Concerning the proper order of authority, Jesus Christ begat the chosen vessel Paul. In turn, the chosen vessel Paul then begat the apostle Peter and the rest of the apostleship under his authority.
This means the creation of the position of 'Pope' has long been a false authority in this world as there never was a time when the apostle Peter and the apostleship under his authority were not submissive to the chosen vessel Paul. Therefore, as the high position of Emperor was shown to have been nullified in part one, likewise should the authority of the Pope be considered voided in the second part of this letter to the Supreme Court.
As the chosen vessel Paul was taken out of the Fullness of Christ the Holy Trinity, so was the Apostle Peter and the rest of the apostleship taken out from the being of the chosen vessel Paul.
To continue along this line of reasoning, the authority of the kings of this earth were taken out of the apostle Peter and the apostleship. And then the authority of our *Founding Fathers were taken out of the authority of the kings of this earth.
Indeed, our Founding Fathers knew this proper order as they demonstrated their submissiveness to it in the Declaration of Independence.
In turn, the Declaration of Independence was taken out of our Founding Fathers as they gave birth to its Natural Law. In turn, the lone document of the Declaration of Independence gave birth to the two documents contained within the U.S. Constitution.
As our Founders established a new order within the Declaration of Independence - as a new order has to be first established before any new laws can be erected - they laid down a new base for a New World. Concerning the two documents within the U.S. Constitution, one erected laws upon the Natural Law declared within the Declaration of Independence, with these being necessary evils contrived for the creation of an ever dynamic more perfect Union. Along with this "necessary tyranny," the other document our Founders wrote included the absolute natural rights of the people, with these superseding the absolute power the likes which was often proclaimed by the world's kingship (John Locke).
In other words, the natural rights of the people cannot be nullified by any proclaimed laws decreed by the kings of this earth as such absolutions were understood to reduce literally on the physical level much like DnA.
For example, a rightful king should never interfere with motherhood ordering them to alter the way they care for their children as such is an absolute natural right. After all, no amount of force in the universe can ever be amassed to interfere with mothers caring for their children. Therefore, such a natural right can never be repealed meaning the best a king can ever achieve in attempting to separate mothers from caring for their children would be to cause them untold suffering. In causing such persecutions, the formal rightful king would be exhibiting the fallen characteristics of an Emperor and, as a consequence, be judged a tyrant and rightfully divorced from his high position of rule.
As the immovable Truth is the ultimate power, and the dynamic actions of evil doings the lessor false powers of manipulation, caring for children is not a matter of a mother's doings things, but is a matter of her just being herself. Similarly, fathers, by natural right, will forever fight against the evil doings of tyranny by taking up arms (the second amendment).
And so here we stand today at a crossroads as there are ahead of us two paths to choose from with one being the two-party system, an official concoction that the Federal government adopted for itself from the Old World, and the other being the American Movement, a fresh new unofficial solution that arose of, by, and for the people.
In truth, the U.S. Constitution gave birth to the American Movement while the best the two-party system can ever achieve is to work in the best interest of the people as a necessary tyranny. And as it is with every necessary evil, such a dangerous organization should be circumcised as much as possible having its authority **reduced down to what is most ideal concerning the advancement of the people's ***Civil Purpose.
*Our Founding Fathers should always be written in the higher-case as they dealt with matters concerning the unapproachable Truth, with it being the ultimate power, rather than matters concerning legal precedence which was the norm in the Old World, with these being the lessor false powers of manipulation.
**That government is best which governs least - our Founding Fathers, Ralph Waldo Emerson, Henry Thoreau, and Samuel Clemens along with many others in the American Movement.
***Government is not the glory of God, but the glory of God is expressed in the people when the authority of government has been circumcised ideally so to that of a more perfect Union. Therefore, the people don't have an executive purpose, a legislative purpose, or a judicial purpose; but, the people have an ever expanding Civil Purpose.
No hay comentarios.:
Publicar un comentario