In a forever growing government, those without conscience overpower those with conscience; or, why is an ideal communist state really a fascist one?

The best a two-party system can ever achieve is a necessary-evil or a necessary-tyranny.  Beyond that, it is a perpetuated lie.  Indeed, the document of the Declaration of Independence and the documentation of the U.S. Constitution were both unofficial within the Old World as they weren't officially deemed by way of a king's proclamation or blessing.  So too was it the American Movement process that grew out of the people and not the advent of the two-party system that was later concocted by the official necessary tyranny established by our Founders.  Indeed, during the Enlightenment period, our Founding Fathers forsook their rightful titles as gentlemen in British high society to play the part of mere commoner people, acting on our behalf, separating us as a New World from the prior Old, establishing for us an American Civil Purpose.  This whole new order was first declared by them as a natural law within the Declaration of Independence.  Then they later created upon that new order the two documents within the U.S. Constitution, one being their *pronuciation of our Bill of natural rights as warnings made towards all future tyranny - both domestic and foreign - as well as the necessary laws needed to establish a new ideal government as a more perfect Union.  As they were acting of, by, and for as the people and not under the authority of a king, so both the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution should be considered unofficial in its relationship with that of the Old World.

The subtle but significant point being made here is that the two-party system did not usher forth from the people, but from a system concocted in the Old World tyranny.  So, if anything, the two-party system should be considered secondary in importance, a necessary-tyranny at best for the primary purpose of advancing the Civil Purpose of the people, and as a mere means to a greater end.

As did both the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution, what process also ushered out from the people?  It was the American Movement.  And what was the primary conclusion of this American Movement?  A "more perfect Union is best obtained by having the least amount of government possible, by the process of having its authority circucised (reduced) towards what is the most perfect or most ideal.    

So, we have a choice to make between what is the right path and the wrong one.  While the wrong path will lead us towards the two party system and an ever growing government, the right path will lead us towards an ideal circumcised authority.

The wrong path is a perpetual lie set up by two kinds of drunkards who, with both having been intoxicated on the false powers of manipulation, work in unison to usher in a new tyranny.  As the drunkards with a conscience return the people to a government of equality and responsibility, to a new age of social communism, the drunkards without a conscience will then execute and exile the drunkards with a conscience.  In the end, the best an ideal communist state can ever be is really a fascist one governed by conservatives acting out the parts of the caring liberals with a conscience.

Indeed, and where did the conservatives go within the social system after it was set up within the Soviet Union?  Well, being strong and without a conscience, they went straight to the top of the government.  And where did the primary liberals go who were responsible for setting up social system?  You know, the professors, the activists for equality, the homosexuals, and the minorities? Why, they were the ones sent to Siberia where they were executed indirectly by being imprisoned in work camps.

It is both the conservatives and the liberals who usher in social communism.  Afterwards, it is the conservatives who overpower the liberals as they will then run a fascist society masked as a social communist state.

What is the only way to deal with this absurdity?  Well, reduce the size of government.  As Plato might say, circumcision towards what is the ideal man-writ-large.