On this date of May the nineteenth, 2013, by the formal authority given to me by the people's Proclamation of Sovereignty, I, William M. Jones, alias Uncle Emanuel Watkins, the first attorney to our Founding Fathers as they will one day have to stand under the judgement of the Truth, and the rightful formal Prime Minister of these United States, do hold every international media corporation in contempt of the people's Civil Purpose.  From this day on, consider all of your future actions not to be just accountable, but held to an even higher standard and to a greater penalty under judgement of the Truth.  

The Formal Order founded by our Founding Fathers for the people of these United States, as a declaration of independence made by them establishing a whole new foundation, should never be disgraced by any filthy acts of official sanctioning.  

Again, this is why the Declaration of Independence should be considered a formal document while, in contrast, the U.S. Constitution should be considered lessor but still important legal documentation.  Indeed, a natural law is a rational conclusion, for, when they were acting on behalf of the people under judgement of the Truth, our Founding Fathers reduced towards the heart by the process of the scientific method of *Natural Law.  This formal conclusion provided the people the justification necessary to divorce themselves out from under a rightful sovereign ruler.  Upon that established Order, they then instituted the **powers within the U.S Constitution as rights of the people.  These new empowered rights were both legal and formal as separate they cannot be judged rational.  

In other words, the people could not legislate new laws apart from the old system of legal precedence without first establishing the foundation of a whole New Order.  So, to contradict that which has long been assumed, the formal meaning within the Declaration of Independence and the legal elaborations made within the U.S. Constitution cannot be mutually exclusive of the other.  As the first was the formal divorce out from under tyranny, the second was the legal remarriage to a more perfect Union.  

The point being made here is, as they restricted their attention to narrowing and reducing within the formal document of The Declaration of Independence, in contrast, our Founders freely expounded and elaborated within the legal documentation of the U.S. Constitution.  Therefore, in order for them to gather to elaborate in the erecting of new laws apart from the old, our Founders first had to narrow towards establishing a new formal order as a base for them to stand upon.

So very troubling it is for many Americans today, as they can perceive erosion, that in order to bring down the legal documentation of the U.S. Constitution, all the enemy has to do is bring to a crumbling state the formal Order established beneath it within the Declaration of Independence.

This is why I am a lawful Prime Minister of these United States, sanctioned officially by way of legal precedence, empowered like others for the purpose of strengthening the U.S. Constitution; but, rather, I have taken up the title as a formal position for the express purpose of preserving the philosophical foundation in which it all stands upon, with this being the supreme Order of the land.

Even simpler to understand, as long as the natural law within The Declaration of Independence serves as a base, the empowered rights within the Constitution have support and remain rational.  In contrast, irrational governments are tyrannies.

The distinction made above is very subtle and holds very little meaning for those stumblers up of the people who practice a rule of legal precedence blindly apart from any established order, with these being those deceived ones over us intoxicated by the false powers of manipulation.  Indeed, we all know to be submissive to these all-knowing fiat-bullies or else!  However, the point made is very important concerning our Founding Fathers as they will one day have to stand in judgement of the unapproachable Truth, with such a one being an immovable ultimate Power.  Remember, there is no more of a befuddling offense passed down as contempt committed against the law for the sake of the law; but, the only true offense is contempt committed against the people's Civil Purpose, with this foundation being the formal Order.  That is why a ***true American attorney will suffer any troubles involved with representing our Founding Fathers as it was they who both put their heads and souls on the line while standing both in danger of a tyrant and under the judgement of the Truth.  As I am the first of these attorneys, I am the rightful (first) Prime Minister of these United States.

*The metaphysical scientific method of natural law that was, at the time, blessed by the authority of the church and so utilized during the time of our Founders in order to abolish all prior legal precedence.  This method was the one which existed prior to the advents of both the modern theoretical and the cognitive sciences in use today. 

**A civil right should be interpreted more as a civil power as there is a difference between something that is just a legal civil right and something that is a formal natural right.  James Madison spoke about natural rights.  As we have a civil right by law, we are empowered by a natural right by Truth as such a way reduces, as John Locke said, on the physical level to the very Soul.  Therefore, in a civil right, I , as an American, have both legal and formal rights.  To violate my legal right will disappoint the Almighty.  To violate my second formal right will bring down wrath upon you during the time of judgement.
***The ultimate expression of the people's happiness isn't government, but we utilize the endeavor of government as a necessary-tyranny in the quest of advancing our Civil Purpose.  Therefore, the people today seek after better ideal individuals to rule over us than the legal-precedent attorneys who we now have instituted.