Mary, the mother of Jesus, was an outcast. Joseph, the step-father of Jesus, was a convert over to the side of Mary. Jesus Himself was the "Son of Man."
Mary wasn't even considered a prostitute by tyranny, but was considered even less of a person as a prostitute represents the lowest form of a slave. Instead, Mary was a wretch.
Three classes of women in society:
Woman: This person is worthy enough to be slept with by a king.
Prostitute: This person is worthy enough to kneel before a king.
Wretch: This person is condemned to death by the king.
When king Herod committed infanticide by sentencing every first born to be put to death, he sentenced both Mary and Joseph to also being put to death by the people themselves, the parents of many first born.
Okay, think of mankind as a factory and the wretch as its highest quality product. Indeed, the ministry of Jesus increased immeasurably whenever a lowly wretch preached the gospel to Him. This is why it is important for government to take care of the nameless and faceless by narrowing their authority to operate under His commandment that "You give them something to eat!" Under the Light of the Truth, there will be no forgiveness for allowing the people to starve even in the most desolate of places.
As Mary herself was an untouchable wretch who was hated and despised by tyranny, Joseph was a convert who chose to serve by her side as a converted step-father.
Therefore, in the New World, water should be thicker than blood, just as, with great risk, Joseph served future generations unto eternity.
As Joseph was an ideal step father, Christ was the perfect Step Son. As a stepchild, Christ referred to Himself as the Son of Man. This means that He was the very least one born from among the most worthless. This is why Peter's response that Jesus was supreme declaring Him to be the Son of the Living God so surprised and caused Him to rejoice. As a Son of God would be considered an offspring who is greater than God Himself, in contrast, the Son of Man, a nameless and faceless classification in comparison, would be considered an offspring who is lessor than the most worthless.
Fallacy 2:
Metaphorically speaking, there was a time not so very long ago when tyranny would have us fixing our roofs inside the house from beneath the ceiling working from the bottom up. While it is possible, with lots of determination, to repair a leaky roof in such a fashion, unfortunately, a legal precedent of how not to go about doing something had become, over a lengthy period of time, a long standing tradition. So, doing nothing at times can actually be more productive than doing something. Complicating matters, again with this being part of the metaphor provided above, when their own roofs would start leaking, the rulers themselves issued legal decrees with these being "fiat" type make-it-so commandments to have whole new houses built for them. So, for a very long time, the philosophical notion of best-principled "form" of "what is a leaky roof" and "what is the best way to fix it" never had to be considered. These types of persecutions happened in a quite casual fashion as no alternate points of view ever existed challenging them.Fallacy 1: Tyranny isn't made up of only two parts of a master class ruling over a slave class, but it is three parts made up of what has already been mentioned above while both the master and slave classes together as society exert persecution upon another class of outcast untouchables even to the extent of death. So, the minority who needs protection isn't the slave class, but the class that is being persecuted by this two-party system.
The idea of "Formal Knowledge" was introduced by the ancient philosopher Plato with the intentions of being conveyed many years later to posterity which includes the modern audiences of today. Indeed, he had to write and perform his dialogues deceptively expressing their meaning below the conscience of tyranny. Perhaps attempting to lead the Greeks away from religious folly, with this being the godhood their underlying economy was based upon (imagine trying to ban both Santa Claus and Christmas?), Plato described a huge gray area of virtue, high quality truths existing between the two far extremes of what was the unapproachable Truth, and what was no Truth, as the Sophists themselves believe no such virtue even existed. His "theory of the forms" helped further define terms philosophically by creating endless relationships between what were the lessor informal ideas relative to the greater formal ones, helping form points of views of the issues being discussed.
In other words, it wasn't that Plato disagreed with the point the eloquent Sophists were making regarding the lack of any truth; rather, he went a full step further by arguing it was possible to obtain a certain degree of virtue by utilizing such truth-engines as inductive, best-principled, and deductive reasoning. In the writing of The Declaration of Independence, our Founders utilized all of these methods.
Oddly, when they were given the chance, our rational Founders didn't abolish tyranny, but utilized it as a necessary tyranny in later forming "a more perfect Union." For, as they declared in our nation's collective oath of independence, we aren't here to be responsible and equal people primarily; rather, we are here for contentment's sake on an exponential scale. In other words, in order to keep smiles on their faces, the minds of children must be in a constant state of advancement. If those smiles ever disappeared veiling their face with darkness, then mothers would perceive immediately a problem. This is why, in the United States, such virtues as freedom and equality shouldn't be considered ends to a mean, but means-to-an-end prerequisites necessary for achieving an exponential contentment. This quest wasn't meant by our Founders to be a tremendous burden placed upon those in government, but, as the American Movement has determined over time, a call for them to limit the size of government.
Indeed, in the endeavor of fixing a leaky roof correctly, less government will always lead to the most efficient way of doing the job.
In separating the American people from the Old World, our Founders chose not to do it in the legal customary way; rather, they refrained from doing anything first in a formal way by utilizing the scientific method of Natural Law in divorcing the people justifiably from tyranny. In this way, they avoided committing promiscuity. Only after this divorce was signed by our Founders holding each to a higher standard and to a greater penalty under God's judgement did they then set about doing something - tending to the task of remarrying us to a "more perfect Union."
We Took a Step Backwards Adopting a Two - Party System
Following their establishing this new Union with the instituting of the U.S. Constitution, our Founding Fathers seemed rather perplexed by the rapid creation of a two-party political system soon after. It is almost as if after all the tremendous effort they had exerted shutting out tyranny, a gust of wind blew through at the last moment forcing the door ajar just enough to allow much of it back in. Unfortunately, as it is now sapping our nation of everything green and fruitful, this hybrid two-party system has grown into an out of control weed overshadowing every ray of hope from our Founder's age of Enlightenment. As many modern Americans would mislead us into believing, with most of these being lawyers, this contempt committed against the people's Civil Purpose wasn't a major set to worry about, no, not at all; but, rather, this quick sucker punch to the gut of the people was actually a good thing - bad tasting like medicine it might be - as a great advancement over the U.S. Constitution! Yet, as the two - party system functions today, it is stumbling up the children of God dividing them into many parts, instigating strife and inequality among their ranks, and benefiting parasitically off them by turning the whole inward against itself.
To recover from this present corruption, a pause is needed to mediate on the new order our Founders established under our feet. As, in the Old World, the law itself was the order of tyranny; much to the contrary, in the New World, our Founders established a whole new order as a new foundation before new laws were then erected upon it. In the process, this abolished the tyranny of the Old World, those legal precedents that persecuted the people, replacing that with a positive New World government; one that was instituted of men, by men, and for men.
From forever beforehand, to the early ancient founders of
Ancient Greece, to our American Founding Fathers of today
Ancient Greece, to our American Founding Fathers of today
During the time of Socrates, there were three types of intellectuals: the Sophists, the Philosophers, and the All Knowers. As the Sophists argued rather eloquently on both sides of an argument for the purpose of proving that no such virtue as the truth existed, the philosophers argued that greater virtues could indeed be obtainable ed by the utilization of truth engines, inductive and deductive reasoning for example. In the case of the All Knowers, those blessed born of the ruling class, it was understood that they, being born royal, knew everything in a bullying sort of way or else there would be hell to pay.
1) What is "Recollection?"
The soul was a magical kind of essence that waked a person in the morning. It made the heart beat. It caused blood to squirt out of a body after it was severely injured. As each soul itself was born from another soul, so, every soul must have originated from one primary Soul. Was it any wonder that Socrates would ponder as to why one soul would be born to appear so different from another soul? For example, while a majestic king would grow up to sit upon a throne having most every function concerning his survival performed for him, a worthless prostitute would grow up to do tedious tasks such as walking everyday a good distance down to the banks of a river to retrieve buckets of water.
According to Socrates, whose mother served as a midwife to poor pregnant women, while every soul was once exactly the same knowing everything there was to know, they were born diverse into this world because of the trauma each had to suffer at birth. Each soul forget different amounts of knowledge depending on varying degrees of suffering. Therefore, if each of these traumatized souls were to be served by a kind of midwife philosopher such as himself, in time, they could then be taught to learn how to "recollect" that knowledge they once knew.
2) Not Law and Form, but Law versus Form
Very enlightened by Socrates, Plato the student advanced to pondering the existence of a formal, deeper Beauty in life as opposed to the more informal, shallower kinds of beauty that existed. He envisioned having beautiful laws as something greater than having laws themselves. He wondered if having a beautiful government was possible of the kinds which went beyond the corrupt ways they had always functioned in the past to working on the side of the people in making them happier - the idea of positive government! Again, using the king and the prostitute as an example here, as the high king would have lots of small informal problems challenging him everyday, the lowly prostitute would have one big formal Problem burdening her.
As her soul is distracted inwardly, this masks the fact that both the souls of the king and the prostitute are exactly equal.
3) The left and right dichotomy of the Golden Mean
Aristotle had good intentions in developing his political model "The Golden Mean." Very much distorted today from what Aristotle intended, he meant to use the model to depict the Greek people as left and right, conservative and liberal extremists in their views in hopes that they would be persuaded to think in a more centered, compromising, and moderate way.
To preserve the New World today, we need to abolish this Old World political spectrum that originated from Aristotle. In its place, we should now depict a new American political spectrum by the placement of a king, the same figure I used above as an example, enthroning him at one far end of this new model, either on the left or right side of it as such a designation is no longer going to apply in this case. As his inverse or perverse, we should next place the figure of a homeless prostitute on the other end. Next, while the term "Law" should be written under the enthroned king, the term "Form" should be written under the lowly figure of a homeless prostitute on the other far end of the scale.
In other words, as not a lot of thought goes into using either of the words today, the meanings of each become clearer when they are understood to be in conflict.
As the American people were once made to suffer from the "laws" of a tyrant who resided too great of a distance away to rule responsibly, our Founders responded by utilizing "form" to divorce us justly out from under the prior traditions of legal precedence (persecutions).
Again, metaphorically speaking, while in the Old World it was always deemed that commoners could only fix their roofs from the bottom up, our Founding Fathers used "form" to find a "best-principled" way of going about it. In the end, the American people were given the authority to fix their roofs from the top down.
We don't live in a legal nation, but a formal nation.
Indeed, as aforementioned, during the time of our Founding Fathers, both the legal precedence of law and the formal scientific method of Natural Law were processes blessed by the church. So, instead of utilizing the method of legal precedence, as was the standard practice of that time, when they set about creating a whole new nation; instead, our Founders utilized the alternate method of Natural Law. In this way, they found justification for divorcing us out from under the rule of tyranny. This action then justified them in proceeding with remarrying us to a more perfect Union.
Therefore, we don't live within a legal nation today as is the case with others living in nations of the Old World; but, we live in a formal nation of the New World. While it was justified for a person to be persecuted by legal precedence in the Old World, our Founders utilized the scientific method of Natural Law to abolish those sufferings. Indeed, our government today is a "more perfect Union," with the intentions here being a necessary tyranny, or a kind of government which today is ideally able to forever perfect itself.
So, love thy neighbor as thyself. Indeed, don't come out fighting with blind courage and hatred, but step forth into the light as a guard in faith and love. For they surely are trying to divide us today just as a wise pimp will at times deem it in the best interests of all to do the same with his prostitutes, attempting to manufacture our consent, in coaxing one side into attacking the other side. As has always been the case in the past, having succeeding in dividing us, tyranny will have established justification in attacking the whole body.
Being converts over to the side of the disadvantaged, as members who have determined to switch fighting the much more difficult and uphill battle against a leisure class, tyrants who have the benefit of the high ground, we can't afford any wasted motion. Indeed, as, on one hand, we are constantly shamed from finding the courage to face our fears, on the other, it is always going to be the Truth within that sets us free. So, in opening our eyes in faith today to see what is happening around us, while fewer and fewer of the able bodied among us are now being deployed by tyranny in their traditional, long established precedence of confusing, manipulating, exploiting, and humiliating the disadvantaged into submission, even fewer of the disadvantaged themselves are now being put to work gainfully employed.
In other words, concerning the endeavor of business at its very worst, always remember how it never takes more than a specialized corp of a few "pimps" to control, in calling tyranny for what it is, a multitude of many "whores."
One might wonder why all this evil is even happening. Well, firstly, our leaders have become drunkards intoxicated by the false powers of manipulation. As such, they rule with no conscience which makes them an enemy of God. Second, as has always been the case in history, the ultimate quest of every tyranny is to revert back to the pleasure principle: backsliding unto the state of constant drunkenness, unto the business of warmongering, and unto the reconstituting of those darkest of times back when many poor young ladies and small boys were made to be imprisoned within secret harems and forced to serve the sexual appetites of rich old men.
And what more might there be of this truth? Well, as aforementioned, when our Founders established our new *formal nation justifying it by the utilization of the scientific method of natural law, they managed a way of freeing the people by divorcing them from the prior legal precedence of the Old World. In succeeding, they drove a wedge between what, on the right side, has become a more perfect Union of today and, on the wrong side, what is now considered unacceptable organized crime committed in contempt of the people and the advancement of their Civil Purpose. In other words, prior to our Founding Fathers, both the royal government ruling rightfully over Americans and the insidious organized crime taking advantage of them were both one in the same.
Indeed, after all the pain, the effort, and the suffering endured by the disadvantaged in their eternal efforts not to destroy, but to control tyranny, our hard-fought-for nation was taken away during its infancy and reorganized into a false dichotomy of the two-party system, a process which, as noted above, was instituted out of greed from the prior Old World with little thought. This evil has so fully corrupted today that even illegal aliens crossing over our borders have been misled into supposing that the greatest aspect about these United States was never meant to be the abilities of its nameless and faceless, but of the government meant to serve them.
(As you now know this, so, consider yourselves held to a higher standard and to a greater penalty under the Light of the Truth.)
This kind of disillusionment would imply that most believe our Union isn't any more special of a Democratic Republic than are the other lessor nations residing outside of our borders, and that the monumental work performed in the past by our Founding Fathers was no more significant than any of the other supremacist kinds of nationalistic achievements by those founders in other supposed great nations. And, in turn, that our Union today isn't any different than any other collection of states that also think of themselves as the greatest in the world, and who also believe, for the same material reason many disillusioned in this nation do, that that greatness was achieved as a result of an elite class of leaders, of lawyers, of business executives, of doctors, of teachers, and so on.
Finally, this leads us full circle back to the two-party system as the big lie itself, to a time when things went astray for our Union. And what would arise from this darkened time in our history to challenge this wayward system that has so infected our Union and endangered our Civil-Purpose? Indeed, what process arose from the ashes to bring about a slow recovery lifting these United States back up as a shining beacon among the many other countless political systems that failed? Why, it was the advent of the American Movement! Indeed, the true advancement over the U.S. Constitution arose not as the two-party system, but as the American Movement! This phenomenal happening ushered forth from within the collective conscience of the American people originating fully outside of the two-party political system. The American Movement was also the same kind of solution as were the great achievements of the prior U.S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and The Declaration of Independence. Indeed, just as the above mentioned were never recognized by the British government, the American Movement process today has never been recognized by the official sanctioned state now ruling over us.
The premise of this American Movement should never alter in its focus as the process aids the nameless and faceless in the redeeming of our American souls, leads us to the revering of our Founding Fathers, and to the honoring of the laws and rights these great men assembled in fellowship to establish as lightning in a bottle for future posterity. Indeed, they handed down to us not only the legal documentation that is both the U.S. Constitution and the evocation of our Bill of Rights; but, they also passed down a formal order to us as well that we should all be cherishing today - the natural law they declared and each signed their names to within the formal document of the Declaration of Independence. But beyond even all this, the American Movement has always argued singularly in purpose for the virtue of limiting the size of government. Indeed, when achieving such a circumcised authority, the abilities of the nameless and the faceless shine forth for all the world to see as the one and only true greatness about these United States.
As the children of God today are being stumbled up misled into both hoping unto vain darkness and following after change for-the-sake-of-it, in total opposition, the greatest of benefits have always been and will always be derived from the most precious of alterations. Therefore, to advance ever so slightly beyond that which we have already received as our American inheritance, the people should now commence in prohibiting every kind of attorney from serving in any government within these United States, the district of Columbia, and territories.
From this day on, let every member of our government understand that they are no longer held to be just accountable, but they are now by this proclamation of sovereignty to be held to a greater standard and to a greater penalty under the Light of the Truth.
FD. (Uncle) Emanuel Watkins
**Formal Prime Minister of These United States &
First Attorney to Our Founding Fathers Under the Light of the Truth
*We don't have a legal nation, but a formal one. As every nation prior to ours was created by way of legal precedence, with these being long established traditions of persecutions, our Founding Fathers established a new nation based on the scientific method of National Law. The significance here was how the latter method they utilized, along with legal precedence, was also a process blessed by the church.
**This title of Formal Prime Minister is not to be a legal position created on the side of tyranny, by tyranny, for tyranny, but is now being raised on the side of the people, by the people, for the people.
No hay comentarios.:
Publicar un comentario