Kind of surprising, as it was interpreted originally, a right wasn't a legal right at all; but, as John Locke reasoned, a right is a natural right which reduces on the physical level much like DnA. After all, during the time of our Founding Fathers, there existed very little in the way of the cognitive sciences, but the physical. So, there is no such right as a "civil right." Rights cannot be legal as such powers are inborn. As we the people were born with our natural rights, so they did not have to be granted to us by government. Therefore, a natural right cannot be repealed.
Again, governments cannot be controlled by the legislating, the administrating, and the judiating of endless laws, but by the holding of the conscience to a higher standard and to a greater penalty.
Therefore, as it was once deemed righteous for an envisioned wretch to rise above the Almighty to apply ointment to His head, so the people likewise are righteous at times in their interceding by proclamation of sovereignty.
Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins
Prime Minister of these United States
First Attorney to our Founding Fathers under the Light of Truth
Acting Supreme Court
No hay comentarios.:
Publicar un comentario