The false powers of manipulation versus the supreme power of the Truth

How to discern between the people's best interest and the people's Civil Purpose:  What is a fooling of the people by way of manufacturing their consent versus what is a true movement of the people.  In the past, the people's Civil Purpose began to advance with such figures as Confucius and Socrates.  While they dared to question the kingship by pointing out technicalities, they still functioned submissively under their authority behaving submissive to its rule.

The figure of Socrates was a paradox.  First off, we know that he was an incredibly brave man for, because of it, his life was once spared by the bravest of the brave with they being the Spartans.  So, Socrates wasn't afraid to think.  Problem is, Socrates realized he was living as a man among boys:  His ideas could get him killed.

In his dialogue "Meno," Plato writes of Socrates demonstrating his courage by daring to demonstrate how the mind of a slave child could learn something by itself by "recollection" if only he or she were served (taught) by a mid-wife philosopher (a teacher).

So, ethics isn't a product of a king, of a royal family, or of those who support them by propping them up.

No!

Ethics is a product of the most worthless having been born out from the nameless and the faceless making up the multitude.  Indeed, there has always been a subversive movement which has never been accepted by those in power to the extent that they would deem it official.  The burden of this ethics has always been to improve the plight of lessor ones.  This long standing movement has always moved under the radar of the greater ones.   It has managed to go unnoticed by always remaining under authority by behaving submissive to it.  However, to behave submissive is not the same as behaving obedient.  In other words, we should weed out all acts of violence.  In this way, evil is not empowered by our interference with it, but it will destroy itself.

Hatred will always be stronger than love because of its advantage of working downhill.  In contrast, love is an uphill process that has to be worked at as it has to put the pieces back together again.  Evil replaces broken parts thoughtlessly with newer copies; meanwhile, the Truth redeems by repairing all the wounds in a broken heart.                  

A true movement of the people is not something born out of nothing.  Eventful change for the sake of change is no better than no change whatsoever.  A real movement connects with the past all the way back to its origins where ethics came out of the most worthless.  Again, the manufacturing of consent will always be mysterious while justifying itself as eventful change for the sake of change.  It becomes a drunkard intoxicated on the powers of manipulation.  It always claims to work in the best interest of the people.  In contrast, the Truth is always quite clear.  Any attempt to stumble up the children of God hindering them in their quest to expand exponentially their Civil-Purpose will be judged as contempt.

As you should now know better, consider yourselves held to a greater penalty and a higher reward under judgment of the Truth.

Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins
Prime Minister of these United States

Concerning the media

There should be three types of information gathering.  The most secret of all information is known by the central media.  Think of the functioning of the central media in society as a necessary evil much the same way that the central bank has been accepted as so.  As the central media manufactures truths, so, the central bank manufactures money.   Both the central banking and the central media are official.  This means the central bank can put in and pull out money from the economy at their discretion creating or destroying any amount of it for causes which are often said to be in the best interest of the people.  Similarly, the central media manufacture consent of the people for reasons that are also said to be their best interest by way of fabricating truths.   Many agencies make up this central media such as the CIA, the FBI, the numerous secret military agencies, the NSA, and so on.

Yet another kind of media are the commercial media companies.  Of course, the central media are going to be privy to much more of the valuable information than the commercial media as the latter of the two have to go begging for a living relying on the central media for much of their information.  So, one of the ways the central media functions is by manufacturing consent of the people through the commercial media.  This commercial media comprise all the network television and radio stations, the daily newspapers, and the many independent media organizations of the internet.

The third type of media should be the Supreme Court.  They as a court should be the people's media concentrating expressly on their Bill of Rights within the Constitution.  Any time the Supreme Court is in contempt of this duty, as they are today, then that responsibility should fall back on the Prime Minister of these United States.  In other words, the Supreme Court today is way too busy for the people's good.  Being too busy, they focus instead on matters concerning the law and on what is in the best interest of the people which are matters concerning the manufacturing of their consent.  Instead, the court as the people's media should be focusing on what are the natural rights of the people and on whether or not the government is committing contempt concerning the advancement of their Civil Purpose.

Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins
Prime Minister of these United States  
 

What do we have to fear?

So that we can place our trust in someone, following the rules and regulations must first become our primary prerequisite.  Only then will our trust be prized and appreciated by them as special.    

Beware!  There are now wolves in our midst dressed as sheep!

Ethics are not an offspring of tyranny, but such virtues were born out of the most worthless of the people.  Indeed, concerning the law and those few that it works to benefit, there has never been a need for ethics.  As I've already mentioned, unlike within a written declaration, no preamble was ever needed in a proclamation of authority.  Either one obeyed the authority of the British crown or else.  As the very least of wretches living on the streets knew during that time, this meant either shutting ones mouth or receiving a beating on every level.  

Ethically, a wretch today has two choices to decide between in which path to take.  Either she can choose to live intimately with others within a righteous kingdom or she can choose to live as a stranger within that of a cruel world.  That world is a chaotic war mongering empire.  In turn, that empire governs to the detriment of the health of the body acting parasitic upon it.  In contrast, a kingdom rules symbiotic in concert with the whole.  Worldly empires utilize the law in order to maintain the people in a constant state of ill health.  They sicken others through the utilization of legal precedence which are the false powers of manipulation.  They don't see the law as a necessary tyranny or evil, as a mere means to a greater end. no; but, they manipulate the law in order to blind the people from seeing the Truth.  It is this Truth which is the ultimate power and glory and not the false powers of manipulation (the legal precedence of the law).  

Are we living today within a symbiotic kingdom or are we suffering more and more within a parasitic world?  Well, some among us are willing to give their heads for the sake of others.  However, there are many others among us who are our enemy prospering as workers of inequity.  These particular members divide and conquer by stumbling up the children of God.  Indeed, they are warmongers as they are powered by hatred won by the manufacturing of the consent of the people.  They do this to create fear in others.  They aren't willing to give their heads, but they take the heads of others.

Many of our Muslim friends today believe in their hearts that they are doing God's Will by the taking the heads of others.  These Muslims are being governed by a worldly empire.      

We should all pray to be strengthened in our spirits so that, if and when the time comes, we will be more than willing and courageous to do our duty.  This means developing a mental toughness about ourselves.  It also means being able to face the worst imaginable situations.

Two Kinds of Brothers

When someone calls me by the name of "Bro," I have to stop to ask myself if they are someone of this cruel world or from the kingdom.  A brother of this world is someone from the street.  He is mysterious and, as he lives in the dark, is an adversary.  A brother of this world has his own agenda and culture.  He is lawless and doesn't follow even the simplest of regulations.  

Then again, our true brothers are meek in the sense that they are always willing to give their heads for our sake.  They are mentally tough meaning that they are not strangers of this world who are street smart.    

Jesus disobeyed the law as it existed as a manifestation of the marketplace.  However, He did not walk away from being submissive to authority and its laws, rules, and regulations.  

We are so beyond contempt today, but God is merciful.  Indeed, we have survived as adults today because our loving mothers micromanaged our lives for us.  The problem isn't with intimate micromanagement concerning the following of rules and regulations, but the kinds of macro managing that governs affairs from afar.

Jesus Himself was perfect.  This means He wasn't just behaving Himself concerning the law, but that He also followed every rule and regulation.  It also means Jesus was perfect in the way He never stepped a foot Willfully into the marketplace.  In other words, when His ministry dealt with matters concerning the law and the *marketplace, He was being forced to do so as the Messiah against His nature.  Once Jesus had finished fulfilling the prophecy, He then walked away from both the law and the marketplace with a stern warning to His disciples to never look back.                       

A Writ by Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins