Part I.
The Rule of Manifestation
While lessor courts deal in matters concerning the law, the one that is the most supreme would make judgments by manifestation. This type of authority would rule by illuminating light unto the conscience. In scripture, rather than they be enlightened in this way, as they were intoxicated by the law, the twelve disciples could not perceive His Light and, as a result, expressed very little concern in the way of fear and remorse. In contrast to them, the very least of wretches who sought after Him perceived this light and, in doing so, acted in fear and trembling. Indeed, while it was ordered that He be hunted and killed, the law could never find Him. In contrast, the aforementioned wretches sought after His Light and, out of concern for others, found Him! Yet, as it is written in the four gospels, the Lord did not judge these lowest of the worthless; but, to the contrary, it was a cruel and harsh law within His disciples who judged and condemned them. It is written clearly that instead of these wretches being rebuked by Him, His Glory was charmed to the extent of marveling at their persistence.
As our Lord has immeasurable tolerance for these very least who interfere with His Holy ministry, therefore, the people too are empowered by natural right to intervene into the affairs of lessor governments. Any attempt to manipulate these natural rights away from the people shall be judged contempt and considered to be the most serious of offenses tantamount to stumbling up the children of God.
As all should know better, let us now consider ourselves held to a higher reward and to a greater penalty under the Light of Truth.
Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins
Part II.
The Truest of Dichotomies
 |
| Left or Right of Middle |
 |
| To the Left or Right of Middle |
< Moderate >
Middle
I. The One True Dichotomy
When we focus our attention upon what is the truest of dichotomies, many deceptive faulty-dichotomies become exposed. This most virtuous political spectrum, of which a model of it is depicted above, slices reality into an eternal ongoing conflict between that of a formal king at one extreme end of a scale and of an informal wretch at the other extreme end of it.
II. They are not opposite, but inverse
At one end of the model, either towards the left or right side of it, is a blessed king. Meanwhile, towards the other side, also either the left or right side, is positioned a cursed wretch as his exact inverse. Therefore, as the king is rational knowing much, the wretch on the other side is irrational knowing little. As the king benefits by owning every piece of property and all possessions upon that property; meanwhile, the wretch is just the inverse owning nothing. As he is sovereign, so she is a criminal trespasser. As he possesses immunity in all matters, she is condemned. As the wretch is at a disadvantaged having to resort to learning how to prostitute herself, the king is privileged having received ample amounts of training in how to prostitute others.
III. Being inverse, the two sides of this political spectrum are a perversity to each other.
Moreover, while the worst decisions made by the king are accepted as wisdom, so the best decisions made by the wretch are considered foolish. Pertaining to those remaining people living between the two extremes within what is the moderate middle of the spectrum, there are at least three types of rational thought. These three are expressed as the sophist, the philosopher, and the bully.
The eloquent sophist is rational because he or she are masters in the art of oratory debate. They perform their skill in front of audiences entertaining them concerning the question of the truth and demonstrations of how such a virtue is impossible to know. He or she substantiates this conclusion by arguing both sides of a topic spending half their time presenting one point of view and afterwards, perhaps after taking a break, spending the other half presenting the opposing point of view. Granted, as the ultimate Truth is an infinite measure of all of eternity and as such a place would be unapproachable to us, the rational argument made by the sophist does have some validity.
The second type of people within the moderate middle are the philosophers. Like the sophists, they too are rational. While acknowledging the validity of the sophist argument, by utilizing the skills of reading and writing, they venture even further by training their minds in the discipline of truth engines. Indeed, these philosophers develop rational processes in which raw informal knowledge is collected and inputted for the purpose of reducing a large quantity of data down to smaller more formal qualitative outputs of truth. So, while it is a fact that one can't arrive at an absolute Truth by the use of truth engines -- which is the argument of the sophist, it is quite possible for one to arrive at quality best-principled statements. In other words, because the paths created by these truth engines travel in a general direction of the overall Truth, they possess virtue.
The third type of rational people are the bullies. They are deemed rational by the position of their births. To put it simply, the bullies are sovereign by inheritance. Society either chooses to respect the rationale of these bullies or else there will be consequences. Any disagreement gets overpowered quickly by them.
Of the three types of rational people depicted above, the bullies have always remained somewhat of a mystery. Indeed, because they have always been feared by the masses, the many writers and orators of the past have had to avoid making direct references to them. A paradox exists involving these bullies. While on one hand we need to be practical utilizing laws in the government as a necessary tyranny, on the other it is impossible to control ourselves by pointless changes brought about by the endless legislation of laws. However, rather than choose a platonic best-principled middle ground between these two extremes, we can't help but be the animals we are after all invariably resigning ourselves to a state of perpetual abuse. In turn, by utilizing the false powers of manipulation, the alphas are able to maintain society in a chronic state of irrationality.
As the manipulative false powers are expressed as faulty dichotomies, the faulty dichotomies themselves are disinformation. To understand the difference between misinformation and disinformation, while misinformation are lies perpetuated by the state for reasons deemed to be in the best interest of the people, disinformation is information given justifying those lies told. In other words, while misinformation deals with the deception of others, disinformation deals more with the deceiving of oneself. While misinformation is deceit caused by the deliberate propagation of untruths, disinformation is self-deception caused by the over indulging in the fraudulent dichotomies. These fraudulent dichotomies are intoxicating. Indeed, they work to poison both the bullies in charge of the state and those under their rule. This is why a bully can't see his or her conscience even when light has been shown unto them.
The different kinds of fraudulent dichotomies are most oftentimes expressed as conflicts between male and female. Understand, in the narrowed dichotomy expressed at the beginning of this essay, the ongoing conflict depicted is not between a male and a female. Indeed, a man can live wretched just as a woman can rule over her children as a king. Other than male versus female, some of the other fraudulent dichotomies to be wary of are white versus black, youth against the elderly, poor competing economically with the rich, and on and on endlessly. Simply put, a house of cards has been manufactured upon a foundation of fraudulent dichotomies. Yet, the bullies feel justified today in spreading misinformation among the people because disinformation has deceive them into believing that they will avoid one day having to stand under the Light of Truth. Yet, these false powers of manipulation do stumble up the people by distracting their focus away from the one truest of dichotomies. Again, the model dichotomy depicted above is the truest of them all as it depicts what has long been an eternal conflict between a king of the highest rank and a wretch of the lowest.
IV. The Fleeing Elite are made up of the royal family and those who support them
To enjoy an unfair advantage within the marketplace, the fleeing elites utilize their political influence to avoid definition. Indeed, the better defined a social function is, the more efficient and economical it becomes to society. Much to their benefit, as the king and his or her supporting tyranny have managed to avoid having their roles defined clearly in society, so has the character of the lowly wretch remained a mystery as well. This is because society has always sliced reality into just two classifications of a master-class and a slave-class. However, upon closer examination, reality reveals the existence of a third class. These three classes as a whole are a class of masters, a class of slaves, and a class of outcasts. While the master class has long exploited the slave class, in turn, those two together as a society have exploited yet another class of outcast. As a master class props up a king, so, at the other inverse side, a slave class expels an outcast wretch from society.
V. As the king is the master at one end of the political spectrum, the wretch is the outcast at the other.
Metaphorically, the wretch is the very least rated among three types of prostituted. These three types are a master wife, a slave commoner, and an outcast wretch. Among these three, the highest rated is the master wife. Being highly valued, she is a woman who is rated worthy enough to sleep with the king. The second highest rated of these prostitutes is the slave commoner. While she is not rated worthy enough to sleep in the bed of the king, her life will be spared by him as long as she is willing to kneel in his presence. Finally, the lowest rated of the prostituted is the wretch. She has been outcast by the king and from his kingdom even to the extent that she will be killed on sight.
Compared to the wretch, the king is divided into two types. These two are a great Son-of-God and a least Son-of-man. As he would be born of a king, a Son of God is renowned and intimately known possessing a namesake. The fearful people honor a Son of God treating his princely social status as greater in status than even his own father the king. In contrast to a Son of God, a Son of man is a stranger. As a Son of God is the offspring of a king, A son of man is the offspring of a wretch. In contrast to how a Son of God is praised, a son of man is shown disdain and treated less than his nameless and faceless parents. Quite paradoxical, as the term "God" denotes an intimate classification, the term "man" is impersonal. As a person's face represents their authority, so a king's face is majestic. In contrast, a wretch has no face. As it is with dogs, a wretch is recognized by her behind. Indeed, dogs do recognize each other by sniffing their behinds. However, as she isn't even valued for her behind, a wretch is rated even less than a dog.

VI. The Wretch's Warning
The voice of the most worthless wretch might warn us to neither speak in fear nor to act in a threatening manner. For, as she knows only too well, such unwise behavior will only serve in getting us a beating on every level of society. Indeed, a bully is like a lion devouring what he fears and consuming what is a threat to his domain. Like the wretch, except for our inborn natural rights, we should be silent possessing little else. As there exists no such right as a legal one, at the same time, such concocted rights dilute the power of our in-born natural rights.
In the end, the ultimate power is in the Truth. In establishing the truest of dichotomies above all others, we can slice reality forming a distinction between what is in the best interest of the king and what is the Civil Purpose of the wretch and her prerequisite right to advance them on a level which is exponential.
VII. Rejecting the legislation of effectual change just for the sake of effectual change
To ordain a whole new order, our Founding Fathers reduced and refined towards a golden natural law. This formal act of theirs was in opposition to the traditional way of ordainment which, based on the legal precedence of the Old World, required that they crown a new king. Indeed, in submitting to such a rule, our Founders could have lived the life of Lords. After all, under the laws of Old World legal precedence, they had every justification in their doing so as conquerors. Instead, they chose to function intimately among the people -- of, by, and for as Abraham Lincoln once so elegantly described this action of theirs -- for the purpose of addressing any future threat from tyrants and tyrannies. As they stood reverent upon a mighty foundation constructed by their own ancestors, they made a precious alteration to it. As they did so, they stood under threat of penalty from his judgment being mindful of His possible divine providence moving against them. Furthermore, they had both, of their own free wills, signed their names against the rightful rule of a king and taken a sacred oath against his best interest. Indeed, rather than they cower and continue to perpetuate the same old tyranny, they took a thoughtful step forward narrowing with the declaration that:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
VIII. The greatest of benefits are derived from the most precious of alterations.
Indeed, all our ancestors grieved mightily braving the same great darkness before perishing for our sake. While we can revere them all today by focusing a gentle eye upon the one truest of dichotomies; so, we should be wary with our other more subtle eye keeping watchful vigilance for the faulty dichotomies. As the vain legislation of effectual change continues to scatter our inheritance, desperation has led our hearts to seeking to salvage what we most treasure. As the same is true among every soul, concerning the valuable documents that we inherited from our Founders, so we should never make an alternation beyond what is deemed most crucial. As already stated, our Founding Fathers once acted out a little masterpiece on our behalf. During their performance, they were burdened to the extent of throwing off their rightful statuses as high ranking gentlemen in British Society. Even beyond that, in order to divorce us from tyranny, they were willing to suffer the impoverished consequences caused by fighting a war and, thus, cutting our new nation from the Old World economy. As our desperate Founders narrowed thoughtfully to what they once most treasured, so do We the People today reject every faulty dichotomy for the truest of one.
As our Founders once declared, so we also declare that all men are born equal -- whether they be the highest of kings or the lowest of wretches -- with each possessing in their beings the same exact business agenda for Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.
No hay comentarios.:
Publicar un comentario