A Message Empowering the People 
written by FD. Uncle Emanuel Watkins
The First Attorney to our Founding Fathers Under Judgement of the Truth and, 
in Being the First to Serve Them as Such, The Formal Prime Minister of these United States

As a young man in my teens, I can remember one day asking my dad one of those very important questions regarding ethics and virtue.  My question pertained to Adolph Hitler and whether or not he was truly the evil man that history had painted him out to be.

Kind of shocked at my question, my dad at first qualified himself by providing the quick and legal answer dictated by society that Adolph Hitler was indeed an evil man.  He then spent many years after that giving a pain staking, careful, and more formal type of answer that altered greatly from the social norm.

The point I am trying to make here is how people today aren't free to think for themselves just as we weren't free to think in the past.  To respond by thinking in legal terms is not thinking, but is conforming.  Still, such behavior is an absolute must as we all have to be careful about how we think juggling back and forth between both that of legal conformity and the more thoughtful formal process in order to survive.  Just consider how Confucius, Socrates, and even the Lord Jesus Christ Himself all had to be very careful with what they said.  Plato, a student of Socrates, had more liberty to elaborate because, when any questions were raised pertaining to his behavior, he could blame it all on his teacher who he always utilized as the main character in his dialogues, and, I might add, had already been silenced choosing a sentence of death over permanent banishment from Athens.   Similarly, when writing the Revelations of the Lord Jesus Christ, the Apostle John had to write it in code to keep those in the Roman Empire from trashing it.

As we don't elect our leaders on a formal level but on the legal, meaning that for the love of money we don't put much thought into the electoral process, once again, for the sake of proficiency, limiting the size of government becomes an absolute American necessity.

Think about what I am saying here.  A politician is never going to warn people that it isn't  in their best interest to vote for him or her.  Likewise, a professor isn't going to teach his or her students to be careful about accepting what they are being taught.

As those on top of society have better capacity and leisure time to behave natural, meanwhile, as extensive research into the evolutionary biology of nature has proven, every animal is both a predator looking to eat smaller and less intelligent prey, while they are also prey looking to avoid being eaten by other bigger and more intelligent predators.

So, as we people too are human animals, just what predator is looking to feast upon us?  This is an easy question to answer as our Founding Fathers once declared our enemy to be tyranny.  And just who make up this collective tyranny?  Why, it is those legal ones who are telling you what you want to hear, enticing you to walk into a trap, and claiming to you that it is safe to do so.  They are also the ones throwing our attention off from themselves by accusing other tyrants of being the predators we should be watchful of.

Being wise to the subtle ways of evil, our Founders would address the question of who is a tyrant and tyranny with the answer:  "Why," they'd reply back while thinking about such people as king George and those akin to him within the royal family, "he or she is always going to be the most well mannered and nicest people you will ever meet in your life."

How can we avoid being exploited by such cool and smooth predators?   Well, as we can't avoid having to think in superficial legal terms, once again, our best option is for us to limit the size of government.

So, to be an American is to be bipartisan concerning limiting the size of government.

This has nothing to do with being smart and exercising self control for we can all find places to hide in order to think in a deeper more formal fashion.  Problem is, the best fit people to govern over us, those born with a God given love for the people, have all perished to insignificance within what amounts \to a legal body.  In other words, those best fit for government rarely get elected into office.  Indeed, the ones who are best fit might be the very same ones walking the streets, might be criminals in prison, all angels in society brought to their knees.

In here lies the answer.  For, you see, a vote to limit the size of government is a vote for those who have perished to insignificance, those best suited to govern, with them being shepherding types of thinkers; moreover, by limiting government, we delegate most of the responsibility of government back to those best suited to govern, with these being those I like to fallen angels, those who would be empowered to lift themselves and society up and off our knees.

So, we should never vote on the person as such action is always childish on a superficial legal level.  Instead, once again, we should vote on the more mature formal level which involves limiting the size of government.  Again, don't allow yourselves to be fooled into voting for a person, but always vote for limiting the size of what should become more of an outward ceremonial government.  In this way, the true government, the one which has been made to perish lost among the people, can better gain control.

I warn you about this as your true Prime Minister of these United States.  Remember that we aren't north and south; that we aren't east and west; that we aren't industrial versus agricultural; that we aren't separate Federal Reserve banking districts; and that we aren't divided into one premium Federal district, lessor districts of states, and even more inferior districts of territories.  All these fallacies are just wishful dreaming by a butcher!

For the sake of our preservation within a world of predatory tyrants, our Founding Fathers established the people as a Democratic Republic of these United States!

At the same time, we shouldn't allow ourselves to be carried away by the false dichotomies.  For we aren't white versus black, male versus female, youth against the elderly, homosexuals against hetero, and so on.  In pinpointing who we truly are and what is truly our conflict, the one true American dichotomy, we need to further Aristotle's political spectrum, the model he called "the Golden Mean, altering it slightly from the extremes of left and right political persuasions.  Instead, we need to establish both a blessed king enthroned on one end of the spectrum, and his inverse or perverse as a cursed prostitute at the other end as a soul who is trespassing upon the territory he owns.  As Americans, we would then place ourselves in a bipartisan position between these two extremes.

I now see that I need to write a fifth letter holding those Americans who follow after false dichotomies to be in contempt of the people's Civil Purpose.

Anyway, don't vote the typical legal way for a person, but vote the more formal and thoughtful way for less government.