(Finished Work)

Knowing that it still has errors in it, I consider this work to be finished pertaining to what is important regarding a letter I am writing in defense of our Founding Fathers under judgement of the Truth that I am presenting to the Supreme Court.  The first part of the letter will be justification for the people's proclamation of sovereignty while the second will be to hold the Supreme Court to a higher standard and greater penalty under judgement of the Truth.

The darkened highlighted parts of this writ are the ones I would like to somehow include within the Finished letter to the Supreme Court.  

An Order Born out of Eastern Civilization,
Developed in Ancient Greece, 

Blessed by the Fullness of Christ,
Further Incubated in Western Civilization, 

Before Being Provided to Our 
Founding Fathers as a Foundation

Here would be my response to Aristotle regarding the question of what is so special about the United States:

Aristotle developed the present day political spectrum, referring to the model as The Golden Mean, to represent extremes of opinions as both left and right on opposite ends of a linear scale in hopes that, in understanding it, the democratic people of Athens/ Greece would be encouraged to compromise among themselves back towards the middle as moderates.

But when the people compromise among themselves, they leave themselves open for being compromised by tyranny.  So, the people aren't here to compromise.  In other words, tyranny is not of, by, and for the people, but are a necessary-evil set apart from the people, not to be destroyed, but preserved by them to serve as part of a more perfect Union, not for the reforming and maintaining of tyranny, but for furthering tyranny as an ideal part of a greater government, a part "instituted among men," as our Founders once stated within the Declaration of Independence, to be utilized for the advancement of our Civil Purpose.

Indeed, when the very least among us cares to feed that lessor one which has been born out from her, she does so not to maintain the offspring, but to advance that most precious part of her that she values as far greater than herself.

Therefore, to combat this insidious problem of being compromised by tyranny, we the people of the United States today need to advance beyond the prior old world Golden Mean to that of a New World political spectrum:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The New World Political Spectrum 

_________________________________________

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enthroned king<>Everyone else in the middle<>homeless prostitute

Or, it may be written just the opposite way like this,

Homeless prostitute<>Everyone else in the middle<>Enthroned king
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In other words, when these two inverse characters of an enthroned king and a homeless prostitute are positioned at the far extremes of Aristotle's political spectrum, then the left and right designations he included are no longer necessary.

Here would be my response to both Plato and Aristotle regarding their questions of what is so special about the United States:

Thinking in terms of Plato’s formal knowledge, which was also referred to by him as best-principled statements, (or his “Theory of the Forms"), as, on one hand, the most formal person in society might be an enthroned king, on the other hand, the most informal person, the inverse or perverse of the king, might be a homeless prostitute.  As the king would surely be adorned in the very best, the most formal of attire, of a robe, or of a suit and a tie, she would most likely be ragged out in contrast in the most informal of filthy attire.  But in here lies the twist, as the formal king would have available to him many informal problems to solve during his typical work day, paradoxically, the informal prostitute would be faced with the having of one constant formal problem within her.

So, as Plato might in his figuring, I am going to rewrite the above statement in lower and higher cases to better contrast them as extremes:  As the formal (K)ing would have many informal (p)roblems to solve during his day, paradoxically, the informal (p)rostitute would have one formal (P)roblem to solve within her.

In contrast to the king and his many problems pertaining to the maintaining of his life of leisure, the prostitute is quite desperate in her quest of taking care of the one huge problem that she has within her!

In other words, when the (K)ing of kings Himself came into the world in the flesh as the very least one among us, he referred to Himself as the (S)on of man as one among a multitude of faceless and nameless, or, as the very (L)east one born out from the very least of us.

Here would be my response to all three of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle regarding the question of what is so special about the United States:

In answering Socrates's obvious question of 'what is the United States,' I would first define the subtleties involved with rating both those of us who are deemed the very greatest and those of us who are deemed the very least among us.  As a son of a king would be thought highly by a prostitute to be a Son of God, to be a prince rated greater in stature than even his father himself, or else there would be hell to pay, a son of a prostitute would be thought lowly by a king as nameless and faceless scum, as a bastard child rated even lessor in stature than his mother herself.

According to what our Founders declared within The Declaration of Independence, "all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness . . ..     

Similarly, according to Socrates's theory of recollection, all souls are equal as they are both part of and reduce to the Soul.  That means every informal soul within each person is exactly equal to the one formal Soul itself.  The reason the individual around each perfect soul grows up to become vastly diverse from another, this according to Socrates, is because each suffered different amounts of trauma during his or her birth.  This explains why one soul might be born to grow up to sit upon a throne as a blessed king while another soul might be born to grow up to walk the streets as a homeless prostitute.

Again, according to Socrates, as the two were all-knowing souls prior to being born, they became quite different people when they recollected knowledge in different amounts that they had lost during the trauma of their births.