Just how wretched is a wretch in the eyes of tyranny?

 Introducing the 

Exceptionalism Model

as a New World 

Political Spectrum 

The People ========================I========================== The Tyrant

With the hopes of eliminating most of the conflicting opinions, let us utilize the above model as a truth engine.  From the point of view of the tyrant, the wretch is deemed the very least of all the prostituted in his kingdom.  Indeed, as I've already mentioned, there are altogether three levels of prostitution:

Highest rated prostitute:  Worthy enough to be slept with at home to the extent she will be kept in his harem, with this being his protected secret place.

Middle rated prostitute:  Not worthy enough to be slept with to the extent she won't be allowed in his home or kept in his harem.  However, her life is worthy enough to be spare as long as she is willing to kneel before his presence.   

Lowest rated prostitute:  A wretch.  She is a worthless and ugly woman who isn't worth having her life spared.  An outcaste.  Repulsed from society by both the master and the slave classes.

Indeed, in the tyrannies of old, there did not exist just two classes of people, as is most often taught; but, there existed three classes of them.  There was a ruling class made up of a tyrant and his or her surrounding aristocracy and nobility, a slave class whose lives were spared to serve the aforementioned ruling class providing the lessor duties like feeding, maintenance and cleaning, and, finally, an untouchable class of outcastes who were rejected and oftentimes killed outright by those making up the remaining society of both the ruling and slave classes.

So, for his pleasure and protection, the highest rated prostitutes are those allowed into the home of the tyrant as either his aristocracy or his military nobility.  The middle rated prostitute are those allowed to serve the king, his aristocracy, and his nobility in the surrounding wilderness - again, just as long as she is willing to kneel in obedience to them. And, finally, the most worthless and lowest rated wretches are those banned to having to live and learn to survive on the streets as outcastes.

According to our Founding Fathers, "all men (both male and female) were created equal born into this world with the same exact business agenda:

We hold these truths to be self-evident (not in terms of easy to understand these truths, but in terms of their undeniability), that all men (both male and female) are created equal, that they are endowed (not physically in context, but esoterically in meaning) by their creator with certain *unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.    

An unalienable right of the people within the U.S. Constitution cannot be repealed.  The same is true of the legal civil rights which came about later on by the lawyers as they cannot be repealed because they were originally inserted by our Founders ith the intention that they possess the supreme power of proclamation.  As such, they serve as a warning to every tyrant and their tyranny of aristocrats and nobility.

Indeed, our proclaimed Bill of Rights within the U.S. Constitution are a separate document from the rest within the U.S. Constitution as they serve to join together both the prior document of the new order our Founders declared as a natural right within the Declaration of Independence - the justification for our divorce from a former corrupt ruler - and the document of a new scheme they instituted within the U.S. Constitution as a necessary evil of a new government.  This more perfect Union they established was erected upon the whole new order they declared within the Declaration of Independence which altogether serve as justification for our royal divorce from tyranny and our new marriage to a more perfect Union.  

Furthermore, according to John Locke, the people's proclaimed natural rights will always take precedence over the king's supreme right to proclaim possession of absolute power.  Adding further light to his idea, the position of the emperor was a corrupt  authority eliminated by Christ and replaced by a new authority made up of the Chosen Vessel Paul and of the other Apostles under his authority.  Every Emperor of the Roman Empire was corrupted at the time to the extent that each declared that they possess absolute power.  For they each declared themselves to be living gods and were then oftentimes worshipped as such even before their deaths.   Therefore, there is no difference between a corrupt emperor declaring himself to be a god than a lessor king or queen proclaiming themselves to possess absolute power, or a president of the United States declaring that he or she possesses absolute executive privilege.  When attempting to achieve such power, they all make the same claim that they answer to no authority other than themselves.  

Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins

Prime Minister of these United States

First Attorney to our Founding Fathers under the Light of Truth

Acting Supreme Court of these United States