, the alphas are sovereign by inheritance. Society either chooses to respect the rational decisions of these alphas or else there will be consequences. Any disagreement with this bully rationale gets overpowered quickly.
Of the three types of rational people depicted above, the alphas have always remained somewhat of a mystery. Indeed, in ancient records, fearful writers have always had to avoid making any direct reference to the brutal methods they utilized.
The third type of rational people are the alphas. They are deemed rational by the position of their births. To put it simply, the alphas are sovereign by inheritance. Society either chooses to respect the rational decisions of these alphas or else there will be consequences. Any disagreement with this bully rationale gets overpowered quickly.
Of the three types of rational people depicted above, the alphas have always remained somewhat of a mystery. Indeed, in ancient records, fearful writers have always had to avoid making any direct reference to the brutal methods they utilized.
A paradox exists involving the rational alphas and their majority control of government. While, on one hand, we do need to be practical in our approach, on the other, it is impossible to control ourselves by thoughtless changes brought about by the endless legislation of laws. Rather than choose a best-principled middle ground between the two extremes of governing ourselves in an impractical method and, just the opposite, of governing ourselves by both the thoughtless implementations of changes and endless enactments of laws, we invariably resign ourselves to a perpetual state of abuse under the rule of alphas. They dish out their abuse by stumbling up the people. They do so by utilizing false powers of manipulation.
They maintain power over us by way of disinformation. To understand the difference between misinformation and disinformation, while misinformation are lies perpetuated by the state for reasons deemed to be in the best interest of the people, disinformation are justifications for utilizing those lies. In other words, while misinformation deals with the deception of others, disinformation deals more with the deceiving of oneself. While misinformation is deceit caused by the deliberate propagation of untruths, disinformation is self deception caused by the propagation of fraudulent dichotomies. These fraudulent dichotomies are poison. Indeed, they work to intoxicate both the alphas and those under their rule. This is why the alpha rulers don't follow their consciences as they have become political drunkards. By their partaking in these false powers of manipulation, they have lost their political souls.
Such fraudulent dichotomies are most often expressed as conflicts between male and female. Understand, in the one true dichotomy expressed in the introduction between the king and the wretch, the ongoing conflict is not male versus female. Indeed, a man can live wretched just as a woman can rule over her children as a king.
Other than male against female, other fraudulent dichotomies to be wary of are white against black, the young against the old, the poor against the rich, and on and on endlessly. Simply put, the drunken alphas manufacture deceit on a foundation of fraudulent dichotomies. They feel they are justified in spreading lies because of a deception of disinformation has deceive them into believing that they will one day be standing blameless under the Light of Truth. Yet, these false powers of manipulation stumble up the people by distracting their focus away from the one true dichotomy. Again, the model dichotomy above is the formal one as it depicts what has long been an eternal conflict ongoing between a king of the highest rank and that of a wretch of the lowest.
Other than male against female, other fraudulent dichotomies to be wary of are white against black, the young against the old, the poor against the rich, and on and on endlessly. Simply put, the drunken alphas manufacture deceit on a foundation of fraudulent dichotomies. They feel they are justified in spreading lies because of a deception of disinformation has deceive them into believing that they will one day be standing blameless under the Light of Truth. Yet, these false powers of manipulation stumble up the people by distracting their focus away from the one true dichotomy. Again, the model dichotomy above is the formal one as it depicts what has long been an eternal conflict ongoing between a king of the highest rank and that of a wretch of the lowest.
Today, we shouldn't just consider what every past philosopher and sage wrote and said; but, we should also appreciate what they couldn't write or say about those who were ruling over them. Neither Tao Te Ching, Confucius, Socrates, or Plato, along with many others, could write or speak freely about the alphas, but had to be submissive to them lowering their eyes when addressing such rulers in either rational conversation or in written prose. So, while one won't read much about these alphas in ancient texts, realize how their threatening stares were always ever present over society. But remember also how we are so helpless as people that we can't even help ourselves. Indeed, the best we can seem to institute as a rule over ourselves are governments of bullies. This human frailty is why our Founding Fathers chose to circumcise authority relegating it to the status of a necessary tyranny. As the people are more than capable of taking care of themselves, this necessary tyranny would function, as our Founders had it envisioned, as just part of what would become a dynamic, ever improving, more perfect Union.
Considering this more perfect Union, law and order is not the same. Indeed, proper government is a procedural relationship needing to be put into perspective concerning both law and order. The tyranny of thoughtless changes and endless laws is a chaotic process. It is a process which implements changes for the sake of change and enacts endless laws for the sake of change and for the law. As a consequence, the minority making up the government become the glory and serving them as the focus becomes the purpose of the lessor people. In contrast, the people weren't created in order to be equal or responsible, but to be exponential in their happiness.
Considering this more perfect Union, law and order is not the same. Indeed, proper government is a procedural relationship needing to be put into perspective concerning both law and order. The tyranny of thoughtless changes and endless laws is a chaotic process. It is a process which implements changes for the sake of change and enacts endless laws for the sake of change and for the law. As a consequence, the minority making up the government become the glory and serving them as the focus becomes the purpose of the lessor people. In contrast, the people weren't created in order to be equal or responsible, but to be exponential in their happiness.
The processes of implementing changes and enacting laws are not ends, but mere means to a greater end. That greater end is to advance the Civil Purpose of the wretch's offspring. Indeed, as the sophists would say, it is impractical to think that we can govern ourselves by the Truth as such a virtue is unapproachable to us. However, at the same time, as the philosophers would say, we should never give into being enslaved by deceit involving the false powers of manipulation. The idea is to create government as a necessary tyranny. However, as one would desire to limit any necessary evil, authority too should be limited through a process of careful circumcision.
IV.
Much to their benefit, as the king and his supporting tyranny have managed to avoid having their roles defined clearly in society, so has the character of the lowly wretch remained a mystery also. This is because society has always been thought to be divided into just two classifications of a master-class and a slave-class. However, upon closer examination, society reveals the existence of a third class. These three classes as a whole are a master class, a slave class, and an outcast class. While the master class has long exploited the slave class, in turn, they together as an acting society then exploit another class of outcast.
Much to their benefit, as the king and his supporting tyranny have managed to avoid having their roles defined clearly in society, so has the character of the lowly wretch remained a mystery also. This is because society has always been thought to be divided into just two classifications of a master-class and a slave-class. However, upon closer examination, society reveals the existence of a third class. These three classes as a whole are a master class, a slave class, and an outcast class. While the master class has long exploited the slave class, in turn, they together as an acting society then exploit another class of outcast.
![]() |
| The Outcast Wretch |
V.
As the king is the master on one end of the political spectrum, the wretch is the outcaste on the other. Metaphorically, she is the very least rated among three types of slaves. These three types are the wife, the commoner, and the wretch. Among these who are prostituted in society, the highest rated is the wife. She is a woman who is rated worthy enough to sleep in the bed of the king. The second highest rated of the prostitutes is the commoner woman. While she is not rated worthy enough to sleep in the bed of the king, her life will be spared as long as she is willing to kneel in his presence. Finally, the lowest rated of the prostituted is the wretch. She has been outcast by the king from his kingdom even to the extent that she will be killed on sight.
Compared to the wretch, the king is divided into two types. These are a Son-of-God and a Son-of-man. As he was born of a king, a Son of God is renowned and intimately known possessing a namesake. The fearful people will honor a princely Son of God treating him greater in worth than even his own father the king. In contrast to a Son of God, a Son of man is a stranger. He is the offspring of the wretch, a metaphor for the very least. In contrast to how they will praise a Son of God, the fearful people will show disdain towards a son of man rating his worth as even less than his nameless and faceless parents. A paradox is expressed here for, as the term "God" denotes an intimate meaning, the term "man" denotes an impersonal classification. So, the one who is blessed as a Son of God will tend to be exalted by the fearful masses as greater than the very greatest: Meanwhile, in stark contrast, the one who is a cursed son of man(kind) will be rejected by them as they will tend to degrade such a lowly person rating him as more worthless than the very least.
As a person's face represents their authority, so the king possesses a glorious face. In contrast, the wretch has no face. As it is with dogs, prostitutes are recognized by their behinds. Indeed, dogs recognize each other by the sniffing of their behinds. However, a wretch is rated less than a dog as she isn't even valued for her behind.
As a person's face represents their authority, so the king possesses a glorious face. In contrast, the wretch has no face. As it is with dogs, prostitutes are recognized by their behinds. Indeed, dogs recognize each other by the sniffing of their behinds. However, a wretch is rated less than a dog as she isn't even valued for her behind.
Just the opposite of a dog, a Son of God is empowered by the praises of the people just as governments receive their power from the consent of the governed. For example, the Buddha received his empowerment from the wise men who sought after him. To find his whereabouts, as people will read a page of a book, they were born with a gift to read the universe. So, they were able to seek out the Buddha by interpreting the stars. When they did finally pinpoint his residence, they found the Buddha inside had not yet been born as he was still within his pregnant mother's womb. So, they picked him up by carrying the whole bed along with his mother still laying upon it. Unfortunately, during the birthing process, his mother died. I must pause here to marvel at the question of, what if the Buddha had ended up being born female? As he grew, it was the people who taught the Buddha teaching him about ideal perfection for, being Hindus, they believed in their hearts that he was the very manifestation of God Himself.
Problem is, someone left the door of the palace open one day allowing the Buddha to venture out from his ideal palace into the real world. Here he would become traumatized after witnessing for the first time the harsh realities of sickness, hunger, poverty, crime, and old age. Quite offended at being so misled in his education, the Buddha would then demand that he be further taught everything pertaining to the reality of the outside world. So, as they believed he was the very manifestation of God, the people then had to teach him about reality also. The point here being that the people were the ones who were responsible for empowering the Buddha. In the beginning, the Buddha was taught an ideal life within a palace isolated from the world and what it was like to live as a king. Later, he would then be taught about a real life outside in the world and what it was like to have to live as a wretch.
Problem is, someone left the door of the palace open one day allowing the Buddha to venture out from his ideal palace into the real world. Here he would become traumatized after witnessing for the first time the harsh realities of sickness, hunger, poverty, crime, and old age. Quite offended at being so misled in his education, the Buddha would then demand that he be further taught everything pertaining to the reality of the outside world. So, as they believed he was the very manifestation of God, the people then had to teach him about reality also. The point here being that the people were the ones who were responsible for empowering the Buddha. In the beginning, the Buddha was taught an ideal life within a palace isolated from the world and what it was like to live as a king. Later, he would then be taught about a real life outside in the world and what it was like to have to live as a wretch.
Similarly, Saul of Tarsus had to live the life of the worst human being to ever live. He was the unforgivable one who offended the Holy Spirit by his actions of hunting down and persecuting Christian believers. Indeed, during His torture and crucifixion, Jesus in the flesh did not ask king Herod or the preface Pontius Pilate the question of why they were persecuting Him. No, that question was reserved for Saul, the one who would be truly held responsible for His persecution. In other words, Saul of Tarsus was the greatest one among the very worst who offended the Holy Spirit. The worst I speak of here were the ones who were responsible for empowering the wayward emperors - those empowered ones who would dare to declare themselves living gods and would demand to be worshiped as such. So, the judgement of the Holy Spirit was preserved to fall upon Saul as the lone responsible one. As a consequence, the person of Saul had to suffer a spiritual death, indeed, the person of Saul could never be forgiven. As a result, Saul was born again and transformed into the Apostle Paul, the highest authority over all other apostles as God's chosen vessel.
To add another example, later on, it wasn't a king of England who would pronounce himself, by way of proclamation, to possess absolute power. No, it was a subject under him named Sir Robert Filmer. Robert Filmer wrote a book of political philosophy called "The Partriarcha" which leaned towards an argument of increasing the king's empowerment. Of course, in writing such a book, Robert Filmer was looking for the king's favor concerning his own advancement and increased empowerment within the ruling monarchy. In contrast, John Locke had to write a challenge to Sir Robert Filmer in secret to the extent that his identity and would only reveal it after his death by a request put within his last will and testament.
Similar to the Buddha, Moses had to be first raised as a king. Along the way, his rise to power was challenged as he was exposed to the fact that his true family were actually the Hebrew slaves in bondage to the Egyptians under the rule of the Pharaoh his father. After coming to this realization, Moses chose to lower himself by becoming a slave. In this way, Moses could first understand the plight of the most wretched from the point of view of a king. When the stuttering and stammering Moses would later return to free his people, in order not to offend the predatory nature of Pharaoh, he was wise enough to hide his lameness by utilizing his brother Aaron as a strong interpreting mouthpiece.
VI.
Similarly as Moses, as the voice of the most worthless wretch among us might warn, so we should be careful speaking in fear or in threats towards the king's authority as to do so will only serve in getting us beaten on every level. Indeed, the alpha king, the metaphorical lion, both devours what he fears and what is a threat to his domain. Like the wretch, except for our inborn natural rights, we possess no power. Like our Founders, while we should remain submissive to the king's authority, we should always be on our guard willing to both disobey any violation committed against both our natural rights to live as free souls, and, at a moments notice, to enslave ourselves of our own free will to the common duty of fighting for those rights. But we should also be wise kings knowing in our hearts that, as it is one thing to have to face a band of crazed men fighting for God only knows, it is quite another to be run over by a wretch intent, for the sake of her litter, on finding exponential contentment for them!
Similarly as Moses, as the voice of the most worthless wretch among us might warn, so we should be careful speaking in fear or in threats towards the king's authority as to do so will only serve in getting us beaten on every level. Indeed, the alpha king, the metaphorical lion, both devours what he fears and what is a threat to his domain. Like the wretch, except for our inborn natural rights, we possess no power. Like our Founders, while we should remain submissive to the king's authority, we should always be on our guard willing to both disobey any violation committed against both our natural rights to live as free souls, and, at a moments notice, to enslave ourselves of our own free will to the common duty of fighting for those rights. But we should also be wise kings knowing in our hearts that, as it is one thing to have to face a band of crazed men fighting for God only knows, it is quite another to be run over by a wretch intent, for the sake of her litter, on finding exponential contentment for them!
VII.
In order to ordain our new nation, the hearts of our Founding Fathers reduced towards a natural law. Their blessing of this new order was in opposition to the traditional ordainment of the day which, based on the legal precedence of the Old World, required the blessing and crowning of a new king. Our Founders could have made themselves Lords over us. Indeed, under the authority of a new king, they could have governed over us as conquering officials. Instead, they chose to function intimately of, by, and for the people - as Abraham Lincoln once so elegantly perceived - for the purpose of addressing all future tyrants and tyrannies that might rise up to threaten our new nation. As they stood upon a foundation constructed of their own ancestors, they themselves made a precious alteration to world history. When doing so, they were mindful of His possible divine providence moving against them as they all had both signed their names of their own free will and taken a sacred oath all under penalty of His judgement. Rather than cower and continue to perpetuate the same old tyranny, they took a thoughtful step forward narrowing with the declaration that we hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
In order to ordain our new nation, the hearts of our Founding Fathers reduced towards a natural law. Their blessing of this new order was in opposition to the traditional ordainment of the day which, based on the legal precedence of the Old World, required the blessing and crowning of a new king. Our Founders could have made themselves Lords over us. Indeed, under the authority of a new king, they could have governed over us as conquering officials. Instead, they chose to function intimately of, by, and for the people - as Abraham Lincoln once so elegantly perceived - for the purpose of addressing all future tyrants and tyrannies that might rise up to threaten our new nation. As they stood upon a foundation constructed of their own ancestors, they themselves made a precious alteration to world history. When doing so, they were mindful of His possible divine providence moving against them as they all had both signed their names of their own free will and taken a sacred oath all under penalty of His judgement. Rather than cower and continue to perpetuate the same old tyranny, they took a thoughtful step forward narrowing with the declaration that we hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
![]() |
| Necessary Tyranny |
![]() |
| The People |
VIII.
As all our ancestors have braved the same great darkness and then perished for our sake, so we all should focus our attention towards a single dichotomy, perceiving with a subtle eye the true tyranny that now threatens our Union. Indeed, aren't they the very best mannered, the most pleasant, and the very kindest among us? As they uplift us with the most eloquent of speeches, aren't they tricking us into selling our souls, cheating us with empty boxes of goods adorned with the prettiest of outer wrappings, and stumbling us up with false hope and quick changes implemented for the sake of change? Such chaos has divided our people against themselves to the extent of atrocity. Behold as white fathers are being blinded into fighting against their own black sons, as people are being forced to reject their natural rights — the very inborn powers provided to them by God Almighty — and, worst of all, the wretch is being distracted into abandoning her children for political causes.
This desperation today has us looking to salvage from what we most treasure from a scattered inheritance. As the same would be true among all the multitude of the earth, concerning the messages that were left to us by our Founding Fathers, so should we never amend beyond what are the most precious of alterations. As already stated, our Founders once acted out a little masterpiece on our behalf, daring to perish with us during its enactment, indeed, even to sit and tarry with us as common members of the congregation. They were burdened during that crucial time to the extent that they were willing to throw off their rightful social statuses as Gentlemen. They did forfeit those honorific titles willingly when they divorced us rightfully from tyranny — when they cut our new nation off from the Old World economy. As our desperate Founders once thoughtfully and carefully narrowed to what they most treasured as their own inheritance, so do we reject every false dichotomy today in order to focus our attention on a single conflict between a king and a wretch.
As our Founders once declared, so do "we the people" of these United States today declare both the highest of kings and the lowest of wretches as equal in their power and in the endowment provided to them by their Creator, with each possessing in their beings the same exact business agenda for Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.
What something is made out of.
So, in Western Civilization, on one hand, the alphas were training their children in how to maintain the perpetual dynasty that would one day be handed down to them as an inheritance; meanwhile, on the other hand, Socrates was daring to teach the souls of the most wretched, these being the children of the slaves, in how to recollect the information lost to them in order so that they too might learn how to advance in society.
While the Lord might be impressed with those highly rated ones working for and in support of the king, he would have to stop along the way and sit down marveling at the works of the wretch. Indeed, helping her survive an exponential amount of adversity set up against her, the creative wretch has had to resort to both thinking scientifically in her being concerning those decisions she has had to make and acting artistically in her becoming in the needed work she has had to perform.
In other words, we should appreciate her for what got us all here. But we can't see this without understanding the present system as divisive conflicts set against her, that the divisions between the arts and the sciences, the physical sciences and the cognitive sciences, the management and the labor, and so on forever are yet other false dichotomies implemented to stumble up the wretch. But these should go right on existing as necessary evils. Indeed, let them have their cake! Just understand, while the king and his many princes of the earth live in a fallacy apart from reality, it is the worthless being of the wretch who represents the actual best-principled way for society to follow.
Part III.
Exponentialism
The most subtle aspect about life is the hidden amount of exponential effort nature exerts. One theory has it that nature does not work, but that most of her effort is spontaneous. In other words, to work implies that we exist within a garden and so living in such a place will require a plan. But science of late has been trying to teach that the plan exists within an overall chaos. Problem is, inn contrast to uphill work, the spontaneous effort involved with chaos tends to flow down hill.
Using the wretch as an example of this uphill / downhill differential, when she was a small girl, when it was time for her to play, it was easy for her to spill out her toys in a big bunch as the effort she made flowed along with gravity. As her toys would interact with each other, the dreams in her mind too would flow releasing within it a vivid imagination.
However, when her mother would step in to force her to pick up the toys, this entailed the little wretch having to do work. To do this job, the little girl would then have to work both against her nature and the flow of gravity. As she had utilized gravity at the beginning of her play in spilling out her toys in one big bunch, she would now at the end of it have to work against nature being selective in picking them up an individual piece at a time.
See, while this might seem like a difficult lesson for the little wretch to learn, the amount of exertion involved in building a laboratory for her to do these simple experiments was beyond enormous to that of an exponential degree. Ultimately, the energy that was exerted in bringing up the little wretch to understanding these exponential aspects about her life were also exponential.
Of course, this exponential uphill task isn't the only battle this wretch is having to wage as the king above her when he was a little boy was raised in totally inverse reality. While most of his leisure time was spent playing down hill, indeed, there would be times that he would have to do some work. See, this in itself is not a bad thing. However, in the serious time he will spend in his training, the little king will be taught how to rule over the wretch.
So, in order to help the wretch along, the following third part of this letter lays down a new foundation of science. Forcing children to focus their minds, to concentrate, is one aspect in teaching exponentialism. Exponentialism teaches children both the subtle measures involved with exponentialism and how a exponential amount of effort is needed to raise children up to an understanding of such measures. Another part of teaching them exponentialism involves cutting out the confusion caused by disinformation and its teaching of false dichotomies.
A) Metaphysical Reduction
What do I mean by "metaphysical reduction?" Well, I'm arguing that the following isn't a theory, but is the one true order. You might ask if the following is really absolutely true or if that is even possible. Well, for the sake of weeding out the false dichotomies, the answer to that question is yes. See, I am not looking for an absolute Truth here, but seeking to construct a foundation in which to establish existentially the one true dichotomy of a king and a wretch. By existential, this means I'm narrowing my attention upon all the living beings of both the king and a wretch and those between them. Notice how I am not focusing on a fingernail and a super nova, on a tea leaf and a soup spoon, or on a dirty sock and an electrical extension cord. In order to establish such an existential foundation, I have utilized Aristotle's Four Causes. As the linked website illustrates, these four causes are:
The Efficient cause: What did that?
Material cause: What something is made out of?
Formal cause: What makes a thing one thing rather than many things?
Final cause: Why efficient causes do what they do and why formal causes do what they do?
Utilizing the above method, I have classified the universe into three abstracts (faraways) and a purpose:
The Formal Cause - Outer universal abstract
Material Cause - Medium chemical abstract
Efficient Cause - Inner physical abstract
Final Cause - Biological perception
Basically, to establish a foundation, I will first reduce from the outer abstract to the medium one before reducing even further from the medium one to the inner one. Please note that I am weeding out biology here. Being it is a subcategory of chemistry, it is just an interpretation and therefore should be considered a matter of opinion and on the level of the social or cognitive. Meanwhile, the medium abstract realm exists as a transition between where the outer and the inner abstracts blend together. Think of an abstract as deep theory. Any proofs existing within the unfathomable dimensions of deep theory can only be perceived by way of experimental manipulation or of indirect reflection.
Formal Cause - Fathering Effect
Material cause - Inverse Proponent
Efficient Cause - (2+0)1/2 = 1
I. What is the Fathering Effect?
The Fathering Effect phenomenon is caused by the relationship between living gradational stars and dying rudimentary stars. Very profound, as living gradational stars are part of nature and serve an important function in the maintenance of it, the dying rudimentary stars create nature.
II. Reduction from the outer abstract of the Fathering-Effect to the medium abstract of the Inverse-Proponent
Law of Nature - No substance may collide but a force.
When reducing from the outer universal abstract of the Fathering Effect to the medium chemical abstract of the inverse proponent, one must understand a subtle step in the process. Indeed, it is easy for people to understand the motion of falling things, but not the acceleration involved in that motion. What Sir Isaac Newton understood was the involvement of an extra exponential aspect and how such a relationship caused an acceleration in an object's motion.
Similarly, our minds are tricked by the predatory habit of thinking in opposites. Such opposites, or false dichotomies, are male versus female, white versus black, rich against poor, and so on. So, nature, at times, is able to display her exponential efforts hiding them from us in plain sight. In other words, there is no opposite to Collective-Gravity, but an inverse proponent which has been working along with it called CenterPoint-Friction.
Indeed, Collective-Gravity and CenterPoint-Friction are not forces which oppose each other, but they work inversely together. In other words, by way of the universal Fathering-Effect, Collective-Gravity and CenterPoint-Friction work together in order to create a chemical foundation both under our feet and over our heads. What makes this substance possible is a linear, head-on force called Collective-Gravity, a force which pulls all things together, and a more dimensional side-to-side repelling force called CenterPoint Friction, a force which repels all things apart.
Again, thinking in terms of epistemology, much confusion in the past has been caused by the way the mind interprets reality as in opposites rather than as in inverses. We think of opposites in a linear straight line fashion. If white is that way, then black, being that it is opposite in color, must be in the equal and opposite direction. But the inverse of gravity is neither equal nor opposed. And neither is Centerpoint Friction a linear force, but it has existed all along side to side as a force working in plain sight with Collective-Gravity.
III. Reduction from a Medium Abstract of the Inverse Proponent to the Inner Abstract of (2+0)1/2 = 1
Law of Nature - Every phenomenon and infinite possibility exists within the brackets of the equation (2+0) = 1.
While the realm of infinity is limitless, the realms of both the (2) infinite and the (0) finite (1/2) oscillate to the sum of (1) eternity.
The above natural law is expressed in the equation of (2+0)1/2 = 1,
with 2 equaling infinity,
and 0 equaling the finite,
and 1/2 oscillating the two variables to a sum of 1 (eternity).
In other words, reality can't be reduced down to an expression of pure natural numbers. As the variable 2 is a rational number, the variable 0 is an irrational number - as in no number whatsoever. So, the sum of 1 is derived from an oscillation of "all numbers" in one instant and then of "no numbers" the next.
Again, though it sounds absurd to say, because eternity oscillates back and forth between 'numbers' one instant and then 'no numbers' the next, so reality cannot be expressed in pure numbers. Let us say as an example, as the variable 2 would be equal to 'math,' so the variable 0 would be equal to 'unmath.'
IV. Biological Perception as the Final Cause
Law of Nature - Every part of the universe whether it be organic or inorganic exists either as a sense organ, or exists as a sense organ in a rudimentary state for the purpose of serving the existing sense organs. The rudiment sense organs aid existing sense organs concerning the achievement of ever greater quality perception to a degree which is exponential.
The Final Cause in nature is a proper perspective. The perspective today is out of order. Indeed, the ultimate purpose isn't for the achieving the end of the efficient cause which is to know and / or reproduce, these are just means, but for the achievement of a formal cause which is to perceive oneself in greater quality to an exponential degree. This means all substance is either made up of sense organs or of sense organs that work with them for the purpose of benefit the living being's perception exponentially in greater quality. This phenomenon is made possible by a process of withering devolution through a rudimentary process. For example, let's say overtime that a sense organ degrades into a useful fingernail for the purpose of grasping. This function of grasping is not for the sake of grasping alone. No, the reason sense organs wither to secondary characteristics like fingernails is for the reason of advancing the overall quality of a being's perception of oneself. The human senses aren't part of the brain, but the brain itself has evolved into a complex organ of lessor rudiment sense organs for the symbiotic purpose of advancing the overall perception to an exponential degree, with this being a person's collective senses. For nature to fulfill this final cause, raising a child from a small babe to a mature adult isn't just a task for her to perform, but is a very difficult effort she will have to undertake to an exponential degree.
Again, in revisiting Aristotle's Four Causes:
The Efficient cause: What did that?
Material cause: What something is made out of.
Formal cause: What makes a thing one thing rather than many things
Final cause: Why efficient causes do what they do and why formal causes do what they do
So, what makes a thing one thing rather than many things?
The Fathering-Effect is the formal cause. It is a phenomenon created when living gradational stars interact with dying rudimental stars. As the structure of matter is maintained by the oscillations of already existing rudimental stars, the alterations of both the motion of the structure or change happening within it are created by the additions of new rudimental stars. In other words, the oscillations of force created by existing rudimental stars will become somewhat in tune over time which works in the maintenance of the structure of matter. Meanwhile, the oscillating frequencies of newly rudimental stars will be out of tune with the frequency of existing rudimental stars which, in turn, work to cause change and dynamic motion in matter.
What something is made out of.
The Inverse Proponent is the material cause. Substances are created between the formal cause of the Fathering-Effect and the efficient cause of the equation (2+0) 1/2 = 1. More exact, substances are formed and maintained by both the inverse forces of Collective Gravity and of Centerpoint Friction. Therefore, as all matter in space attracts together in a linear fashion, all matter also repels dimensional side to side. So, no substance may collide but a force.
What did that?
The equation (2+0)1/2 = 1 is the efficient cause. While two is infinite, and 0 is finite, 1/2 oscillates both variables to a sum of 1.
Why efficient causes do what they do and why formal causes do what they do
The efficient cause is for the secondary characteristics of knowing and reproducing as a means to a greater formal cause. That greater formal cause is for the achievement of an ultimate end which goes beyond seeing to the perceiving of ones being in ever greater quality to a degree which is exponential.
B) Existential Unification
While the formal king is all things official, the informal wretch is unofficial.
To help protect themselves and a king they have propped up, the alphas have built up a fortress around him by institutionalizing a ruling monarchy made up of both an aristocracy of elites and of a military nobility. Ultimately, both the aristocracy and the nobility have benefited greatly through a unified effort as they have worked politically together to hinder those remaining outside the monarchy.
Now, my point in mentioning all this isn't to be the creator further political strife, but to simply reduce to what is the reality of the situation. Indeed, in order to create a favorable situation for themselves, a small portion of the people have instituted an irrational king over their heads. In returning the favor, the king then blessed them with rational titles that can be quite lucrative depending on the king's favor. This is a subtle point. See, the king is irrational and remains that way because those subordinate rational ones in support of his authority have to tell him exactly what he wants to hear.
Now, you might think this royal situation would be quite amusing to the wretch. But, see, she is both the one who is trying to raise up worthless sons of men by furthering their Civil Purpose and the one who decided to keep the authority of the king as a role model for these lessor sons to advance towards. So, while we should take ourselves with a grain of salt, the best way to appreciate our skills or functions in society is as valuable role models for worthless sons of men to advance towards.
Now, my point in mentioning all this isn't to be the creator further political strife, but to simply reduce to what is the reality of the situation. Indeed, in order to create a favorable situation for themselves, a small portion of the people have instituted an irrational king over their heads. In returning the favor, the king then blessed them with rational titles that can be quite lucrative depending on the king's favor. This is a subtle point. See, the king is irrational and remains that way because those subordinate rational ones in support of his authority have to tell him exactly what he wants to hear.
Now, you might think this royal situation would be quite amusing to the wretch. But, see, she is both the one who is trying to raise up worthless sons of men by furthering their Civil Purpose and the one who decided to keep the authority of the king as a role model for these lessor sons to advance towards. So, while we should take ourselves with a grain of salt, the best way to appreciate our skills or functions in society is as valuable role models for worthless sons of men to advance towards.
Backing up a little here, in his Theory of Recollection as is portrayed within Plato's dialogue entitled Meno, Socrates made a brave attempt at exposing this corruption. As the Greeks had long accepted the one supreme Soul as a perfect entity which understood all things, so, as Socrates had it figured, each individual life possessing a piece of that Soul should also have known all things as well. The reason Socrates gave for a diversity which, to use as an example, had one soul being born as a king and another as a wretch was determined by the amounts of trauma each had suffered during the birthing process. As a result, they would become distinct living souls as each being would forget different amounts of information. To heal this divide, a kind of learning would be required to help the most injured beings recollect the information that was lost to them. As only he during that time understood this problem, so Socrates would take up the challenge by becoming a new kind of teacher. This "mid-wife philosopher" wouldn't infringe on the soul by violating its mind, but would instead help it learn for itself in the recollection of the information lost to it.
So, in Western Civilization, on one hand, the alphas were training their children in how to maintain the perpetual dynasty that would one day be handed down to them as an inheritance; meanwhile, on the other hand, Socrates was daring to teach the souls of the most wretched, these being the children of the slaves, in how to recollect the information lost to them in order so that they too might learn how to advance in society.
Both the Being and the Becoming of the Wretch
While the Lord might be impressed with those highly rated ones working for and in support of the king, he would have to stop along the way and sit down marveling at the works of the wretch. Indeed, helping her survive an exponential amount of adversity set up against her, the creative wretch has had to resort to both thinking scientifically in her being concerning those decisions she has had to make and acting artistically in her becoming in the needed work she has had to perform.
In other words, we should appreciate her for what got us all here. But we can't see this without understanding the present system as divisive conflicts set against her, that the divisions between the arts and the sciences, the physical sciences and the cognitive sciences, the management and the labor, and so on forever are yet other false dichotomies implemented to stumble up the wretch. But these should go right on existing as necessary evils. Indeed, let them have their cake! Just understand, while the king and his many princes of the earth live in a fallacy apart from reality, it is the worthless being of the wretch who represents the actual best-principled way for society to follow.













No hay comentarios.:
Publicar un comentario