Why, as an American, I am not an extremist!


The concept of extremism originated as a bothersome issue with Aristotle and was the reason why he developed a political spectrum, a model that he would go on to call "the golden mean."  His ultimate plan was to make government more efficient by pulling the Greek people inward from far left and far right political positions towards a more compromising middle.

His method favored tyranny, however, which is an "aristocracy" established around an ever compromising tyrant who together are a detriment to the people, the disadvantaged who, as Socrates demonstrated clearly in Plato's dialogue "Meno," possessed the ability to improve themselves by recollection, a process of regathering lost knowledge that each human soul would lose during the trauma of their birth -- they had the ability to learn and advance in other words.

So, the foundation for the Democratic Republic of these United States is rooted deep in history.  The quest of the people today isn't to be on par-with or free-from tyranny, but to control it.  As I've mentioned before in a prior post, in the advancement of our Civil Purpose, we should not be bothered by equality and liberty, but such virtues should be considered essential prerequisites!  Those fervent ones who fight vainly for liberty and equality aren't the enemy of the people, but should be ashamed of themselves regarding how easily they are used and manipulated by the enemy against the people.

Along with having to combat many who would be on their side typically, the people are at a disadvantage as they stand at the bottom of a metaphorical mountain with little available leisure time to better their positions.  In their quest to control tyranny, the very least among us have to depend on converts such as myself, a true American, who are willing to fight on their side the much more difficult fight.

So, contrary to what the winds of chaos imply, as an American, I am not an extremist!  Indeed, I am someone who reveres my Founding Fathers, as I am willing to die to preserve the supreme Order of the land within the Declaration of Independence while, at the same time, I am still submissive to the U.S. Constitution as the supreme law of the land!

Yet, the above mentioned proof is just one level of why I am not an extremist.

On another level, I can further substantiate my conviction.  As I have introduced already in another post, along with the new Order our Founders established for us as our Civil Purpose, we should also include a slightly altered version of Aristotle's political spectrum.  Indeed, rather than a model expressing the extremes of a far left and a far right, in our American model, we should include at one extreme end of it an enthroned king as representative of the greatest one among us; meanwhile, on the other extreme, we should include his inverse, or perverse, as a homeless prostitute representative of the very least among us.  As the enthroned king's main function is to go about a leisure life gainfully solving problems in his best interest, in contrast, the homeless prostitute is polarized in her society distracted by a big Problem that she has within her.  It is in the middle between these two extreme figures that I place myself not as an extremist, but as a converted American!

Even on the scientific level is proof of my convictions that I am an American and not the extremist the media has painted me out to be.  As I showed in the scientific model equation (2+0)1/2, as the variable 2 represents order, the variable 0 actually represents the endeavor of law on the side of chaos.  This phenomenon of opposition is something I realized recently.  Law and order are not virtues on the same side, but are in opposition with each other.  In other words, the worst situation politically is the one we are living today which isn't just chaotic, but is a chaos of laws legislated endlessly in the name of change for the sake of change apart from that which we have already inherited as a long established Order