State of the Union Address by Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins

Oddly, as predators by nature are tuned in to attacking and killing because they feel threatened by the lame expressions of fear, and as such actions of attacking and killing others are themselves lame expressions of fear, following after the sweet wishy-washy path  of hope for the sake of it will surely find a fool who has been mauled and eaten.  And the word change for the sake of change when spoken in such a pretty fashion is like plastic trinkets of bling bling dangled in front of desperate children, a work of inequity designed to stumble them up from their born natural right of existentially advancing their Civil Purpose.

As these modern sophisticates of hope and change are now cowering behind the battle front too afraid to shoot their arrows, they will never understand how arrows when aimed directly at the top of a tree will never achieve knocking the prize of an apple from it; meanwhile, at the same time, tyranny has darkened every hope today by limiting the people through congressional legislation, judicial decisions, and executive administrative actions from ever aiming their arrows high enough in the direction of the light of a blue sky.

In contrast to all this fluffed up vainglory and confusion of hoping and changing, the greatest of benefits are derived from the most precious of alterations, with these being the slightest of changes made, carefully and thoughtfully, to a treasured masterpiece that we already possess as our inheritance.          

Part of my responsibility as Prime Minister of these United States is to unify and strengthen our Republic, helping the fifty United States in the disadvantaged relationship they all share with the federal government.  Indeed, my own Texas that I live in today is part of this union meaning that she should never allow herself to be treated as a lessor whore, a lessor dominion, a lessor territory, or a lessor colony, all of which were once deemed so officially in order to serve under a global Emperor and his Empire.  Indeed, my Texas shares equal statehood with the other states meaning that her people are married rightfully to their own authority of a state government.  In the case of Texas, as her legislative branch meets every two years, sometimes calling on special sessions to take care of pressing concerns, her judicial branch is divided up into legal and criminal supreme courts, and her administrative executive branch is divided into five divisions of equal parts: a Governor, a Lt. Governor, a Land Commissioner, a State Comptroller, and an Attorney General.  

My state of Texas has a true economy as her budget is balanced by amendment.  When our state legislature attempts to spend too much money, the State Comptroller will step in to sue them taking them to court to settle the matter.

In comparison, the federal government of these United States has no economy as it operates unabated as an Old Word fiat power having the same unhindered authority as they to spend.

This ability to counterfeit out of thin air has worked inequity among our Union providing tyranny the means of a bottomless dole of funds to divide the American People into many endless false dichotomies, into liberals versus conservatives, Democrats versus Republicans, blacks versus whites, males versus females, homosexuals versus heterosexuals, the youth of today versus the elderly of yesterday, and so on.  Rather than each state now share equal statehood with the others as was the original idea, with representatives serving on behalf of the people, and two senators elected from each state to serve on behalf of each state, the functional operating system within the legislative system of Congress itself has become a venomous bastion of scheming colleagues.  In other words, they no longer go as elected servants, but they go as colleagues having already learned the tricks and corrupted ways of its established system.  As the head of the serpent now appears, as the two-party system is now dead, and as the Republican Party itself is now dead, we are now being ruled over by a single Legal Party made up of Republican and Democratic attorneys.

This is why we are fast becoming a client nation (a nation of legal idiots).  Yet, even worse, as we are idiots in ways of the law, lawyers are idiots in the functions necessary to keep society viable.  Indeed, both legal attorneys and the law they practice were originally intended to be means to a greater end, as necessary evils so to speak for a greater cause.  Meaning, other than creating legislation that will help achieve the greater end of advancing the Civil Purpose of the people, a lawyer knows nothing of value.

As there is no such beauty as the achievement of great government apart from the people (with they being the nameless and the faceless multitude), the glory of God itself is achieved by the nameless and faceless when the government ruling over them circumcises its authority towards that state which is most ideal.


         


  

Rewrite and revision: Part III. What is Divine Providence?

As the ultimate Truth is the greatest of power, and such a supreme entity unapproachable in its  Form, so, the best the Almighty can ever intervene in matters concerning the powers of the earth is by the act of stepping forward.  The book of Acts is an example of such a major Movement by Him.  Indeed, invariably, the Lord will always intervene divinely so by the utilization of one of his little fingers.  David slaying Goliath is one such example (1 Samuel 17).  Samson killing a thousand men is another (Judges 15:15).  Indeed, there are many examples of His nature confronting the most evil with just the use of His little finger:  But God has chosen the foolish things to confound the wise (1st Corinthians 1: 27,28).

Ultimately, an insane man was chosen to reveal God's Divine Revelation to the world.    

Indeed, In "Acts" of the New Testament, before the first words of the book were ever written, one needs to understand how, before the mentioning of its first character of the Apostle Peter, the Apostle Peter had been taken out from the being of the Apostle John.  Indeed, the Apostle John is a prior unspoken character in this book of Acts as he was even closer to Christ than was Peter, but his character had to be diligently hidden by the church as he suffered from insanity.  Suffering from such, his nakedness needed covering by the Holy Spirit just as his mental illness needed constant care by the Spoken Word of God.  Indeed, prior to the advent of the church and to His conversion to Christianity, with it being the new temple of God to replace the old, the head of John, as a disciple, also needed to be in constant contact, physically speaking, with the heart of Jesus Christ.

So, the Apostle Peter in the Book of Acts was raised out from the insanity of the Apostle John, with the latter being the leading protagonist in the book not spoken about.

While both Apostles were perceived as weaklings, the rational Apostle Peter, because of his time spent with Christ as a disciple, was made strong in his knowledge of the Old Testament.  Indeed, the first portion of the Book of Acts depicts Peter speaking strongly about specific subject matters pertaining to the Old Testament while Jewish members of the older temples now sat in as converted members of the new church and accepting of his authority.  In other words, the strong authority that was now being expressed by the Apostle Peter in the book of Acts would have been equally accepted during the prior times within the old Jewish temples.

It is here that we should stop to ask ourselves about the Book of Acts and its intended purpose. The Book of Acts is a paradox in how the Lord performed His greatest of miracles by both establishing a new system of authority within the church, while also abolishing all authority as the ultimate purpose by delegating it out as a shared relationship - as a new marriage so to speak.  Indeed, while Ananias and his wife were held in contempt of the Holy Spirit in the book of Acts, both possessed a face of authority in the new church as each were held responsible by the Holy Spirit and judged so separately three hours apart from the other.      

When the hands of the great and mighty Apostles were later placed upon the souls of lowly deacons within the church, all for the purpose of creating a lessor positions of responsibility which could wait on tables, the authority of the Holy Spirit transferred into them.  As a result, the lowly deacon Stephen began speaking about the Old Testament with the same countenance of strength as did the Apostle Peter, but, with this being a major difference, the face of Stephen was angelic.

Although Stephen appeared far less of an imposing figure than the Apostle Peter, physically speaking, his words had more of a bite to them.  While the predatory nature of the members within the temple were fine with the Apostle Paul ministering the Old Testament, it became enraged from the get go when the little deacon Stephen stepped forward to do the same.  

Indeed, the point of view during this passage of the Book of Acts focuses more on the being of the lowly deacon Stephen, than on the actual subject material he spoke about within the Old Testament.  It was if the ire of the old members of the Jewish temple began to rise even before Stephen began to open his mouth to minister.  Indeed, while any authority expressed as weakness was intolerable within the old temple, the predatory nature of intolerance would become unacceptable behavior within the new church.

Anyway, the Divine Intervention of the Lord Jesus Christ was beginning to step forward to confront Saul of Tarsus, the most evil man to ever live, the one who committed the unforgivable sin of offending the Holy Spirit.

Okay, so as the Apostle Peter was taken out from the being of the Apostle John, the angelic deacon Stephen was taken out from the being of the Apostle Peter.

As the new church was shattered and its members scattered to preach the gospel of the deacon Stephen and how he was murdered in cold blood in the new church, the lowly deacon Phillip happened upon a eunuch.  While deacon Stephen spoke with great countenance about matters pertaining to the Old Testament, the deacon Phillip in the Book of Acts preached the gospel about the death of the lowly deacon Stephen.

Meanwhile, the executioner Saul, having heard the Gospel about the death of Stephen, was traveling to investigate the incident.

So, the deacon Phillip was taken out from the being of the deacon Stephen.  Strange as it might seem, I am presenting a paradoxical flow of authority here.

While the deacon Phillip preached about the deacon Stephen to the eunuch, the eunuch, in turn, expressed feelings that he couldn't understand the Old Testament without the help from a brother.  To this, Phillip argued that the eunuch could indeed possess the authority of the Holy Spirit to understand through the process of Baptism.  Indeed, upon his baptism, the eunuch received the authority of the Holy Spirit and began rejoicing.

So, the eunuch was taken out from the being of the deacon Phillip.

Next, the eunuch having the authority of the Holy Spirit confronted Saul of Tarsus, at least that is the order in which it follows in the book of Acts.  I have already spoken much about the Apostle Paul in prior posts to this one.

So, Saul of Tarsus, the most evil one to ever live, was taken out from the being of the Eunuch.  He was then transformed into the Apostle Paul, the chosen vessel of God (the strong one who did not need the help from a weaker vessel (a wife) to stand in God's judgement).

So, as the first character spoken of in the book of Acts was the Apostle Peter, it should be understood that he was taken out from the Apostle John.  In turn, the deacon Stephen was taken out from the being of the Apostle Peter, the deacon Phillip was, in turn, taken out from the being of the deacon Stephen, the eunuch, in turn, taken out from the being of the deacon Phillip, and, finally, the Apostle Paul was, in turn, taken out from the being of the eunuch.

1st Corinthians 15.9 - 15.10:  For I am the least of the apostles and do not even deserve to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God. 10 But by the grace of God I am what I am, and his grace to me was not without effect. No, I worked harder than all of them—yet not I, but the grace of God that was with me.

Part 1. What is Divine Providence?

In "Acts" of the New Testament, before the first words of the book were ever written, one needs to understand how before the mentioning the the first character Apostle Peter, the Apostle Peter had been taken out from the being of the Apostle John.  Indeed, the Apostle John is a prior unspoken character in the book as he was even closer to Christ than was Peter, but his character had to be diligently hidden by the church as he suffered from insanity.  Suffering so, his nakedness needed covering by the Holy Spirit just as his mental illness needed constant care by the Spoken Word of God.  Indeed, prior to the advent of the church, with it being the new temple of God, the head of the disciple John also needed to be in constant contact with the heart of Jesus Christ.

So, the Apostle Peter in the Book of Acts was raised out from the insanity of the Apostle John.

While both Apostles were perceived as weaklings, the Apostle Peter, because of his time spent with Christ as a disciple, was made strong in his knowledge of the Old Testament.  Indeed, the first portion of the Book of Acts depicts Peter spoke strongly about specific subject matters pertaining to the Old Testament while Jewish members of the older temples now sat in as converted members of the new church and were accepting of his authority.  In other words, the strong authority that was now being expressed by the Apostle Peter in the book of Acts would have been equally accepted during the prior times within the old Jewish temples.

It is here that we should stop to ask ourselves about the Book of Acts and its intended purpose. The Book of Acts is a paradox in how the Lord performed His greatest of miracles by both establishing a new system of authority in the church, while also abolishing all authority as its expressed purpose by delegating it out as a shared relationship - a new marriage so to speak.  Indeed, while Ananias and his wife were held in contempt of the Holy Spirit in the book of Acts, both possessed a face of authority in the new church as each were held responsible by the Holy Spirit and judged so separately three hours apart from the other.        

When the hands of the Apostles were later placed upon the lowly deacons in the church, for the purpose of creating a lessor position of authority which could wait on tables, the authority of the Holy Spirit was then transferred into them.  As a result, the lowly deacon Stephen began speaking about the Old Testament with the same countenance as did the Apostle Peter, but, with this being a major difference, the face of Stephen was angelic.

Indeed, the point of view during this passage of the Book of Acts focuses more on the being of the lowly deacon Stephen, than on actual subject material within the Old Testament.  It was if the ire of the old members of the Jewish temple began to rise even before Stephen began to minister.  Indeed, while any authority expressed as weakness was intolerable within the old temple, the predatory nature of intolerance would become unacceptable behavior within the new church.

Okay, so as the Apostle Peter was taken out from the being of the Apostle John, the worthless deacon Stephen was taken out from the being of the Apostle Peter.

As the new church was shattered and its members scattered to preach the gospel of the deacon Stephen and how he was murdered in the new church, the lowly deacon Phillip happened upon a eunuch.  While deacon Stephen spoke with great countenance about matters pertaining to the Old Testament, the deacon Phillip in the Book of Acts preached the gospel about the death of the lowly deacon Stephen.

So, the deacon Phillip was taken out from the being of the deacon Stephen.  Strange as it might seem, I am presenting a paradoxical flow of authority here.

While the deacon Phillip spoke about the deacon Stephen to the eunuch, the eunuch, in turn, expressed feelings that he couldn't understand the Old Testament without the help from a brother.  To this, Phillip argued that the eunuch would possess the Holy Spirit to understand through the process of Baptism.  Upon his baptism, the eunuch received the authority of the Holy Spirit and began rejoicing.

So, the eunuch was taken out from the being of the deacon Phillip.

Next, the eunuch having the authority of the Holy Spirit confronted Saul of Tarsus, at least that is the order it is giving in the book of Acts.  I have already spoken much about the Apostle Paul in prior posts to this one.

So, the Saul of Tarsus, the most evil one to ever live, was taken out from the being of the deacon Phillip.  He was then transformed into the Apostle Paul, the chosen vessel of God (the strong one who did not need the help from a weaker vessel to stand in God's judgement.

So, as the first character spoken in the book of Acts the Apostle was the Apostle Peter, it should be understood that he was taken out from the Apostle John.  In turn, the deacon Stephen was taken out from the being of the Apostle Peter, the deacon Phillip was taken out from the being of the deacon Stephen, the eunuch taken out from the being of the deacon Phillip, and the Apostle Paul was taken out from the being of the eunuch.

1st Corinthians 15.9 - 15.10:  For I am the least of the apostles and do not even deserve to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God. 10 But by the grace of God I am what I am, and his grace to me was not without effect. No, I worked harder than all of them—yet not I, but the grace of God that was with me.
       

                          

  

Part II. a simple writ on the Three Kinds of Prostitutes

Again, a writ differs from an essay in that it isn't deemed rational because of its content.  Indeed, it is rational because of for whom the content is being written.  In writing a "writ," the author shrinks the whole world into the being of a worthless wretch - the lowest rated of all prostitutes who is having to persevere surviving homeless on the street.   

On the highest side of the scale, the Emperor sits enthroned as a shrewd businessman and as one who has the countenance of a cruel predator.

On the other lower side, there are three brands of prostitutes making up his market:

1)  Call Prostitutes:  Those who are worthy of being slept with.
2)  Mercy Prostitutes:  Those who are worthy of being saved when they are kneeling.
3)  Wretched Prostitutes:  Those who are so worthless that they are deemed to being condemned to death.

As the Emperor sits enthroned on one extreme side of this New World American spectrum, the wretched prostitute sits homeless on the other far side of it representing his inverse / perverse opposite.  While the Emperor has executive privilege, as he has proclaimed himself to be a god, to possess absolute power, he is also the greatest of *lawyers in how he possesses knowledge of all things (or else!).  In contrast to him, the wretch is totally powerless in how she knows nothing.    

*Lawyers don't know very much about useful functions with these being necessary in order to keep society growing and expanding.  Indeed, they know more about those false powers involved in manipulating society.  As the Emperor is the one who is the best trained concerning the works of inequity involving the manipulations of society - with these being the schemes involved in manufacturing consent of the people; so, the Emperor is the greatest among all lawyers. Understand, the Emperor or Empress are not deemed (graded) to possess rational ability, but he or she are deemed so possess such ability out of fear caused by acts of bullying.

For the Lord Jesus Christ did not bless the Jews because they were reasonable; but, rather, in Him fulfilling the prophecy as the Messiah, He had to bless the way of the Ten Commandments which bullied the Gentiles into submission.  By Him being the Almighty and blessing such laws, He made untouchable outcasts out of the Gentiles condemning them to having to serve the Jews.  But then He abandoned the law, walking away from the temple and approaching the Gentiles, forsaking the Ten Commandments for a New Covenant, lifting them up by narrowing to the command that they "Love thy neighbor as thyself."

The Lord didn't enjoy blessing the Jews nor the laws in which they were obedient as He had to perform such an action against His Will.  After all, upon fulfilling the prophecy, the Lord Jesus walked away from the temple demanding that his disciples never look back upon it.  Indeed, these were the same faithless laws which condemned His own mother beyond the suffering as a nameless and faceless one to that of a constant fleeing for her life as one who was condemned as a wretch.  

     

Part I. A Soveriegn Emperor Versus a Homeless Prostitute

As it comes to me, I have been working my way through a story.

There are just too many false dichotomies deceiving the American people today with a major one being the left / right paradigm.  This opposing spectrum has its origins in a model called "the golden mean," a political scale developed long ago by the ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle.  His intention in devising such a political concept was to pull his fellow extremist Greeks in towards voting along a more mutual moderate position.  However, Aristotle, though surely one of the most intelligent individuals to ever live, was quite limited in his creativity by constant threats from those sovereign offspring born to rule from birth.

Along with this left / right paradigm, yet another false dichotomy is the two-party system.  Such a model has long stumbled up the Children of God by dividing them into competing Democrats and Republicans.  In actuality, a truer dichotomy exists on a deeper philosophical level as a division between being ruled by a bipartisan New World American Movement and being so by a two-party Old World legal system.

If the survival of our nation depended entirely upon the seemingly noble endeavors of Democracy and voting, then we would all be dead today.  Indeed, the great aspects about these United States was never intended to be nor has it ever been its ruling government.  To the contrary, the marvels and wonders about these United States in the past has always been in the abilities of its people when the government's authority was managed to be ideally circumcised and reduced towards what is the most ideal state.    

So, as Americans, we have two paths we can proceed upon today choosing to either belong as a member to a bi-partisan American Movement or to a lone Legal Party made up of attorneys.  

As I mentioned in prior posts, it was the advent of the American Movement and not the two-party system that advanced the people ever so slightly over benefits wrought from the creation of the U.S. Constitution.  As the American Movement later developed out of the U.S. Constitution, in turn, the two kinds of laws that are expressed within the U.S. Constitution itself were developed out of the new order our Founders declared within the Declaration of Independence, with it being a Natural Law:

We Hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

In their declaration above, our Founders envisioned a different conclusion than the one which was always accepted traditionally as legal precedence - rituals of the past condemning the people to having to live their lives without any possibility of advancement.  Indeed, scientifically speaking, in the farthest reaches of deep theory, they chose to craft a more existential kind of Natural Law over that of the former distant and cruel laws of the Old World.

Along with these two false dichotomies of a left / right "golden mean" and of an Old World two-party system, other ways in which Americans are being deceived today are by way of color (black versus white), of sex (male versus female), of sexual orientation (hetero versus homosexuality), of age (young versus old), and so on.

All these false dichotomies have resulted in the erection of a single legal party today which, as I've already mentioned, is made up of Republican and Democratic attorneys.

To counter all this deceit, I've presented what I think is the one true American dichotomy.  In other words, rather than waste precious time vainly pushing against fictional pendulums in directions that are either left or right, a simpler way is to realize what is the true dichotomy itself:

Metaphorically speaking, the world is made up of two inverse individuals with one being a blessed enthroned Emperor, as the rightful owner of all things, and the other being a cursed homeless prostitute, as the owner of nothing.  As his highness always demands to be treated as a rational person (or else!), the low irrational prostitute is never taken seriously as she lives in a constant state of distraction (confusion) caused by an inward burden.

In other words, no political solutions are needed here.  As our Founders declared in the Declaration of Independence, all men, both male and female, are born equally endowed with the same business agenda for life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.  After the coming of Christ, as He changed the game from whoever survives in the end are the victors, to that of whoever are touched and called in the end are the victors, both the figures of the sovereign Emperor and the worthless Prostitute become exactly equal.  Indeed, though his blessed position in society allows him the leisure time to better himself giving him an advantage and superiority over her, and while she has been relegated to a damned position in society making her even more desperate in her ability to advance the Civil-Purpose of both herself and her posterity, both of these metaphorical figures are exact equals in how they each represent the exact inverses of the other.                            

So, while we we need to give nothing material to the disadvantaged prostitute other than our tolerance, at the same time she doesn't need to be burdened with finding a way off the streets as she already owns all the property (His purported ownership over all the possessions is a lie as, in the matrimonial relationship of sharing authority, he only owns the authority as all of his property was deeded away to his bride by the Lord Jesus Christ). Indeed, the groom is the head (authority) while the bride is the body (property).  This provides both partners with a face, circumcising towards his and granting towards hers.  As she is the property, she doesn't need to "do" anything.  However, if along the way she is ever burdened to do something, she will need to act alone and of her own free will standing in faith (in darkness) and walking in faith (out of darkness).

Old World Law Versus New World Law: Legal Precedence Versus the Science of Natural Law

Philosophically speaking, obeying the law first and then the order second was the sequence followed in the Old World.  This was all according to legal precedence - the traditional way in which things had been done forever, whether that be the right way or the wrong (or else!).

In other words, during Imperial times under the rule of the fallen Emperors, there existed no such concept as organized crime as they were the principle figures to institute such an economy.  The Emperor was to be recognized as the supreme rational one above every other rational individual in society - much like a God Father figure in a mob family - with these other rational individuals being the oral, multi-linguistic speaking sophisticates, the experimenting scientists, and the reducing philosophers (again or else!).  During such times of tyranny, he or she who bullied the best were recognized as knowing the most.

Again, the Emperors were drunkards on two levels.  On the physical level, they were constant drunkards who drank constantly, and, on the spiritual level, they were drunkards who utilized the false powers of manipulation in order to keep the commoners (nameless and faceless) under their rule at a constant state of disadvantage.

For fear of reprisal, during the great conflict between the sophisticates and the philosophers in ancient Greece during the time of its Zenith, this sovereign power of ruling bullies could never even be mentioned.  Indeed, just inferences made by Socrates and Aristotle are what got them in trouble.

In other words, there has always existed not just two knowers in history, but three of them with one being the unmentionables I just defined.  Likewise, there makes up the same kind of three knowers today:  1) The sophisticates (the sophists) who expanded their knowledge by learning many languages and cultures, the Philosophers who, by the use of their concocted truth engines, reduced to those best-principled paths outside of the unapproachable Truth itself, and those supreme bullies of offspring who were sovereign in their position as knowers in society having been born and trained to rule as part of the government.

In contrast, our Founding Fathers established an order first - as a whole new oner at that - establishing it as a foundation for a whole New World declaring it so as a new natural law within the single document that is The Declaration of Independence.  This new natural law was significant as it justified them in divorcing the people out from under the fallen rule of a tyrant (Emperor), accomplishing such while not gathering as a lawful government of "officials;" but, rather, they achieved such while acting as representatives on the behalf of (by, and for) other commoners.

Indeed, our Founding Fathers denounced their rightful roles within this New World, rejecting their social statuses as "gentlemen" in high British society along the way (as they revealed towards the end within the formal Declaration of Independence).

After establishing a whole new order, they then erected (instituted) two different kinds of laws upon it.  Indeed, not with just one documents, but with two of them contained within the documentation of the U.S. Constitution.  Indeed, one type of laws were the legal precedent type of amendments necessary for the establishment of a more (ever) Perfect(ing) Union - with this being the new marriage between the people and the government (necessary tyranny) that they established - an ideal New World.   Indeed, our Founders chose to preserve the endeavor of government for the purpose of advancing the people's Civil Purpose.

In order to further expand their prerequisite Civil Purpose, they then included another document within the U.S. Constitution with this second writ incorporating the new order they had founded within The Declaration of Independence - it being the justification for divorcing he American people out from under the rule of a fallen, backsliding tyrant (at the time, king George wasn't acting as a rightful king, but as a fallen Emperor of the British Empire).  These Bill of natural Rights broke the new natural law that they had declared as a new order into practical pieces.

 A single natural law cannot be taken out from many natural rights, but the Natural Rights were all taken out from the formal Natural Law, the new order.

So, as the endeavor of law in the Old World was born out of chaos, a whole new order was established in the New World and then new laws erected upon it.

Therefore, in the United States, we live by order and law.
  
Again, as one document of law (legal precedence) within the U.S. Constitution was established by our Founders to serve as a necessary tyranny (government), with this becoming the more perfect Union so to speak, the other document of Natural Law within it incorporated the new order as natural rights of the people.

To give further insight into what I speak, as the Pharisees in the Gospel of Luke interpreted the law religiously, behaving as strangers towards the Lord as ones who did not understand nor believe that He was the true Almighty, the servant woman washing the Lord's feet was acting intimately by a greater natural law, washing away the sins of the nameless and faceless who represented His feet, all the while perceiving His feet as representing her own lowly condition within society.

As the Pharisees could not see her, in contrast, she believed in Him in faith (and so was envisioned and empowered) to take care of the lowest parts of Him, the nameless and faceless who made up the feet of Jesus Christ.

She even understood that she was not allowed to touch His Holy preciousness as, technically, with her being a Gentile servant, she was not allowed to do so.  So, she instead washed him with the pure spirit of her tears, caressed Him with the Holiness of her kisses, and uplifted Him with the highest glory of her hair.



        



  

The Republican Party is dead

Indeed, the Republican party is dead.  In place of a two-party system, the federal government of these United States has become a bastion of Republican and Democratic lawyers whose sum total now make up a single, parasitic Legal party.

How strange is it that the Republican party would utilize today's *Imperial media to criticize the new burgeoning Tea Party and the vast numbers of members who once belonged to the Republican Party itself?  The odd reason as to why they do so is because they don't want word getting out that their own party is dead.

This slow and eventual death of the Republican Party is also the reason why the office of the presidency has, over the years, corrupted to the position of the dictatorship it is today.  So, the first solution is to get word out that the Republican Party is dead.  After achieving this, then it will be possible to both impeach and prosecute the president who today is ruling unabated as a dictator.

As my position of authority originated of, by, and for the people, as I am acting on their behalf as this nation's interim Prime Minister, as I am serving them also as this nation's **Supreme Court, and as I am now playing all these parts as a fictional character and narrator who I concocted, as Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins, I have already shown in a previous post how the office of the presidency of these United States has taken on the same status of those wicked Emperors of yesteryear (tyrants).  I then declared the position of the presidency to be a tyranny - backsliding tyrants who express the same six characteristics once expressed by the wicked Emperors of old.  Therefore, the office of presidency of these United States is now acting in contempt of the people and their Civil Purpose and the prerequisite advancement of it.      
      
*The media of "sayers" who were once utilized by fallen Emperors to stumble up the Children of God.

**Not the question of what is the federal Supreme Court, but the question of what is the most supreme of all courts.  In answering this question, the most supreme of all courts would be that one which understands the limits of authority and how such is achieved by narrowing down towards that which is the most subjective state, with this being the ideal relationship between both the rulers and the ruled. A reduction to authority by way of circumcision.  Such an ideal authority will always work to express itself in the best interest of the people, the practical, realistic and objective goal which never whispers a mysterious best interest, but attains a clear and never wavering focus upon the people's Civil-Purpose and the prerequisite advancement of it.

    

Not judgement over Constitutionality, but over matters that are in contempt of the people's advancement of their Civil Purpose

What is the most supreme of all courts?

A true Supreme Court is not the one serving to maintain the people alone; but, it is the one serving to advance their Civil Purpose.  The Federal Supreme Court today is one which was concocted by the Federal Government, with the Federal Government itself being a necessary tyranny established by our Founding Fathers, and not a part necessary for the creation of a More Perfect Union.  Indeed, the Federal Supreme Court was not a thoughtful and ideal creation of, by, and for the people; but, it is part of a tyranny operating parasitical upon the souls of the people.  Indeed, the Federal Supreme Court has already been declared in contempt as they continue to choose to side with tyranny against advancing the Civil Purpose of the people.

Therefore, as one of the duties of the Prime Minister of these United States is to hold the Supreme Court accountable under Light of the Truth during those drunken times when they choose to be corrupt, so do I now thrust back upon Congress their lessor duty involving sitting in judgment over matters concerning Constitutionality.

Therefore, on this date of 01/18/2014, I Uncle Emanuel Watkins, serving as the temporary Supreme Court, make the declaration instead that the Republican Party is dead, null, and void.  This ruling by me is intended to cause both a detriment to tyranny and a benefit to the people.  Indeed, the Republicans are merely pretending to be viable today in acting as half of a two party system - a concoction which arose by shallow lawyers before implemented for the purpose of maintaining the people in perpetual confusion.  Therefore, I do declare members of the Republican Party today to be acting in contempt of the people and the advancement of their Civil Purpose.  Likewise, as the members of the Democratic Party and the media they now own are all acting, feigning, and pretending the Republican Party to be viable, they too are operating in contempt of the people and the prerequisite advancement of their Civil Purpose.

Therefore, the people do now overcome to temporarily take our rightful power, stepping up for the purpose of making a *slight correction - as we now hold proclamation of sovereignty - so, let every member of the Republican Party, those in the Democratic Party, and as well as those in the media be held to a higher standard and to a greater penalty under Light of the Truth.

Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins
01/18/2014.    

*We the people did not dare to venture out from our darkness for the purpose of joining in with the endeavor of government, or, so that we might rise up to govern at a high position over others; but, we the people chose to spare government from suffering a rightful destruction, utilizing it instead as a necessary tyranny for the ultimate quest of advancing our Civil Purpose and that of our posterity.

Not left or right, but a patriotic American Movement on the side of the people versus a loyalistic two-party system on the side of Old World Tyranny.

My title is Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins meaning that I am a "founder" within the American Movement, with this event in American history being the true improvement over the creation of the U.S. Constitution.  Indeed, the advent of the two-party system was a false dichotomy against the advancement of the Civil Purpose of the people.  As I've already established, the documentation of both the two documents within the U.S. Constitution were taken out of the document of The Declaration of Independence as each was erected upon the new order our Founders established in the their declaration as a natural law.

By "improvement," I understand the word to mean "The greatest of benefits are derived from the most precious of alterations made to that which we already possess from our ancestors as our inheritance."

The improvement I mention above is the long and steady true motion and, so the true "hope and change" as, in the past, the evil Emperors and the fallen kings of old would also deploy wizards to utilize modern technology deceitfully as trickery in stumbling up the Children of God.        

During the time of our Founding Fathers, they understood the world to be a result of a fall-of-man meaning that their world was made up of patriots to Truth and loyalists against an evil one.  Since their time, a tyranny of sophisticates have deceived the American people by twisting reality around to an understanding of the rise-of-man meaning, in contrast, the world is made up of a two-party system of liberals and conservatives.

Indeed, in its infancy, the necessary tyranny created to make up our government did not incorporate the Old World concoction of a two-party system as this false dichotomy was incorporated into the system later on.  It was only later that the advent of the American Movement organized among the people to challenged the false dichotomy.

What I am trying to express here can be better envisioned philosophically by defining what is work and what is play.

The two-party system is a result of playing around.  It flows along leisurely with the downward flow of gravity itself much like a child will enjoy doing when they spill out their toys from their toy box.  In contrast, the advent of the bipartisan American Movement ushering forth later on to challenge the false dichotomy of the two=party system worked painfully against the flow of gravity.  Indeed, children hate picking up their toys as, after a mess has been made, they have to be selective in picking up each one and placing it back in the box.  Indeed, as we should think of those who support the two-party system as backsliding loyalists to the former state of tyranny of the Old World, we should also think of those supporting the bipartisan American Movement as new reborn patriots who, having taken lots of effort to fight against their own fallen nature, now work at truly serving the advancement of the people by ruling over them in a bipartisan fashion.

In other words, contrary to what the sophisticated loyalists might argue today, our Founding Fathers were a lot smarter than us.

But, paradoxically, with this point being quite subtle, that fact doesn't make them smarter as that would disappoint them!  Indeed, when we think of our Founders as representing our own flesh and blood fathers, as being their children we were born inferior to them, just I was born inferior to my own flesh and blood father, they worked together to impart their love into us by the act of teaching us better.  So, while we have fallen and, as a result, are inferior to our Founding Fathers and our own flesh and blood fathers, we possess in our beings today the totality of both the greater part of them and the lessor part of us.  

In this way, a Tree of Life can be our Holy Father within the Book of Genesis in the Old Testament.

Therefore, if, in time, Dr. Ron Paul would like to take up this new role of *Prime Minister of these United States, then his new title would be that of Fd. Ron Paul.  

*A new position of authority within these United States which is rising up not of, by, and for a best interest of those making up the necessary tyranny our Founders established originally - with it being the Federal government; but, a new position of authority which is rising out of, by, and for the advancement of the Civil Purpose of the people.

The Federal Government has become parasitic against the people by stifling the necessary advancement of their Civil Purpose

Again, one can tell the truth or one can tell a direct lie, but being deceitful to the extent of stumbling up the Children of God is evil.  For example, the disciples didn't tell the multitude to simply get lost.  No, thinking like serpents, they told them deceitfully to go down to the market to take care of themselves and then come back later.  Jesus, knowing that the multitude possessed nothing as they had endured three days suffering (fasting) the same as Him, knew that they would never come back.

So, what did He do?  Well, after rebuking His disciples, He then usurped all the property away from them giving it all to the multitude by ordering them to lay back and relax as if they themselves were the rich people.  He then offended His disciples even further by ordering them to "serve" the multitude by making the demand that "You go give them something to eat!"

If the multitude are the most nameless and faceless of the earth, then this is a paradox.  Indeed, it isn't the gifted and blessed angelic individuals born into this earth who own all the property and possessions, but the nameless and faceless.  That means the betters in society are the trespassers and not the nameless and faceless that they rule over.

Though the Lord Jesus fed the multitude twice, the disciples still didn't understand this subtlety, even after they had become Apostles later on, that power is only given to those who serve the nameless and faceless.  Feeling as Apostles that they had more important matters to attend to, they laid their hands upon seven deacons so that they could "wait tables" in their place, with these deacons being the very least of the brothers in the new church of Christ.  In doing so, they unwittingly transferred the power of the Holy Spirit into them.          

With this in mind, the Federal Government of these United States today, a necessary tyranny created originally by our Founding Fathers to serve the people's Civil Purpose, has become a foreign parasitic entity.  In other words, the Federal Government is no longer acting symbiotic in its relationship with the individual states (the people) for their betterment.

To give an example in biology, long before the mitochondria worked its way into the living cell as a symbiotic living organism (it still has its own DnA even today), parasitic organisms were there working keeping it in a constant state of ill health.  In other words, it isn't in a parasite's best interest to kill the host body it inhabits as doing so would also kill itself; but, its purpose as a parasite is to maintain the body in a constant state of futility without any hope for advancing itself.

As a result, the living cell at one time only possessed the energy they were born with and, so, only lived until that energy supply was spent.

The mitochondria was a miracle as a living organism as it behaved symbiotic working into the living cell as part of it for the benefit of both the mitochondria organelle and the host cell that it was serving by making the process of respiration possible.  This added energy production making the creation of even larger and more complex organisms possible.  In the process, the former parasitic organisms upon the body were cast out of the host body over time where they evolved further into such blood sucking insects as mosquitoes and ticks.

Even today, such parasites make their living not by killing the host body, but by causing it to remain suffering in a constant state of illness.  They do this by injecting disease, with these being their original former ancestors, back into the body.  At the same time, they take a blood meal from the body not for the purpose of eating, but to incubate whole new parasites.

In other words, as some of the living organisms came out from the earth, so too did some of the living organisms evolve out parasitically from what eventually became the greater beings of mankind and the other animals.

The goal of the global leaning Federal Government today is to be parasitic upon the backs of these United States (of the people) in order to maintain them in a constant state of ill health.        

          

Not knowing a lot about just a little, but knowing just a little about a lot.

Mystery solved, Saul of Tarsus was the man upon the horse who is spoken about in the four Gospels during Christs Crucifixion, because, after later getting knocked off his horse and having been converted over to Christianity, that was all he knew of to write about.  Indeed, the later Apostle Paul only wrote about matters concerning the Crucifixion of Jesus Christ.  In contrast, the other Apostles during the time of Christ's crucifixion had all abandoned the Son of Man running away.  So, they knew nothing about Jesus Crucifixion.

I was always puzzled about this character Paul until I realized, when as Saul of Tarsus, he was the most evil man to ever live - the one who committed the unforgivable offense by offending the Holy Spirit.

So, God spoke to us in the New Testament through the being of the most evil man to ever live after knocking him from his horse and converting him over to our side as a Christian.  Indeed, whatever authority the Apostle Peter ever had was under that of the Chosen Vessel Paul.  Likewise, whatever authority the Apostle John had in his writing of the Book of (the) Revelation (of Jesus Christ) was also penned under the authority of the Chosen Vessel Paul.

This is what the world doesn't get.  The Pope should be considered a false authority today because of how they have never recognized the limits to the Apostle Peter's authority and how he was always submissive to the authority of the Chosen Vessel Paul.

Indeed, it is important to understand how the Almighty took Saul even above the most wicked of all Emperors, as the most wicked one to ever live.  He then transformed this wicked person into the Chosen Vessel Apostle Paul.  The remaining Apostleship was then put in submission to the authority of the Apostle Paul as God's Chosen Vessel / as well as under the authority of the converted Saul as the most wicked one to ever live having committed the unforgivable offense of offending the Holy Spirit.

From the very get go, evil has never stood a chance.                

The Federal Government is in contempt of the people's Civil Purpose

When a person writes, they write, just as when a person converses orally, they converse orally; but, when people communicate on the internet or on a computer network, they neither write nor converse orally, but they social network.

Therefore, I, Uncle Emanuel Watkins, as acting Prime Minister and as the temporary acting Supreme Court of these United States, do forgive every citizen within these United States, every member of Congress within these United States, and every member of what is now a corrupted Supreme Court within these United States for any and all offenses they might have committed, are now deemed to have committed, and are now being held hostage under threat of blackmail by information begotten off the internet or from any other form of computer network.

Any government holding such accountable shall, from this date onward, be judged in contempt of the people's Civil Purpose and be held to a higher standard and to a greater penalty under the Light of the Truth.

The position of president of these United States has been corrupted, backsliding towards tyranny.  As the six offenses committed by the evil Emperors in the past were to 1) partake in pleasuring with the souls of young women and small boys in secret harems, 2)  plunder as warmongers the wealth of the commoner people in Kingdoms by the deploying of their armies and then promising to provide the kings and governments over them protection for a cost, 3) declare themselves to be gods by denouncing the one God Himself, 4) deceitfully employ bankers to stumble up the Children of God, 5) to maintain themselves in a constant state of drunkenness apart from the realities of the people's sober condition, and 6) to favor the false powers of manipulation as their primary methodology over the supreme Power of the Truth.

Like the Emperors before them, the kings of Great Britain during the time of John Locke and our Founding Fathers, all proclaimed themselves to have absolute power.  As the office of the presidency of these United States has been recently eroding back to these six conditions of the former Emperors (tyrants), I, Uncle Emanuel Watkins, do hold the office of the presidency to be in contempt of the people and their Civil Purpose.  Therefore, from this day onward, let him or her in the office of the U.S. presidency to be held to a higher standard and to a greater penalty under Light of the Truth.

01 / 14 / 2014
Prime Minister Uncle Emanuel Watkins          

A New Position of Prime Minister with Ron Paul as the Model

At this time, I am volunteering to serve as interim Prime Minister of these United States while the philosophical groundwork established by our Founding Fathers is clarified and advanced.  Advanced only in the sense that the greatest of benefits are derived from the most precious of alterations to that which we already possess as our inheritance.

Having my conscience bother me on the matter, I am serving in this capacity today in order to maintain it not as an authority created of, by, and for the present necessary tyranny over us - the necessary tyranny of the Federal government, but as an authority created of, by, and for the people.

Indeed, as the necessary tyranny of the Federal government over us is now functioning unofficially so relative to the government of Great Britain, so am I functioning unofficially so relative to the necessary tyranny of the Federal government.

The functions of the Prime Minister are:

1)  to serve as the Supreme Court when the supreme court corrupts itself to the extent of serving on the side of tyranny against the Civil Purpose of the people.  Indeed, the Supreme Court may have as its sum total a single member as, in its infancy, our nation wasn't intended to function as an Old World two-party system.  When the Supreme Court acts on the behalf of the people and the advancement of their Civil Purpose, then the primary duty of the Prime Minister shall fall back to his or her primary duty of:

2) The primary duty of the Pime Minister is to work individually with each state strengthening the balance of power between themselves and the overriding duties of the Federal government.

The purpose of the first duty is to throw the question of Constitutionality back into the arena of Congress.

After all, when asking oneself the question of what is the most supreme of all courts, the answer is always going to be "that high court which limits itself existentially to matters concerning the people and the advancement of their Civil Purpose."

In the case when our government is held in contempt of the people and their Civil Purpose, the judgement of the Supreme Court will condemn such a tyranny holding them to a higher standard and greater penalty under Light of the Truth.

In other words, as the greatest power is the solid and immovable foundation of the Truth; so, governments are only made to behave by holding them to their conscience.

If he would like to hold the position, I would like to hand this authority over to Ron Paul as soon as possible.  In the meantime, anyone who would like to help further strengthen the foundation we inherited from our Founders is welcome to do so.                

First draft of Part II of my letter to the Supreme Court

Concerning the proper order of authority, Jesus Christ begat the chosen vessel Paul.  In turn, the chosen vessel Paul then begat the apostle Peter and the rest of the apostleship under his authority.

This means the creation of the position of 'Pope' has long been a false authority in this world as there never was a time when the apostle Peter and the apostleship under his authority were not submissive to the chosen vessel Paul. Therefore, as the high position of Emperor was shown to have been nullified in part one, likewise should the authority of the Pope be considered voided in the second part of this letter to the Supreme Court.

As the chosen vessel Paul was taken out of the Fullness of Christ the Holy Trinity, so was the Apostle Peter and the rest of the apostleship taken out from the being of the chosen vessel Paul.

To continue along this line of reasoning, the authority of the kings of this earth were taken out of the apostle Peter and the apostleship.  And then the authority of our *Founding Fathers were taken out of the authority of the kings of this earth.

Indeed, our Founding Fathers knew this proper order as they demonstrated their submissiveness to it in the Declaration of Independence.

In turn, the Declaration of Independence was taken out of our Founding Fathers as they gave birth to its Natural Law.  In turn, the lone document of the Declaration of Independence gave birth to the two documents contained within the U.S. Constitution.

As our Founders established a new order within the Declaration of Independence - as a new order has to be first established before any new laws can be erected - they laid down a new base for a New World.  Concerning the two documents within the U.S. Constitution, one erected laws upon the Natural Law declared within the Declaration of Independence, with these being necessary evils contrived for the creation of an ever dynamic more perfect Union. Along with this "necessary tyranny," the other document our Founders wrote included the absolute natural rights of the people, with these superseding the absolute power the likes which was often proclaimed by the world's kingship (John Locke).

In other words, the natural rights of the people cannot be nullified by any proclaimed laws decreed by the kings of this earth as such absolutions were understood to reduce literally on the physical level much like DnA.

For example, a rightful king should never interfere with motherhood ordering them to alter the way they care for their children as such is an absolute natural right.  After all, no amount of force in the universe can ever be amassed to interfere with mothers caring for their children.  Therefore, such a natural right can never be repealed meaning the best a king can ever achieve in attempting to separate mothers from caring for their children would be to cause them untold suffering.  In causing such persecutions, the formal rightful king would be exhibiting the fallen characteristics of an Emperor and, as a consequence, be judged a tyrant and rightfully divorced from his high position of rule.

As the immovable Truth is the ultimate power, and the dynamic actions of evil doings the lessor false powers of manipulation, caring for children is not a matter of a mother's doings things, but is a matter of her just being herself.  Similarly, fathers, by natural right, will forever fight against the evil doings of tyranny by taking up arms (the second amendment).            

And so here we stand today at a crossroads as there are ahead of us two paths to choose from with one being the two-party system, an official concoction that the Federal government adopted for itself from the Old World, and the other being the American Movement, a fresh new unofficial solution that arose of, by, and for the people.

In truth, the U.S. Constitution gave birth to the American Movement while the best the two-party system can ever achieve is to work in the best interest of the people as a necessary tyranny.  And as it is with every necessary evil, such a dangerous organization should be circumcised as much as possible having its authority **reduced down to what is most ideal concerning the advancement of the people's ***Civil Purpose.

*Our Founding Fathers should always be written in the higher-case as they dealt with matters concerning the unapproachable Truth, with it being the ultimate power, rather than matters concerning legal precedence which was the norm in the Old World, with these being the lessor false powers of manipulation.

**That government is best which governs least - our Founding Fathers, Ralph Waldo Emerson, Henry Thoreau, and Samuel Clemens along with many others in the American Movement.

***Government is not the glory of God, but the glory of God is expressed in the people when the authority of government has been circumcised ideally so to that of a more perfect Union.  Therefore, the people don't have an executive purpose, a legislative purpose, or a judicial purpose; but, the people have an ever expanding Civil Purpose.                      

Third Rewrite of Part One of a Letter I am Writing to the Supreme Court Holding Them Accountable Under Light of the Truth

Our Founding Fathers understood what is the proper order of authority.

The Lord Jesus Christ, Being the Fullness of the Triune God, is the Supreme Authority while the sequence of the next in line to Him was a) His Chosen Vessel the Apostle Paul, b) the apostleship under his authority, c) and then the kings of the world.

So, the position of Emperor has been eliminated having been replaced by the Apostles.

Concerning the Apostle Paul, the prior character he lived as 'Saul' was the most evil man to ever live as he committed the unforgivable sin of offending the Holy Spirit.  Therefore, while on the road to Damascus, he was knocked off his horse during a confrontation between himself and one of the little fingers of the Almighty - a baptized eunuch. After having been struck blind and devastated by just one of God's many angels, Saul was then taken and transformed into God's Chosen Vessel the Apostle Paul.  Spiritually speaking, at the same time the old man of Saul was put to death, the new man of the Apostle Paul was born again and then later transformed into God's Chosen Vessel.

(I'm thinking the man on a horse riding up to force another to help our Jesus Christ during the time in which He was persevering carrying His cross up a hill to His Crucifixion is the same Saul on a horse who met up with the baptized eunuch on the road to Damascus.  As a consequence, as he had witnessed Christ in the flesh, so Saul recognized Him also as the Holy Spirit within the eunuch. )    

This action by Jesus Christ eliminated the position of *Emperor (of the anti-Christ) as the ultimate authority on earth. As it was with Caesar Nero, the six characteristics making up a fallen ruler today are 1) he rules in a constant state of drunkenness, 2) plays about in the world killing thoughtlessly as a warmonger, 3) spends his leisure time in secret harems housing the souls of young women and small boys, 4) works to the people's detriment causing division and inequity in their ranks, 5) pimps as a whore monger by delving into the organized business (crime) of prostitution, and, worst of all, 6) pleasures in the stumbling up of the Children of God (infanticide).

Our world today is fast returning to this former state of tyranny.

So, the most direct authority under the Chosen Vessel Paul and the apostleship submissive to his authority should be the rule of kings.  After all, Jesus Christ did not address the preface / governor Pilate, whose rule was being subverted by constant manipulation from his wife, or king Herod, whose rule was being was subverted constantly by his constant state of drunkenness, why it was that they were persecuting Him.  To the contrary,  it was only later after His Resurrection as the Holy Spirit that Jesus Christ came in the guise of an angelic and baptized eunuch to ask that question of Saul, the most evil one to ever live.

So, the proper order of how authority is dispensed is very important.  While crafting the Declaration of Independence and signing their names to it, our Founding Fathers acknowledged in writing that they understood themselves to be standing under Judgement of His Holy Truth even to the extent that they were willing to give up their own personal fortunes for the sake of the people.

In other words, concerning this proper order, as God's authority was first dispensed from the fountainhead of Christ, it first traveled through His Chosen Vessel the Apostle Paul and those in the apostleship submissive to his authority.  Only then was it dispensed through the kings.  Likewise, our Founding Fathers within the Declaration of Independence acted as the commoner people in submission to this order of authority.  This means that the royalty of today has not received authority as a result of their being direct blood descendants of Jesus Christ; but, they receive their authority indirectly by way of the spoken Word of God in letters written and sent by the Chosen Vessel Paul to the city of Rome (in the Book of Romans) and those within the rest of the apostleship who were under **his authority.  Under the authority of the Chosen Vessel, the authority of the apostleship was created to replace what had become a corrupt position of Emperor (with they, once again, being the anti-Christ).

Therefore, as our Founding Fathers stood submissive while under judgement of the Truth; so, I stand today as their primary attorney while submissive to their ***authority.  As they divorced the people rightfully out from under the corrupt rule of one who behaved as a fallen Emperor, by their utilizing a new natural law (science) while forsaking the legal precedence of the Old World (the law), so have the people of these United States today become a whole New World apart from the Old.  

In other words, we should remain submissive to the authority of government as it can only be controlled by conscience.  However, we should no longer tolerate the false rule of an Emperor just as we should always disobey the temptations of evil.

Over the last thirty years, the position of the presidency of these United States has been empowered beyond what our Founder's envisioned the position to be.  Indeed, it now takes on the same six fallen characteristics that were once found in the Emperors of old.

Metaphorically speaking, as the true authority of the Shepherd resides at the middle of the flock where He rules behind a false authority of the horned and the menacing, so is the true government today ruling among the nameless and the faceless.

*The Emperors of the Old World all proclaim themselves to be gods.

**Although the apostle Peter was with the flesh and blood Christ serving Him as one of his disciples during His time on earth, the Chosen Vessel Paul was much closer to Christ seeing Him much clearer in the Holy Spirit.  Therefore, the authority of the Apostle Paul surpasses that of the Apostle Peter meaning that the authority figure of Pope in the Catholic church should be voided.

*** I am submissive to the authority of those in the American Movement and not to those misleading us in a two-party system.  For while the concoction of the two-party system was a product reborn of the Old World, the unofficial American Movement process advanced the people in the New World, although ever so slightly, beyond what the prior documentation of U.S. Constitution and the document of the Declaration of Independence managed to do.  (The greatest of benefits are derived from the most precious of alterations to that which we already possess as our inheritance).      

This is the second redo of a letter I am writing to the Supreme Court holding them accountable under Light of the Truth

The Lord Jesus Christ, Being the Fullness of the Triune God, is the Supreme authority.  The next in line to Him was His Chosen Vessel the Apostle Paul.

The prior person of 'Saul' was the most evil man to ever live as he committed the unforgivable sin of offending the Holy Spirit.  Therefore, he was confronted by an angel and knocked off his horse and struck blind all by one of the little fingers of the Almighty - a baptized Eunuch. Being so, Saul was then taken and transformed into God's Chosen Vessel the Apostle Paul.  At the same time the old man of Saul was being put to death, the new man of Paul was born again and later transformed into God's Chosen Vessel.    

This action by Jesus Christ eliminated the position of Emperor (of the anti-Christ) as the ultimate authority (the Emperors would all declared themselves to be gods) on earth. As it was with Caesar Nero, the six parts making up a fallen ruler today are 1) he rules in a constant state of drunkenness, 2) plays about in the world killing thoughtlessly as a warmonger, 3) spends his leisure time in harems housing the souls of young women and small boys, 4) works to the people's detriment causing division and inequity in their ranks, 5) pimps as a whore monger (delves into the organized business (crime) of prostitution), and, worst of all, 6) pleasures in the stumbling up of the Children of God (infanticide). Our world today is fast returning to this former type of tyranny.

So, the most direct authority under the authority of the Chosen Vessel (Paul) should be the rightful rule of a king.  After all, Jesus Christ did not ask the preface / governor Pilate, whose authority was being subverted by the constant manipulation from his wife, or king Herod, whose authority was subverted by his constant state of drunkenness.  To the contrary,  it was later after His Resurrection as the Holy Spirit that Jesus Christ came in the guise of an angel - as a baptized eunuch - to ask that question of the most evil one to ever live (Saul).

While crafting the Declaration of Independence and signing their names to it, our Founding Fathers acknowledged in writing that they understood themselves to be standing under Judgement of His Holy Truth even to the extent that they were willing to give up their own personal fortunes for the sake of the people.

In other words, in what is the proper order, as God's authority was first dispensed from the fountainhead of Christ, it then traveled through His Chosen Vessel the Apostle Paul, and only then did it travel through the kings.  Likewise, our Founding Fathers within the Declaration of Independence acted in submission to this order of authority.  This means that royal authority is not received directly as a result of them being direct blood descendants of Jesus Christ, but they receive their authority indirectly so by way of the spoken Word of God in letters written and sent by the Chosen Vessel Paul to the city of Rome (in the Book of Romans), and from the rest of the apostleship who were under *his authority.  Under the Chosen Vessel, the authority of the apostleship was created to replace the corrupt position of Emperor (with they being the anti-Christ).

Likewise, as our Founding Fathers stood submissive while under judgement of the Truth; so, I stand today as their primary attorney while submissive to their **authority.  As they divorced the people rightfully from under the corrupt rule of one who behaved as if he were an Emperor, by forsaking the legal precedence of the Old World for that of a new natural law, so have the people of these United States today become a whole New World separated from the old one.    

In other words, we should remain submissive to the authority of government as it can only be controlled by way of it being held to its conscience.  However, we should no longer tolerate the false rule of an Emperor just as we should always disobey the temptations of evil.

Over the last thirty years, the position of president of these United States has been empowered beyond what our Founder's envisioned the position to be.  Indeed, it now takes on the same six fallen characteristics that were once found in the Emperors of old.  

Indeed, as the true authority of the Shepherd resides at the middle of the flock where He rules behind the false authority of the horned and the menacing, so is the true government today ruling among the nameless and the faceless.

*Although the apostle Peter was with the flesh and blood Christ serving Him as one of his disciples during His time on earth, the Chosen Vessel Paul was much closer to Christ seeing Him much clearer in the Holy Spirit.  Therefore, the authority of the Apostle Paul surpasses that of the Apostle Peter meaning that the authority figure of Pope in the Catholic church should be voided.

** I am submissive to those in the American Movement and not to those misleading ones in a two-party system.  For while the concoction of the two-party system was a product reborn out from the Old World, the unofficial American Movement process advanced the people in the New World beyond the U.S. Constitution.