Finished copy:

The United States should no longer be utilizing that Old World political spectrum developed long ago by Aristotle, a model which has long depicted a homo-social conflict between two sophisticated males of eloquent rhetoric, one depicting the progressive liberal end of the scale and the other the opposite never altering conservative end of it.  Instead, as our Founding Fathers demonstrated the justification for divorcing the American people out from under the rightful rule of a king with the formal document of The Declaration of Independence, we should be utilizing his majestic character today at one far end of a New World spectrum while, at the other end left vacant, we should be inserting his exact inverse, or perverse, with her being a condemned prostitute.

In contrasting these two, as the tyrant king would be blessed at one end of the spectrum, the prostitute would be equally cursed at the other; furthermore, as he would be enthroned as the owner of all property, she would be abandoned as a homeless trespasser; moreover, as he would be the owner of all things, she would be owned by him as his property; and so on.

If this faceless prostitute only had the benefit of legal rights going for her, then she would certainly be lost forever.  Fortunately, our Bill of (natural) Rights within the U.S. Constitution aren't the same as legal or civil rights.

In contrast to a legal civil right, a natural right reduces on the physical level to that of the heart of the collective Soul the effect of it working to empower the nameless and faceless.

Again, in referencing "instituted among men," our Founders were emphasizing the difference between the prior tyranny of yesteryear and that of the positive government we have today.  While the first making up the tyranny were once a minority of a few scheming together for the purpose of maintaining their advantage forever over a disadvantaged majority, the second making up a government instituted among men were a majority made up of many who, after gathering in fellowship for long consideration, decided that it would be best to preserve the threat of tyranny as a necessary-evil in order to further advance the Civil Purpose of all men.

It isn't only those laws written down within the U.S. Constitution by our Founders that empowers, but also those natural laws written down by them as the willful empowerment of the collective Soul of the people.

If ever chosen to serve as the leader of a government, I would have two reasons to ever write something down.  While one would be to write definitively and conclusively as a figurehead of absolute power in order to create laws for the benefit of myself and my own posterity (to the extent of the establishment of a legal dictatorship), the other reason to write something down would be to substantiate the inborn powers of my lessors in order to warn those greater in opposition with them of a further oral declaration of what had just been written under the Light of the Truth - with this being justification for divine intervention by the Almighty Himself.

The second of the two leaders I just depicted would be considered a convert over to the side of the disadvantaged.

In other words, as paradoxical as this might seem, as power is given only to serve, true power isn't in the power itself, but in the threat of coming forth to demonstrate that power.

While the first example of written authority deals with the false powers of manipulation, with those things that we do, the second example of written authority deals with an open ended further warning of a possible divine intervention into the matter by the Almighty, this latter pertaining to the Truth.

Again, in a government instituted among men, if the people are to be included as part of the process of a more perfect Union, then they would need to be empowered in some fashion.  The way our Founding Fathers empowered the people within the U.S. Constitution was by writing down our Bill of Rights not with the original intentions of them being legal or civil rights, but as the natural will of the people as a collective Soul.

To elaborate, if I were to write something down as a legal conclusion either in the dirt or on a piece of paper, such a law would in very short time blow away and whither unto becoming ineffective.  However, if I were to write something regarding the true empowerment of those who are lessor than me with the further threat of orally declaring them such as a right under the Light of the Truth, it becomes a rock solid natural law upon the conscience of tyranny.

Ironically, while the  people will always bicker among themselves as both friend and foe, their true enemy will always be that of the evil of tyranny.  While policies dividing the people against themselves are false dichotomies perpetuated in tempting the involvement of higher authority into the matter, the threat of tyranny alone whether foreign or domestic is the only justification for government involvement.

After all, the reason for marriage isn't to exploit, but to share by lifting the veil off the bride to shine upon her a face of authority.  As it is with the bride, so are the people to be so empowered.

Being much more than just legal documentation, the articles of the Bill of Rights within the U.S. Constitution are justification for the intervention of the Almighty Himself into the affairs of those making up the more perfect Union, with this being a relationship between the empowered people and the necessary tyranny that they have established over themselves in order to advance their Civil Purpose - with this being a warning by our Founding Fathers towards every future tyranny whether domestic or abroad concerning the natural inborn powers inherited by this nations' posterity, rights of which need no legal protection.  This threat by our Founders still exists today against any who would be so foolish as to stumble up the people, the children of God, from advancing their Civil Purpose.

The true empowerment of the homeless prostitute, with her representing the disadvantaged majority, is in our Founders willful writing down of the Bill of Rights within The U.S. Constitution.